Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



scotch ([info]scotch) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2005-05-02 18:58:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:*sporfle!*
Entry tags:karthur strikes again!, sockpuppets

Hey Cassie, want some cheese with that whine?
The wantastic Ms. Claire has posted that OMFG! People don't know she has updated her stories!!!111

Continue on down the self-wank and you'll learn that her book is "due" in October.
Anyone want to take bets on this shit being published by a vanity press?

Anyway, there's wank of the pet-friend variety in the comments:

1. Mouse who says "these people aren't true fans"

2. Another mouse asks, "will your Original Fiction be as popular as your fanfic?"

3. Huge discussion throughout the FIVE PAGES of comments discussing chapter size. Have fun wading through it.

4. Don't take it away! I know you're mad!

Aww...fuck me. That's enough to get you started. This is Cassie, afterall. She just brings the wank.


Every time I go to my schnoogle review boards or check my email, I find to my frustration that there are a zillion people who have no idea that DV15 part two ever came out and are complaining that I have not updated since last November. Now granted I don't update all that often, and I understand and accept being yelled at for being a lazy b****. But it makes me feel bad as in the cases of the reviewers, I have no way to let them know that the second half of the chapter was posted months ago. My guess is they are just checking my author frontpage, not seeing anything visibly new, and scarpering off in high dudgeon.

I have been considering finishing out the rest of DV in short chapters. It would let me update more often and I wouldn't be losing people through the cracks, so to speak. The downside would be that each chapter would be less satisfying as a whole, because it would by necessity be shorter, move things along less, and address less plot threads. But I hope that would be mitigated for readers by the fact that the next bit would be along sooner.

I am finding I am needing to adjust the time I can give to fanfic in various careful ways since my original fiction book is due in October. (Every time I tell anyone in RL this they make this little gasping noise and then say uncovincingly "I'm sure you can get it done!" Then they edge away.) I really do want to finish DV and this seemed to me to be a possible solution as the pressure to finish a shorter chapter more often is less overwhelming than the pressure to finish one of those 65k word chapters I usually put out.

(It's not a question of "rushing", either way. I write DV in chronological order - I would be writing at exactly the same rate, it's just a question of cutting longer chapters into shorter segments, or not.)




Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]cesare
2005-05-03 02:39 am UTC (link)
" Cassie's Post in case the bitch locks it "

How unbecoming. Grudge wanks are so '03.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]dakotapratt, 2005-05-03 03:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]marlo, 2005-05-03 04:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]luckdragonfujur, 2005-05-03 06:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tocada, 2005-05-05 05:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]luckdragonfujur, 2005-05-06 04:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tocada, 2005-05-10 02:38 am UTC
Oh hell, I'll talk about the wank. - [info]tocada, 2005-05-05 05:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]platypus, 2005-05-03 10:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]narcissam, 2005-05-03 04:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]missambs, 2005-05-04 12:37 am UTC

[info]dreamtoday
2005-05-03 02:39 am UTC (link)
nice heap of grudge wank you're bringing to the table here.

(Reply to this)


[info]herongale
2005-05-03 02:42 am UTC (link)
I'd have to say, there's no real wank here. Sorry.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]notjo, 2005-05-03 05:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-05-03 02:08 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-05-03 02:43 am UTC (link)
I love the fangirls and their response to Cassie's crybaby crap.

Bring it on, Baby.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]platypus, 2005-05-03 10:26 am UTC

[info]ignatius
2005-05-03 02:44 am UTC (link)
Cassie's Post in case the bitch locks it

Wow. I know we have a reputation as shit-slinging cunts, but you don't have to play that up for everyone. Just posting the grudge-wank-of-no-substance would have been enough.


(Reply to this)


[info]tangentialone
2005-05-03 02:47 am UTC (link)
So... she's frustrated that people are complaining that she hasn't updated yet when, in fact, she has updated.

...Almost as bad as all those people who post in fanficrants about readers who ask when the next part of a fic that's already finished is going to be posted.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]the_clansmen, 2005-05-03 05:34 am UTC

[info]iris
2005-05-03 02:51 am UTC (link)
...I was hoping for real wank.

