Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



The Talented H. Bradley (hunterbradley) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2005-02-16 03:30:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:It tastes like burning.

The "my luv 4 keita TT________TT" Wankage
A mini-wank, but an entertaining one nonetheless: Little girl dumps her boyfriend for a Japanese popstar and then posts about it in a community dedicated to said popstar's music group. Wankage follows.

The wanker's LJ userinfo looks highly suspicious, but the fandom gets credit for being able to make fun of itself as this LJ account was created for mocking purposes.



(Post a new comment)


[info]wolfsamurai
2005-02-16 10:52 am UTC (link)
I'm not sure anything has ever screamed "troll" quite as much as that does to me. But maybe that's because I desperately don't want to believe that it's real. Gods know that humanity does enough damage to its perception in my eyes without it beating me over the head with a dead and rotting trout if this turned out to be true.

And I've read that comment 3 times and I'm still not sure if it makes any sense. Meh.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]hinata
2005-02-16 01:03 pm UTC (link)
As she has no posts to her LJ, I'm inclined to call troll. Not that it doesn't mean anything, what with all the empty journals for community posting, but I'm trying to try to not believe that it's possible. It's just too mind-boggling to be true.

At least he's a young one. The fact that the boys in question are borderline "underage" has been torturing my friend who has been finding them hot (and pleasantly able to sing).

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]kyuuketsukirui
2005-02-16 01:39 pm UTC (link)
I like w-inds. They're what, like 17 or 18 now? I've liked Imai Tsubasa from Tackey & Tsubasa since he was like 13, so... ^_^;;

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2005-02-18 05:15 am UTC (link)
Actually, two of them are 19, and the oldest is 20.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]kyuuketsukirui
2005-02-18 05:25 am UTC (link)
Really? O_o Time flies...

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]wolfsamurai
2005-02-16 09:06 pm UTC (link)
Not only no posts in the personal LJ, but it was also created just about a week ago. Combined with some of the mind boggling responses in regards to the whole thing (ie, the comment from the anon saying "kill yourself" and the OP saying "I've thought about it"), it just says "trollsign" to me.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]loony666
2005-02-16 11:03 am UTC (link)
On the other hannd, none of them seem to realise that she (the second one) is clearly joking.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2005-02-17 03:13 am UTC (link)
Ahh, I'm glad someone else noticed this too.

-mochibuni

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]annabelle_lee
2005-02-16 11:07 am UTC (link)
Jesus. The only wank I see is when some bitter mice get nasty and start posting shit. What assholes...I mean, the kid knew she was being an ass; the mice were just absolute pricks to pour salt in the wound afterwards.

It is pretty funny that she's nuts enough to ditch a real boy for a Jpop boyband star, but the rest is just saaad. w-inds wank sucks if people act like that all the time.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]farohji
2005-02-17 05:39 am UTC (link)
i gotta agree with you. the OP's stupid, but atleast she knows it. [info]ayari and [info]ames_909 are being jerks, while the annoymice are just jackasses

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]annabelle_lee
2005-02-17 06:59 am UTC (link)
Now that I've re-read some of the comments, this whole thing stinks of vendetta in a way. Or of a SA fan, with the whole "Go kill yourself" style of commentary.

[is paranoid]

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2005-02-18 12:58 am UTC (link)
annoymice are just jackasses because they can.
OP blows my mind beyond porportion, but I don't see what you're reffering to with the rest of your comment. I read it, and they were at least being civil, using whole words & sentances...no cursing, trying to stray away from just whole blunt insults. There are WORSE comments than those, come on!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2005-02-18 01:04 am UTC (link)
ayari and ames_909 are being jerks

Those are jerk comments???

Then what would you call this (http://www.livejournal.com/community/super_lover/60478.html?thread=393278#t393278) and this (http://www.livejournal.com/community/super_lover/60478.html?thread=403006#t403006)? Sugar?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]tetsuki
2005-02-16 11:13 am UTC (link)
My eyes are fucking bleeding.

TT_TT

(Reply to this)


[info]mutsuki
2005-02-16 11:34 am UTC (link)
[maybe even making him look like keita (just a suggestion)]

...please tell me she's not serious...

(Reply to this)


[info]tapedeck
2005-02-16 11:47 am UTC (link)
Golly gosh. I wish I had the opportunity to discard a partner that easily.

(Reply to this)


[info]c_chan
2005-02-16 12:48 pm UTC (link)
Hoo boy.

(Reply to this)


[info]unoriginality
2005-02-16 01:53 pm UTC (link)
I'm torn between saying troll and real on that first person. Troll because the journal is used for comm-posting only- makes me suspicious in cases like this. I say real, because... well.. I've seen people like that. -_-;; I'm related to one of 'em. -_-||| My cousin refused to date for the longest time because she was too "in love" with Justin Timberlake. >_<;;; I like to pretend I'm not biologically related to that side of the family, just so it's known.

Sadly, no one seems to get that the other journal is a joke. I think it's funny. XD

(Reply to this)


[info]onetrickpony
2005-02-16 02:00 pm UTC (link)
Because why should guys be nice? They act all nice and sweet and then just end up getting dumped in favor of Keita.

I love the implication that people dump their boyfriends in favour of Keita on a regular basis. Goddamn you, Keita! *shakes fist*

(Reply to this)


[info]eclair
2005-02-16 02:45 pm UTC (link)
The journal was just recently made...
I don't really know what to say about it, I mean... whoa, talk about fucking delusional. (If its the case that it isn't a troll.) Sadly, I've seen people that actually act like this.

