Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



NM ([info]narcissam) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2005-03-18 13:39:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
The First Rule: Don't Talk About Portkey
Amusing little tale for you all about HP shipping.

Portkey is a site for H/Hr fans. It has fanfic and discussion forums, the latter of which have some rather interesting rules.

Did you know that you are not allowed to discuss anything said in the Portkey forums?



The text of the announcement made in January.

Sadly, it has been made abundantly clear that people who visit Portkey have either forgotten or never read Portkey's Site-wide rules. Currently we at PA are particularly concerned about this segment:

QUOTE (Portkey Rules)
10. Quoting/Discussing/Reproducing the opinions of Portkey users
The opinions expressed by users of Portkey within the Portkey network (forums, Portkey’s IRC chat, and Portkey’s PM system) may not be quoted/reproduced/discussed on any external websites without explicit permission from the author of the material. External websites are deemed as sites that are not part of the Portkey network. The same applies in reverse. Quoting/Reproducing/Discussing opinions posted on another website is forbidden unless the Portkey user has received permission from the other website to do so. Users breaking this rule may have their posting put on moderated status or have their access suspended. The only time a user is allowed to quote/reproduce/discuss opinions posted from another website, WITHOUT seeking permission, is when the article being posted is deemed completely open to the public. Such examples consist of news articles and interviews. Please consult a Portkey Administrator or Moderator if you are not sure whether permission is required for a specific source/website.

The only exception to this rule is if the comments are used by a party who is neutral and does not attempt to discredit or argue points presented by the opinion. Examples of this would be when used by press organizations.

Q: What does this mean and how does it apply to the PA Forum?
A: You may not post, link to or discuss any essay in the PA Forum outside of Portkey without the Author's permission.

Reason 1: This rule is so situations like this one do not occur. Debate is not allowed in the PA Forum, as PA's purpose is to be a safe haven for H/Hr Shippers to post and discuss their essays. The only place it may be debated without the Author's permission is in Portkey's own Ship Debate Forum (though you should ask anyway out of respect to the Author). The Author, and only the Author of the essay may allow it to be debated outside of Portkey.

Reason 2: The Author always has the right of reply. If the Author doesn't know their work is being discussed somewhere else, how can they defend it? What if they never wanted to defend it? Why should they have to? A major reason people post their essays at PA is because they do not wish to be put on the defensive. By not asking permission, you are taking away their right of reply and showing utter contempt for the Author.

Reason 3: Plagiarism. While this is a big reason for the rules as they stand, this is not directly related to this recent situation so am not going to expand on it here. Plus we all should know why plagiarism is bad, surely?

So, if you wish to discuss the merits of an essay posted here on another site, first show the Author the proper respect and PM them for permission. It will take you moments and save everyone a lot of trouble and potential hurt.


Discussion. It's like Plagiarism in a way.

I went to check the thread that inspired this announcement: Uncovering the Meaning of Harry Potter: why the H/Hr Ship is Important. Oops just broke the Portkey ToU. Bad me. It's a long essay about symbolism in HP, which I've only scanned, the theme of which seems to be "It is Hermione and love that will pull Harry away from Voldemort's influence." Damn. Broke those rules again.

But apparently someone over on the Mugglenet forums copies and pastes this essay and then the R/Hr shippers diss it. (Mugglenet forums are very difficult to search and link to, so I can't present that bit of the story here.) The author, Alexism is very upset. The Portkey mods make the announcement above.

I'm so glad I don't argue ships anymore.

NM



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]marlo
2005-03-18 11:10 pm UTC (link)
Dude. If the forums can be read by anyone, member or not, how the H are they going to enforce this crazy-ass rule? They can't ToS you if you're not a member.

Or maybe I'm missing something.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kadath, 2005-03-18 11:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]narcissam, 2005-03-18 11:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]marlo, 2005-03-18 11:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]palabradot, 2005-03-18 11:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rogue, 2005-03-18 11:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jaina, 2005-03-19 12:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]semtex, 2005-03-19 12:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]palabradot, 2005-03-19 01:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]semtex, 2005-03-19 04:28 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 04:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]plazmah, 2005-03-20 07:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]semtex, 2005-03-19 12:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]marlo, 2005-03-19 12:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ninja_stripper, 2005-03-19 01:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ninja_stripper, 2005-03-19 01:18 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 01:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]deejay435, 2005-03-19 01:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ninja_stripper, 2005-03-19 02:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_clansmen, 2005-03-20 09:25 am UTC

