Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Nyara ([info]squeakytoy) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2005-02-11 22:13:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Snoopy-Dancing
Current music:SG-1 'Threads'

Stargate: "And we're wanking..."
First wank. Use lube. (I didn't even stumble upon it - 'twas pointed out to me by an Anonymouse.)

Stargate SG-1 can't make the kind of claims of LotR or HP, but it sure has its share of wank-downs. ("This wank ain't big enuff fer the two'v us!")

The LJ sgdarkfic is created. Mostly Daniel-centric, and Jack/Daniel darkfic. Sure, fine, yasureyabetcha, whatever.

And two weeks in, it suddenly turns out that the creator holds a grudge against certain authors/moderators from the Daniel-centric board 'Our Stargate'. They are banned from the journal. No posty, no recc-y.

Eh, wanky but whatever. Hissyfits are common in this fandom, meow-booms only slightly less so. Come on, people, just because we sent hate mail politely-worded letters of extreme disagreement to the production/creative crew doesn't mean we can't all be civilised, sane, accepting types, right? RIGHT???

One of the banned mods of Our Stargate takes offence and posts her 'disappointment' about sgdarkfic's behaviour at her LJ. It includes the phrase "Would Daniel do something like this, do you think?" (I love the "WWDD" brigade. Total crack.)

And then the fun begins!

Seems that sgdarkfic went through a phase where she was spamming 'Our Stargate', the mods objected, there were the cries of 'Help! Help! I'm being oppressed!' to which nobody very few people listened, and she went and created sockpuppets.

This all comes out in the wank of course. Who did what and where they did it, who said what and where they said it, who posted what and who oppressed whom! The hands nailed to foreheads and the bitchslaps, the number of warnings sgdarkfic got, the arguments back and forth and back and forth and back and forth and...

Two days later, and it's possible they've finished duking it out. Maybe.

Highlights include wails of "You Did Not Deal Fairly With Me!" and very wordy rebuttals.

Then there's the claim to maturity by someone who hasn't yet worked out punctuation or capitalisation. Oddly enough, I'm not convinced.

It's long. It's mad. It's crazy. It's STARGATE! And the full wanking power of the Daniel-fans...why is it never the Jack-fans who get down and wanky?

IMO, there's no doubt that the OP (sgdarkfic) has the power of the wank on her side. However the OS mods and their cohorts of rebuttal have minor claims to the wank on theirs - for sheer wordiness if nothing else - to say nothing of feeding the damn twit. Oh, and that WWDD deserves a mention. Yeesh. Fictional character? Anyone?



(Post a new comment)


[info]mistressrenet
2005-02-11 02:57 pm UTC (link)
Back when I was more heavily involved in TMNT fandom, two people who had gotten along well enough got into a kerfluffle. One extended the olive branch "in the name of our favorite Ninja Turtle." The response: "Don't you dare invoke his name!" Oh-kay!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]shoiryu
2005-02-11 05:02 pm UTC (link)
...Morbid curiousity, which Turtle was it?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-02-11 05:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]shoiryu, 2005-02-11 06:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-02-11 06:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2005-02-11 07:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-02-11 07:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-11 09:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]oulangi, 2005-02-12 12:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2005-02-12 12:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]oulangi, 2005-02-12 01:42 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 06:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2005-02-14 04:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dine, 2005-02-12 08:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2005-02-14 04:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladysorka, 2005-02-12 05:57 am UTC
does Daniel wank? not on LJ, that's for sure
[info]b_list_celeb
2005-02-11 05:38 pm UTC (link)
"Would Daniel do something like this, do you think?"

No, of course not. If he really existed, he'd have much better things to do than wank about a fictional character on a cult TV show. Once in a while, the characters that haunt the Daniel corner of the fandom make me a bit embarrassed to be a Daniel fan. (C'mon, there's got to be some batshit insane Jack fans...right? *whimper*)
But more often, it's just entertaining. Whether they're bitching about season six or debating flaming Daniel's ever changing hair and eyebrows, it's never really boring.
Not to mention no one can write an epic Stargate Sue like a cracked Daniel fan.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: does Daniel wank? not on LJ, that's for sure
(Anonymous)
2005-02-12 01:41 am UTC (link)
***"Would Daniel do something like this, do you think?"***

That was in response to Darkfic or whatever she calls herself, criticizing the entire of the forum involved in the massive spamming over xmas time -- she hollered loud and clear that if the forum was full of Real Authentic Daniel Jackson Fans (tm), then everyone would have empathized with her crusade to kick out one of the mods. So that qoute was in response to that. Darkfic also got the Golden Rule wrong. Go ahead and read the thread, it's pretty funny that way.

Anyhow, I was one of those people mentioned in her original post on her LJ who is banned from her LJ. Great fun. Who can take this seriously?

