Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Nights Mistress ([info]nights_mistress) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2005-04-22 05:47:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:*sporfle!*

Lolita, engorged members and cancer!
Well, b_r_s brings the wank again, and oh does it!

The topic was raised about words that should never be used again. Somehow, as everything does, the word member appears. Cue wank (sorry herongale, but your comment seemed to be the starting point of the wankiest post EVER).

I'm not even going to attempt to summarise the sheer wank that goes on, really I'm not. However, highlights include the use of verbosity as a compliment, svelte fingers wrapping around engorged lengths (apologies if I got that wrong, my brain melted), the idea that your friend is a literary expert, actual quotes from a (in my opinion, pretty poorly written) paper of the commenter and the comparison between porn and cancer. (I suspect the point that [info]clearedtruth is trying to make...got lost under the splooge. Both hands on the keyboard, dear, it helps!).

Also in there are our own herongale and eljuno!




Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


(Anonymous)
2005-04-21 11:22 pm UTC (link)
He pistoned into her, merciless and lustral, if that's an example of erotica I'll take a pass on it thanks. *headdesk*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]funwithrage, 2005-04-21 11:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 12:14 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 12:20 am UTC
Worst Sex Scene EVER - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 03:18 am UTC
Re: Worst Sex Scene EVER - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 07:56 am UTC
Re: Worst Sex Scene EVER - kroki_refur, 2005-04-22 11:36 am UTC
Re: Worst Sex Scene EVER - [info]tetsuki, 2005-04-22 11:53 am UTC
Re: Worst Sex Scene EVER - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 01:16 pm UTC
Re: Worst Sex Scene EVER - [info]tetsuki, 2005-04-22 05:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2005-04-21 11:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]raisedhackles, 2005-04-21 11:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cill_ros, 2005-04-22 03:46 am UTC
Ooops - [info]cill_ros, 2005-04-22 03:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gweniveeve, 2005-04-23 01:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2005-04-21 11:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - ataniell93, 2005-04-21 11:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sizer, 2005-04-22 12:06 am UTC
(no subject) - ataniell93, 2005-04-22 03:41 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-21 11:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]naienko, 2005-04-22 12:14 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 12:45 am UTC
(no subject) - ataniell93, 2005-04-22 03:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]miome, 2005-04-22 01:57 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 02:37 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 05:13 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 06:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kadath, 2005-04-21 11:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]prettypinkkitty, 2005-04-23 10:08 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-21 11:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2005-04-21 11:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]belafarinrod, 2005-04-21 11:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 12:11 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 02:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2005-04-22 03:43 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 03:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2005-04-22 05:37 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 08:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]windex_junkie, 2005-04-22 08:25 am UTC
Oh my God - Lustral! I finally figured it out!! - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 06:11 am UTC
Re: Oh my God - Lustral! I finally figured it out!! - [info]selenis, 2005-04-22 07:11 am UTC
Re: Oh my God - Lustral! I finally figured it out!! - [info]gweniveeve, 2005-04-22 07:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]innsmouth_eyes, 2005-04-22 09:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]krazycat, 2005-04-22 11:30 pm UTC

[info]ecchaniz0r
2005-04-21 11:24 pm UTC (link)
Dear clearedtruth-

Being a 'victim' doesn't give you an excuse to be an insufferable little particle of putrefying refuse.

And stop fapping to your thesaurus.

Kisses,
-h

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rock_ore, 2005-04-22 12:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rock_ore, 2005-04-22 12:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2005-04-22 05:26 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-04-22 12:07 am UTC (link)
First of all: pistoned? WTF?

Also in response to what yukie1013 (http://www.livejournal.com/community/bad_rpers_suck/1255166.html?thread=20064254#t20064254) said:


Going to an Ivy League school doesn't necessarily mean one is filthy rich, nor that they aren't intellectual. Not to say that there aren't people who are dumb and filthy rich (like one girl I know who got into Harvard b/c her grandfather donated a fucking library).

My sister goes to an Ivy and I have several friends in Ivy schools (including Princeton). There are smart people there. I swear. ><

-Anonymouse that is not a member of b_r_s =\

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - kroki_refur, 2005-04-22 01:15 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 03:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]naienko, 2005-04-22 04:28 am UTC
(no subject) - kroki_refur, 2005-04-22 11:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vasaris, 2005-04-23 09:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - kroki_refur, 2005-04-23 10:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2005-04-22 03:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]waltraute, 2005-04-22 05:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2005-04-23 03:10 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-23 12:30 am UTC

[info]raisedhackles
2005-04-22 12:09 am UTC (link)
Ok, I think I'm half-way though this wank. My GOD it's just beautiful.

