Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Becca Stareyes ([info]beccastareyes) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2005-04-07 22:37:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Because RPGs Bring the Wank...
Okay, so Green Ronin put out an RPG book called Blue Rose. The setting is romantic fantasy (think Mercedes Lackey and Tamora Pierce and similar authors -- anime fen may think shoujo fantasy). The system is heavily modified d20 -- fans christened it True20.

Now, GR apparently didn't intend for True20 to be as popular as it was -- it got to the point where gamers who didn't give a whit about romantic fantasy were buying the Blue Rose core book for the system. Now, GR had a message board (The Noble Assembly) for Blue Rose set up, and many fans, being fans, registered at it.

Now, one would expect the non-romantic-fantasy fen to be respectful to the RF-fen that seem to amke up the majority of the board. I mean, one doens't start complaining about shonen on a Naruto board. Yeah... well.. this is RPG fandom. People are idiots here.

Meet Nisarg. He likes to use words like fascist (Does this count as Godwin's law?), insipid, saccarine, and a dystopia to describe the setting. He also set his signature to "Head of the Aldean politically incorrect resistence!" He really seems like he's trying to win friends and influence people here.

In which a darker version of the setting is discussed. Wank starts on page 2 when Nisarg complains that most traditional fantasy heroes and historical figures would be 'Shadow-aligned' (evil) in Blue Rose (note: Aldea is the world name, Aldis is the happy progressive heroic country (Valdemar, for Lackey fans)):

Except that any campaigns set anywhere in Aldea will still assume that your ne'er do-well swashbuckling rogue who's in it for the gold is INHERENTLY WRONG.

Likewise your bloody-minded priest of a god of vengeance. INHERENTLY WRONG.

Your crusader crying out "deus volt!". WRONG.

Your Elrics, Fahfrds, Grey Mousers, Corwins (or the whole amber family), Conans, batmans, etc etc. ALL WRONG.

For that matter, your Thomas Jeffersons or Benjamin Franklins. WRONG.

Unless you mean that the alignment rules are actually different on Aldea, depending on which country you're in... in which case that would prove that the core book is not really truth, but an Aldisian propaganda piece.

{...}

In my Port Blacksand campaign, what I actually changed is the alignment system, got rid of the absurd notion that collectivism is "light" and libertarianism is "twilight", and replaced it with a moorcockian "Order/Balance/Chaos" alignment.


Note, that this is said in a triple post. When a game writer tells him they will most likenly not remove the alignment rules in a future suppliment, he comments:

but doesn't it fit with te genre? I mean, I don't really know, having read very little feminist fantasy fiction, but I would just sort of assume that evil sorcerers casting patriarchal politically incorrect magic would end up horribly deformed or go nuts because of it (i mean more nuts than they already are for being so evilly patriarchal and all).

This goes over like a sack of hammers with board member McCoy, who tells Nisarg to quit being a jackass (in most of the threads Nisarg posted in)and they get that he hates the setting so he can STFU, and there is a long argument, with a bonus tangent on the meaning of feminism.


In which the fluffiness of the setting is discussed. Wank doens't really get going until Page 4, when Nisarg butts in, but previous pages have quotes like "What's so unmanly about gays? If you ask me, that's like, double-manly." Anyway, Nisarg wonders why everyone's being so hostile and other forum posters inform him that what he calls blunt and forthright they call derailing multiple threads to whine about how he hates the setting. More wondering is done here, when he posts a suggestion to make a separate forum to discuss the ruleset sans setting. He hoenstly doens't seem to get why everyone hates him. I'm boggling over here at the fact he doens't seem to grasp the basic concept of not insulting a genre that most everyone else likes.

A favorite exchange:

Nisarg: (in a thread about another non-BR suppliment GR is planning on putting out): It would also have been a perfect way to introduce people to the system who wouldn't buy the politically correct, preachy-fascism fest that is the Blue Rose setting with a 49' pole.

I almost was among them, but found the system so promisingly irresistable that I dove in anyways, and I'm glad I did. But I still dislike the fact that I have to enjoy my True 20 system rules in a book tied in with such a horrid setting.


Nephandi: Fascist? I thought pluralistic left-wing totalitarianism was associated with Communism. Red Aldis forever, comrades!


In the end Nisarg gets what he wants -- a True20 forum on the main GR boards. Which makes me feel ambivalent. I like the system (but the world isn't that interesting to me) so I like the new forum, but I don't like it when whining and being an asshat gets someone what they want. Stop being on my side.

On the other hand, one of the admins did end the argument with this quote: "Oh for goodness sake, people, don't make me come in there and use my Mom Voice! I'll turn these boards around, mister, don't think I won't!" Which pretty much sums up the entire exchange.


