Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Tangle of Toy ([info]funkyhelix) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2005-05-05 10:06:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Attracting the best to the bug light...

Over on Mock the Stupid, TrollPrincess makes a post about a stupid review she received on a fanfic. Mockage ensues and all is beautiful in we're better than you land. Then along come the husband and wife team of oag and mrs. oaglizzielove with the tried and true fanfic is stealing and ficcers are lazy and pathetic. They also throw in the new twist that the only thing worse than a ficcer, is someone who reviews fic.

Small, but tasty.



(Post a new comment)


[info]phosfate
2005-05-05 05:08 pm UTC (link)
"Umm... Well, it was a great story idea, but I have a few suggestions that you should follow. First of all, it seems like you aren't very familiar with literature in general; you see, stories are supposed to be written in PAST tense only. No exceptions."

Awesome. Just awesome. I want to give them fruit and a Wal-Mart gift card.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]cleolinda
2005-05-05 05:30 pm UTC (link)
Oh my God nuh uh. Someone did not actually say that.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]senor_pinata, 2005-05-05 05:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2005-05-05 06:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]senor_pinata, 2005-05-05 06:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tekenduis, 2005-05-05 07:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2005-05-06 01:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cjk, 2005-05-05 05:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2005-05-05 05:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2005-05-05 06:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2005-05-05 06:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2005-05-05 06:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2005-05-05 06:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2005-05-05 06:56 pm UTC

[info]geekmagirl
2005-05-05 06:02 pm UTC (link)
I...I...


Just...


No.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]iris
2005-05-05 06:28 pm UTC (link)
...well, guess I'd better hand in my membership card to the Good Writer's Union. How much is the fine for writing in present tense these days?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]etcetera_cat, 2005-05-05 06:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cat_mcdougall, 2005-05-05 09:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]skarrow, 2005-05-05 07:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nekoneko, 2005-05-05 08:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]skarrow, 2005-05-05 10:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nekoneko, 2005-05-05 10:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]skarrow, 2005-05-05 10:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sesana, 2005-05-06 07:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2005-05-05 08:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]back_button, 2005-05-05 08:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]threegoldfish, 2005-05-05 08:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]starfish, 2005-05-06 06:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tyraarane_, 2005-05-05 09:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cat_mcdougall, 2005-05-05 09:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jyuu, 2005-05-05 09:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]skarrow, 2005-05-05 10:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jyuu, 2005-05-05 11:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kissee, 2005-05-05 09:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dark_puck, 2005-05-05 10:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2005-05-05 11:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]loonylupinlover, 2005-05-05 11:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kalicephirot, 2005-05-05 11:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]skarrow, 2005-05-06 01:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jedilora, 2005-05-06 12:05 am UTC
A bandwagon!!! Wheeee!!! - [info]xero_sky, 2005-05-06 12:26 am UTC
Re: A bandwagon!!! Wheeee!!! - [info]skarrow, 2005-05-06 03:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hayashi, 2005-05-06 12:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2005-05-06 01:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]slackerbitch, 2005-05-06 02:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]loki, 2005-05-06 02:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]baskinglizard, 2005-05-06 03:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vanilla_tiger, 2005-05-06 04:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]slackerbitch, 2005-05-06 09:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]plazmah, 2005-05-06 05:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dementoid, 2005-05-06 06:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]skarrow, 2005-05-06 06:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lurker32, 2005-05-06 08:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]skarrow, 2005-05-06 08:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lurker32, 2005-05-06 08:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankismyfandom, 2005-05-06 09:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]skarrow, 2005-05-06 09:33 am UTC
(no subject) - nakannimi, 2005-05-06 08:45 pm UTC
Thanks! - [info]wankismyfandom, 2005-05-08 09:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]adora_spintriae, 2005-05-06 09:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lillyv, 2005-05-06 06:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]adinaj69, 2005-05-06 09:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - chief, 2005-05-07 02:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]skarrow, 2005-05-07 02:28 am UTC
(no subject) - chief, 2005-05-07 03:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]skarrow, 2005-05-08 02:14 am UTC
*salutes* - [info]kymscrazy, 2005-05-08 01:14 am UTC
Re: *salutes* - [info]skarrow, 2005-05-08 02:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]elfy, 2005-05-08 10:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ramlatch, 2005-05-09 12:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ultimate_cin, 2005-05-06 04:05 am UTC
(no subject) - cicer, 2005-05-06 08:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]adora_spintriae, 2005-05-06 09:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lillyv, 2005-05-06 06:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - cicer, 2005-05-06 08:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lillyv, 2005-05-06 06:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - chief, 2005-05-07 02:26 am UTC

[info]marks
2005-05-05 05:57 pm UTC (link)
Write homoerotic fantasies about Snape and Harry Potter for all I care.