Bored now. :(

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]dakotapratt, 2005-05-03 03:28 am UTC

[info]theamazingrando
2005-05-03 02:57 am UTC (link)
In fairness, her book deal is legit with a real publisher and everything. There was a post about it in fandom_lounge... anyway, all I remember is that she was signed on to write a three book YA fantasy series.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-05-03 03:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]theamazingrando, 2005-05-03 03:06 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-05-03 03:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2005-05-03 03:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dakotapratt, 2005-05-03 03:29 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-05-03 05:35 am UTC
Upstart? - (Anonymous), 2005-05-03 05:39 am UTC
Re: Upstart? - (Anonymous), 2005-05-03 06:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]platedlizard, 2005-05-03 06:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]platypus, 2005-05-03 10:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]platedlizard, 2005-05-03 10:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]platypus, 2005-05-03 10:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dakotapratt, 2005-05-04 12:42 am UTC
(no subject) - ealusaid, 2005-05-04 06:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2005-05-04 09:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]diane_duane, 2005-05-03 12:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kadath, 2005-05-03 04:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]diane_duane, 2005-05-03 07:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dakotapratt, 2005-05-03 05:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]diane_duane, 2005-05-03 07:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]loony666, 2005-05-04 06:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]diane_duane, 2005-05-04 10:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vasaris, 2005-05-04 07:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]diane_duane, 2005-05-04 08:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-05-03 03:36 am UTC
does not compute
(Anonymous)
2005-05-03 02:58 am UTC (link)
Totally outside of anything at all here in the Big Grudge Wank, does anyone really know if it's a legit publisher or a vanity press or a POD publisher that CC is touting she has a deadline for? I mean, I believe I remember her saying she had an agent, but an agent doesn't equal a paying book deal, and she's been really vague about the details publicly, which (for the Very Public Cassie) doesn't really compute.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: does not compute - [info]dakotapratt, 2005-05-03 03:31 am UTC
Re: does not compute - (Anonymous), 2005-05-03 05:37 am UTC
Re: does not compute - [info]sockonhand, 2005-05-03 07:30 am UTC

[info]eljuno
2005-05-03 03:00 am UTC (link)
And we have Fandom_Wank in five...fou...

Oh. Right.

This wank displeases me. Bring forth another!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]dwarfjen, 2005-05-03 03:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]notjo, 2005-05-03 05:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]plazmah, 2005-05-03 05:57 am UTC

[info]wankprophet
2005-05-03 03:02 am UTC (link)
The fuck?

Oh well, as long as we're here, might as well mock:

[info]scotch? Let's discuss nuance. Did you ever see one of those nature shows where a guy in a cage goes down to film the sharks? There are some basic things you have to do. Get a wetsuit, a couple oxygen tanks, scuba apparatus, camera (waterproofed) and a ship with a winch set-up to raise and lower the cage.

Nuance is knowing that it all works better if you're inside the cage. Follow? Cause right now, you're looking kinda tasty.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2005-05-03 04:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankprophet, 2005-05-03 07:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fandom_bitch, 2005-05-03 05:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankprophet, 2005-05-03 07:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fatesarchitect, 2005-05-04 01:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vampychick, 2005-05-03 10:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]stopthatgirl7, 2005-05-03 03:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2005-05-03 05:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fuzzytowers, 2005-05-04 12:14 am UTC

[info]ladybirdsleeps
2005-05-03 03:05 am UTC (link)
Kee-rist. Writing about your projects in your own journal isn't wanky. That's quite an impressive hate-on you've got there.

