Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



queerasfolkfan ([info]queerasfolkfan) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2005-02-04 21:28:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Fan-Fucking-tastic
Current music:QAF soundtrack
Entry tags:fandom: queer as folk

QAF(US) fandom brings the wank. Again.
Word to the wise: do not let Brian/Justin shippers and Brian/Michael shippers in the same room together - or in the same community.

fishbutt, a B/M shipper, makes a post in queerasfolkfans, announcing that she is "confused" and "doesn't understand the obsession with B/J".

You've got wank.

fishbutt provides us "the facts" of the B/J relationship, and informs us of what those bratty B/Jers have been up to: "The things that happened at the con were disgusting and I can't believe there are so many people that would take the show so seriously as to try to dominate a convention with their shipperdom."

What disgusting things exactly happened at the Queer as Fans con? In the comments, we're given some pretty damn good wanky stuff: allegedly, B/Jers attending the con booed anything shown of Michael's or of the actor who plays him, Hal Sparks, didn't show B/M vids until specifically requested because they were too busy showing B/J fan vids, treated Hal badly, B/M fans being booed or forced to buy Brian and Justin bears together, and forced all volunteers to wear apparently B/J centric t-shirts. A B/Jer who did attend the convention says the Hal stuff's not true. Wanking continues.

I'm too busy being shocked that grown adults are angry about which combinations stuffed animals were sold in at a TV convention to even take in the rest of this wank.

After the convention wank is your standard issue B/M vs. B/J wank, but not bad.

ETA Locked. That was fast. Trying to get a saved version of the page now. Stay tuned.

ETA2 And here's a saved version of the full page.

ETA3 All links above now work - they're linked to saved page versions. Thanks for your patience.




Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]tetsuki
2005-02-05 05:40 am UTC (link)
YES!!! I was hoping that this would get in F_W. W00t!!!

Oh.. and am I the *only* QaF fan who actually likes B/J *and* B/M? Hell, I'm even up for a B/J/M threesome. But, yeah. I like B/J most, because I like their sex scenes how their relationship has developed.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

*using the icon because of emokid!Hal Sparks* - [info]dommichan, 2005-02-05 05:51 am UTC
Re: *using the icon because of emokid!Hal Sparks* - [info]tetsuki, 2005-02-05 06:03 am UTC
Re: *using the icon because of emokid!Hal Sparks* - (Anonymous), 2005-02-05 07:58 am UTC
Re: *using the icon because of emokid!Hal Sparks* - (Anonymous), 2005-02-05 05:58 pm UTC
Re: *using the icon because of emokid!Hal Sparks* - (Anonymous), 2005-02-05 06:06 pm UTC
Re: *using the icon because of emokid!Hal Sparks* - [info]tetsuki, 2005-02-05 06:25 pm UTC
Re: *using the icon because of emokid!Hal Sparks* - [info]dommichan, 2005-02-05 07:08 pm UTC
Re: *using the icon because of emokid!Hal Sparks* - [info]lizzypaul, 2005-02-05 09:12 pm UTC
Re: *using the icon because of emokid!Hal Sparks* - [info]dommichan, 2005-02-07 05:20 pm UTC
Re: *using the icon because of emokid!Hal Sparks* - [info]llorelei, 2005-02-06 12:41 am UTC
Re: *using the icon because of emokid!Hal Sparks* - [info]dommichan, 2005-02-05 07:09 pm UTC
Re: *using the icon because of emokid!Hal Sparks* - [info]rachelmap, 2005-02-05 06:26 am UTC
Re: *using the icon because of emokid!Hal Sparks* - [info]dommichan, 2005-02-05 07:11 pm UTC
Re: *using the icon because of emokid!Hal Sparks* - (Anonymous), 2005-02-05 11:49 pm UTC
Re: *using the icon because of emokid!Hal Sparks* - [info]dkellergrl, 2005-02-06 01:36 am UTC
Re: *using the icon because of emokid!Hal Sparks* - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 04:03 am UTC
Re: *using the icon because of emokid!Hal Sparks* - [info]dommichan, 2005-02-06 06:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]linzee, 2005-02-05 06:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tetsuki, 2005-02-05 07:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]linzee, 2005-02-05 08:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dommichan, 2005-02-05 07:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-05 08:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]panthea, 2005-02-05 07:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]doyle, 2005-02-05 01:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]panthea, 2005-02-05 07:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cheshireempress, 2005-02-05 07:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladysorka, 2005-02-05 08:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]iamtheenemy, 2005-02-06 10:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladysorka, 2005-02-06 10:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladysorka, 2005-02-05 08:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cheshireempress, 2005-02-06 02:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladysorka, 2005-02-06 03:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]doyle, 2005-02-05 09:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cheshireempress, 2005-02-06 02:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]doyle, 2005-02-06 02:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iamtheenemy, 2005-02-06 10:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladysorka, 2005-02-06 10:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]psychofangirl, 2005-02-06 06:44 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-02-05 05:42 am UTC (link)

