Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



NM ([info]narcissam) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2005-02-07 13:21:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
JKR vs. the US Army. Who has the fans?
Over on the Leaky Cauldron, it's posted that JKR's lawyers are looking at the US military's parody of HP characters in a cartoon promoting proper equipment maintenance. The US Army is quoted as saying, "Each copy of our magazine is reviewed by our legal office. After reviewing this copy they judged that we were doing nothing wrong and that these characters were in parity use."

Much wankage follows. Most engaging in a massive slugfest over JKR and the War in Iraq. (Btw, read from the bottom of the page up to get the comments in order) There are so many beautiful quotes in there that it kills me to choose a couple for this summary, but I'll go with these two representative ones.

If my favourite books are used in a comic to cheer up the soldiers in Iraq, then yes, I do have a problem with that. If Jo or her lawyers are doing something to prevent this, I´m al for it.

and

First there are a stupid kids reading this site how know nothing about war and death and what it is not to be free. For 40 million people that’s what they now have because of USA, the UK, and other nations. In addition, I think that this falls under the Fair Use Rule of the United States Copyright Act of 1976. To say nothing of the fact that you can't sue the government unless it give you permission first. JKR would be wise not to get political otherwise people will stop reading her books because of her views and that would be to bad.

NM



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]msmanna
2005-02-07 11:46 pm UTC (link)
Bwaahahahaaaaa! I'm now trying to imagine the religious right's reaction to the Bush administration using Harry Potter to increase military efficiency in the righteous war against the infidel. I suspect the competing reflexes will cause their brains to explode.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]jedilora, 2005-02-07 11:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankismyfandom, 2005-02-08 12:26 am UTC
Ninja! - [info]nekoneko, 2005-02-08 12:34 am UTC
You rang? - [info]ninja_stripper, 2005-02-08 06:45 am UTC
Re: You rang? - [info]jedilora, 2005-02-08 07:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lurker32, 2005-02-08 06:36 am UTC
Worlds are Colliding
(Anonymous)
2005-02-07 11:51 pm UTC (link)
ARMY + HP (and by extension, the HP fandom).

What will this lead to? Slash pairings in the ARMY? No slash occurs in the ARMY!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Worlds are Colliding - [info]narcissam, 2005-02-07 11:54 pm UTC
Re: Worlds are Colliding - [info]nostalgia, 2005-02-08 08:20 pm UTC

[info]jewishninja
2005-02-07 11:57 pm UTC (link)
They actually make the army read that? Holy shit.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]narcissam, 2005-02-08 12:06 am UTC
(no subject) - kroki_refur, 2005-02-08 12:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2005-02-08 12:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]backfromspace, 2005-02-08 03:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]adinaj69, 2005-02-08 04:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]backfromspace, 2005-02-08 04:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]adinaj69, 2005-02-08 05:02 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 06:17 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 06:39 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 06:50 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 07:00 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 07:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gaisce, 2005-02-08 02:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2005-02-08 04:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]captainecchi, 2005-02-08 05:06 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 04:14 pm UTC

[info]bubosquared
2005-02-08 12:10 am UTC (link)
Okay, everything else aside, this made me snicker like a lunatic:

To say nothing of the fact that you can't sue the government unless it give you permission first.

I just. How do you go about asking for permission to sue, anyway? And why would the govt. ever actually give that permission? Oi. *eyeroll*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]darthfi, 2005-02-08 12:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2005-02-08 12:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]soleta, 2005-02-08 12:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mambo, 2005-02-08 02:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mydocuments, 2005-02-08 02:57 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 06:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mydocuments, 2005-02-08 11:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-09 09:20 am UTC

[info]nekoneko
2005-02-08 12:18 am UTC (link)
Ugh. It wasn't even like that was a good parody. Jesus. Prof. Snappy? Bleah, I say.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 12:19 am UTC
(no subject) - chief, 2005-02-08 02:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seppuku, 2005-02-08 01:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]isntitironic, 2005-02-08 09:20 pm UTC

kroki_refur
2005-02-08 12:21 am UTC (link)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't parody supposed to be, um, amusing in some way? Cos that comic made me laugh about as much as imminent fiery death Deuce Bigalow: Male Gigolo...