(Deleted post)
(no subject) - [info]ninja_stripper, 2005-03-19 02:21 am UTC
... - [info]marlo, 2005-03-19 02:29 am UTC
... - [info]aerobot, 2005-03-19 06:18 am UTC
... - [info]napoleon, 2005-03-20 05:11 am UTC
... - [info]marlo, 2005-03-19 02:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gloria_mundi, 2005-03-19 06:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ninja_stripper, 2005-03-19 07:23 am UTC
... - [info]gloria_mundi, 2005-03-19 07:25 am UTC
(no subject) - yuuko, 2005-03-18 11:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]plazmah, 2005-03-20 07:52 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-22 05:14 am UTC

[info]phosfate
2005-03-18 11:25 pm UTC (link)
If anyone there objects to anything said here, does that mean they have to ban themselves?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

*brain go boom* - [info]lindentree, 2005-03-19 07:37 am UTC
Re: *brain go boom* - [info]the_clansmen, 2005-03-20 09:20 am UTC
Re: *brain go boom* - [info]lindentree, 2005-03-20 09:22 pm UTC
Re: *brain go boom* - [info]maev_connacht, 2005-03-20 11:53 pm UTC
Re: *brain go boom* - [info]lindentree, 2005-03-21 04:49 am UTC
Re: *brain go boom* - (Anonymous), 2005-03-26 05:33 am UTC

[info]jumble
2005-03-18 11:40 pm UTC (link)
Utterly batshit.

(Reply to this)


[info]coffee_mug
2005-03-18 11:53 pm UTC (link)
That is fucking hilarious! :D BATSHITBATSHITBATSHIT!

And they ship my anti-ship, too. This is too pleasing.

Freedom Of Speech must be crying in a corner right now.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]marlo, 2005-03-19 01:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dorothy1901, 2005-03-19 02:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]marlo, 2005-03-19 02:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]coffee_mug, 2005-03-19 12:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]marlo, 2005-03-20 02:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ryokoblue, 2005-03-19 03:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]coffee_mug, 2005-03-19 12:58 pm UTC

[info]mastervex
2005-03-18 11:53 pm UTC (link)
Wow. That's...not sane.

(Reply to this)


yuuko
2005-03-18 11:57 pm UTC (link)
I don't even want to discuss the content of said essay and the ToS, because that's just... ridiculous. (So Buckbeak is just a twoo wuv symbolism and not a way of escape for Sirius? *snorts*) Anyway.

So someone copy-pastes your corny essay, they mocked it and you go crying over the board mods so they can punish the bad guys.

Boohoo. That's mature. Go have some ice cream, girl.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]coffee_mug, 2005-03-19 12:01 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 01:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]givemethepen, 2005-03-19 10:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_clansmen, 2005-03-20 09:29 am UTC

[info]qwertyuiop
2005-03-18 11:58 pm UTC (link)
That ToS is completely ridiculous, and really unenforceable, anyone can see the board, so anyone can take an essay and rant about it/mock it/rip it to shreds.

Obviously some people weren't there when common sense was being distributed.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 05:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]photosinensis, 2005-03-19 06:13 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 06:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]narcissam, 2005-03-19 06:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaimonkey, 2005-03-20 04:32 am UTC

[info]furiosity
2005-03-19 12:01 am UTC (link)
*points and laughs*

I'm not a member at Portkey, I'm half-tempted to take that essay and deconstruct it on my LJ, with canon support showing that Harry/Draco is more plausible than Harry/Hermione.

Erm, despite the fact that I have no strong feelings about Harry/Hermione or any other ships. I just want the boy to survive the damn books, who cares whom he ends up snogging?

The thing with ship debates is that you can pull a dozen arguments out of your ass for any ship and make it look plausible. Yes, even Hogwarts/Squid.

*ducks*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]coffee_mug, 2005-03-19 12:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]furiosity, 2005-03-19 12:03 am UTC
(no subject) - yuuko, 2005-03-19 12:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]adora_spintriae, 2005-03-19 02:31 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 11:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]adora_spintriae, 2005-03-20 02:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sparkle_bitch, 2005-03-20 02:48 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 01:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ryokoblue, 2005-03-19 03:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2005-03-19 04:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]schoenschoen, 2005-03-19 06:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_clansmen, 2005-03-20 09:34 am UTC

[info]greypearl
2005-03-19 12:23 am UTC (link)
The first rule of Portkey is, you do not talk about Portkey.

Reason 2: The Author always has the right of reply. If the Author doesn't know their work is being discussed somewhere else, how can they defend it? What if they never wanted to defend it? Why should they have to? A major reason people post their essays at PA is because they do not wish to be put on the defensive.