The web site you are trying to access has exceeded its allocated data transfer.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-05 05:55 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-05 06:10 am UTC

[info]thoms
2005-02-05 06:44 am UTC (link)
Am I the only person around who actually, like, likes Michael/Ben? And I admit a lot of that is because Robert Gant is fucking hot, but. Yes.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]misachan, 2005-02-05 06:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tetsuki, 2005-02-05 07:00 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-05 07:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]linzee, 2005-02-05 08:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]coffee_mug, 2005-02-05 06:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 01:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 10:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-07 12:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-13 06:27 am UTC
hide lives!
(Anonymous)
2005-02-05 07:47 am UTC (link)
http://www.livejournal.com/community/xjapan/40584.html
http://www.livejournal.com/community/xjapan/39692.html

OMG.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: hide lives! - (Anonymous), 2005-02-05 08:03 am UTC
Re: hide lives! - [info]iamtheenemy, 2005-02-07 08:11 am UTC

[info]llorelei
2005-02-05 08:32 am UTC (link)
Don't hate me for being a B/J fan and absolutely despising Michael. I'm a fat, celibate, dumb, masochist lesbian, so I can't help it.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]panthea, 2005-02-05 07:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]llorelei, 2005-02-06 12:16 am UTC

[info]dracolovesharry
2005-02-05 10:27 am UTC (link)
Wow, I saw that post just now and I cannot believe you got this up there so fast. So. Very. Wanky. O.o

I wish that people would stop the B/M vs B/J debates-- since it's an old tune we've played to death.

I must be the only one who apprecaites Brian/Michael as a brotherly relationship (and Mikey is MARRIED), while Brian/Justin is pretty much canon by now through four seasons. I like both, but no sense in starting a flame war.

Can't wait to see how this one progresses.

(Reply to this)


[info]fbiluthien
2005-02-05 11:18 am UTC (link)
I was hoping for the post to end up here, and damn that was fast!

I'm quite new to the whole QaF fandom and I had no idea some fans could be that childish about FICTIONNAL pairings in a TV SHOW. Sure you can have your favorite pairing, but I don't get the pointless mean comments as Don't mind all the bitches who will post endlessly in here about their B/J love. Maybe some people should learn to DISCUSS and bring some arguments instead of attacking people !?

Damn seeing this would almost make me see the lotrips fandom as not that insane finally. O_o

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]doyle, 2005-02-05 01:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]yamashitaaki, 2005-02-05 04:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]zarla, 2005-02-06 07:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iamtheenemy, 2005-02-07 12:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mydocuments, 2005-02-05 09:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jurisenpai, 2005-02-05 04:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]yamashitaaki, 2005-02-05 04:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jurisenpai, 2005-02-05 04:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]yamashitaaki, 2005-02-05 04:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-05 05:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 05:59 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-05 06:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jurisenpai, 2005-02-05 07:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-05 10:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jurisenpai, 2005-02-05 10:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-05 10:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-05 10:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fbiluthien, 2005-02-06 01:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dkellergrl, 2005-02-06 01:46 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-05 04:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]liebestod, 2005-02-05 06:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-05 09:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-05 10:18 pm UTC

[info]serpentis
2005-02-05 04:13 pm UTC (link)
Nooooooooooo! All about the Stu/Vince! Down with Brian/Justin etc.etc.etc.

*waves British flag manically and does the Stu/Vince slightly camp dance with lots of v-signs and Irish swearing*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]jurisenpai, 2005-02-05 04:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]serpentis, 2005-02-05 04:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]panthea, 2005-02-05 07:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]serpentis, 2005-02-05 09:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-07 12:48 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 01:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]panthea, 2005-02-06 01:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iamtheenemy, 2005-02-07 12:44 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-07 05:28 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-02-05 05:48 pm UTC (link)
I can't help but feel partially responsible for the whole thing because of this (http://www.livejournal.com/community/queerasfolkfans/1632512.html?nc=13) post. I was tired and pontificating after my fourth 12 hour day straight and my ninth day straight of working. fishbutt posted an incredibly snarky comment and then wrote the post that exploded in wank. I tried to clarify my feelings in a pair of responses to her post (because of character restrictions in a comment) but all in all, I'm stunned at what happened. The whole thing is so incredibly ludicrious - I wasn't at the con, some people had friends who were, some people went and their reports are incredibly different. The bottom line is that fighting over who would make a better couple in a tv show is beyond silly. I'm suddenly feeling very much like a character in West Side story and having never been part of a fandom that revolves around a TV show before this, I find myself turned off to the whole thing in general. I thought we were all supposed to be adults and I've never seen adults behave like this in my entire life.