(Post a new comment)


(Anonymous)
2005-04-08 08:45 am UTC (link)
Don't make me turn this Internet around.....



lj user Mandibrandybuck

(Reply to this)


[info]adora_spintriae
2005-04-08 10:30 am UTC (link)
What's so unmanly about gays? If you ask me, that's like, double-manly.

Oh damn, that's so metaquote worthy.

...this stuff really is excruciatingly cloying and precious.

I think there's a 99% law like that related to the entire fantasy genre in all its media forms. If there's not, there should be.

And because I have such a difficult time getting my head around any RPG that doesn't involve a playstation/xbox/computer of some kind, that's all I've got to say...

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]telophase
2005-04-08 06:16 pm UTC (link)
And because I have such a difficult time getting my head around any RPG that doesn't involve a playstation/xbox/computer of some kind, that's all I've got to say...

*feels old*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

we used to call it 'pretending really hard'
[info]phosfate
2005-04-08 06:50 pm UTC (link)
*does too*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: we used to call it 'pretending really hard'
[info]cpip
2005-04-08 07:49 pm UTC (link)
Pass the Metamucil and push my walker a little closer too, huh?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: we used to call it 'pretending really hard'
[info]bitca
2005-06-03 04:29 pm UTC (link)
*tries to pass the Metamucil, but it falls out of my arthritic hands*

Damn. I think I just soiled my Depends, too.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]adora_spintriae
2005-04-09 02:18 am UTC (link)
Heh, don't worry. It's me, not you. Like when my brother bought a Warhammer installation, and I kept on going through the box saying, "Where's the installation disc? Why're there all these little plastic things in here? WTF!".

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]skarrow
2005-04-08 07:46 pm UTC (link)
We can call it Sturgeon's 2005?

And because I have such a difficult time getting my head around any RPG that doesn't involve a playstation/xbox/computer of some kind, that's all I've got to say...

Seriously? Wow. I'm 19, but I've been dice-and-papering since I was 8. My father was my first DM.

..I have to remember sometimes that not EVERYONE'S family consists of GMs.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]tapedeck
2005-04-08 12:36 pm UTC (link)
Mercedes Lackey

That is the greatest name in the history of the universe. Pretentious AND servile.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2005-04-08 04:21 pm UTC (link)
Now that deserves to be in MetaQuotes!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]platedlizard
2005-04-08 07:08 pm UTC (link)
Believe it or not that is actually the name her parents gave her, not a psuedonym at all. Her husband is Larry Dixon.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]biichan
2005-04-08 11:37 pm UTC (link)
She likes to call herself Misty for short, though.

*read way too much of the Lackey when she was an adolescent*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]platedlizard
2005-04-08 11:50 pm UTC (link)
Wouldn't you? Misty vs. Mercedes...I know what I would choose.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]kookaburra
2005-04-09 12:27 am UTC (link)
still reads Lackey

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]nights_mistress
2005-04-09 12:32 am UTC (link)
Doesn't care if they're predictable, they're literary popcorn

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]platedlizard
2005-04-09 01:22 am UTC (link)
has the hots for Alberich despite Mercedes's self-insert stealing him

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]nights_mistress
2005-04-09 03:03 am UTC (link)
who doesn't?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]biichan
2005-04-09 07:18 am UTC (link)
Ms Lackey certainly does.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]platedlizard
2005-04-09 10:04 am UTC (link)
her husband's insert is 'Herald Myst's' Companion. Which is a platonic relationship. I wonder how he feels about that

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]biichan
2005-04-10 12:01 am UTC (link)
Hey, it means she gets to ride him. *snerks*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]palabradot
2005-04-08 02:34 pm UTC (link)
Nisarg?

Oh, fuck. I need to go inform some people of this wank. They will *spasm* with laughter.

(Reply to this)


[info]hinata
2005-04-08 02:59 pm UTC (link)
No idea how free the setting is in Blue Rose, but in a lot of games, you can just use the system and make whatever story you want within certain limits in the worldscope. You aren't tied to exactly everything the book says as long as you're creative. That was the point of roleplaying, no? To be creative? The books are just to save you the effort of making everything up from scratch, I thought.

But I still dislike the fact that I have to enjoy my True 20 system rules in a book tied in with such a horrid setting.

Then make your own True 20 system, dipshit. That's what all the cool kids do. Oh wait, that's Earth logic combined with actual creative work. Oops.

Ah, roleplaying, my little bucket of spooge. So much wank at so many levels.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]beccastareyes
2005-04-08 03:29 pm UTC (link)
It's actually pretty easy to divorce the system from the setting -- heck, there are even instructions in the back of the book for playing standard D&D with it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]hinata
2005-04-08 05:01 pm UTC (link)
It seems that the answer is rather obvious then: just make up your own setting with the same system. My friends and I do it all the time, especially for games in certain beta levels that don't technically have settings yet. Depending on how much facism has invaded the game, it shouldn't be that hard.