Then again one of my major pet peeves is people that think they're being all OMG WRITERLY because they fap to the thesaurus.

That and I work with a girl that will insert "Well I DO have my master's degree" into any conversation, because she does write a few things for work...and someone commented on her word usage.

"Well, I DO tend to use words not in the common vernacular~"
And will just go on and on about how the "academia" just hasn't worn off yet and then go on to talk about her MASTERS!!!

So yes...wank hits home, brings a tear it does. *sniffle*
(yoda...is that you?)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]nevadafighter, 2005-04-23 05:43 am UTC

[info]rock_ore
2005-04-22 12:17 am UTC (link)
Wank it hard, honey.

They use the language even more fluidly than I do, and possess a locution that's even more verbose than my ridiculous volubility.

Except maybe that's too hard.

(Reply to this)


[info]ladybirdsleeps
2005-04-22 12:21 am UTC (link)
Don't forget the part where she proves that she doesn't know what thesauruses are for.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]iris, 2005-04-22 12:50 am UTC

[info]mrbimble
2005-04-22 12:26 am UTC (link)
Good God.

Am not part of the community, so my response to Miss Long-Winded-I'm-Ivy-League is:

I chose to use orchidaceous. I like the word. I think it's pretty.

And I think it's pretentious beyond belief.

Does it have to pointed out to you that you're NOT Nabokov?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]elektra3, 2005-04-22 12:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2005-04-22 05:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]favyan, 2005-04-22 09:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 02:44 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 04:43 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 06:46 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 07:07 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 09:22 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 06:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2005-04-23 06:18 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-23 07:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2005-04-22 05:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 04:42 am UTC
I adore people who think they're showing how brilliant they are... - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 04:56 am UTC
Re: I adore people who think they're showing how brilliant they are... - [info]gweniveeve, 2005-04-22 07:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mmmkay, 2005-04-23 03:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2005-04-23 06:15 am UTC

[info]elektra3
2005-04-22 12:28 am UTC (link)
You obviously missed the point. I'm not writing porn, darling. I'm writing erotica. Porn is so gauche. Ugh.

*giggles like a Princeton schoolgirl*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]krazycat, 2005-04-22 11:33 pm UTC

[info]llama_treats
2005-04-22 12:32 am UTC (link)
For more info, see otf_wank.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2005-04-22 12:33 am UTC (link)
*sigh* This wank makes me sad because I go to an Ivy League school (Dartmouth, though, not Princeton) and I LOVE Nabokov and Joyce... if ever there was a time to say "please stop making my side look stupid," it's now.

~kireisarah on LJ

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 02:47 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 05:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]waltraute, 2005-04-22 05:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2005-04-22 05:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2005-04-23 06:21 am UTC

[info]aycelcus
2005-04-22 12:33 am UTC (link)
As long as you've got a group of like minded people having fun I don't care if you're writing horse and elephant porn on the safari with Aslan looking on. Still doesn't make purple prose good role-play. Just means I don't have to deal with it.

....


Bwahahahahaaaaaaa *falls off chair*

Purple pose AND Chronicles of Narnia pr0n. Because what else would you write with purple prose?

Pony up examples, cause now I wanna know!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]soleta, 2005-04-22 12:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aycelcus, 2005-04-22 12:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]soleta, 2005-04-22 01:01 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 01:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aycelcus, 2005-04-22 01:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kadath, 2005-04-22 03:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kadath, 2005-04-22 03:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladysorka, 2005-04-22 03:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aycelcus, 2005-04-22 04:00 am UTC

[info]trintrin
2005-04-22 01:03 am UTC (link)
You keep using those words. I do not think they mean what you think they mean.

And go Princess Bride reference.. best part of the whole thing...

Here

(Reply to this)


[info]heddychaa
2005-04-22 01:04 am UTC (link)
oh my god. did she just compare her yuppy "OMG IVYLEAGUE" contemporary to ALLEN GINSBERG?

HAHAHAHAHA.

HAHA.

HA.




..I'm weeping on the inside.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ororo, 2005-04-23 12:21 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-04-22 01:06 am UTC (link)
I had lustral sex last night. It was fun.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]bohicamouse, 2005-04-22 01:15 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 01:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaimonkey, 2005-04-22 04:39 am UTC

[info]hellespont
2005-04-22 01:13 am UTC (link)
You, darling, have not produced a single word of your brilliant writing, while I've offered myself up to be ripped apart by some shit I literally pulled out of my ass

Do you think s/he means literally literally? Because....damn, that's nasty.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]bohicamouse, 2005-04-22 01:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ultimate_cin, 2005-04-22 04:25 am UTC
Ow... - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 04:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2005-04-22 06:20 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 08:02 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 09:10 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 04:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2005-04-22 05:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]favyan, 2005-04-22 09:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-24 08:45 am UTC

[info]selenis
2005-04-22 01:23 am UTC (link)
I am so done with you. 8'D You can't even connect the dots between rape and cancer.