(Reply to this)


[info]coffee_mug
2005-02-05 07:01 pm UTC (link)
Perhaps next time there ought to be two cons. Oh, but then there'd be the question of "which con does Brian's actor go to?". Hahahahaha.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]jurisenpai, 2005-02-05 07:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dommichan, 2005-02-05 07:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]o_o, 2005-02-05 10:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dkellergrl, 2005-02-06 01:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]coffee_mug, 2005-02-06 04:01 pm UTC
Us wanky QAF(US)ers
(Anonymous)
2005-02-05 07:48 pm UTC (link)
wow, is that a new record for making the Wank? *crosses fingers and hopes*

hehe. I commented on that post, but I usually keep my mouth shut very tightly in that community, 'cause many a discussion has deteriorated into a madness that the 8th circle of hell has never even seen. However, I am very proud to have actually commented on a post that made it to wank-level. *preens*

For the record:
--I am a B/M shipper
--I know it's just a TV show
--I DID attend the Con, and the things that happened there are true. Despite my shipperness, I can (and have before) put aside differences to come together in the spirit of fun and hanging out with the peoples. That didn't really happen at the Con. I heard attendees being boo'd with my own two ears. I heard character/actor bashing (many times with the line between the two being blurred), sometimes from the organizers themselves. It was my first fan convention, and last. Don't have to tell me twice.
--I don't usually participate in these debates unless it's on IM or through private conversations, because they can quickly spiral out of control, and you can get the crazy thrown in with the not-so-crazy.

Oh, and whoever brought up the point that S/V end up together in the original UK version? Thank you. It's one of the main reasons why I ship the way I do.

And even talking about this stuff is crazy on some level, but I never claimed to be fully capacitated in the first place. ;)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Us wanky QAF(US)ers - (Anonymous), 2005-02-05 09:08 pm UTC
Re: Us wanky QAF(US)ers - (Anonymous), 2005-02-05 09:26 pm UTC
Re: Us wanky QAF(US)ers - (Anonymous), 2005-02-05 09:40 pm UTC
Re: Us wanky QAF(US)ers - (Anonymous), 2005-02-05 10:39 pm UTC
Re: Us wanky QAF(US)ers - [info]tiasian, 2005-02-06 01:13 am UTC
Re: Us wanky QAF(US)ers - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 04:33 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-02-05 08:45 pm UTC (link)
But...what about Brian/Ethan? O_o

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-05 08:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 01:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 10:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-07 01:48 am UTC

[info]labyrinthan_elf
2005-02-05 09:39 pm UTC (link)
Justin/Michael all the way, baby.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kenovay, 2005-02-06 12:09 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 11:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]labyrinthan_elf, 2005-02-07 07:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-20 03:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]labyrinthan_elf, 2005-02-21 04:48 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-02-05 09:57 pm UTC (link)
Am I the only person who actually HATES Brian but likes basically every other character?

No? Just me, then.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 03:54 am UTC
Not the only one - [info]dkellergrl, 2005-02-07 06:19 pm UTC

[info]kenovay
2005-02-06 12:10 am UTC (link)
So very little to do with the wank, but if someone recs me some good Brian/Michael I will... lick them suggestively?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 12:03 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-02-06 01:22 am UTC (link)
Well, I was at the Con and I heard very little booing. I have no idea what went on behind the scenes, but I didn't detect any B/J favoritism in the overall theme of the Con. In the interests of full disclosure, I am a B/Jer. I can tell you that they did play the B/M video. In fact, they played it before they played the B/J video.

I have no idea why the B/Mers have a bug up their collective ass, but if I had to hazard a guess, I'd say that they must have been expecting the Con to be a B/M love fest (as perhaps last year's was? Just speculating; wasn't there). Instead, they got a nasty shock when a good percentage of the attendees were either B/Jers or Ben/Mers. Most likely, their negative impressions are based on their own unrealistic expectations, rather than anything that actually happened.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]dkellergrl, 2005-02-06 01:54 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 02:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dkellergrl, 2005-02-07 06:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 01:55 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 02:13 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 03:22 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 03:37 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 04:11 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 04:22 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 04:40 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 04:41 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 04:42 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 06:39 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 08:22 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 04:18 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 04:27 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 04:27 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 05:01 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-07 11:06 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 05:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jurisenpai, 2005-02-06 05:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]llorelei, 2005-02-06 05:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]llorelei, 2005-02-06 05:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iamtheenemy, 2005-02-07 07:34 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-07 10:36 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 05:34 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 05:36 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 05:42 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 06:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]llorelei, 2005-02-06 08:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2005-02-06 10:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]llorelei, 2005-02-06 11:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2005-02-06 11:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]llorelei, 2005-02-06 11:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iamtheenemy, 2005-02-07 07:38 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 06:19 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 06:39 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 06:56 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 07:19 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 08:12 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 11:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 03:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 06:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dkellergrl, 2005-02-07 06:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dommichan, 2005-02-06 07:04 am UTC

