Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Her considerable obliquity ([info]gobsmacked) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2005-06-07 14:59:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Return of the psycho stalker

Well, mostly from IMDb
Sorry to spam you but this is too good to overlook. Michael Pardo, aka The Trevor Blumas stalker, has managed to get accounts an IMDb again. It was noted by a regular Trevor Blumas Board poster:
The STALKER is back...
by - rubyslippersgems (Sat Jun 4 2005 17:26:27 )
------------------------------------------------------------------</small>
How many months has it been and not one "he's gay" post!
Then all at once we've got doglover427 ,lip_lock_bag, rogerdriver, and matchs all show up at the same time with the gay posts again.
The nutjob is already writing on his site about the "evidence" he's planting here.
http://img244.echo.cx/img244/490/plant6zq.jpg
He's getting laughed off LJ so I guess he's come crawling back here.
Time to start hitting those abuse buttons again!


Apparently, those buttons have been getting quite a workout since the Trevor Blumas board appears to have gaps in its postings. However, the deletions prove only one think to our crazy-ass stalker:
what do you think it means?
by - doglover427 (Mon Jun 6 2005 06:14:05 )
---------------------------------------------------------------
what does it mean when imdb deletes gay posts and threads. i think it means the guy is gay and somebody's making them do it. so i'm even more sure that trevor's gay now. really really sure. i don't need what they say at imdb for me to know trevor's gay, i just searched the net on trevor's name and his boyfriend hayden christensen's name together and found out all i need. i'm sure trevor's gay now, for sure.

Despite being told by the other that he is an idiot and has no life, this truly creepy Bugfuck Crazee keeps on plugging away on the Hayden Christensen boards as well:
Re: Gay i think not. Be all over the news!!!
by - doglover427 (Mon Jun 6 2005 06:17:58 )
----------------------------------------------------------------
i'm sure hayden's gay and his boyfriend is trevor. or else they wouldn't be removing threads about them being gay and saying such bad things about gay people. i don't listen to what fan girls say, i just searched the net with trevor's name and hayden's name together and found out what i needed to know. i don't care what anyone else says, i'm sure hayden is gay and trevor is gay and they know each other well and are boyfriends. that's just my opinion.

Re: We don't listen to what a fan boi says
by - rubyslippersgems (Mon Jun 6 2005 10:08:38 )
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Doglover427 is the crazy stalker who's obsessed with Hayden and Trevor.
IMDB has banned him from spaming links to his website so he thinks if he tells people what to put in the search engine they will still be led to his site.
Wow Michael that just went over everyone heads! No one could figure that out! You're so clever.
Oh, btw do a search of Trevor blumas and stalker or Hayden Christensen/Stalker and see what comes up!
Or search google groups for Michael Pardo if you want to read a whole life time of crazy.

Or search google groups for Michael Pardo if you want to read a whole life time of crazy. What a good idea!:
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
From: "Monty Butterfield @ Radio Free Vermont 96.5 FM" <r...@sover.net>
Date: 1999/08/05
Subject: Re: Bill Cooper- Two Households?
***The following is posted by request of William Cooper***
Michael is Michael Pardo an atheist homosexual who runs a website called
Universal Way. He is a mental case. I forced his discharge from the Second Continental Army on mental incompatability grounds. Needless to say he hates my guts.
I do not smoke... anything.
Michael Pardo is a liar.... and he sucks, literally.
[post snipped for relevance]

Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
From: "Michael" <iam...@erols.com>
Date: 1999/08/05
Subject: Re: Bill Cooper- Two Households? - Pardo (mental case) responds to accusations by Cooper (homophobe & circumcision supporter)
[post snipped for relevance; to read the rest, click]

There's more, including this thread in which a guy called Michael Kelleher makes his appearance, along with his gf Shawna. However, I doubt that this is our own beloved MsA, since she says she lives in Tampa and asserts that her bf is most assuredly not gay! I'm off on a crazy hunt!

(Post a new comment)


[info]hugsnkisses
2005-06-07 10:49 pm UTC (link)
Hey, would you mind removing the purple tag off the text, at least for the ones that are outside the cut?

It looks cheap, it's distracting and it really clashes with your recent red-text post which I also have a problem with.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]gobsmacked
2005-06-07 10:54 pm UTC (link)
I've already done so. I went to purple because you expressed a dislike for the red. I find your comments a bit OTT about this. The use of colour is a matter of taste and also how "distracting" it is depends upon a lot of factors. I used to work soemwhere where the daily schedule was done in colour. Out of a large group of people, only two objected violently. We removed the colour. Then people claimed they couldn't read the text!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]hugsnkisses
2005-06-07 11:03 pm UTC (link)
Thanks for removing the colouring.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]threegoldfish
2005-06-07 11:04 pm UTC (link)
I'm all for scheduling in colors - makes days and groupings easier. But wank posts? Classic black and white is easiest to read.

