Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Thorn_Star ([info]thorn_star) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2005-05-13 01:10:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Hypnotized
Current music:Don't Know Why - Norah Jones

Dedicated to the Triskaidekaphobiacs
Some of you may be wondering why non-member/anon commenting is currently switched off on fandom_wank. Less than 10% of fw members have voted in the related poll so far, so this is your chance to have your say, if you don't know what's going on.

There's been a poll about it on fw_debate. Go HERE to vote, or voice your opinion, if you care. Further discussion and/or wanking has been taking place HERE and HERE. Previous discussion HERE.

Comments off on this post. Grab your bathing suits and rubber duckies, and dive into the splooge on the links above, if ya want.

(PSA and wank links in one post. Dun complane!)

ETA: there seems to be some disquiet in fw_debate about my turning comments off on this post. I did it as it was suggested by others as a way of making a PSA on f_w. No other reason. *turns them on to stop the whining*

ETA II:Attack of the Mod

Apparently, I'm now up for BANNING!</b> on fw_debate. (How many days will I get before they decide?) This is the reason why people are reluctant to post PSA's on f_w. Funkyhelix (well-connected) can come in and bully people with her screaming, and get away with it, but an ordinary member can't go with some suggestions made on fw_debate and make a PSA (albeit, with a bit of snark attached. Hey, this is fandom_wank!). I have to say, I'm not surprised backfromspace came up with this since he was the one who wanted to ban me before. There's been some disquiet among the so-called Cabal today. Snacky (the main stirrer), Eljuno and Funkyhelix(all over the place) have been whining about my post here. So, fellow F_Wers, go vote. Just remember, you're voting for more than my banning. You're voting for whether you think ordinary non-in-crowd members should be able to post meta-topics, and engage in some snark at the same time, without getting banned!. Don't forget, I did change my post as people asked. The fact that my post changed the vote for allowing anons from 'no' to 'yes' has especially displeased some people. Your community, you decide.

Final Point: I think it's appropriate to update here as it's related to this post.




Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]wankprophet
2005-05-13 09:06 am UTC (link)
Good little wanker.

::pats::

Now, to correct an error: non-members can post. Just not anonymous ones.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]thorn_star, 2005-05-13 09:15 am UTC

[info]sepiamagpie
2005-05-13 09:12 am UTC (link)
thanks for turning them back on.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]thorn_star, 2005-05-13 09:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2005-05-13 09:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]thorn_star, 2005-05-13 09:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2005-05-13 10:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2005-05-13 10:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2005-05-13 10:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2005-05-13 11:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]naienko, 2005-05-14 06:30 am UTC

[info]funkyhelix
2005-05-13 09:16 am UTC (link)

I think you're a shit stirring troll who's past needing a beating with the ban hammer.

The link to fw_debate is in the userinfo. The community has been mentioned here, and I made a post pointing at the userinfo and comms before the matter came up. If people gave a damn about the community and not having the ability to anonymously troll, they would have joined or watched that community before this. The people who's opinions actually matter, are the ones that actively participate in how this community is run, and they decided about a week ago to put an end to anonymous trolling.

Finding your fun curtailed, you throw this up sans comments hoping to stir up a hornets nest.

Why?