So shut up.


There. Are. Just. No. WORDS!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]etcetera_cat, 2005-04-22 01:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]platedlizard, 2005-04-22 06:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nights_mistress, 2005-04-22 12:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]etcetera_cat, 2005-04-22 08:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkvalkyrie, 2005-04-22 02:18 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 05:30 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 06:15 am UTC

tourette
2005-04-22 01:33 am UTC (link)
I am personally of the opinion that writing can be clear and beautiful at once. There's no need to go inserting words like "orchidaceous" into prose just because you think it's pretty. Especially if no fecker knows what the bollocks it means.

Speaking of bollocks, an opinion was expressed that ClearedTruth's beloved Nabokov sucks donkey balls. I think what that poster meant to say was the the metaphorical facial labia of the physical personification of the written prose of Vladimir Nabokov regularly descend upon the rounded genital mass of the equine mammal known as a donkey. Not that I necessarily agree (I thought Lolita was alright if I kept to the right side of teh_wangst and saw it for what it was), but ClearedTruth is talking a bunch of engorged lengths so I feel obliged to take the opposite side lest the Purple envelop me.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

*sings* - [info]aycelcus, 2005-04-22 01:39 am UTC
Re: *sings* - [info]aycelcus, 2005-04-22 01:40 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-04-22 01:59 am UTC (link)
Wow. That is awful and splendid all at once.

It's like Clearedtruth just can't grasp this simple concept: just because one person can write ornate prose and have it work, doesn't mean you can. Just because it's pretty doesn't mean it doesn't still have to be utile.

Plus, I might add that I think the word "elegent" is currently shuddering in a ball, in the shower, because it can't get rid of the dirty feeling of being applied to that trash. Am I the only one who thought part of being elegent was knowing when it was appropriate to wax poetic, and when to to use clear, concise language?

--sarolynne on LJ

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]dang, 2005-04-22 02:58 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 04:59 am UTC

[info]darkvalkyrie
2005-04-22 02:15 am UTC (link)
Aaaand [info]zinthos wins the post:

My apellation is Merriam-Webster Third Edition. You murdered my predecessor. Anticipate expiration.

Hee!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-23 11:00 pm UTC
Your mom connects the dots!!111
(Anonymous)
2005-04-22 03:19 am UTC (link)
I come with icon gifts~ Mwah <3

Image

-Some kind of mouse

(Reply to this)


[info]lukita
2005-04-22 03:28 am UTC (link)
hey... clearedtruth is deleting her posts, anyone has it archived?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]herongale, 2005-04-22 03:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dhaunea, 2005-04-22 03:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lukita, 2005-04-22 03:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]herongale, 2005-04-22 04:05 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 04:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]naienko, 2005-04-22 04:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2005-04-22 05:37 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 10:46 pm UTC

[info]crysiana
2005-04-22 03:29 am UTC (link)
She's bahleeting as I read it! *cries*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

off topic - [info]ororo, 2005-04-23 12:27 am UTC

[info]dhaunea
2005-04-22 03:33 am UTC (link)
AUGH! I always arrive after the deletions begin! Noooooo.

P.S. I loathe Nabakov and I find it hysterical that she's claiming he's wonderful to back herself up when, frankly, it's entirely a matter of personal taste.

Just because a large number of people say someone is wonderful at what they do doesn't mean it's true. Just look at Bush.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]singe, 2005-04-22 04:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dhaunea, 2005-04-22 04:09 am UTC

(Deleted post)
Re: Ditto on the loathing. - [info]dhaunea, 2005-04-22 04:20 am UTC
You are putting very ugly images in my mind. - (Anonymous), 2005-04-22 06:16 am UTC
Re: You are putting very ugly images in my mind. - [info]dhaunea, 2005-04-22 06:21 am UTC

[info]ueuecoyotl
2005-04-22 03:47 am UTC (link)
Bah, it was deleted as I was reading.

I really like how she used anime-type emoticons in her arguments, all the while singing praises of a book that is a prime example of sleeze. Classy!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2005-04-23 06:58 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-04-23 11:41 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-04-22 03:52 am UTC (link)
The post has been deleted... a few people were dragged into that didn't ask to be so... Yeahhhhhhhhhh. :\

(Reply to this)



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map