So does this mean I can post my essay about Harry and Hermione finding Tru Luv in outer space riding on Dumbledore's Rocket Ship of Good Times? And no one there would say a word? Right.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2005-03-19 12:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dawnswalker, 2005-03-19 01:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2005-03-19 03:13 am UTC

[info]feenix
2005-03-19 12:24 am UTC (link)
...

...

You know, if they were so concerned about making PA a safe spot, they could, you know, make the forums private and invite-only. Any monkey can do it on Invision.

And really. I thought this kind of batshit was only reserved for the Tinfoil Army. Supar sekrit means nothing if it's open, dipshits.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 07:07 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-03-19 12:33 am UTC (link)
Some interesting tidbits about the kerfuffle that caused this reminder to be posted:

--the author was a member at the CoS love thread and simply chose not to post or discuss the piece there

--there were several glowing kiss-up posts about it that didn't bother her or Portkey for some reason

--there were some strong criticisms of it in very general, brief, terms that created many followers to be quite affronted...it was okay for them to speak highly of it and recommend it but not for others to speak lowly and lament the inability to have a go at it

--I think there was only one person who went ahead and addressed specific points and may have (although I don't know) quoted excerpts but that post was deleted at the request of the essay writer

--the essayist posted a screed of her own about it that was also quickly deleted for some reason...apparantly it had much wankage too

(Reply to this)


[info]sitt_isis
2005-03-19 12:40 am UTC (link)
Pardon me whilst I earn myself a permanent ban from a place I’ve never heard of & will never belong to.


Buckbeak = love?!

Because Harry loves Sirius => Voldemort was defeated, and Harry & Sirius are connected by Buckbeak, & Buckbeak = love, & the only other person who’s connected to Buckbeak is Hagrid Hermione, & since Buckbeak = love, Harry & Hagrid Hermione = love, & that will defeat Voldemort.

Did I get that straight?

So, on this vein of thought, if Harry & Hagrid Hermione make mad passionate love, will Voldemort’s head explode & he’ll die?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]marlo, 2005-03-19 12:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2005-03-19 01:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]marlo, 2005-03-19 01:48 am UTC
(no subject) - ataniell93, 2005-03-19 02:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2005-03-19 02:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2005-03-19 03:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2005-03-19 04:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ruaha56, 2005-03-19 06:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 11:15 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 07:09 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-04 02:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]waltraute, 2005-03-19 10:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2005-03-19 10:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 11:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-20 12:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]waltraute, 2005-03-20 03:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]calliope14, 2005-03-24 03:17 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 01:37 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 01:40 am UTC
(no subject) - yuuko, 2005-03-19 02:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]schoenschoen, 2005-03-19 06:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2005-03-20 07:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_clansmen, 2005-03-20 09:39 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-20 04:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sitt_isis, 2005-03-20 08:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nights_mistress, 2005-03-21 02:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_clansmen, 2005-03-20 09:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2005-03-21 12:54 am UTC

[info]sassyinkpen
2005-03-19 12:44 am UTC (link)
Good lord....I don't waste that much text unless there's Deatheaters and anal sex involved....

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ninja_stripper, 2005-03-19 01:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2005-03-19 01:47 am UTC
BWAH.
[info]semtex
2005-03-19 12:51 am UTC (link)
I'm curious as to just HOW the admins enforce this particular fascist R00L of theirs. Unless they are freaking omniscient, there's no way they can.

Dear Portkey admins:

YOU FAIL IT



&heart; semtex

(Reply to this)(Thread)