Because you're a whiny bitch troll that should be gone.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]memii, 2005-05-13 09:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]funkyhelix, 2005-05-13 09:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]goblin, 2005-05-13 09:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2005-05-13 09:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]goblin, 2005-05-13 09:57 am UTC
What are you high? - [info]funkyhelix, 2005-05-13 10:01 am UTC
Re: What are you high? - [info]goblin, 2005-05-13 10:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2005-05-13 10:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2005-05-13 10:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2005-05-13 10:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2005-05-13 10:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]backfromspace, 2005-05-13 11:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2005-05-14 12:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ymfaery, 2005-05-14 12:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2005-05-14 12:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ourself, 2005-05-14 10:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2005-05-14 10:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]backfromspace, 2005-05-14 05:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2005-05-14 05:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]backfromspace, 2005-05-14 05:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2005-05-13 10:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2005-05-13 10:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]backfromspace, 2005-05-13 11:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2005-05-13 09:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]memii, 2005-05-13 09:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2005-05-13 11:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gal_montag, 2005-05-13 10:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]esorlehcar, 2005-05-13 06:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]marlo, 2005-05-13 09:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]thorn_star, 2005-05-13 09:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]funkyhelix, 2005-05-13 09:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]thorn_star, 2005-05-13 09:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]funkyhelix, 2005-05-13 09:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]thorn_star, 2005-05-14 05:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]naienko, 2005-05-14 06:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2005-05-15 10:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]workingslacker, 2005-05-13 09:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]goblin, 2005-05-13 09:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]thorn_star, 2005-05-13 09:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]oulangi, 2005-05-13 10:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]goblin, 2005-05-13 10:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]oulangi, 2005-05-13 11:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]omega, 2005-05-13 02:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]oulangi, 2005-05-13 08:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]goblin, 2005-05-13 05:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]oulangi, 2005-05-13 11:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nights_mistress, 2005-05-14 06:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]oulangi, 2005-05-14 06:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nights_mistress, 2005-05-14 07:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]oulangi, 2005-05-14 08:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nights_mistress, 2005-05-14 08:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkwitch666, 2005-05-14 12:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nights_mistress, 2005-05-14 12:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkwitch666, 2005-05-14 12:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cesare, 2005-05-13 11:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]goblin, 2005-05-13 06:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cesare, 2005-05-14 12:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]goblin, 2005-05-14 02:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cesare, 2005-05-14 03:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]goblin, 2005-05-14 03:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]elfy, 2005-05-13 10:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]goblin, 2005-05-13 10:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]elfy, 2005-05-13 11:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlebitca, 2005-05-13 09:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2005-05-13 09:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlebitca, 2005-05-13 10:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2005-05-13 10:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]workingslacker, 2005-05-13 10:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2005-05-13 10:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]workingslacker, 2005-05-13 10:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]herongale, 2005-05-15 11:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]funkyhelix, 2005-05-15 05:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]herongale, 2005-05-15 05:39 pm UTC

[info]crickets
2005-05-13 09:34 am UTC (link)
You forgot to mention the original fw_debate post where the option to turn off anon comments was proposed and discussed.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]thorn_star, 2005-05-13 09:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2005-05-13 09:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2005-05-13 09:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]thorn_star, 2005-05-13 09:50 am UTC

(Deleted post)
Re: Doubleplusungood - [info]memii, 2005-05-13 10:03 am UTC

(Deleted post)
super good! - [info]goblin, 2005-05-13 10:21 am UTC

[info]loki
2005-05-13 09:39 am UTC (link)
I did it as it was suggested by others as a way of making a PSA on f_w.

Right. And who are you again?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2005-05-13 09:48 am UTC
I realize this may be taken out of context, but you're a perfect example. - [info]glomobius, 2005-05-13 04:05 pm UTC

(Deleted post)
Boobies - [info]starzipan, 2005-05-13 11:43 pm UTC
Re: I realize this may be taken out of context, but you're a perfect example. - [info]glomobius, 2005-05-14 12:21 am UTC
Re: I realize this may be taken out of context, but you're a perfect example. - [info]prettyveela, 2005-05-13 06:09 pm UTC
Re: I realize this may be taken out of context, but you're a perfect example. - [info]glomobius, 2005-05-14 12:24 am UTC
... - [info]hugsnkisses, 2005-05-13 07:09 pm UTC
Re: ... - [info]telesilla, 2005-05-13 11:41 pm UTC
Re: ... - [info]glomobius, 2005-05-14 12:33 am UTC

(Deleted post)
Re: ... - [info]glomobius, 2005-05-15 05:39 am UTC
Re: ... - [info]adinaj69, 2005-05-14 02:01 pm UTC
Re: ... - [info]prettyveela, 2005-05-15 03:13 am UTC
Re: I realize this may be taken out of context, but you're a perfect example. - [info]ymfaery, 2005-05-14 01:09 am UTC
Re: I realize this may be taken out of context, but you're a perfect example. - [info]glomobius, 2005-05-14 03:48 am UTC
Re: I realize this may be taken out of context, but you're a perfect example. - [info]loki, 2005-05-14 08:11 am UTC
Re: I realize this may be taken out of context, but you're a perfect example. - [info]darkwitch666, 2005-05-14 12:24 pm UTC
Re: I realize this may be taken out of context, but you're a perfect example. - [info]sahz, 2005-05-15 05:56 pm UTC
Re: I realize this may be taken out of context, but you're a perfect example. - [info]darkwitch666, 2005-05-25 09:19 pm UTC

[info]eljuno
2005-05-13 09:52 am UTC (link)
ETA: there seems to be some disquiet in fw_debate about my turning comments off on this post.