He sounds like the kind of player too lazy to do anything but go by the book and complain a lot. So glad I play with elitest asses when I have the chance to RP.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]squib
2005-04-08 03:05 pm UTC (link)
He may be wanky in that forum, but I'd love to have Nisarg in a game with me-- having been the "this is why the biases in Setting X suck donkey dick" girl for most of my life.

(Reply to this)


[info]kadath
2005-04-08 06:45 pm UTC (link)
Is alignment that crucial to the system? Because if you want, you can completely ignore it in D&D. The only mechanic it affects is people taking spells like Chaos Hammer or Protection from X, which, oh well, are super-meta anyway. Arcana Unearthed and Arcana Evolved get by just fine with d20 and no alignment matrix.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2005-04-08 11:11 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, I always thought that alignment in D&D was mostly for beginners. In my campaign we differentiate supernatural evil like demons and undead from plain old human jerks.

- Toren

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]kadath
2005-04-08 11:21 pm UTC (link)
I'm sorry. I can't understand you; I only speak the Chaotic Alignment Tongue.

Marlo's Toren? OMG R U STLAKING ME???!!!11

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]marlo
2005-04-08 11:28 pm UTC (link)
haha. I sent him the link to this wank because he does a lot of art for Green Ronin. :D

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]beccastareyes
2005-04-09 01:34 am UTC (link)
Not especially. They have a system that's vaguly like the Star Wars Dark Side Points that gives you penalties if you start doing really evil things like torturing people or messing around in their minds, but the basic alignment system is mostly flavor text, IMO.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]greenling
2005-04-09 03:09 am UTC (link)
As a mostly-CRPG Dungeons and Dragons person, I've always found it rather annoying that so many games that bother noting alignment like to associate "good alignment" with such actions as "not being rude to people when being nice might get you free shit" and "killing random minor nobles and looting their families because they're annoying", and yet the only thing I've ever done that earned me "evil alignment points" was killing a villain after he surrended. The next surrendering evil villain didn't even have that. *hmmph*

My little theifly heart agrees that malleable tabletop games are much better. My character doesn't steal because he's evil; he steals because jewelry is pretty. Much different! *g*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]marlo
2005-04-08 08:49 pm UTC (link)
The squeaky wheel should get motherfucking curb-stomped in most cases.

Fascist? I thought pluralistic left-wing totalitarianism was associated with Communism. Red Aldis forever, comrades!

Hee! Totally my favorite part, 'cause that's what I was thinking, too, when he was dropping "fascist" here and there. And cause, you know, COMMUNISM. w00t!

Now I'm interested in this True 20 system. I will have to investigate it further.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2005-04-08 11:17 pm UTC (link)
Marlo! You would never do such a thing!

Mind-raped by your dreadful psionic powers, yes, but curb-stomped? Never.

Sorry, they didn't ask me to do any art in the book, so no contributor copies (Thieves' World though - that's a different story). Maybe my art is too macho? I might be able to coax someone at GR out of a copy though.

-Toren

ps - Andorian on TOS today

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

SPOILER!
[info]kadath
2005-04-08 11:25 pm UTC (link)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
He's not an Andorian. He's a spy!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]marlo
2005-04-08 11:34 pm UTC (link)
oo. I'll try and get there early then!

No, I'd never curb-stomp anybody. But the phrase "motherfucking curb-stomped" has such a beautiful yet brutal feel to it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]elektra3
2005-04-08 09:30 pm UTC (link)
"What's so unmanly about gays? If you ask me, that's like, double-manly."

TheirwankissoPlatonic!

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2005-04-08 11:22 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, the GR staff have a pretty strict 'no twaddle' policy which I for one am thankful for. Keeps things positive and focused.

-Toren

(Reply to this)


[info]nights_mistress
2005-04-09 12:02 am UTC (link)
Completely random, but am I the only one who finds it entertaining that all of the problems that Valdemar faces are directly caused by the fact that they continue to be 'heroic' and meddle all the time?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]kookaburra
2005-04-09 12:30 am UTC (link)
No. I love the books (I also admit I have no taste) even though half the time I spend thinking, "NO you morons! Just Let. Them. Be."

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]nights_mistress
2005-04-09 12:37 am UTC (link)
I mean, a notable example would be Vanyel. Painted out to be a national hero, sacrifices life and limb for his country...and sent a demon back on Karse. As a direct result of this, generations of Karsites are sent to the fires for the ability to do magic, despite the fact that it's inborn.