Here's hoping Rob Schneider wastes a fortune to tell me to STFU

(Reply to this)


[info]maryavatar
2005-02-08 01:20 am UTC (link)
What I find disturbing is that the US military uses comic strips to educate the troops. I mean, do you really want the world's most powerful country to handing out guns to people unable to read books without pictures?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]adora_spintriae, 2005-02-08 01:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2005-02-08 01:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pfeffermuse, 2005-02-08 03:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_gentleman, 2005-02-08 09:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]platedlizard, 2005-02-08 05:19 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-09 02:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mijan, 2006-11-12 12:44 am UTC
Nothing like the smell of self-righteous army personel in the morning. - [info]adora_spintriae, 2006-11-12 12:57 am UTC
Re: Nothing like the smell of self-righteous army personel in the morning. - [info]mijan, 2006-11-12 01:08 am UTC
Re: Nothing like the smell of self-righteous army personel in the morning. - [info]adora_spintriae, 2006-11-12 01:19 am UTC
Re: Nothing like the smell of self-righteous army personel in the morning. - [info]mijan, 2006-11-12 01:21 am UTC
Re: Nothing like the smell of self-righteous army personel in the morning. - [info]adora_spintriae, 2006-11-12 01:24 am UTC
Re: Nothing like the smell of self-righteous army personel in the morning. - [info]mijan, 2006-11-12 05:03 am UTC
tl;dr - [info]adora_spintriae, 2006-11-12 10:38 am UTC
Re: tl;dr - [info]mijan, 2006-11-12 06:20 pm UTC
... - [info]adora_spintriae, 2006-11-13 10:40 am UTC
... - [info]mijan, 2006-11-13 02:29 pm UTC
... - [info]adora_spintriae, 2006-11-14 11:37 am UTC
... - [info]apoplexia, 2006-11-16 10:17 am UTC
My Pet Bush - [info]darkrose, 2005-02-08 01:23 am UTC
Re: My Pet Bush - [info]maryavatar, 2005-02-08 01:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lush_rimbaud, 2005-02-08 02:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mambo, 2005-02-08 03:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2005-02-08 03:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pfeffermuse, 2005-02-08 03:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2005-02-08 03:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pfeffermuse, 2005-02-08 04:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]boadicea, 2005-02-08 05:59 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 03:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2005-02-08 03:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lush_rimbaud, 2005-02-08 04:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mijan, 2006-11-12 12:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lush_rimbaud, 2005-02-08 04:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2005-02-08 04:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lush_rimbaud, 2005-02-08 04:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2005-02-08 04:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lush_rimbaud, 2005-02-08 05:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]boadicea, 2005-02-08 06:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lush_rimbaud, 2005-02-08 07:44 pm UTC
... - [info]boadicea, 2005-02-08 08:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cathowl, 2005-02-08 06:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2005-02-08 03:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hangingfire, 2005-02-08 05:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]toxictattoo, 2005-02-08 05:23 pm UTC
... - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2005-02-08 09:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]xero_sky, 2005-02-08 04:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2005-02-08 05:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]boadicea, 2005-02-08 06:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mijan, 2006-11-12 12:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]boadicea, 2006-11-12 12:46 am UTC
... - [info]mijan, 2006-11-12 12:49 am UTC
... - [info]boadicea, 2006-11-12 12:51 am UTC
... - [info]mijan, 2006-11-12 12:52 am UTC
... - [info]boadicea, 2006-11-12 02:05 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 06:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rogue, 2005-02-08 04:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lush_rimbaud, 2005-02-08 04:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rogue, 2005-02-08 05:42 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 06:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dreamtoday, 2005-02-08 03:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2005-02-08 03:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dreamtoday, 2005-02-08 04:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2005-02-08 04:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dreamtoday, 2005-02-08 04:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dreamtoday, 2005-02-08 04:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dommichan, 2005-02-08 04:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lush_rimbaud, 2005-02-08 04:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2005-02-08 04:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dommichan, 2005-02-08 05:09 am UTC
... - [info]maryavatar, 2005-02-08 05:12 am UTC
... - [info]lush_rimbaud, 2005-02-08 07:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]boadicea, 2005-02-08 06:13 am UTC
... - [info]dommichan, 2005-02-08 07:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lush_rimbaud, 2005-02-08 04:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2005-02-08 04:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lush_rimbaud, 2005-02-08 04:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2005-02-08 04:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lush_rimbaud, 2005-02-08 04:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2005-02-08 05:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mindset, 2005-02-08 05:29 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 05:32 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 05:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]boadicea, 2005-02-08 06:21 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 04:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 08:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lush_rimbaud, 2005-02-08 03:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 03:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2005-02-08 03:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lush_rimbaud, 2005-02-08 04:36 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 08:41 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 10:17 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 12:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 03:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2005-02-08 03:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lush_rimbaud, 2005-02-08 08:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 04:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2005-02-08 04:42 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 06:12 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-09 02:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]silrana, 2005-02-08 04:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mindset, 2005-02-08 05:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2005-02-08 05:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2005-02-08 05:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosalita, 2005-02-08 05:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wolfychan, 2005-02-08 05:48 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 09:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lush_rimbaud, 2005-02-08 03:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mindset, 2005-02-08 06:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 06:32 pm UTC