Gategrrl

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: does Daniel wank? not on LJ, that's for sure - [info]oulangi, 2005-02-12 01:55 am UTC
Re: does Daniel wank? not on LJ, that's for sure - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 03:55 am UTC
Re: does Daniel wank? not on LJ, that's for sure - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 04:13 am UTC
Re: does Daniel wank? not on LJ, that's for sure - [info]oulangi, 2005-02-12 08:42 am UTC
Re: does Daniel wank? not on LJ, that's for sure - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 10:11 am UTC
Re: does Daniel wank? not on LJ, that's for sure - [info]b_list_celeb, 2005-02-13 03:43 am UTC
Re: does Daniel wank? not on LJ, that's for sure
(Anonymous)
2005-02-12 09:23 pm UTC (link)
Nah, it's not so much that Daniel fans are the only ones who wank, it's just that the wankavision for Daniel is much more in the public than it is for other characters. I know I've had a screeching (if that's possible), long, hostile, holier-than-thou rant or two about how faboo Jack is and how it's All About Him in my day. ;)

There are pockets of wank shoved away into private lists and whatnot regarding all sorts of SG stuff.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: does Daniel wank? not on LJ, that's for sure - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 10:46 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-02-11 06:10 pm UTC (link)
Jack is wanky enough for himself and his fans.

Fortunately (or unfortunately) I haven't ever run into another Grogan fan, let alone a batshit insane one. Hmm. Maybe I should try focusing on more major characters if I want wank...

...but the Stargate fandom scares me very, very much.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]squib
2005-02-12 05:04 am UTC (link)
Word on the major characters thing. Goa'uldfen (plural, yes, in a fit of optimism I'm *sure* there are more of us... somewhere!) are pretty quiet. As in, sitting back, dreaming of Jack/Baal and Daniel/Yu plots and *never writing the darned things.* Dammit.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 05:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jeanne, 2005-02-12 09:19 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-13 06:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jeanne, 2005-02-14 05:20 am UTC

[info]nevadafighter
2005-02-11 06:38 pm UTC (link)
I wish these folks would just shut up so I can continue to ogle RDA in peace . . . the flames keep getting in the way of my drool, dammit.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2005-02-12 03:29 pm UTC (link)
But your drool would quench the flames! You owe it to the world to drool, so that the flames may not get out of control! More drool, the power of wank compels you.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Mmm I do enjoy me some good Stargate wank.
[info]hearsawho
2005-02-11 07:21 pm UTC (link)
Daniel's the underdog character and when you get right down to it, went from being the star of the movie to being constantly sidelined and shafted later in the series. And we like to wank on that. HARD.

Jack fans? Have very little to wank about.

There is never any end to the wank surrounding the core group of people at OS and SDJ. They have the most-visited sites, the biggest forums, yadda yadda, and people HATE them for that. So little underground pockets of hatey hate emerge everywhere you look, and not a month goes by that one of these pockets doesn't pop up long enough to let some wank fly, to which of course the OS and SDJ people close ranks, and well... you get crap like this.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Mmm I do enjoy me some good Stargate wank. - [info]nostalgia, 2005-02-12 12:16 am UTC
Re: Mmm I do enjoy me some good Stargate wank. - [info]adora_spintriae, 2005-02-12 02:35 am UTC
Re: Mmm I do enjoy me some good Stargate wank. - [info]squib, 2005-02-12 05:01 am UTC
Re: Mmm I do enjoy me some good Stargate wank. - [info]b_list_celeb, 2005-02-13 03:45 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-02-11 08:40 pm UTC (link)
Jackfans never wank, because it's all about Jack's penis anyway. Thus, you get the Daniel-y wankage while the Jack fans sit back and wait for the inevitable blowjob.

And I'm really saddened that this is all the wank to be found, considering how wanker-ific the post-Threads debates should be.

*pouts* I feel like I'm not gettin' my memos.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

More OS-related wank! - (Anonymous), 2005-02-11 08:51 pm UTC
Re: More OS-related wank! - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 01:13 am UTC
Re: More OS-related wank! - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 04:00 am UTC
Re: More OS-related wank! - [info]nostalgia, 2005-02-12 04:35 am UTC
Re: More OS-related wank! - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 04:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nostalgia, 2005-02-12 12:16 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 03:55 pm UTC

[info]munchkinott
2005-02-11 09:04 pm UTC (link)
why is it never the Jack-fans who get down and wanky?

Because shiny MacGyver DVDs provide respite from Teh Crazeh.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2005-02-11 09:11 pm UTC (link)
We've stopped feeding the nutjob troll now, honest.

