Page 2 of 2
<<	[1] [2]	>>

(Post a new comment)

	(Anonymous) 2005-02-25 06:24 pm UTC (link)
	Back to the source wankage: may I just say that Hrubec's "You have created a managed care environment" has to be one of the best descriptors yet. (Reply to this)

	That was hilarious (Anonymous) 2005-02-25 08:40 pm UTC (link)
	It's not a good idea to email criticism either, as "Goofy McTwatTwat" found out: http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/story.cgi?show=136&story=7117&page=2&sort=&limit= (Reply to this)(Thread)

	Re: That was hilarious (Anonymous) 2005-02-25 08:44 pm UTC (link)
	Wow. TWoP is run by 13 year olds. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: That was hilarious - (Anonymous), 2005-02-26 01:26 am UTC

Re: That was hilarious - (Anonymous), 2005-02-26 08:15 am UTC

Re: That was hilarious -

tinfoilhat, 2005-02-26 10:35 am UTC

Re: That was hilarious - (Anonymous), 2005-02-26 08:33 pm UTC

Re: That was hilarious

bookshop
2005-02-27 11:41 pm UTC (link)

"No dice, Goofy McTwatTwat! I don't refer to Boone, God's Friggin' Gift to Humanity as Boone, God's Friggin' Gift to Humanity because it's funny. I refer to Boone, God's Friggin' Gift to Humanity as Boone, God's Friggin' Gift to Humanity because that is the man's proper and full name. So it would be rude of me to shorten that full name, just as it would be rude of me to shorten your full name, Goofy McTwatTwat. "

...and here I thought I had to stretch it to be witty. This is exactly why I stopped reading the Lost recaps after the 2nd or 3rd ep and have been hanging out at

cleolinda's ever since. The unfunny is *so* unfunny it's astonishing--I'm honestly boggled at how you could take a show as unintentionally hilarious as Lost and end up with 12 pages of dreck like this.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: That was hilarious -

bishounenhuntrs, 2005-03-01 10:35 am UTC

	We have Godwin's Law! mediumdave 2005-02-25 11:59 pm UTC (link)
	While "Grow Up" is making some good points, the Nazi comparison isn't gonna help things. Why does no one ever make a comparison to Peronist Argentina, I wonder? (Reply to this)(Thread)

	Re: We have Godwin's Law! phosfate 2005-02-26 12:34 am UTC (link)
	It's harder to spell. And pronounce. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: We have Godwin's Law! -

pd_noosh, 2005-02-26 12:48 am UTC

	(Anonymous) 2005-02-26 01:59 am UTC (link)
	My problem with TWOP is that whenever I try and post anything, their server craps out. (Reply to this)

	deeablo 2005-02-26 02:13 am UTC (link)
	Someone just sent me this INCREDIBLY unfunny video link to Sars (Sarah) and Wing Chun (Tara) "debating" Oscar predictions on MSNBC. Wow. Also, TWoPs servers are down yet AGAIN for some sort of something. The more things stay the same... hey, wait a minute! (Reply to this)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2005-02-26 03:24 am UTC (link)
	But even when the servers are down, you're seeing the Yahoo ads. They make money regardless. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) -

teleute, 2005-02-26 04:06 am UTC

(no subject) -

esseilte, 2005-02-26 12:58 pm UTC

(no subject) -

teleute, 2005-02-27 01:03 am UTC

jrs1980
2005-02-26 04:41 am UTC (link)

Oh...my God. Pamie has passed Anne Rice on the ARTISTE wank scale.

Gilmore Girls - Behold! The perfect recap. No, really. No. Really.

She starts off quoting the infamous "flame" and then goes into "Eeeee!" fangirl mode. See how far you can get.

Her issues make me cry.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

	panthea 2005-02-26 04:52 am UTC (link)
	Oh, that was awesome. I was just coming over here to post this. g Oh, woman. Oh dear oh dear. Bwah. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	isobelsomething 2005-02-26 05:07 am UTC (link)
	Wow. That was just... wow. Pamie officially has no class. I'm pretty disappointed to see something I like sullied by wanky behaviour. If she kept her issues about this shit out of her recaps, I'd be fine, but now she's just smacking it around. She took up an entire fucking page! I love[d] TWoP, but that's just too damn much. (Reply to this)(Parent)

iamtheenemy
2005-02-26 05:14 am UTC (link)

Just when I didn't think she could be a bigger douche bag.

Someone constructively criticizes you, and so they're either tweens or lonely old women? Why, because they take their favorite shows seriously? This coming from a person that writes for a fucking television website. She's the most mind-bogglingly hypocritical person I think I've ever come across.