I R e-tarded. - [info]semtex, 2005-03-19 12:53 am UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 01:21 am UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 01:31 am UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - [info]marlo, 2005-03-19 01:42 am UTC
Also - [info]loki, 2005-03-19 02:27 am UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - [info]semtex, 2005-03-19 05:27 am UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - [info]semtex, 2005-03-19 05:30 am UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - [info]aycelcus, 2005-03-19 10:06 am UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 01:55 am UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - [info]kenovay, 2005-03-19 01:55 am UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - [info]deejay435, 2005-03-19 02:05 am UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - [info]pokecheck, 2005-03-19 02:59 am UTC
... - [info]ninja_stripper, 2005-03-19 03:18 am UTC
... - [info]mrbimble, 2005-03-19 04:11 am UTC
... - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 05:09 am UTC
... - [info]semtex, 2005-03-19 05:20 am UTC
... - [info]alpheratz, 2005-03-19 05:56 am UTC
... - [info]semtex, 2005-03-19 06:46 am UTC
... - [info]prettyveela, 2005-03-19 10:26 am UTC
... - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 10:30 am UTC
... - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 10:31 am UTC
... - (Anonymous), 2005-03-20 02:01 am UTC
... - (Anonymous), 2005-03-20 02:05 am UTC
... - [info]crickets, 2005-03-21 08:56 am UTC
... - [info]crickets, 2005-03-21 09:00 am UTC
... - [info]gloria_mundi, 2005-03-19 06:40 am UTC
... - [info]semtex, 2005-03-19 06:48 am UTC
... - [info]ninja_stripper, 2005-03-20 12:59 am UTC
... - [info]ninja_stripper, 2005-03-19 07:22 am UTC
... - [info]gloria_mundi, 2005-03-19 07:26 am UTC
... - [info]semtex, 2005-03-19 07:48 am UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 02:05 am UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - [info]tangentialone, 2005-03-19 04:24 am UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - [info]luckdragonfujur, 2005-03-19 05:00 am UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 05:07 am UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 05:09 am UTC
... - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 05:13 am UTC
... - [info]semtex, 2005-03-19 05:33 am UTC
... - [info]maureenlycaon, 2005-03-19 05:42 am UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 06:25 am UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - [info]schoenschoen, 2005-03-19 06:35 am UTC
Love! - [info]lindentree, 2005-03-19 07:47 am UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - ataniell93, 2005-03-19 08:14 am UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - ataniell93, 2005-03-19 08:16 am UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - cicer, 2005-03-19 08:40 am UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - cicer, 2005-03-19 08:41 am UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - [info]prettyveela, 2005-03-19 10:21 am UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - [info]tiasian, 2005-03-19 01:15 pm UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - [info]tiasian, 2005-03-19 01:15 pm UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 01:58 pm UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - [info]rossywar, 2005-03-19 02:35 pm UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - [info]loony666, 2005-03-19 06:45 pm UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - [info]sarracenia, 2005-03-19 11:16 pm UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - (Anonymous), 2005-03-20 02:10 am UTC
... - [info]sarracenia, 2005-03-20 07:58 am UTC
... - [info]sarracenia, 2005-03-20 07:59 am UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - (Anonymous), 2005-03-22 05:30 am UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - (Anonymous), 2005-03-20 08:21 am UTC
Re: I R e-tarded. - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2005-03-20 10:58 pm UTC

[info]dawnswalker
2005-03-19 01:20 am UTC (link)
Hey! Did you get Portkey's permission before wanking them?!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]coffee_mug, 2005-03-19 01:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mrbimble, 2005-03-19 04:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]prettyveela, 2005-03-19 10:27 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 07:12 am UTC

[info]narcissam
2005-03-19 01:52 am UTC (link)
I told you I hadn't read the essay involved before I posted the Portkey policy wank. But now that I am I'm having a grand time.

Hippogriffs, the essay explains, symbolize love. Except they don't. A quick google search found only HP shipper sites claiming the hippogriff symbolized love. All other resources confirmed my memory.

The Hippogriff symbolizes an impossible thing. There is an old expression "Jungentur jam grypes equis" which means "To cross griffons with horses", indicating an impossible scenario.

I'm serving whoever let loose the hippogriff = TWU LOVE theory on this fandom with an e-warrant.

NM

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - ataniell93, 2005-03-19 02:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tiasian, 2005-03-19 01:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]livii, 2005-03-19 05:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]narcissam, 2005-03-19 06:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - ataniell93, 2005-03-20 05:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nights_mistress, 2005-03-19 02:46 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 02:48 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 03:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hermiones_hymen, 2005-03-19 03:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]luckdragonfujur, 2005-03-19 05:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]loony666, 2005-03-19 06:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dawnswalker, 2005-03-19 04:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]plazmah, 2005-03-20 07:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]schoenschoen, 2005-03-19 06:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nights_mistress, 2005-03-19 07:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]schoenschoen, 2005-03-19 07:22 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 08:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nights_mistress, 2005-03-20 12:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]coffee_mug, 2005-03-19 01:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]plazmah, 2005-03-20 08:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]renata_hpjc, 2005-03-19 04:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ignatius, 2005-03-19 06:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]narcissam, 2005-03-19 06:10 pm UTC
It's from Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable. - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 09:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]renata_hpjc, 2005-03-20 05:29 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-20 08:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2005-03-21 09:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_clansmen, 2005-03-20 09:46 am UTC

[info]adora_spintriae
2005-03-19 02:37 am UTC (link)
First of all: Essay = tl;dr. I'll leave that batshit to someone else with more crack patience than I.

The only other reaction I have to this wank is "Bwhua?". How the fuck are they gonna enforce this shit?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]photosinensis, 2005-03-19 06:09 am UTC

[info]ladybirdsleeps
2005-03-19 02:52 am UTC (link)
So ...