Because it was impossible to self-mod you as a moron when you had the comments off.

I did it as it was suggested by others as a way of making a PSA on f_w.

As previously mentioned, the voices in your head do not count as 'others'. Neither, for that matter, do they give you permission to post a wanky assed pile of crap and attempt to avoid said self-modding.

Don't listen to those voices. They don't really like you. They want you to look dumb.

No other reason. *turns them on to stop the whining*

And aren't you a sweetheart about it?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]herongale, 2005-05-15 11:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2005-05-15 03:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2005-05-15 03:44 pm UTC

[info]cesare
2005-05-13 09:54 am UTC (link)
I did it as it was suggested by others as a way of making a PSA on f_w.

Would you jump off a bridge if it was suggested by others as a way of making a PSA on f_w?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2005-05-13 09:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2005-05-13 10:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2005-05-13 09:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2005-05-13 09:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]esorlehcar, 2005-05-13 06:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankprophet, 2005-05-13 10:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]leto, 2005-05-13 02:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]gweniveeve, 2005-05-13 11:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mmmkay, 2005-05-13 09:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]oulangi, 2005-05-13 10:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mmmkay, 2005-05-13 10:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]thorn_star, 2005-05-14 05:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lurker32, 2005-05-13 05:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - coreopsis, 2005-05-13 06:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]thorn_star, 2005-05-14 05:12 am UTC

[info]bohicamouse
2005-05-13 10:03 am UTC (link)
*obligatory calling out of [info]deoridhe*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]deoridhe, 2005-05-13 03:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bohicamouse, 2005-05-14 01:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]xeno4eyes, 2005-05-14 08:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ymfaery, 2005-05-14 12:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2005-05-14 09:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2005-05-14 11:12 am UTC
**obligatory pastede-on icon** - [info]bubosquared, 2005-05-14 03:17 pm UTC

(Deleted post)
Re: The plural of idiot is wank. - [info]nights_mistress, 2005-05-13 12:06 pm UTC

(Deleted post)
Re: The plural of idiot is wank. - [info]moonjaguar, 2005-05-13 05:34 pm UTC

(Deleted post)
Re: The plural of idiot is wank. - [info]moonjaguar, 2005-05-13 06:32 pm UTC
Re: The plural of idiot is wank. - [info]thorn_star, 2005-05-14 05:50 am UTC
Re: The plural of idiot is wank. - [info]ilpalazzo, 2005-05-14 10:18 am UTC

(Deleted post)
(no subject) - [info]ilpalazzo, 2005-05-14 10:46 am UTC

(Deleted post)
Re: That's...sweet? - [info]ilpalazzo, 2005-05-14 01:55 pm UTC

(Deleted post)
Re: That's...sweet? - [info]moonjaguar, 2005-05-14 08:07 pm UTC

[info]telesilla
2005-05-13 10:14 am UTC (link)
*yawns*

Come back when you're actually witty and/or funny, plzkthx.

(Reply to this)


[info]elfy
2005-05-13 11:14 am UTC (link)
?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]pointsandlaughs, 2005-05-13 01:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]thorn_star, 2005-05-14 05:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]memii, 2005-05-14 05:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mrbimble, 2005-05-14 05:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]thorn_star, 2005-05-14 05:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]elfy, 2005-05-14 07:11 am UTC

[info]xero_sky
2005-05-13 12:26 pm UTC (link)
Some of you may be wondering why non-member/anon commenting is currently switched off on fandom_wank.

And the rest of us have better things to do, like trimming our toenails, lapsing into comas, or continuing the endless search for better porn.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]adora_spintriae, 2005-05-13 01:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]funwithrage, 2005-05-13 05:58 pm UTC
...
[info]adora_spintriae
2005-05-13 01:12 pm UTC (link)
I got nothing...

