Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



hinky ([info]hugsnkisses) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2005-06-01 11:34:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Remember that crazyfun [info]oselle wank not more than a few short days ago? Of course you do, who could forget. (note: if forgetfulness has occured, one short burst of link clicking is your memory loss remedy.)

Well she's back with a vengence after some naughty mouse (seriously kids, don't do it) links her to the FW post. [info]oselle chose not to click the link citing wank as "dull", but does not view it as beneath her to comment heavily on the wanks supposed contents.

Despite [info]esorlehcar chastising the mousie [info]oselle responds with some quite hurtful words:

But I will say that if the entire essay is posted there, even when [info]esorlehcar repeatedly said she wouldn't do so, then she is a liar on top of being a careless reader and a wank-obsessed character asassin. If it was posted by someone else, then they no doubt got the text from her, so she is still a liar. This should not surprise me, since she started off THIS post by saying that she wouldn't provide the link to my LJ -- which she then promptly offered up when asked. This kind of sleazy and dishonest behavior usually leads to people getting wanked, but apparently not when a wanker is doing it. Then it is perfectly acceptable. Would it be wanky of me to suggest that people in fandom should question these contradictions? I suppose it would. [*]


After replying several more times [info]oselle ends her last comment with:

If you want to respond to this so that you can prove to the folks here that you got the last word in, then you go right ahead. But it won't be a real response – I won't read it, just as I won't read one word of whatever is going on at fandom_wank. If I so much as see your name appear in my in-box, I will delete the message without opening it. So I advise you not to waste your time with any sort of response.


But "getting the last word in" is apparently not enough! [info]oselle then makes another post in her LJ and the fun just never stops.

eta: Oh, oops, one slightly mocking comment seems to have dragged me fully into this wank and now I'm fapping away like the best of them. To [info]i_wank slink I, for the appropriate kinky beatings.


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map