Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Devonshire Jones ([info]roz_mcclure) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2005-01-21 12:42:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current music:EVIL, SOUL-WARPING PORN.

fandom_scruples is back!
Fandom_Scruples returns, with, unfortunately, a rather boring post.

It looks as if some elements of the Harry Potter Fandom have collapsed in on itself and I have to say I'm not surprised.

I can only assume this is a reference to the new installment of DV having gone up yesterday.

...a couple of people who have defended on many occassion their 'right' to promote what many of us feel is inappropriate fanfic about a series of Children's books. (Yes, they are children's books.)

Despite, you know, the AUTHOR saying that they aren't. But whatever you like, f_s. Whatever you like.

For those who wonder why this journal still exists, it is mainly this reason. Secret Society? Indeed, but we are more than happy to keep to ourselves.

Which totally fits in with their "crusading against Moral Wrongs!!" attitude. You know, if you sit around, don't participate in discussion, and deliver judgement from your corner of the sky, people will worship you do what you say!


(Post a new comment)


[info]cathowl
2005-01-21 10:59 pm UTC (link)
I say being annoyingly judgemental from their little corner of the web is better than if they tromped all over it to declare people immoral and whatever.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]sarajayechan
2005-01-21 11:55 pm UTC (link)
Nice icon. XD

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]deejay435
2005-01-22 06:35 am UTC (link)
Better for the rest of us, absolutely.

But for their purposes? Kind of fucking stupid. But then, I read some of the other posts so that's probably redundant.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cathowl, 2005-01-22 06:49 am UTC
Won't anyone think of the CHILDREN?
[info]kadath
2005-01-21 11:33 pm UTC (link)
Their userinfo is priceless. I'm quite certain the evil smut writers tremble in fear of the mighty fandom_scruples "Black list."

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Won't anyone think of the CHILDREN?
[info]kirsch
2005-01-21 11:40 pm UTC (link)
I know when they first started spewing, a lot of people used their "black list" (http://www.livejournal.com/users/fandom_scruples/1110.html#cutid1) as a rec/reading list ;)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Won't anyone think of the CHILDREN? - [info]kadath, 2005-01-21 11:47 pm UTC
Re: Won't anyone think of the CHILDREN? - [info]atalantapendrag, 2005-01-22 06:37 am UTC
Re: Won't anyone think of the CHILDREN? - [info]nightfalltwen, 2005-01-23 10:03 pm UTC
Re: Won't anyone think of the CHILDREN? - [info]tangentialone, 2005-01-23 01:07 am UTC
Re: Won't anyone think of the CHILDREN?
[info]mouseybrown
2005-01-21 11:41 pm UTC (link)
I thought they took down the Black List and the White List because people complained. Is it back up, then?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Checks the LJ - [info]mouseybrown, 2005-01-21 11:43 pm UTC
Re: Checks the LJ - [info]llama_treats, 2005-01-21 11:45 pm UTC
Re: Checks the LJ - [info]mouseybrown, 2005-01-22 12:02 am UTC
Re: Won't anyone think of the CHILDREN? - [info]kadath, 2005-01-21 11:45 pm UTC
Re: Won't anyone think of the CHILDREN? - [info]skarrow, 2005-01-22 03:57 am UTC
Re: Won't anyone think of the CHILDREN? - [info]princessdot, 2005-01-22 04:59 am UTC
Re: Won't anyone think of the CHILDREN? - (Anonymous), 2005-01-22 04:53 am UTC

(Deleted post)
Re: Won't anyone think of the CHILDREN? - [info]mouseybrown, 2005-01-24 05:49 pm UTC

[info]phosfate
2005-01-21 11:33 pm UTC (link)
So, according to f_s, something, somewhere, happened.

Good to know.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]llama_treats
2005-01-21 11:38 pm UTC (link)
But, more importantly, the something happening caused some stuff. Some bad stuff.

Yeah.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2005-01-22 01:08 am UTC
OT for Icon - [info]skarrow, 2005-01-22 03:57 am UTC

[info]sarajayechan
2005-01-21 11:54 pm UTC (link)
XD Aah, I'd almost forgotten about that group of self-righteous Sailormoon wannabes them. :P

(Reply to this)


[info]jamac
2005-01-22 12:17 am UTC (link)
There's a Harry Potter secret society about morals? and banning porn?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]skjeve
2005-01-22 12:30 am UTC (link)
Yep. Taking out the fandom, one author at a time. ~snicker~

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]skjeve, 2005-01-22 12:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rustybitch, 2005-01-22 04:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]skjeve, 2005-01-23 02:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rustybitch, 2005-01-23 06:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]skjeve, 2005-01-23 10:37 pm UTC

[info]marlo
2005-01-22 12:29 am UTC (link)
Now I know there's a Jurisimprudence Law re: "ITS JUST A KIDS BOOK U ST00PID FANGURLZ."