Woohoo, this wank officially has everything! :D

The "No exceptions" clause killed me dead.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]gmth, 2005-05-05 06:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]marks, 2005-05-05 06:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]gmth, 2005-05-05 06:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]marks, 2005-05-05 06:17 pm UTC
Non-con twincest? - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2005-05-05 06:44 pm UTC
Re: Non-con twincest? - [info]gmth, 2005-05-05 07:11 pm UTC
Re: Non-con twincest? - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2005-05-05 07:13 pm UTC
Re: Non-con twincest? - [info]goblin, 2005-05-07 03:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]erototoxin, 2005-05-05 07:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]marks, 2005-05-05 07:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]starrysummer, 2005-05-05 08:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]scarah2, 2005-05-06 02:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-05-05 08:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]xeno4eyes, 2005-05-05 09:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-05-05 09:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2005-05-06 02:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-05-07 04:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladysorka, 2005-05-06 08:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-05-07 03:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]xeno4eyes, 2005-05-06 08:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-05-07 09:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2005-05-05 08:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2005-05-05 11:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rolling_my_eyes, 2005-05-05 09:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kalicephirot, 2005-05-06 12:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]marks, 2005-05-06 01:16 am UTC

[info]wolfgangmozart
2005-05-05 06:06 pm UTC (link)
OK. The original reviewer still needs to go back to school or BlissfulIdiotland or wherever h/sh/it came from. But really, isn't the convo between oag and mayhap worth the price of admission?

mayhap: In other news, the pot informed the kettle that it was perverting the pure, original platonic form of cookware for its own debased purposes, and everyone had a good laugh before pouring themselves another cup of tea.

*declares winner*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-05-05 06:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]s8219, 2005-05-06 09:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tehlils, 2005-05-07 05:56 am UTC

[info]thebratqueen
2005-05-05 06:37 pm UTC (link)
Credit to somebody on Trollprincess's LJ for pointing this out, but the guy flaming fanficcers? Is in a cover band.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]smo, 2005-05-05 06:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]thebratqueen, 2005-05-05 06:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2005-05-05 06:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]renata_hpjc, 2005-05-06 04:14 am UTC
(no subject) - nakannimi, 2005-05-06 06:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2005-05-06 01:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - nakannimi, 2005-05-06 08:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2005-05-06 10:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - nakannimi, 2005-05-07 05:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]moonjaguar, 2005-05-05 06:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]xeno4eyes, 2005-05-05 09:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2005-05-05 09:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]marumae, 2005-05-08 12:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-05-05 06:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - redwarrior, 2005-05-05 08:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2005-05-05 08:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-05-05 08:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2005-05-05 08:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2005-05-05 09:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]favyan, 2005-05-06 01:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2005-05-06 03:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hypercubed, 2005-05-05 10:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlebitca, 2005-05-07 07:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nevadafighter, 2005-05-06 12:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ninja_stripper, 2005-05-06 03:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]twocorpses, 2005-05-06 05:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2005-05-06 05:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]twocorpses, 2005-05-06 05:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2005-05-06 05:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cimorene111, 2005-05-05 11:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ultimate_cin, 2005-05-06 04:06 am UTC

[info]smo
2005-05-05 06:37 pm UTC (link)
So it's okay to steal as long as there's no pedophilia? WTF?

First of all, it seems like you aren't very familiar with literature in general; you see, stories are supposed to be written in PAST tense only.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Shakespeare sez: "STFU, n00b."

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]wankprophet, 2005-05-05 07:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2005-05-05 08:17 pm UTC

[info]elektra3
2005-05-05 06:49 pm UTC (link)
Yanno, I'd really like to see what oag thinks of "Lolita." Just sayin'.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]smo, 2005-05-05 06:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankprophet, 2005-05-05 07:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mirabellawotr, 2005-05-05 07:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankprophet, 2005-05-05 07:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]marks, 2005-05-05 07:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2005-05-06 09:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2005-05-06 07:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2005-05-06 09:48 am UTC

[info]funwithrage
2005-05-05 07:38 pm UTC (link)
Note to the public:


In future, arguments of "It's just my opinion and I have a right to my opinion and why are you getting so upset over MY OPINION?" will be met with the statement that, in *my* opinion, your mother spreads for Rhesus monkeys and you're one of the results. And that's just my opinion. Which I have a right to. And you shouldn't be getting upset, because it's just my opinion.