YMMV

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]gobsmacked
2005-06-07 11:09 pm UTC (link)
Classic black and white is easiest to read
I actually find it much harder if the post is at all long, unless I print them out - and that can kill a lot of trees! I think the b&w vs colour problem on f_w has something to do with it being on a monitor, but that's just my personal theory.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]shoiryu
2005-06-07 11:12 pm UTC (link)
Eh, I agree with [info]threegoldfish. It's wank. Just throw it on up there without tabs or special colors or spacing. We'll figure it out okay, don't worry. We manage somehow with every other post here. ^_~

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]threegoldfish
2005-06-07 11:16 pm UTC (link)
You like me! You really like me!

*clings*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]shoiryu
2005-06-07 11:19 pm UTC (link)
:D I DO! LET'S BE BESTEST FRIENDS!!!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]threegoldfish
2005-06-07 11:24 pm UTC (link)
AND HAVE SLEEPOVERS AND DO EACH OTHER'S HAIR AND TALK ABOUT BOYS! omg!!!11

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]gobsmacked
2005-06-07 11:25 pm UTC (link)
Just throw it on up there without tabs or special colors or spacing
The mere thought is painful >< *reels and staggers* I format text (in colour, mostly) for a living right now and have become a bit compulsive about the way things look. I have standards! [/joke]

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]shoiryu
2005-06-08 02:44 am UTC (link)
*L* Okay, well, I'm a systems administrator at the moment and I'm not trying to reformat your computer or check your network connection. Mostly because, um, I'm not at work.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]elfy
2005-06-08 09:03 am UTC (link)
i love you, shoi.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]gobsmacked
2005-06-08 07:11 pm UTC (link)
I'm not trying to reformat your computer or check your network connection
No one checks *my* network connection without at least dinner and drinks first;-)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]goblin
2005-06-08 04:43 am UTC (link)
I demand not only colored text, but also sparklies! Dooo eeeeet!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]elfy
2005-06-08 09:04 am UTC (link)
people say that, but i know, i always know...
they always end up regretting it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]gobsmacked
2005-06-08 06:16 pm UTC (link)
Tell me how you get the sparklies, pls.! The codes I have tried don't work for me.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]pyratejenni
2005-06-09 01:55 am UTC (link)
Use this:
font style="background:url(http://miko.magical-art.com/sparkle.gif)">

With the obligatory less-than arrow in front, your text to sparklified after the greater-than arrow, and </font> to round it out.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]backfromspace
2005-06-10 12:56 am UTC (link)
don't encourage her

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]smit
2005-06-09 04:14 am UTC (link)
Bad Elfy. I think you want spankings too.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]elfy
2005-06-09 04:55 am UTC (link)
...who me? *HALO*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]eljuno
2005-06-09 07:20 am UTC (link)
Now you're just indulging her.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]smit
2005-06-09 12:20 pm UTC (link)
You are just jealous. :D

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]threegoldfish
2005-06-07 11:15 pm UTC (link)
That's why I turn the brightness/contrast/whatever down so that my bright whites are actually pale greys. Makes a big difference.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]altoidsaddict
2005-06-08 03:35 am UTC (link)
Purple isn't a color. And amethyst has an unpleasant association with gemstones.

*g*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]coffee_mug
2005-06-08 01:36 pm UTC (link)
It's true, the wanker said so!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]miome
2005-06-08 03:41 am UTC (link)
Just to chime in a second ...

On a regular webpage colored text is perfectly ok. But on LiveJournal based systems, people are going to be reading your entry on their own friends pages. Some of them may have brown backgrounds, red, purple, what have you. It's really difficult to find a color that will look good and show up on all of them, plus they've already gone to the trouble of picking out background and text colors that they like.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]gobsmacked
2005-06-08 07:13 pm UTC (link)
Some of them may have brown backgrounds, red, purple, what have you. It's really difficult to find a color that will look good and show up on all of them
I'm not disagreeing but I'd have to say that this is true of just about any colour combination. My personal peeve is white or grey text on very dark backgrounds because my crappy ancient home printer goes apeshit and gives me either plain white or all-black pages.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]miome
2005-06-08 07:39 pm UTC (link)
The thing is, you don't have to pick a color. If you just type, the text will be whatever color the user chose for their friends list. Whenever you colorize the text (and I assume you're using <font color=red>colored text here</font> or something similar) you override their choice, and that becomes problematic.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]shoiryu
2005-06-07 10:50 pm UTC (link)
I, um. I really don't want to be wanky, but I'm kinda seconding Hinky, here. The multicolored text is really annoying.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]shoiryu
2005-06-07 10:53 pm UTC (link)
:D Thanks!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]isobelsomething
2005-06-08 04:54 am UTC (link)
Is that from Metal Gear Solid?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]isobelsomething
2005-06-08 04:55 am UTC (link)
That = your icon.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]shoiryu
2005-06-08 06:49 am UTC (link)
Sure is! Mei Ling the savegame girl. :D MGS is my big fandom at the moment.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]coffee_mug
2005-06-08 12:12 am UTC (link)
Colouring aside, this guy is truly kind of scary.

