(Post a new comment)

	nekoneko 2003-06-13 03:15 pm UTC (link)
	It is Stormfreak, I believe. I don't really know much about him/her though, since I'm a pretty much n00b here. (Reply to this)(Thread)

	sajasma 2003-06-13 08:54 pm UTC (link)
	Stormfreak who adored attention, negative or good, and would continuously troll here with her friends, spamming and spamming until everyone got sick of her. Thus, FW has disabled anonymous commenting for that purpose. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: unoriginality 2003-06-13 10:41 pm UTC (link)
	nodnod Ah, okay. ^_^ I saw that an I kinda wondered who on earth would be safe from us like that. XD (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	sagralisse 2003-06-13 10:59 pm UTC (link)
	If you say her name three times, she appears. I count two times on this thread already. ::shudders:: (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	ymfaery 2003-06-14 12:33 am UTC (link)
	And the problem with that is saying her name three more times doesn't make her disappear. I didn't think she was safe per se, but since everyone's tired of her it'll have to be a really extra special wank in order for her to get wanked again. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: unoriginality 2003-06-14 12:47 am UTC (link)
	L A wank of epic proportions? I almost wish she would do something report-worthy. I need a good laugh. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	zannechaos 2003-06-14 02:06 am UTC (link)
	Trust me, you really don't want to get tied up with She-Who-Shall-blahblahblah. She's very wanky, this is true, but her sheer level of outright stupidity is brain-melting. Her "best" comebacks usually involve telling people to suck her (nonexistant) cock. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	jerry_ds_girl 2003-06-14 02:44 am UTC (link)
	Or accusing a community which is probably 90% (or so) female of 'jacking their dicks' over her. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	Re: unoriginality 2003-06-14 03:27 am UTC (link)
	.....BOL Becky: XD (Reply to this)(Parent)

cimorene111
2003-06-14 07:02 am UTC (link)

no, she's really safe. the last tactic we saw from her and her minions was posting giant images in their responses and... what else was there? there was something else. anyway, there was the possibility of it causing difficulty for the lovely

zorrorojo and her servers at slashcity-journalfen, so she delivered a resounding flameto She-Who-Must-Not-Be-Wanked, and then decreed that in order to avoid the possible danger to the servers, and also because we were all getting really bored of her, SF would no longer be wanked, mentioned, baited, responded to, etc etc.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	ymfaery 2003-06-14 07:09 am UTC (link)
	Ah, okay. I wondered about that. Weren't they posting big chunks of text from "Thus Spake Z(something)" also? (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: cimorene111 2003-06-14 10:10 am UTC (link)
	zarathustra? were they really? o.0 well, uh, that doesn't eat bandwidth in particular, that i know of, but i can see how it could be pretty obnoxious. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	ymfaery 2003-06-14 04:00 pm UTC (link)
	I think it depends on how much of the text they were posting at a time, and over how many comments. I think at one point there were around 10 comments in a row filled with text. >.> (Reply to this)(Parent)