Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



kalindi ([info]kalindi) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2005-03-03 00:41:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Webcomicy fanartist wank
A mouse posted this in one of the earlier threads. Poor mouse doesn't have an account, but I do. Basically, there's a webcomic called Sublunary. Its a yaoi comic that pretty much manages to cram in every single yaoi cliche known to man and for extra flavor, throws in some of the worst character/costume designs and neon hair known to man. Supposedly this is fanservice. Sublunary also has a raving fangirl population.

Over on 4chan, someone pimps out one of Sublunary's pictures. (This place isn't exactly 100% worksafe, apparently). Most of the commenters are not impressed by the picture, and offer mildly snarky comments sniping at each other.

That is until one of Sublunary's artists show up, and begins to wank fairly hard. With the usual "I don't see you posting your links/you must not be as good as me and suck at art" stuff to boot, etc. etc. etc.

It's almost like a baby Anne Rice in the making. I love the smell of fairly fresh wank.



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


(Anonymous)
2005-03-03 10:48 am UTC (link)
Dude, where's the "It's not FOR you?"

I vaguely remembered seeing wank for this webcomic on i_wank way back.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

i_wankness - (Anonymous), 2005-03-03 10:57 am UTC

[info]cathowl
2005-03-03 10:54 am UTC (link)
Ah, yes. On the list of Things That Annoy Me would be people who think that unless you participate in an activity, you can't look in on it as say "this is good/bad".

I wonder what people like this think of movie critics.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kalindi, 2005-03-03 11:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2005-03-03 10:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]squib, 2005-03-03 11:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nevadafighter, 2005-03-03 11:48 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-03-03 11:45 am UTC (link)
It's not bad. I like the storyline. The artwork's pretty decent, not extraordinarily so, but not bad either...

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-03 11:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]omgwtflol, 2005-03-03 01:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]omgwtflol, 2005-03-03 01:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-03 02:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-03 03:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hooverdam, 2005-03-03 05:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]omgwtflol, 2005-03-03 10:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]skarrow, 2005-03-04 08:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]redjackcash, 2005-03-03 06:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]annabelle_lee, 2005-03-04 04:30 am UTC

[info]aerobot
2005-03-03 12:00 pm UTC (link)
Geez, that pic they're bitching about isn't actually that bad. In fact, it's rather good. The hair looks pretty damn awesome.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]redjackcash, 2005-03-03 06:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]redjackcash, 2005-03-03 08:27 pm UTC
I'll respectfully disagree - [info]simkin_mouse, 2005-03-03 08:32 pm UTC
Re: I'll respectfully disagree - [info]redjackcash, 2005-03-03 08:54 pm UTC
Re: I'll respectfully disagree - [info]entelodont, 2005-03-03 09:07 pm UTC
Re: I'll respectfully disagree - [info]simkin_mouse, 2005-03-03 11:14 pm UTC
Re: I'll respectfully disagree - [info]redjackcash, 2005-03-04 07:31 am UTC
Re: I'll respectfully disagree - [info]redjackcash, 2005-03-04 07:32 am UTC
Re: I'll respectfully disagree - [info]telophase, 2005-03-03 09:48 pm UTC
Re: I'll respectfully disagree - [info]redjackcash, 2005-03-03 10:05 pm UTC
Re: I'll respectfully disagree - [info]telophase, 2005-03-03 11:09 pm UTC
Re: I'll respectfully disagree - [info]redjackcash, 2005-03-04 06:56 am UTC
Re: I'll respectfully disagree - [info]pantyless_angel, 2005-03-04 12:56 am UTC
Re: I'll respectfully disagree - [info]telophase, 2005-03-04 01:06 am UTC
Re: I'll respectfully disagree - [info]pantyless_angel, 2005-03-04 01:10 am UTC
Re: I'll respectfully disagree - [info]telophase, 2005-03-04 02:14 am UTC
Re: I'll respectfully disagree - [info]pantyless_angel, 2005-03-04 02:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ironymaiden, 2005-03-03 09:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]redjackcash, 2005-03-03 09:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]redjackcash, 2005-03-03 10:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tekenduis, 2005-03-03 11:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]redjackcash, 2005-03-04 06:59 am UTC
Well, I made it through a third of Unicorn Jelly... - [info]beandelphiki, 2005-03-04 07:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]soleta, 2005-03-03 10:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2005-03-03 11:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2005-03-04 08:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]redjackcash, 2005-03-04 08:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2005-03-04 11:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]redjackcash, 2005-03-04 01:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-04 01:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-04 02:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2005-03-05 02:53 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-03 07:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-03 07:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2005-03-04 12:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-04 01:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2005-03-05 02:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]selene_avis, 2005-03-05 02:22 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-05 05:59 am UTC

[info]adora_spintriae
2005-03-03 12:02 pm UTC (link)
but compared to the majority of webcomics on keen, we're kickass.