(Reply to this)


redwarrior
2005-05-05 08:02 pm UTC (link)
Writing is not writing. Hence the difference between say William Faulkner and Anne Rice.

...Which is difffernt, how?

Not a fan of William Faulkner

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]smo, 2005-05-05 08:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ravenclaw_devi, 2005-05-05 08:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]braidedbaka, 2005-05-06 12:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2005-05-10 06:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]were_lemur, 2011-04-19 09:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2005-05-05 08:33 pm UTC

[info]loopywafflehead
2005-05-05 08:36 pm UTC (link)
I'm willing to bet large quantities of porn and cash that oag is The Shaking Heads - the person/people who were writing songs for the Fanfic Savvy people, about how HP fanficcers are all underage slashers (whatever an underage slasher is). The language and fixation on peodophilia sounds very similar, but then again these types all sounds the same after a while.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]gorogoro, 2005-05-05 09:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2005-05-05 10:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]gorogoro, 2005-05-06 01:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cheshireempress, 2005-05-05 10:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2005-05-05 11:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2005-05-05 11:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2005-05-06 02:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2005-05-07 03:25 am UTC
(no subject) - ataniell93, 2005-05-10 03:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2005-05-10 03:13 pm UTC

dracothelizard
2005-05-05 08:37 pm UTC (link)
Well, shit. Fanfic writers are pedophiles now? Dammit, there goes my cover.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mael, 2005-05-05 08:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ninja_stripper, 2005-05-06 03:15 am UTC

[info]panthea
2005-05-05 08:46 pm UTC (link)
The couple that wanks together, stays ...spanks together?

(Reply to this)


[info]slothrop
2005-05-05 08:49 pm UTC (link)
You know, for a second there, I thought the Shaking Heads had discovered eljay. Same specious arguments and all.

(Reply to this)


[info]chash
2005-05-05 08:52 pm UTC (link)
I really enjoy this exchange:
"Fanfic is a hobby. A pastime."

"Not when I see people doing little else with their lives."

Dude. You're ON THE INTERNET. Maybe she's talking about one of her close friends, but if not, what is the basis for this? She's only seen someone talk about fanfic in their LJ? I wonder why. Perhaps because LJ is not life. Hmm.

Nah. Couldn't be.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]azhidahaki, 2005-05-06 12:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ninja_stripper, 2005-05-06 03:18 am UTC

[info]zarla
2005-05-05 10:00 pm UTC (link)
Man, this guy can't let go of the whole pedophilia angle.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]smo, 2005-05-05 11:25 pm UTC

[info]iczer6
2005-05-05 11:12 pm UTC (link)
Dear Lord, please send someone to teach the internet what 'plagiarism' means, as well as 'pedophilia'.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]skarrow, 2005-05-06 09:08 am UTC

[info]cimorene111
2005-05-05 11:32 pm UTC (link)
how about this:

[info]azurelunatic: Truly worthwhile fanfic takes the stuff that the source material did badly or skipped over and expands on it and/or does justice to the concept.

(Much of the fanfic out there is not worth the time it takes to read it, especially the stuff that's the author saying, "Hey, wouldn't it be cool if I went to Hogwarts and was friends with Harry Potter? Wow, Harry's hot. I bet he'd kiss me.")


[info]oag: Well that is true. Some published authors can be improved upon. The lame and sick fanfic that I have a problem with are the chan and the Mary Sues you mentioned.

and a bit lower,


[info]luhtarian:Why? Even if you think fanfic is bad writing, why do you think it's stupid to write it?

[info]oag:Because if you are any kind of a writer at all you can come up with your own shit instead of stealing it from someone else.

okay, so, it's stupid to write anything that doesn't come from an original idea, unless the source "can be improved upon".

what's the standard for can-be-improved-ness, here?