Love,
The OS Mods

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-11 09:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-11 09:42 pm UTC
In my own defense.... - (Anonymous), 2005-02-11 10:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nostalgia, 2005-02-12 12:14 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 12:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nostalgia, 2005-02-12 03:16 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 12:32 am UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]squeakytoy, 2005-02-12 12:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nostalgia, 2005-02-12 03:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squeakytoy, 2005-02-12 03:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nostalgia, 2005-02-12 03:29 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 06:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nostalgia, 2005-02-12 06:42 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 06:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nostalgia, 2005-02-12 07:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squib, 2005-02-12 09:26 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-13 12:44 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-13 04:52 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 03:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]wrenlet, 2005-02-12 05:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nostalgia, 2005-02-12 05:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wrenlet, 2005-02-12 06:05 am UTC

[info]mirabellawotr
2005-02-11 10:15 pm UTC (link)
I believe this is the first time I have ever seen a Quizilla quiz brought in to support someone's assertion that she is RIGHT BECAUSE I AM MORE LIKE WHATSISNAME THAN U OMG!!!

Wow. That is some full-bore hollow-point crazy, right there.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]squeakytoy, 2005-02-11 10:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]oulangi, 2005-02-12 12:22 am UTC
sgdarkfic here - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 01:12 am UTC
Re: sgdarkfic here - [info]oulangi, 2005-02-12 01:41 am UTC
sgdarkfic here - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 01:45 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 05:36 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-02-11 10:52 pm UTC (link)
Oh Stargate, I still love you so much even though you're so bad for me. Please get help.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2005-02-12 01:29 am UTC (link)
Well, it's only natural for the crappiest character to get the crappiest fans. It's only fair. I still can't quite believe the SDJ thing. I sure hope the Red Dwarf fans never tried to save Arnold J. Rimmer. I'd be very, very embarrassed if we did.

I'm not quite sure what it is about Daniel I don't like, I just have something against him. Could be because he has no basic math skills. Or is just plain stupid at times. And calls early modernish English Pre-Chaucer Middle English, although I blame bad researching for that. The difference is easy:

Pre-Chaucer Middle English: WTF? Is this French or Norse or something that looks nothing English? Oh wait, this sorta looks like English, and this does too. Hmm.

Early Modern English: Dude! This is English. This is I get. Except for the formal phrasing, but hey, that's no biggy.

And he reminds me of Kevin Sorbo for some reason.

Me and Stargate, we have issues.

So why do I keep watching?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 01:49 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 01:59 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 02:35 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 04:05 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 03:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]squib, 2005-02-12 09:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nights_mistress, 2005-02-12 01:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-13 12:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]munchkinott, 2005-02-12 02:53 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 03:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]munchkinott, 2005-02-13 09:47 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-13 04:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]munchkinott, 2005-02-14 06:51 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-14 04:40 pm UTC
I Was A Teenaged Smeggie - [info]munchkinott, 2005-02-14 10:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]squeakytoy, 2005-02-14 07:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlekitsch, 2005-02-16 06:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]squeakytoy, 2005-02-12 03:14 am UTC
sgdarkfic here
(Anonymous)
2005-02-12 04:46 am UTC (link)
Real life stalking of a person has indeed occured. Jmas posted some of my real life identifying information. In response to my request for her to remove it, mentioning that I had removed similar identifying information for the OS Mods, Jmas posted it again.

Graculus cyber-stalked me for over a year. And now I have a real life stalker. I agree that the wank stops there, and this has crossed over into something serious.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Gategrrl here - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 05:06 am UTC
sgdarkfic here - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 05:18 am UTC
Re: sgdarkfic here - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 05:30 am UTC
Re: sgdarkfic here - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 05:35 am UTC
Re: sgdarkfic here - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 06:07 pm UTC
Geez...Re: sgdarkfic here - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 06:36 pm UTC
Re: Geez...Re: sgdarkfic here - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 06:41 pm UTC
Re: sgdarkfic here - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 05:17 am UTC
Re: sgdarkfic here - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 06:14 am UTC
Re: sgdarkfic here - [info]nostalgia, 2005-02-12 07:21 am UTC
Re: sgdarkfic here - (Anonymous), 2005-02-13 10:24 am UTC
Re: sgdarkfic here - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 09:18 pm UTC
Re: sgdarkfic here - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 05:47 pm UTC
Re: sgdarkfic here - (Anonymous), 2005-02-13 12:30 am UTC
Re: sgdarkfic here - (Anonymous), 2005-02-13 01:25 am UTC
Re: sgdarkfic here - (Anonymous), 2005-02-13 01:30 am UTC
To Dark whatever -- Gategrrl here
(Anonymous)
2005-02-12 05:13 am UTC (link)
Where and what information could have possibly have been posted up about you? Give the links and I'll check it out for myself. And so can the other people here.