(Reply to this)

(Reply from suspended user)

[info]soleta
2005-02-16 03:22 pm UTC (link)
god, that guy's whipped. catch me starting all over at the beginning because of a bloody pop star.

(Reply to this)


[info]coffee_mug
2005-02-16 04:57 pm UTC (link)
W-inds? Dude, their singer sounds like a *girl* in most of their songs. It's freaky as hell. How can anyone be in love with him like omgzwhoa?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]lurker32
2005-02-16 05:38 pm UTC (link)
Hey, won't somebody think of the lesbians?!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]redjackcash
2005-02-16 07:00 pm UTC (link)
The two comments that made the wank...

[maybe even making him look like keita (just a suggestion)]

Because tranforming him into someone he isn't for your overly zealous obsessive fantasies is A-OK!

Also, I personally don't think I know any gyu/girl who wouldn't get jealous over his/her girl-/boyfriend going smittens all over some celebrity. I'd guestion if it's not minding or not caring. If it's not caring, you SHOULD dump him!

Because EMOTIONAL MANIPULATION is the way to go! Let's not be honest, tolerant, and loving...let's silently beam hatred and anger because our significant other is not getting angry at our (usually) harmless love of a j-pop star (and a bad one, at that).

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]plazmah
2005-02-16 08:14 pm UTC (link)
Because tranforming him into someone he isn't for your overly zealous obsessive fantasies is A-OK!

It worked for that sailormoon cosplayer and her "Mamo-chan".

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]nights_mistress
2005-02-16 09:21 pm UTC (link)
You mean...my significant other's supposed to get pissed off because I find Nick Stahl's naked back to be the hottest thing on television at the moment? Oops.

He's allowed porn. I'm allowed Nick Stahl. It works out pretty well.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]marlo
2005-02-16 10:18 pm UTC (link)
okay!

(Reply to this)


redwarrior
2005-02-16 11:14 pm UTC (link)
Ahh...my heart feels sorry for fangirls who think with their ovaries. >3

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2005-02-17 08:33 am UTC (link)
LOL. Hi, this is [info]ayari.

I'm honoured, really; I can't believe that one little joke actually made it onto fandom_wank. I couldn't help but notice [info]fahroji's comment, though. Apparently, Ames and I are jerks now? The last time I checked, you people are the ones sitting around analysing that entry and its comments to death. All we did was have a little fun with it, but you actually take it seriously. What part of satire don't you understand?

In case you couldn't tell, the second post was a JOKE. We knew the person who was posting, hence the lack of "inhibition" (so to speak) in our replies. I'm not so cruel as to go and actually say that to a real person. I am the mod for that community, and I let the post stay for a reason. It was to show that people in the w-inds. fandom does actually have a sense of humour. We know we have stupid fangirls, but hey, at least we can laugh at ourselves and not angst over it like other fandoms tend to do. An obviously at least some people had fun with it, otherwise it wouldn't get a gazillion sarcastic comments.

Well, I'm always up for a laugh, so keep going!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]redjackcash
2005-02-17 07:04 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, we knew. Dude, the wank review is composed of four lines, and yet you seemed to miss this part:

"but the fandom gets credit for being able to make fun of itself as this LJ account was created for mocking purposes."

Are you blind?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2005-02-17 07:26 pm UTC (link)
And obviously others have as well, otherwise they wouldn't comment with things such as this:

"i gotta agree with you. the OP's stupid, but atleast she knows it. ayari and ames_909 are being jerks, while the annoymice are just jackasses"

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]redjackcash
2005-02-17 08:13 pm UTC (link)
I believe that is in reference to the actual way you spoke to kazutachi_keita in the wank, and in response to mocking her with a journal. I don't think anyone ever questioned it was a joke. Being a joke doesn't absolve it of being an assholish thing to do.

Anyway, I think what you said to kazutachi_keita was perfectly reasonable...she's gone over the deep end and let her fantasy life run wild for a man she's built up an image of for as the "perfect man". And he'll never fall off that pedestal because they'll never meet, so she'll never have to worry about disappointment.

This is why "idol love" creeps me the fuck out. It just seems like a major distraction from thinking about the things you don't like about yourself. After all, at the end of the day, you have Keita!

I also think the other post was funny, if callous.

But obviously, other people in the thread do not feel that way.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2005-02-18 01:07 am UTC (link)
assholish

Not a word.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2005-02-18 04:57 am UTC (link)
Being a joke doesn't absolve it of being an assholish thing to do.

...Oh, I see. So I guess it was a pretty 'assholish' thing of us to point out the truth to her, huh. Rather than give her 'supportive' comments like "Don't feel bad about what you did! *hugs*" and "Maybe you can make your boyfriend to look like Keita!" (HA.), we tried to reason with her in a logical and serious manner. But that somehow made us out to be the jerks out of all the comments on that post. No, the anonymous people who said "Kill yourself" weren't jerks. We were.

That's what irks me the most, really. I don't mind that this whole business made it onto fandom_wank. I just don't see why we're singled out from everyone else and labelled as jerks when clearly there are others who've said worse things than us.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2005-02-18 01:05 am UTC (link)
In case you couldn't tell, the second post was a JOKE. We knew the person who was posting, hence the lack of "inhibition" (so to speak) in our replies.

Are YOU blind?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2005-02-18 12:02 am UTC (link)
It's stupid, for sure, but... I'm not seeing wank.

-Ketsuban (http://www.livejournal.com/~ketsuban)

(Reply to this)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2005-02-18 12:16 am UTC (link)
or maybe you're just stupid

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2005-02-18 06:57 am UTC (link)
the wank is coming from inside the house!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2005-02-18 12:52 pm UTC (link)
don't explode

(Reply to this)(Parent)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map