If I had been Alberich, I wouldn't have just disliked Valdemar, I'd have hopped onto the nearest non-Companion horse and disappeared into any of their neighbouring countries, all of which they've pissed off with their meddling. Or Iftel.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]platedlizard
2005-04-09 01:34 am UTC (link)
Well, the only ones put to the stake were those with the 'Mind Magic', Mindspeach, Fetching, Farsight, etc. The folks with the Mage Gift (ie 'real magic') were made into priests, and proceeded to continue summoning demons to use against Valdemar and their own folk. Plus, there was the whole 'Karse started it' thing...

And the Second Cataclysm wasn't exactly caused by anything Valdemar did, given that the country didn't even exist at the time. (Skan the Black/White/Piebald Gryphon on the other hand... I'm amazed he didn't seem to feel the least bit guilty about that. Sheesh)

For that matter, Ancar's invasion wasn't Valdemar's fault either. Hardon was an ally until Ancar killed his father.

So, um, yeah. I'm missing the bit about how all their problems were caused by themselves.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]nights_mistress
2005-04-09 03:02 am UTC (link)
I'm a little skeptical about a country that has all of this power and yet claims "We didn't start nothing! They did it! They did it all!" It sounds a little odd, given that in the books Valdemar is always the long-suffering nation who only have the best intentions at heart.

I'll grand that the second Cataclysm wasn't their fault, given that they weren't around then. However, the Karse thing has me quite baffled, as does Hardon. I mean, seriously. What sort of dumb-arse monarchy is going to attack a country wherein it seem that half the populace has magic? I'm thinking that there's something fishy going on there...

...or I'm overanalysing a series of romantic fantasy books. Either or!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]biichan
2005-04-09 07:23 am UTC (link)
Well, he was being controlled through his dick by Hulda (I think that was her name) and that Eastern Emperor dude. Whose M.O. was to get his country so fucked up so that when the Empire invaded they would be hailed as heroes and liberators.

But yeah. Valdemar is the Gryffindor of the Lackeyian world.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]platedlizard
2005-04-09 09:45 am UTC (link)
I think you're over anilyzing it, Valdemar is supposed to be lite fantasy, after all! Mind candy, no deep thought needed. Having clear black/white problems make that much easier. If I want deeper thought I go read Pratchett or Brust. Or Steven Pinker if I really want to bend my brain.

That being said... Hardon and Karse are the only two conflicts that we really have any information about. Now Valdemar has about a 700 year history, and during that time it absorbed a number of smaller nations. In Magic's Pawn we see two client states, and it's pretty clear that they are client states because Valdemar is the biggest kid on the block. Given a choice both states would have remained independant, but they were forced (I suspect through trade, the offer of military support that they don't have, as well as the on-going fued between them) to accept Valdemar's protection. Now, they didn't have to be invaded, but I think the threat was there.

Another thing to consider is that Iftel, a 'good' nation, has had, for most of it's history, extremely limited trade and political relations with Valdemar. Even before the barrier was in place there were only a few merchent families who were allowed into and out of Iftel. Anyone else who left kept their mouths shut and never returned. Heralds were never, ever, allowed to enter Iftel. Even the Shin'a'in allowed the occasional stranger onto the Plains, and Heralds, the few times they were ever that far south, were allowed in. (under restrictions, yes, but this is still more then what Iftel allowed). The point I'm trying to make is that Iftel, a 'good' country, felt that Valdemar and the Heralds were possibly some kind of threat to them, and thus excluded them. My guess is that they may have had a few conflicts in the past. (I vaguely recall some treaty that Elspeth the Peacemaker signed with them, but I'm too lazy to look it up).

Also, I think that while the Nation Valdemar doesn't do anything to trigger a war, some of the border lords might! A raid might be illegal, but that doesn't mean it doesn't happen.

And I think I'm putting too much thought into a lovely piece of mind-candy.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]platedlizard
2005-04-09 09:47 am UTC (link)
anilyzing D'oh! Spellcheck is a friend I need to call more often.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]nights_mistress
2005-04-09 09:48 am UTC (link)
I broke up with Spellcheck. They were too needy.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]i_luv_fw
2005-06-02 12:05 pm UTC (link)
I <3 ML!

Y'all make me feel so warm and fuzzy...*laughs*

The barrier of Iftel was put up by their God during the times after the First Cataclysm when the wonkyness of the....Cataclysm *laughs* (for lack of anything better to call it) was causing problems for them. Plus the fear of invasion from the newly formed Eastern Empire. It wasn't anything the goody-goody two shoes Heralds had anything to do with. (oh, and Elspeth married some bloke from Iftel, that was the deal there....even tho she was life-bonded to some other geezer - damned duty!)

Trust me, it's all there in the books. I've got every one of them, plus the Herald's Companion. ML whore? Yep. And not ashamed of it either.

If I were to RP in the Heralds world, I'd be....a Northern Barbarian *smirks*

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map