Let's do this in a Journal forum which has little to do with your concerns other than see you knock yourself out with your weirdishness.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: To Dark whatever -- Gategrrl here - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 05:49 am UTC

[info]nostalgia
2005-02-12 05:59 am UTC (link)
I'm so over-whelmed by my lack of shock that the OS crowd wanked a bit. Is one of these people the chick with the annoying purple sparkly sig images?

(Reply to this)

(Screened Post)
Re: Gategrrl to SGDarkFic - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 10:49 am UTC
Re: Gategrrl to SGDarkFic - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 05:34 pm UTC
Re: Gategrrl to SGDarkFic - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 06:41 pm UTC
Re: Gategrrl to SGDarkFic - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 10:51 am UTC
Re: Gategrrl to SGDarkFic - [info]kinneas, 2005-02-12 11:17 pm UTC
Re: Gategrrl to SGDarkFic - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 11:38 pm UTC
Re: Gategrrl to SGDarkFic - (Anonymous), 2005-02-13 12:24 am UTC
Re: Gategrrl to SGDarkFic - (Anonymous), 2005-02-14 04:36 am UTC

[info]amakath
2005-02-12 11:10 am UTC (link)
Stargate emits powerful boredom rays, but its wank is adorable.

(Except of course when the wankers decide to argue their fucking case on Fandom_Wank.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]squeakytoy, 2005-02-12 01:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]amakath, 2005-02-12 01:10 pm UTC
Apologies to FanWank - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 11:18 pm UTC
Re: Apologies to FanWank - [info]kinneas, 2005-02-12 11:22 pm UTC
Re: Apologies to FanWank - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 11:43 pm UTC
Re: Apologies to FanWank - [info]kinneas, 2005-02-12 11:45 pm UTC
Re: Apologies to FanWank - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 11:50 pm UTC
Re: Apologies to FanWank - [info]kinneas, 2005-02-12 11:50 pm UTC
Re: Apologies to FanWank - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 11:52 pm UTC
Re: Apologies to FanWank - [info]kinneas, 2005-02-12 11:54 pm UTC
Re: Apologies to FanWank - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 11:57 pm UTC
Re: Apologies to FanWank - [info]kinneas, 2005-02-13 02:27 am UTC
Re: Apologies to FanWank - (Anonymous), 2005-02-13 03:00 am UTC
Re: Apologies to FanWank - [info]squeakytoy, 2005-02-13 03:04 am UTC
Re: Apologies to FanWank - (Anonymous), 2005-02-13 03:07 am UTC

(Screened Post)
Re: Apologies to FanWank - (Anonymous), 2005-02-13 03:33 am UTC
Re: Apologies to FanWank - [info]squeakytoy, 2005-02-13 03:36 am UTC
Re: Apologies to FanWank - (Anonymous), 2005-02-13 03:48 am UTC
Re: Apologies to FanWank - (Anonymous), 2005-02-13 03:55 am UTC
Re: Apologies to FanWank - (Anonymous), 2005-02-13 04:11 am UTC
Re: Apologies to FanWank - (Anonymous), 2005-02-13 03:14 am UTC
Re: Apologies to FanWank - (Anonymous), 2005-02-13 03:05 am UTC
Apologies to Thread -- Gategrrl - (Anonymous), 2005-02-13 03:27 am UTC
Re: Apologies to Thread -- Gategrrl - (Anonymous), 2005-02-13 03:29 am UTC
Old Skool Stargate Wank?
(Anonymous)
2005-02-12 11:39 pm UTC (link)
I need someone to school me in old school stargate wank. So...I get there was craziness when The Shanks left in...2001? And the Save Daniel Jackson people. Who are they, when and where did the wank happen and was it ever retrospectively wanked on fandom_wank?

Shipper wars. Who are the main S/J people and who are the main J/D people? Have the shipper wars always been raging or was there a major split??

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Old Skool Stargate Wank? - (Anonymous), 2005-02-12 11:45 pm UTC
Re: Old Skool Stargate Wank? - [info]squeakytoy, 2005-02-13 01:30 am UTC
Re: Old Skool Stargate Wank? - [info]nostalgia, 2005-02-13 07:30 am UTC
Re: Old Skool Stargate Wank? - [info]munchkinott, 2005-02-13 09:54 am UTC
Re: Old Skool Stargate Wank? - (Anonymous), 2005-02-13 06:21 pm UTC
Re: Old Skool Stargate Wank? - (Anonymous), 2005-02-14 04:42 am UTC

[info]ladyrogue
2005-02-13 06:11 am UTC (link)
*just stares* As a Daniel and Jack fan, this makes me sad. I really need to go find a confused Daniel or Jack icon for this one. ^.^

(Reply to this)


[info]stjarna
2005-02-15 03:27 am UTC (link)
Sod the wank, your icon just had me!

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map