Sadly, this fact is true. Doesn't change the fact it's still teh suck, though.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-03 12:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]telophase, 2005-03-03 04:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]beccastareyes, 2005-03-03 04:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-03-03 04:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]telophase, 2005-03-03 04:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-03-03 05:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]telophase, 2005-03-03 05:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mister_terrific, 2005-03-03 11:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]telophase, 2005-03-03 04:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]allison, 2005-03-03 06:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]telophase, 2005-03-03 06:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aloysius, 2005-03-03 07:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pantyless_angel, 2005-03-03 08:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]telophase, 2005-03-03 09:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pantyless_angel, 2005-03-03 11:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]telophase, 2005-03-03 11:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pantyless_angel, 2005-03-03 11:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]selenis, 2005-03-04 01:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pantyless_angel, 2005-03-04 01:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]selenis, 2005-03-04 02:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pantyless_angel, 2005-03-04 02:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lukita, 2005-03-04 03:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pantyless_angel, 2005-03-04 05:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lukita, 2005-03-04 10:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]entelodont, 2005-03-03 06:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]electricchick, 2005-03-03 08:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]threegoldfish, 2005-03-04 06:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sairobi, 2005-03-04 10:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]threegoldfish, 2005-03-04 04:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sairobi, 2005-03-04 07:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]threegoldfish, 2005-03-04 08:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sairobi, 2005-03-03 05:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]redjackcash, 2005-03-03 06:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sairobi, 2005-03-03 06:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]redjackcash, 2005-03-03 07:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]redjackcash, 2005-03-03 07:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-03-03 08:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]beccastareyes, 2005-03-03 08:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]redjackcash, 2005-03-03 08:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]theartema, 2005-03-04 04:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]redjackcash, 2005-03-04 07:11 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-05 12:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sairobi, 2005-03-03 07:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]redjackcash, 2005-03-03 07:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]redjackcash, 2005-03-03 07:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2005-03-04 08:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sairobi, 2005-03-04 04:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]telophase, 2005-03-03 10:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]redjackcash, 2005-03-03 10:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]telophase, 2005-03-03 11:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]redjackcash, 2005-03-04 08:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2005-03-04 09:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]telophase, 2005-03-04 04:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mindset, 2005-03-04 12:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]redjackcash, 2005-03-04 07:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]beccastareyes, 2005-03-03 07:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sairobi, 2005-03-03 07:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-03 07:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]redjackcash, 2005-03-03 08:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]beccastareyes, 2005-03-03 08:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-03 08:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]alpheratz, 2005-03-03 09:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]miss_kitten, 2005-03-03 10:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]selene_avis, 2005-03-05 02:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tekenduis, 2005-03-03 09:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]annabelle_lee, 2005-03-04 05:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]coyotegirl, 2005-03-05 04:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]beccastareyes, 2005-03-03 04:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pokecheck, 2005-03-03 09:57 pm UTC

[info]mooncalf
2005-03-03 12:15 pm UTC (link)
Oh, 4chan. You never fail to... fail to amuse me.

Thanks for all the stolen and unattributed pr0n, though!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-03 12:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]omgwtflol, 2005-03-03 01:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-03 02:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]shun_mcdaddy, 2005-03-03 05:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-03 07:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]shun_mcdaddy, 2005-03-03 09:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-04 02:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]suzywongdress, 2005-03-03 11:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]shun_mcdaddy, 2005-03-04 12:00 am UTC

[info]big_bad_wolf
2005-03-03 02:42 pm UTC (link)
Alright, that's fucking weird. I just had that comic shown to me last night ("Art's not bad, story's a load of ass - quite literally") and now it's on F_W? Jesus.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2005-03-03 06:02 pm UTC (link)
just FYI, that's over on not4chan, kind of a sister board, but even more NSFW than 4ch, if that's possible.

(Reply to this)


[info]shun_mcdaddy
2005-03-03 06:06 pm UTC (link)
If your linking to 4chan anything, maybe you should screencap this thread. 4chan's been known to delete entries within a week,it just depends on how active the traffic in posting is.

Besides, this is just one wank from 4chan, come over alot on a daily basis and believe me, another fight will pop up.

4chan is infamous for arguments.;)

I'm just happy I got a new Violent BL game from it today.:D

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-03 10:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]shun_mcdaddy, 2005-03-03 10:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-04 10:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]shun_mcdaddy, 2005-03-04 11:11 pm UTC

[info]ladysorka
2005-03-03 06:09 pm UTC (link)
Er, that's actually on Not4Chan, the Loli/Shota division of the site.

So it's really, really, really not worksafe.

FYI.

Besides, it's 4chan. The very definition of 4chan is "wank".

...not that I spend time there. Really. Curse 4chan and it's free unattributed hentai!

(Reply to this)


rachelthedemon
2005-03-03 06:10 pm UTC (link)
I think that picture just scarred me for life. Dude, Photoshop coloring is not a blanket for the fact that you know not how to draw anything resembling a male body. And I agree with the comments that it needs a discernable light source badly.