[info]slothrop
2005-02-06 04:25 am UTC (link)
I could care less who Brian fucks just as long as he does it well and with great frequency.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 11:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]yanks02, 2005-02-15 07:20 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-02-06 04:46 am UTC (link)
Bring back Ethan!

/shitkicking.

-wemblee (@ LJ)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 06:08 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 06:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dommichan, 2005-02-06 06:31 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 06:36 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 06:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dommichan, 2005-02-06 06:57 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 07:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dommichan, 2005-02-06 07:09 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 11:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dommichan, 2005-02-07 05:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]iamtheenemy, 2005-02-07 08:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dommichan, 2005-02-07 05:12 pm UTC
::points above::
[info]dommichan
2005-02-06 06:34 am UTC (link)
Wow...are we going to have to [info]fandom_wank, [info]fandom_wank? Because, damn, look at all the fucking wank.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: ::points above:: - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 09:02 am UTC
Re: ::points above:: - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 03:44 pm UTC

[info]ladysorka
2005-02-06 07:14 am UTC (link)
The anonymice in this entire thread scare me. A lot.

I'm suddenly immensely grateful I stopped watching that show after season 1 because it was far too soapy.

I'm going to go... make some Stuart/Vince screencaps. Or something. And hide blissfully in my fandom of around 400 people.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]iamtheenemy, 2005-02-07 07:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladysorka, 2005-02-07 08:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iamtheenemy, 2005-02-07 08:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladysorka, 2005-02-07 08:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iamtheenemy, 2005-02-07 08:19 am UTC

[info]mastervex
2005-02-06 08:24 am UTC (link)
People are behaving like this about WHICH FICTIONAL CHARACTERS GET TOGETHER? To the point of acting like crazy jerks in real life about it, and warring over trying to make a con for fans of the show all about their own pet pairing? WHAT THE HELL?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 08:58 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-07 01:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iamtheenemy, 2005-02-07 07:58 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 11:40 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-02-06 10:43 am UTC (link)
...damn, people are being really wanky here.

I think the only reason why I don't like Brian/Michael as much as I like Brian/Justin is because I really like Michael/Ben.

And I absolutely LOVE Hal Sparks.

Also, "Open relationships rarely work and why would you want one if you're in love?"

...um. Polygamy does exist. If someone is seriously poly, they can make it work. You know, the whole primary partner, secondary partner, just for sex thing.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]dommichan, 2005-02-06 04:48 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-02-06 11:09 am UTC (link)
Interesting - I just finished a marathon viewing of all four season a few weeks ago, and I was under the impression that Brian and Justin are lovers, Ben and Michael are married, and that Brian and Michael are best friends.

Huh. Where did I get that stupid idea? Clearly Brian and Michael are destined for each other and miserable with their own lovers of several years, and the relationship between Brian and Justin which has survived so much is actually in jeopardy and needs defending.

Well, good thing to know - I won't ever bother joining the fandom now. Nice tv series, though!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 11:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iamtheenemy, 2005-02-07 08:03 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-07 10:32 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-02-06 11:04 pm UTC (link)
Okay, maybe B/J got more coverage, maybe it didn't. If it did, I'm not surprised. Because, when it comes right down to it, B/J is canon. B/M is not. This is not QAF UK. B/J is the relationship that developed. And I'm sorry if the B/M 'shippers don't like that. They can continue to 'ship B/M, there is no problem with 'shipping a non-canon pairing. But seriously. B/M is not going to happen.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]dawnydiesel, 2005-02-07 06:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iamtheenemy, 2005-02-07 08:04 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-07 09:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tetsuki, 2005-02-07 11:14 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-07 09:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 05:51 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-07 05:43 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-02-06 11:08 pm UTC (link)
Okay, maybe B/J got more coverage, maybe it didn't. If it did, I'm not surprised. Because, when it comes right down to it, B/J is canon. B/M is not. This is not QAF UK. B/J is the relationship that developed. And I'm sorry if the B/M 'shippers don't like that. They can continue to 'ship B/M, there is no problem with 'shipping a non-canon pairing. But seriously. B/M is not going to happen.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-06 11:08 pm UTC


Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map