Also, way to fuck up yet another recap. Because god knows I want to hear all about your issues when I'm reading about a show I happen to like.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - chief, 2005-02-26 04:29 pm UTC

"...so they're either tweens or lonely old women?" - Pammie is MsA? -

txvoodoo, 2005-02-26 10:50 pm UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-26 11:37 pm UTC

	crimsonashes 2005-02-26 05:19 am UTC (link)
	What the hell is Pamie's problem? I'm tempted to write a letter to her. It wouldn't be a wanky thing to do. I'd be helping her by giving her material for her next recap, because apparently, she's incapable of doing the job she was paid to do. Too bad I'm so damn lazy. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	Bitch, are you for real? (Anonymous) 2005-02-26 05:23 am UTC (link)
	sporfle This, from the group of people who called Aaron Sorkin a big baby for getting peeved with their trashing of his writing. Oh noes, did negative feedback make us cry? Poor little Pamie. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Bitch, are you for real? - (Anonymous), 2005-02-26 05:40 am UTC

Re: Bitch, are you for real? - (Anonymous), 2005-02-26 11:38 pm UTC

Re: Bitch, are you for real? - chief, 2005-02-26 01:05 pm UTC

	(Anonymous) 2005-02-26 05:29 am UTC (link)
	Wow, that was so very obnoxious. And, even worse, it wasn't funny at all. As usual. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-26 05:01 pm UTC

	(Anonymous) 2005-02-26 05:50 am UTC (link)
	Wow, that's just bizarre. But I have to admit it... I'm enjoying the Pamie's Breakdown Show. Now if someone would just do a witty recap of it, it would make my week. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	deeablo 2005-02-26 05:51 am UTC (link)
	I posted this part of the wank upthread here. Thanks, jrs1980, for the link! (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) -

jrs1980, 2005-02-26 06:00 am UTC

(no subject) -

deeablo, 2005-02-26 06:03 am UTC

(no subject) -

jrs1980, 2005-02-26 06:12 am UTC

	grapefruitzzz 2005-02-26 07:20 am UTC (link)
	So either we flash-advert-assaulted readers have to post regularly in the "Props to the Mod!" subforum, or we are squeeing teenagers? I found this comm lying around... (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - chief, 2005-02-26 01:11 pm UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-26 01:06 pm UTC

Wordy McWord
(Anonymous)
2005-02-26 07:27 am UTC (link)

This whole thread gets a "word". I don't even like the shows they recap, I selfishly did not buy stickers, mousepads, or lavish praise upon the mediocrity, just posted in the OTT threads. Oh, it's like watching PBS without donating! The shame, the horror!
Now, I have a life, and I just like to come visit you cute kids now and then and see what you're up to. Keep up the good work kids, you're fun, you're cute, I like you.

(Reply to this)

	(Anonymous) 2005-02-26 09:39 am UTC (link)
	Hmm, why can't I find a link to this on pamie.com anymore? Shocked, shocked I am!!! Oh well. Good thing that haloscan link still works. (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-26 09:33 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-02-26 10:59 pm UTC (link)

The amount of Stee splooge flowing in the comments thread makes me fear that whatever sex life he and Pamie may once have enjoyed is over for now, to whit:

"I understand not everyone likes the way the TWOP boards are moderated, but to even suggest that without moderating the boards would be a place for "intelligent conversation" shows me someone who has never seen the Internet.

Go visit Aint It Cool News and read the boards; that's what TWOP would be without moderating. And you know what? TWOP has been around, generating income, for a lot longer than most sites have. Do you think for one second that perhaps the fact that boards aren't allowed to descend into chaos is perhaps (along with smart, talented writers) the reason?

Laugh and point all you want, Hrubec, bitch. We still clockin' dollars. What WHAT!?!?!
stee | Email | Homepage | 02.25.05 - 11:58 am | # "

Oh, the wank, it writes itself.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

jrs1980, 2005-02-26 11:42 pm UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-28 04:01 am UTC

	smo 2005-02-27 02:15 am UTC (link)
	Wow. When did Pamie turn into Gustave? (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-02-28 07:17 pm UTC

(no subject) -

smo, 2005-02-28 07:20 pm UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-02 11:40 am UTC

(no subject) -

smo, 2005-03-02 03:36 pm UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-16 11:24 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-03-01 01:53 am UTC (link)

The problem with TWoP is that they are generally greedy asshats and all want money; yet they refuse to treat the patrons of the site as customers. Anyone that doesn't kiss ass is usually banned. They also tend to have it in for certain characters or personalities on shows, and their fans are just DOOMED.

Classic examples - Spike on BtVS, Wesley on Angel and Clay Aiken from American Idol. Shack had it out for Clay fans. Articulate, intelligent and sure, fangirly ramblings on Clay usually provoked mass bannings. However, grammatically incorrect spewing about how Clay Aiken is a flaming, bitchy diva? That slid by without a whisper, despite their supposedly strigent rules on grammar and spelling. Anyone that praised Clay was out, anyone that hated him was fine by Shack. It was such bullshit.

None of the recappers at TWoP are as self-aware as they think they are. Jessica is wicked and I used to love Johanna's O.C recaps - but the rest of them? Meh. They're too busy snickering amongst themselves at their own 'cleverness' to actually be, ya know, funny anymore.

(Reply to this)

	(Anonymous) 2005-03-12 08:04 pm UTC (link)
	Hi. Someone upthread mentioned Camper's booting, and to this day I've been dying to know why, specifically. I loved her QaF recaps, she seemed interesting in the show doing better, and it showed in her interview with "Ted" from the show. But it was like, poof...gone. And god help you if you asked who, what, when, or why. So...anyone know why she was replaced? (Reply to this)

Page 2 of 2
<<	[1] [2]	>>