(Reply to this)


[info]big_bad_wolf
2005-05-13 02:38 pm UTC (link)
So, I was going to skim this post but there were comments, and suddenly all the wank is in-house again. Which is dull.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]thorn_star, 2005-05-14 05:08 am UTC

[info]shoiryu
2005-05-13 03:11 pm UTC (link)
So. You pop up around the same time Phoenix gets banned, you use European idioms like "rubbish" and so on and so forth, and you harp on the exact same issues and troll with the exact same tactics and typing style as Phoenix. You even do the same passive-aggressive "congratulating people who stand up to the mean awful mods" bullshit that Phoenix did.

...So how much longer do you think you're going to be able to pull this off, Phoenix?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2005-05-13 04:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]thorn_star, 2005-05-14 05:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shoiryu, 2005-05-14 05:55 am UTC

[info]phosfate
2005-05-13 04:13 pm UTC (link)
I did it as it was suggested by others as a way of making a PSA on f_w. No other reason.

I can think of a few more suggestions for you.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]thorn_star, 2005-05-14 05:41 am UTC

[info]o_o
2005-05-13 04:43 pm UTC (link)
I'm undecided on your post. On the one hand, it seems more members have noticed the poll. On the other hand, you are an absolute idiot, no question about it. And, on top of that, rude and a coward. There have been posts with comments disabled linking to [info]fw_debate and I seem to recall to other offshoot communities, but nobody with common sense thinks posting wank (or grudgewank as might be your case) with comments disabled is kosher behaviour round these parts.

I'm not going to believe you're Phoenix until I'm provided with actual proof, but I'm thisclose to wanting you banned regardless of whether you're him or not.

If you only come here to pick fights (and I haven't seen you do anything but), could you please go troll somewhere else?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]coffee_mug, 2005-05-13 07:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]oulangi, 2005-05-13 11:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mrbimble, 2005-05-14 05:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]o_o, 2005-05-15 12:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]thorn_star, 2005-05-14 05:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]panthea, 2005-05-18 03:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]thorn_star, 2005-05-14 05:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]o_o, 2005-05-15 12:32 am UTC

[info]sunhawk
2005-05-13 06:34 pm UTC (link)
oh in-house wanking, fantastic XD

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lindentreeisle, 2005-05-13 07:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sunhawk, 2005-05-13 11:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jrs1980, 2005-05-14 12:11 am UTC

[info]ktnb
2005-05-13 08:33 pm UTC (link)
The in-house wanking is not nearly as funny as what a fucking moron you are. *snerk*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]thorn_star, 2005-05-14 05:07 am UTC

[info]aycelcus
2005-05-13 11:35 pm UTC (link)
Fandom Wank: It's Not As Funny When We Eat Our Own.

Is it my imagination or is the in-house wankage becoming a weekly tradition now?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ymfaery, 2005-05-13 11:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aycelcus, 2005-05-13 11:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ymfaery, 2005-05-14 12:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aycelcus, 2005-05-14 12:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]memii, 2005-05-14 04:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aycelcus, 2005-05-14 08:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]memii, 2005-05-14 08:27 am UTC
TAKE IT TO 'wankitywank' YAH DAMN WANKER
[info]hugsnkisses
2005-05-14 06:05 am UTC (link)
.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: TAKE IT TO 'wankitywank' YAH DAMN WANKER - [info]crickets, 2005-05-14 07:22 am UTC

[info]naienko
2005-05-14 06:29 am UTC (link)
You mispelt your title.

PSAs are an inverse of the approximate length of the size of your ego.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]raane, 2005-05-17 10:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]naienko, 2005-05-18 01:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]raane, 2005-05-18 05:13 am UTC

[info]hermiones_hymen
2005-05-14 06:56 am UTC (link)
*YAWN*

Is there nothing going on in HP/LoTR fandoms right now?

Be funny or be gone already.

(Reply to this)


[info]snacky
2005-05-14 08:07 am UTC (link)
There's been some disquiet among the so-called Cabal today. Snacky (the main stirrer)

Dude, I was joking around on my own journal, not in any of the comms. I thought it was clearly a joke, as did most of the people who responded.

Personally, I think you're a troll, but I'm usually happy to ignore you. I voted to ban you because other people can't seem to do the same, and it's ruining my ability to slack off at work by reading JF (and it's all about me, doncha know.)

Change my mind about you, and I'll change my vote. And for the record, no, I'm not convinced you're Phoenix.

(Reply to this)



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map