(Reply to this)


[info]adora_spintriae
2005-05-03 03:11 am UTC (link)
Mummy, where's the wank?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2005-05-03 04:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]notjo, 2005-05-03 05:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nostalgia, 2005-05-03 10:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dakotapratt, 2005-05-03 04:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]slippery_fish, 2005-05-03 10:24 pm UTC

[info]jaina
2005-05-03 03:18 am UTC (link)
Dude, what's with the CC loathing? Keep this sort of thing in your own journal, plz. We like to save Cassie for when she's *actually* wanky.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2005-05-03 04:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ignatius, 2005-05-03 06:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]platypus, 2005-05-03 10:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-05-03 02:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dakotapratt, 2005-05-03 04:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-05-03 04:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]platypus, 2005-05-03 07:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-05-03 07:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dakotapratt, 2005-05-04 12:44 am UTC
(no subject) - ealusaid, 2005-05-04 06:27 am UTC

[info]xero_sky
2005-05-03 03:20 am UTC (link)
I don't really understand her logic (if her updates aren't getting through now, why would more frequent ones get through? Law of averages?), but this isn't even close to wanky.

Damned tease.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2005-05-03 03:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]xero_sky, 2005-05-03 07:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2005-05-03 08:52 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-05-03 03:20 am UTC (link)
I'm not really seeing any wank here - at least not from CC.

(Reply to this)


[info]borus_redrum
2005-05-03 03:20 am UTC (link)
As much as I dislike CC and her fen, this isn't wank.
Next?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kannaophelia, 2005-05-03 05:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]goodrobotsdance, 2005-05-04 06:06 am UTC

[info]monkeywrench
2005-05-03 03:30 am UTC (link)
She's had her wanky moments. This is not one of them. And it's not a vanity publisher.

(Reply to this)


[info]frau_eva
2005-05-03 03:32 am UTC (link)
Don't really like CC, but...if I had updated recently and people were bitching me out for being lazy, I'd be miffed too.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]monkeywrench, 2005-05-03 03:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]livii, 2005-05-03 03:55 am UTC
It is wise and terrible. - [info]loki, 2005-05-03 05:58 am UTC
Re: It is wise and terrible. - [info]rowan, 2005-05-03 09:04 am UTC
Re: It is wise and terrible. - [info]loki, 2005-05-03 04:25 pm UTC

[info]backfromspace
2005-05-03 03:49 am UTC (link)
What they said.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2005-05-03 05:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]backfromspace, 2005-05-04 02:13 am UTC

[info]pesky
2005-05-03 03:50 am UTC (link)
I don't know whether to label this grudgewank or cockteasewank, but either way you've left me unfulfilled.

(Reply to this)


[info]sarracenia
2005-05-03 03:50 am UTC (link)
I'll admit I think she's an idiot for editing her last chapter with the second half rather than posting it as a new chapter, but if it's wanky to post complain about your fanfics in your lj, f_w would be overwhelmed with wank posts. And I would be very bored. And of course, my boredom is the only thing that matters.

(Reply to this)


[info]sorchar
2005-05-03 03:52 am UTC (link)
Just because Cassie's involved doesn't make it wank. This does, however, reeeeek of grudge.

(Reply to this)


[info]livii
2005-05-03 03:54 am UTC (link)
Worst post ever.

Well, maybe not, but holy crap, grudge wank and unsubstantiated claims about her publishing deal! (Which like posters above, I believe is legit enough).

No love for Cassie from this front, but c'mon. On the other, hand, never a better time for this icon.

(Reply to this)


[info]didodiva
2005-05-03 03:56 am UTC (link)
Ah, for once I can make my "This isn't that wanky" gripe and not be the only one of that opinion. Honestly, what's so wanky about her being frustrated that people that her fans don't know about her updates and bitch at her? I'd think any author of a popular series would do the same.

And why the Vanity Fair slight? I don't love the girl and I hated The Trilogy That Never Ends, but if I found her books in the stores I'd be willing to give it a shot and judge it on its own merits. (Damn, I sound like such a little ninny!)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]wankprophet, 2005-05-03 03:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2005-05-03 04:02 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-05-03 04:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2005-05-03 06:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bitca, 2005-05-03 05:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caribbeanblue, 2005-05-03 08:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - ealusaid, 2005-05-04 06:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ironymaiden, 2005-05-03 04:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2005-05-03 05:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fuzzytowers, 2005-05-04 12:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ethelbert, 2005-05-04 01:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2005-05-04 06:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lexin, 2005-05-04 12:23 am UTC


Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map