(Reply to this)


[info]favyan
2005-05-06 01:34 am UTC (link)
Wait a minute. Writing a Mary sue fanfic in which you omggettogotoHogwartsandmaybeHarrywillkissmeteehee is perverting a children's book, yet getting a symbol from said children's book tattooed on you ASS is good, clean fun? Is that a little bass-ackwards, or is my Earth logic just getting in the way?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]slothrop, 2005-05-06 02:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]favyan, 2005-05-06 03:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]slothrop, 2005-05-06 07:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]xeno4eyes, 2005-05-06 08:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]skarrow, 2005-05-06 09:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mastervex, 2005-05-06 09:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]slackerbitch, 2005-05-06 02:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]favyan, 2005-05-06 03:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2005-05-06 08:21 am UTC
(no subject) - ataniell93, 2005-05-10 02:59 am UTC
oag snarks back in his own LJ
[info]slackerbitch
2005-05-06 02:43 am UTC (link)
The number of tongues stuck out at me leads me to believe that not one of them was older than 16. I actually think most of them were more like 10 or 11, especially the last one who did a sort of "nyah nyah you don't have a job". ... Kids these days.

http://www.livejournal.com/users/oag/59007.html

He's just a fount of maturity, no?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: oag snarks back in his own LJ - [info]trollprincess, 2005-05-06 03:43 am UTC
Re: oag snarks back in his own LJ - [info]luckdragonfujur, 2005-05-06 06:13 am UTC
Re: oag snarks back in his own LJ - [info]trollprincess, 2005-05-06 06:38 am UTC
Re: oag snarks back in his own LJ - [info]luckdragonfujur, 2005-05-06 06:41 am UTC
Re: oag snarks back in his own LJ - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-05-07 04:10 am UTC
Re: oag snarks back in his own LJ - [info]dommichan, 2005-05-06 08:32 pm UTC

[info]necronomist
2005-05-06 08:04 am UTC (link)
...

I hear rumors of Police RPS. Should I send him some, or is it like making "Don't Stand So Close to Me" about Stewart Copeland?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2005-05-06 08:23 am UTC

[info]bekkoko
2005-05-06 10:27 am UTC (link)
Tasty indeed! Thanks for posting such satisfying wank. Now I feel all warm and sploogy inside. ♥

(Reply to this)


[info]mariagoner
2005-05-07 02:56 am UTC (link)
Because it was funny. I like flame wars. I think insult can be an art form. Calling me an asshole isn't very clever because we know that already and it is extremely obvious. However, if someone finds a clever way of saying it and makes me laugh they get props.

Most people take all of this shit, and particularly themselves, waaaayyy too seriously. I've been flamed, taunted and mocked in every way imaginable for not liking fanfic and in the end who gives a fuck whether I like it or not? Apparently my opinion matters a great deal and needs to be addressed at great length since I'm such an important and famous talking head and I voiced my opinion on international tele to billions of people. This entire discussion is so mockworthy I don't even know where to begin. Look at all the wank. It's hilarious.


He's trying so hard to spin this whole wank into something positive that I kind of... well... feel a little bad for him. Personally, I don't think I'd like it if even people I didn't know thought I was pompous, overly-precious, pin-dicked ass of the worst order-- and furthermore, if I gave them seemingly endless fodder for HOLDING that opinion.

But gosh, he's so darn... peppy about the whole ordeal. Wish that, if nothing else, was an attitude more wankers would take. I've met waaay too many people who OMG LIVED IN DEADLY FEAR of ending up here...

(Reply to this)


ataniell93
2005-05-10 01:56 am UTC (link)
This is a big ass grudge wank. Lizzie is mad at some friends of hers that she met when she was pagan and polyamourous--BEFORE she met OAG, supercool!Christian!rocker over the internet, forswore polyamoury, became gloriously monogamous, moved across the country to marry OAG, and decided she hated all slutty people. She got irritated with those friends of hers because even though they had given up polyamoury too, they still wrote porn, and didn't consider themselves prudes, even though one of them had given up casual sex, started wearing modest clothing and thinking about trying to keep kosher. She tried to rope that person into becoming a proud prude with her, but that person writes chan and Malfoycest and still likes bdsm, and thinks she is being very silly, because if she's so damn happy being monogamous and going to church with her husband, why can't she just, like, do that instead of putting other people down who still like the stuff that she used to like? So Lizzie is frustrated.

Meanwhile, cool!Christian!OAG is upset that his wife is friends with a person who writes long loud posts in her journal decrying "concerned parents" who want explicit fic taken down and defending her right to write chan and Malfoycest.

But cool!Christian!OAG and Lizzie, despite the fact that they are supposedly friends with all these people and have known some of them in real life for years, know that if they make asses of themselves in their friends' journals they'll just get banned and emailed and called on the phone and asked what kind of crack they're smoking, so they decide to trash their friends anonymously in Mock the Stupid, where they won't know about it.

Except for the fact that their friends read Fandom Wank.

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map