Here it is!

(Reply to this)


[info]panthea
2005-01-22 12:44 am UTC (link)
You know, if you sit around, don't participate in discussion, and deliver judgement from your corner of the sky, people will worship you do what you say!

Hey, it worked for God.

Several times.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2005-01-23 04:45 am UTC (link)
hahahahaha

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]tangentialone
2005-01-22 12:47 am UTC (link)
I can only assume this is a reference to the new installment of DV having gone up yesterday.

Eh what? It did? Or does DV not stand for Draco Veritas here? [hopes she isn't looking stupid for asking]

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]teleute
2005-01-22 01:00 am UTC (link)
Yes, it did. And it was shiny, or so sez I.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]vampychick, 2005-01-22 01:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]teleute, 2005-01-22 01:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vampychick, 2005-01-22 03:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]teleute, 2005-01-22 04:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vampychick, 2005-01-22 04:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]teleute, 2005-01-22 04:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]teleute, 2005-01-22 01:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2005-01-22 02:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]teleute, 2005-01-22 02:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vampychick, 2005-01-23 03:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2005-01-22 01:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]teleute, 2005-01-22 01:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2005-01-22 01:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]narcissam, 2005-01-22 10:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2005-01-22 11:24 pm UTC

[info]adora_spintriae
2005-01-22 03:06 am UTC (link)
It looks as if some elements of the Harry Potter Fandom have collapsed in on itself

It looks as if your ability to use English has as well. And what fucking "elements" are these asshats talking about, anyway? I think I missed that memo. Has Cassie Claire fallen down the stairs? FBP finally imploded up his own arsehole? Crystal is dead from pastede onness?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]seppuku
2005-01-22 03:14 am UTC (link)
Now she ded from pastede on yay!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]skarrow, 2005-01-22 04:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sarajayechan, 2005-01-23 11:17 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-01-22 04:57 am UTC (link)
Who is Crystal? It's been annoying me for months

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]adora_spintriae, 2005-01-22 05:12 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-01-22 05:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_, 2005-01-22 02:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-01-22 08:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]skarrow, 2005-01-24 12:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]roz_mcclure, 2005-01-24 01:53 am UTC

[info]princessdot
2005-01-22 05:07 am UTC (link)
errrrr....help a sista out, FBP?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]adora_spintriae, 2005-01-22 05:15 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-01-22 10:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-01-22 11:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-01-22 02:44 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-01-22 05:22 am UTC (link)
You know, if you sit around, don't participate in discussion, and deliver judgement from your corner of the sky, people will worship you do what you say!

Don't you occasionally have to unleash a thunderbolt from the Heavens or a plague of locust for that to really work, though?

(Reply to this)


[info]gal_montag
2005-01-22 11:00 am UTC (link)
I'm *never* going to make the black list.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]vampychick, 2005-01-23 03:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gal_montag, 2005-01-23 09:05 am UTC
(no subject) - ataniell93, 2005-01-28 10:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gal_montag, 2005-01-28 10:28 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-01-22 12:31 pm UTC (link)
"I can only assume this is a reference to the new installment of DV having gone up yesterday."

Why would you immediately assume that? Most of the fandom does not revolve around that fan fiction, even if you seem to think it does.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]narcissam, 2005-01-22 10:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]roz_mcclure, 2005-01-22 10:34 pm UTC

[info]msmanna
2005-01-23 01:16 am UTC (link)
I can only assume this is a reference to the new installment of DV having gone up yesterday.

Wasn't there an anonymous hate meme somewhere in the HP fandom? One which involved posting Cassie Claire's picture and so on? That would seem to tie up with the part about:

Why not spread hatred about our friends? Why not talk anonymously and have no accountablility for our actions?

I know all that was was a while back, but maybe it took fandom_scruples this long to chew through the straightjacket and post.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-01-23 08:50 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-01-23 08:53 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-01-23 10:38 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-01-23 06:41 pm UTC

[info]lurker32
2005-01-23 05:10 am UTC (link)
Comments are off now. Jesus, they're predictable.

(Reply to this)

  
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map