Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



kalindi ([info]kalindi) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2005-03-28 01:58:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:4chan, fanart, my pretension let me show you it, not good with criticism

Arteest Wank
Once again, kiddies, I bring wank from the land that is 4chan.org (not worksafe, though so far this particular wank is).

Another arteest wank, in which said-artist asks for a critique. When people speak up, offering opinions or thoughts and whatnot, their response to this Masterpiece of All That is Art is less than enthusiastic. Artist begins to wank, with the usual "U DUN UNDERSTAND MY WORK U UNCULTURED BUFFONS" and "MI PEICE HAS INNUR BEUTY!!!!", as well as the typical blaming-of-cameras and general preaching about being close-minded.

Short, but sadly amusing in its cute little wanky way.


(Post a new comment)


(Anonymous)
2005-03-28 12:26 pm UTC (link)
tad ot but I thought 'chan' was something like 'pedo'. Yet the site says that has art about teenagers (until 18 y/o)?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]monkeywrench
2005-03-28 03:17 pm UTC (link)
Chan = channel, not chan as in chanslash.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]smo, 2005-03-28 06:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]monkeywrench, 2005-03-29 04:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bemysty, 2005-04-02 04:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]monkeywrench, 2005-04-03 10:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2005-03-29 01:21 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-03-28 12:32 pm UTC (link)
Wow, the /ic/ boards are very friendly for 4chan. On the other boards they rip artists to pieces- they're very serious about porn quality control.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]adora_spintriae
2005-03-28 01:38 pm UTC (link)
You could never tell...

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]simkin_mouse
2005-03-28 12:34 pm UTC (link)
*blink-blink* so...her pride and joy is a painting that a second-grader would be ashamed to turn in? *blinks s'more*

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]jaseroque
2005-03-28 12:51 pm UTC (link)
You uncultured peon! It's art!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]simkin_mouse, 2005-03-28 01:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jaseroque, 2005-03-28 01:45 pm UTC

[info]rossywar
2005-03-28 01:09 pm UTC (link)
I've been banned from 4chan! Which is impressive, seeing as I've never been to that site before now...

(Reply to this)


[info]cjk
2005-03-28 02:18 pm UTC (link)
Is s/he aiming for Matisse, Picasso, or kindergarten?

I mean, it's a nice enough picture, but why the kneejerk reaction when others refuse to agree it's art?

...oh. nevermind.

(Reply to this)


[info]shadownlite
2005-03-28 02:25 pm UTC (link)
Ahh artist wank.

Further proof to why you should never ask how people like your work unless you want to hear the truth.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-28 06:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]shadownlite, 2005-03-29 06:23 am UTC

[info]skarrow
2005-03-28 02:58 pm UTC (link)
Artist:
"I am not without peer." (direct quote)

Critiquers:
"Yeah, this isn't the greatest."

Artist: "OMFG SHUTUP I AM WITHOUT PEER~!"

(Reply to this)


[info]aerobot
2005-03-28 04:16 pm UTC (link)
Man, did she make that in two seconds? Yeesh.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]nostalgia, 2005-03-28 04:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-29 06:47 am UTC
"I do what I do out of joy and love."
[info]goblin
2005-03-28 05:47 pm UTC (link)
This here is some classy wank.
"There arises a joyous spontaneous interaction between the artist and medium, and hopefully the audience."
Unfortunately for her, it appears that the "spontaneous interaction" contains more mockery and less adoration than she expected, poor thing.

(Reply to this)


[info]smo
2005-03-28 06:19 pm UTC (link)
It comes out with trasparent vibrancy in life. Who can you say there is no feeling in it? She vibrates with excitement and happiness! It's a beauty who is just happy to be in your presence. Can't you guys see that?

A vibrating picture that's happy to see me? Sweet! I'll take five, please!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mooncalf, 2005-03-28 09:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2005-03-28 09:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mooncalf, 2005-03-28 09:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2005-03-28 09:52 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-03-28 06:29 pm UTC (link)
but I think you should look at this from the artist's point of view before making judgement.


There are no words.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]smo, 2005-03-28 06:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2005-03-29 06:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2005-03-29 06:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2005-03-29 06:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2005-03-29 06:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2005-03-29 06:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2005-03-29 06:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]zuzu, 2005-03-28 07:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-28 07:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-29 01:11 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-29 03:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2005-03-29 06:34 am UTC

[info]katienichol
2005-03-28 09:05 pm UTC (link)
"I did get through to someone. Beauty is in the holy spirit. I is not until you let that into your hearts that you will see what I'm doing. I will be so."

*blinks* Mel Gibson? Is that you?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]fandom_bitch, 2005-03-29 12:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]katienichol, 2005-03-29 01:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fandom_bitch, 2005-03-29 05:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kannaophelia, 2005-03-29 04:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]katienichol, 2005-03-30 03:10 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-03-28 10:49 pm UTC (link)
Hilarious. The artist even claimed to spend an entire hour on this piece. Does anyone here figure draw? You know, where you should be have a nicely shaded, anatomically correct drawing on newsprint after 45 minutes?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-29 10:28 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-03-28 10:54 pm UTC (link)
Am I the only one who thought for several seconds this was wank about basketball player Ron Artest? I probably am.

(Reply to this)


[info]ravenclaw_devi
2005-03-28 11:18 pm UTC (link)
Amusing indeed.

P.S. Pure and unadulterated icon love.

(Reply to this)

I couldn't resist
[info]didodiva
2005-03-28 11:32 pm UTC (link)
A nut like that BEGS for mocking icons. Feel free to grab!
1. Image hosted by Photobucket.com
2. Image hosted by Photobucket.com

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: I couldn't resist - [info]semtex, 2005-03-29 02:31 am UTC

[info]fandom_bitch
2005-03-29 12:48 am UTC (link)
Man, it took me a while to even figure out what this was. All I could see was red.

And er...there's no top of the head. It's like there's no brain or something...::squints:: It looks like a badly rendered Buddha head. ::squints s'more:: A badly rendered red Buddha head.

And I thought most of the "negative" comments were quite constructive. Well, except for that last one.

And I'm with Dark, I'd be insulted too if someone implied I was not "filled with the holy spirit" because I didn't get his/her very bad art.

(Reply to this)


[info]akairis
2005-03-29 02:08 am UTC (link)
...Not even terribly good art. And what's the point of it, really? I rather agree with the poster who said it showed neither technique nor feeling.

(Also, OOOOOOH YOU WORKED ON IT FOR A WHOLE HOUR I R SO IMPRESSED. Sheesh.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-29 06:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]akairis, 2005-03-29 07:08 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-30 06:49 am UTC

[info]innsmouth_eyes
2005-03-29 06:11 am UTC (link)
I don't know, I think troll. That's not an hour's work, not even an hour's bad work. I think somebody slapped that out in ten minutes and wanted to see how many pretentious art people they could sucker into thinking it was amazing. Red Herring, overbearing sanctimonious attitude, it can't be serious, can it? Can it?

(Reply to this)


[info]stroppy_prof
2005-03-29 04:34 pm UTC (link)
Favourite comment by Atomicweasel 03/28/05(Mon)13:13 No.4762:

"This would be interesting if it were a clay pot. Then I could smash it. The only thing lofty about this piece is its pretension...Needs more anime-styled boobies and tentacle violation."

(Reply to this)


[info]suzywongdress
2005-03-29 06:12 pm UTC (link)
man, i bet her dickensian principles are stretched to the MAX.

(Reply to this)


[info]phosfate
2005-03-29 09:17 pm UTC (link)
I've seen worse.

That's not a compliment.

(Reply to this)

  
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map