*mops up after self*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]redjackcash, 2005-03-03 06:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]heddychaa, 2005-03-03 11:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lukita, 2005-03-04 10:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tetsuki, 2005-03-04 10:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tetsuki, 2005-03-04 11:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]selene_avis, 2005-03-05 03:15 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-03 07:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]entelodont, 2005-03-03 09:10 pm UTC

(Reply from suspended user)

(Anonymous)
2005-03-03 07:13 pm UTC (link)
I'm still waiting for someone to go link back to their gallery on that page after giving an honest critique. I'm almost sure "Torso-kun" will either flame in response or sic Sublunary's mindless fangirls on the poor bastard though.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - rachelthedemon, 2005-03-03 07:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-03 08:07 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-03-03 08:17 pm UTC (link)
Bad anatomy...? ....okay... seriously.... have these people seen any yaoi at all? I mean in Japan they put out doujinshi where the seme's cock is like twice the width of the uke's forearm. This isn't exactly a genre that screams "realism".

I vast majority of the professional yaoi/BL stuff is poorly drawn and has no relation to what actual real life men look like. I see no reason why the amateur stuff should be different.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]redjackcash, 2005-03-03 08:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-03 08:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-03 08:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]redjackcash, 2005-03-03 08:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-03 11:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]gorogoro, 2005-03-03 08:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-03 08:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-03 11:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]gorogoro, 2005-03-03 11:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-04 05:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2005-03-04 08:34 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-03-03 08:34 pm UTC (link)
can anyone point me to some particularly worksafe pics so i can see what all the fuss is about?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-03 08:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-04 01:29 am UTC

[info]lurker32
2005-03-03 08:45 pm UTC (link)
Okay, is the title supposed to make me think of "dull sublunary lovers' love"? Because it does. And that doesn't inspire me to read it at all.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-03 08:47 pm UTC

[info]electricchick
2005-03-03 08:47 pm UTC (link)
Oh my God is that art horrible. There's no light source, the guys all look like girls... even in anime, there's more ways to differentiate between characters than giving them funky hair. And don't even get me started on the costumes. After reading the fist six pages or so, I had to exit out to save my retinas.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-04 09:38 am UTC

raikochan
2005-03-03 09:55 pm UTC (link)
Why do the sound effects go from English to Japanese midway through? Most people aren't going to be able to read them, and for the people that can....they're mostly weird. I mean, even weird for onomatopoeia.

And using serif font in comics annoys me for some reason. *is reading through for the helluvit*

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2005-03-03 10:07 pm UTC (link)
The Jetiswatcher wank (http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/641660.html?view=58011516#t58011516) just got interesting again. (http://www.livejournal.com/users/shaggirl/106878.html)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-03 11:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-03 11:08 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-03-03 10:38 pm UTC (link)
Oh yeah, I remember when this was posted in canon_sues. I tried to read a little bit of it but my eyes started glazing over the four hillion pounds of exposition. Plus I don't like cyber-punk or chan slash. Or the art. And the plot has holes big enough to shove the artist's ego through.

~ Chickenman

(Reply to this)

Eh.
[info]semtex
2005-03-03 10:39 pm UTC (link)
I only looked at the 1 image (cause I'm at work oops) but I'm not that impressed. Waay to girly for my taste.

I will have to check this out *ahem* later.

& this is coming from someone who, in her spare time and her own amusement, draws teh slutty men in various states of undress lol

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(Reply from suspended user)

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-03 11:59 pm UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-04 03:00 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-04 05:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]annabelle_lee, 2005-03-04 05:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pipssister, 2005-03-04 07:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]selene_avis, 2005-03-05 03:51 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-03-03 11:39 pm UTC (link)
Y'know, not all of us Subby fangirls are total lunatics, really.

Some of us are just there in the hopes of Greenlove. (Aka, CyanxTheo)

Oh, and.. The articles. Right. o.o Very interesting articles on.. Uh.... Chaining up ones village bike?

-AnonymouseR

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-04 10:31 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-04 12:32 pm UTC

[info]nekoneko
2005-03-04 12:35 am UTC (link)
That's a boy, right? So why does it look like he's wearing lipstick?

I'm normally all into the femmy looking boys (Yamato Nadeshiko Shichi Henge with the anorexic boys = yummy), but that's really taking it into the extreme.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hooverdam, 2005-03-04 12:49 am UTC

[info]mythdefied
2005-03-04 01:37 am UTC (link)
I've seen a lot worse than this web comic, but I've seen better too. The hair is kind of pretty, but yeah, the lighting is a big WTF? And why is it that most of the "male" characters look like women without tits? I have plenty of manga where the guys look like guys, not women post-mastectomy.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-04 07:51 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-03-04 02:01 am UTC (link)
Unrelated, but some of the the replies In This Post (http://www.livejournal.com/community/ohnotheydidnt/1269942.html?thread=74292918#t74292918) are cracking my shit up.

(Reply to this)



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map