[info]adora_spintriae
2005-02-08 01:20 am UTC (link)
I'm making it my mission in life to spread the panel of Ron polishing his wand to every HP slash community online.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]seppuku, 2005-02-08 01:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]adora_spintriae, 2005-02-08 01:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jrandomlurker, 2005-02-08 01:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]etherealzoe, 2005-02-08 03:09 am UTC

[info]skarrow
2005-02-08 01:42 am UTC (link)
How does that not fall under parody and fair use?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]khym_chanur, 2005-02-08 02:00 am UTC

[info]o_o
2005-02-08 01:44 am UTC (link)
Now somebody has to throw a link to that comic to the hipsterbookclub community, so we can see what happens when two wanks collide.

(Reply to this)


[info]gaisce
2005-02-08 02:42 am UTC (link)
"This has got nothing to do with my countires understanding of satire, which is far more devloped then America's will ever be."

Wow, and it's written with its own demonstration of parody. I especially like the misspelling of "country's," adds a nice touch.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mambo, 2005-02-08 03:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hellespont, 2005-02-08 03:47 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 05:11 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-02-08 04:09 am UTC (link)
"Rowling wants people to read in one single way and write and parody in one single way and no way else. She wants one type of fan. She wants one single mind. If you don't fit, the final solution is her lawyers. She wants to control the way you feel and what you think. For Rowling, there is only one way to think. No other. Dictatorship???? YES!!! She is Voldemort."
Holy wankiness Batman! Someone comes across as a conspiracy nut...(and sounding rather cranky that no-one shares his/her totally "rational" opinion)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2005-02-08 04:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]captainecchi, 2005-02-08 05:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cathowl, 2005-02-08 06:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mydocuments, 2005-02-08 07:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dawnswalker, 2005-02-08 09:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nekoneko, 2005-02-08 11:56 pm UTC

(Reply from suspended user)

[info]mariagoner
2005-02-08 04:29 am UTC (link)
Dude, in a legal battle between Jo Rowling and the US army, I'd put my money on Jo every time. [i]She[/i] is the beloved author of probably the best-selling fantasy series of all time. The poor saps in the army, however, seem to have depleted their good will quite a few months back...

Not to mention, the US army seems to have enough trouble handling an insurgency in Iraq. How the hell could they ever deal with an insane crowd of Harry Potter fans creating havoc worldwide?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]els_chan, 2005-02-08 04:44 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 05:10 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 08:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]prettyveela, 2005-02-10 11:52 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 10:23 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-09 09:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2005-02-11 12:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-15 01:37 am UTC

[info]ladydisdain
2005-02-08 04:42 am UTC (link)
Is this cartoon available online anywhere? I'm curious to see *how* they could have used HP in this context...

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mindset, 2005-02-08 04:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]marks, 2005-02-08 04:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mindset, 2005-02-08 06:07 am UTC
Please just be sure to credit us! - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 07:36 am UTC
Re: Please just be sure to credit us! - [info]mindset, 2005-02-08 08:41 am UTC
Re: Please just be sure to credit us! - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 09:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]zarla, 2005-02-08 07:51 am UTC
Ok those names are making me crack up!!!! - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 11:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladydisdain, 2005-02-09 01:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]zarla, 2005-02-09 05:12 am UTC

[info]marks
2005-02-08 04:54 am UTC (link)
Oh, I was waiting for this one to make it over here. I only saw it in its wankbaby form yesterday morning, but damn, that's a load of crazy from all sides.

(Reply to this)


[info]redjackcash
2005-02-08 05:14 am UTC (link)
Oh, jesus. These peopel can't separate anything, can they.

Supporting the troops doesn't necessarily equal supporting the war. You can be opposed to the war, but you better goddamn respect the people who are fighting it for you. They can't help it, they aren't involved in the political process, they're just people willing to put their liveson the line and die for you. Just because our President has decided to take advantage of that and send them on a looney suicide mission to take over the Middle East doesn't mean that they had a say in it.