If Fandom Wank were to make such a rule for itself, and the Portkey admins wanked about being wanked ... they would be hypocritical jerkfaces, wouldn't they?

I think we need a rule like that.

Just for fun.

Y'know.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]semtex, 2005-03-19 05:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlebitca, 2005-03-20 07:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2005-03-20 08:00 am UTC

[info]dark_puck
2005-03-19 02:53 am UTC (link)
The first rule of Portkey is, you do not talk about Portkey.

Portkey. It's like Fight Club. Only, you know, not.


♥ Puck

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]gweniveeve, 2005-03-19 03:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]isobelsomething, 2005-03-19 03:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nights_mistress, 2005-03-19 06:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]coffee_mug, 2005-03-19 01:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]xburnbabyburnx, 2005-03-19 08:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 05:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dark_puck, 2005-03-19 06:06 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 02:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pantyless_angel, 2005-03-19 06:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dark_puck, 2005-03-19 06:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shadownlite, 2005-03-21 11:35 am UTC

[info]ryokoblue
2005-03-19 04:06 am UTC (link)
What is the point to posting an essay among people who will never debate you? Isn't that like preaching to the choir?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]luckdragonfujur, 2005-03-19 05:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ryokoblue, 2005-03-19 06:42 am UTC
Meanwhile, in a different fandom - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 07:11 am UTC
Re: Meanwhile, in a different fandom - [info]coffee_mug, 2005-03-19 01:20 pm UTC
Re: Meanwhile, in a different fandom - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 10:55 pm UTC
Re: Meanwhile, in a different fandom - (Anonymous), 2005-03-21 02:25 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 05:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]elektra3, 2005-03-21 02:46 am UTC
The second rule about Portkey is you DO NOT talk. about. Portkey! ....Asshat.
[info]xburnbabyburnx
2005-03-19 05:22 am UTC (link)
Apparently, I can read through pages of F_W and not get bored, but I can't get through one scroll down from my mouse on that essay. BOR-ING.

But, what the hell is up with that rule? Now, we must all ban ourselves from Portkey. Woe.

........ Portkey Portkey Portkey Portkey Portkey Portkey Portkey Portkey Portkey. Sorry, couldn't help myself.

(Reply to this)


[info]photosinensis
2005-03-19 05:31 am UTC (link)
Well, the policy says nothing about linking. In fact, their policies don't have much merit in that case. However, I will be bringing some of these concerns to the owners when I find myself back in communication with them (which should be as soon as I can get on IRC).

Furthermore, the poster is overinterpreting the rules set down by the authorities. These rules specifically state that if the material is posted on a site other than Portkey/Kindred Spirits, you must obtain permissions to reproduce/link on Portkey's forums. There is nothing in the wording specifically preventing the discussion of essays or post content from PK/KS elsewhere.

Basically, this is a case of a troll that is trying to use a site's TOS against regular users, such as what happens every now and then here on Fandom Wank.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 06:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]photosinensis, 2005-03-19 06:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dark_puck, 2005-03-19 06:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2005-03-19 07:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dark_puck, 2005-03-19 07:52 am UTC

[info]aerobot
2005-03-19 06:17 am UTC (link)
It's They Who Must Not Be Mentioned! Ooooh.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-21 11:23 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-03-19 06:48 am UTC (link)
That rule was probably written with an eye on the ship debates, where people regularly link and quote whole essay posts all of ships, which in turn allows other people to discuss them to death even when the original poster didn't wanted them to or isn't around to defend himself when criticism turns into "the writer must have been smoking crack" stuff. The linking rule is wanky on Portkey's side, but the "not reproducing whole posts" part is actually reasonable. Not even Deletrius quotes whole fanfics, they link, they post paragraphs, but they don't anally rape the Suethor's copyright by posting the whole damn thing. The ship debaters on all sides do. Although PK just should start mailing the ship debate moderators and demand more respect of their users's copyright.

Has someone a tissue?

Anon 69

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 04:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]msmanna, 2005-03-19 06:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]narcissam, 2005-03-19 06:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 06:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]narcissam, 2005-03-19 07:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 08:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]narcissam, 2005-03-20 04:19 am UTC
... - (Anonymous), 2005-03-20 11:54 am UTC
... - [info]narcissam, 2005-03-21 01:28 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-19 08:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-20 06:13 pm UTC

[info]sockonhand
2005-03-19 07:13 am UTC (link)
Methinks they need to look up some legal things. Or use common sense.

Then again, they ARE technically part of the Harry Potter fandom.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]khym_chanur, 2005-03-19 09:01 am UTC



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map