I hate the war, but I fucking respect anyone who is putting their life on the line out there.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]els_chan, 2005-02-08 05:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cathowl, 2005-02-08 06:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2005-02-08 11:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cathowl, 2005-02-08 12:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]boadicea, 2005-02-08 06:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lurker32, 2005-02-08 06:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]firebird5, 2005-02-08 12:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]redjackcash, 2005-02-08 01:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]firebird5, 2005-02-08 04:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]redjackcash, 2005-02-09 01:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]soleta, 2005-02-08 02:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 09:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]soleta, 2005-02-08 10:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tiasian, 2005-02-09 04:10 am UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]mijan, 2006-11-12 01:09 am UTC

[info]kaiser_chan
2005-02-08 05:27 am UTC (link)
Um, wow. Good luck winning a copyright battle against something that's totally legal.

Because, you know, she didn't leap on all those people doing political cartoons last time I saw. Why not? Because it's called parody. >>;;

The irony of conservatives using HP for something, however, is simply magnificent.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]fatesarchitect, 2005-02-08 07:35 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 08:22 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 09:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]silrana, 2005-02-08 03:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-09 02:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkrose, 2005-02-08 09:06 pm UTC

[info]dawnswalker
2005-02-08 09:55 am UTC (link)
The picture of Half-Mast on the cover looks creepily like Mr. Weatherbee.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

OT... - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 01:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]twocorpses, 2005-02-08 09:42 pm UTC
An aside on the use of comic-style presentation of information
(Anonymous)
2005-02-08 10:29 am UTC (link)
The subthread in here about what this means about the literacy and intelligence of troops has gotten a bit snarled so I just wanted to bring this out here:

Sometimes, presenting information through a heavy use of illustrations rather than text *is* a better way to convey things. Look at books on home repair, knot tying-- hell, origami: there's extensive use of illustrations or photos, sometimes with little or no accompanying text.

Humor is just an attempt to make chunks of information more palatable and/or memorable.

And, just to put a frisson of wank on this: I recommend you all find and read Larry Gonick's Cartoon History of the Universe (all 3 volumes). If you feel the need to assimilate more purely textual info, he has extensive bibliographies in each volume.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: An aside on the use of comic-style presentation of information - [info]mindset, 2005-02-08 12:09 pm UTC
Re: An aside on the use of comic-style presentation of information - [info]cathowl, 2005-02-08 02:01 pm UTC
Re: An aside on the use of comic-style presentation of information - [info]sir_hellsing, 2005-02-08 09:03 pm UTC

[info]loopywafflehead
2005-02-08 03:03 pm UTC (link)
Hee! This comment from Nina wins:

Awww, don't you people realize? This has nothing to do with politics or the US army or whatever war.

No. It's the fact that Snape ("Snappy") asks Harry ("Topper") a question, which he answers - and Snape replies "GOOD, Topper." (!!!!!)

If THAT is not a crude misinterpretation of the characters, I don't know what is! ;-))

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tocada, 2005-02-08 10:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2005-02-08 10:49 pm UTC

[info]lexin
2005-02-08 03:47 pm UTC (link)
Oh, much is explained! I posted an amused note on my LJ about the (London free daily) Metro article from yesterday on this, and the comments seemed to be completely off the wall and about a different thing. I had wondered wtf.

(Reply to this)

(Screened Post)
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 07:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]backfromspace, 2005-02-08 11:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-08 11:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]backfromspace, 2005-02-08 11:35 pm UTC
This is just the kind of thing...
[info]tocada
2005-02-08 10:13 pm UTC (link)
I'd love seeing on Celebrity Deathmatch.

(Reply to this)


[info]bakunina
2005-02-08 11:46 pm UTC (link)
Anyone have text of the real article? Because the Leaky Cauldron version makes it sound, to me, as if the Times reporter is the real wanker by sending the stuff to the lawyers in order to poke a story out of a nonstory. And since the lawyers had to have a response, they pushed it off to Warner Brothers, who hold copyright to character names and film (thus actor) images in the US.

(Reply to this)


[info]prettyveela
2005-02-09 07:24 am UTC (link)
I can't fucking believe the American HP fans wanked so damn hard on this one. No wonder other nations hate us so much. :\

"JK Rowling won't let our troops use her characters?!? She can't do that, were THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!"

Bitch please.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-09 10:23 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-11 07:55 am UTC



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map