(Reply to this)


[info]plazmah
2005-06-08 12:42 am UTC (link)
Besides the crazy, I can't take someone who doesn't capitalize seriously.

But really... THE CRAZY IS STRONG WITH THIS ONE.

(Reply to this)


[info]daromaius
2005-06-08 01:33 am UTC (link)
Of course Hayden is gay, and I am compleeetely fine with this. It means I have a chance.

(Reply to this)


[info]khym_chanur
2005-06-08 02:23 am UTC (link)
So, is this the dude who thinks that being a closeted gay actor is somehow causing a gay holocaust, or something? Or was that someone else?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]gobsmacked
2005-06-08 07:10 pm UTC (link)
Yes, this is he. The old google groups postings lead to sections of his website not previously explored such as the mind-bogglingly long pages on alien life, The Truth About Circumcision, More Truths About Circumcision and The Nature of Sex and Sexuality, which contains the following *fascinating* observations:
The next conclusion along this logic path might be "all children are born gay." There appears to be some double-meaning to that conclusion, when people look closely at children. If children cannot reproduce, and if the definition of children is the brothers and sisters in the human species who simply cannot yet make children, then if children cannot possibly make other children, what practical use could they have for heterosexuality?....
Furthermore, a study of the structural facial characteristics of children, when compared with the structural facial characteristics of homosexual and bisexual people, will result in the observation of a discernible pattern of similar innocence, happiness, and childishness, distinctly different from the hateful predatory structural facial characteristics that can easily be observed on the faces of active, aggressive, self-indulgent heterosexuals. The difference in this matter is the difference between a caring, knowing smile, and a selfish, ignorant sneer.
That little boys and little girls are so often so happy and gay until they reach the age where they obtain the ability to reproduce (which no longer makes them children but "young adults" instead), is an oft-spoken observation; often unspoken is the observation that the condition of the gay youth of children is similar to the stereotype of the condition of homosexuals by society, and this is a condition which should be considered normal for children. Thus, it would appear that anyone who interferes with the ability of children to understand their true nature is committing some form of child abuse upon those children.
And now I feel a selfish ignorant sneer coming on, so I'd better go and check on my co-worker, who was said he needed the printer unjammed.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]shadownlite
2005-06-09 05:06 am UTC (link)
That ramble of his has "loves the kids" overtones with all the talk of "innocent, childlike, facial structure". Pretty icky is this stalker.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]gobsmacked
2005-06-09 10:07 pm UTC (link)
Pretty icky is this stalker
He does come across as a borderline pedophile, yet he spends virtually half of his website asserting that any form of sexual activity which does not involve children or the potential production of children is good. It makes me a bit suspicious.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ultimate_cin
2005-06-08 04:26 am UTC (link)
Hmmmm.....maybe his posts are being deleted because....*gasp* he's fucking batshit!

Just a theory, mind you...

(Reply to this)


[info]girllyzilla
2005-06-08 11:31 am UTC (link)
Hey! I'm rubyslippersgems at IMDB.
I feel sort of e-famous....ok that's sad I know ;)

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]gobsmacked
2005-06-08 06:58 pm UTC (link)
First garnetmist and now you. It's like old home week. Welcome IMDb-ers!

BTW, I created an IMDb account very recently in order to read the threads but make a point of never posting. However, I am quite happen to report abuse. You'll be happy to know that I've already reported the latest incarnation of Mr. Bugfuck Crazy to the IMDb admins. My first "report abuse"! *tears*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]girllyzilla
2005-06-08 10:27 pm UTC (link)
Hey good job! That's where I first ran into the TB stalker was at IMDB. He's back again there today.

If you are ever board and want to look into the mind of metal illness he has an unbelievable amount of posts on the google new groups. They go back 5 years!
I love the one you posted part of where he's arguing with the militia group who kicked him out. How crazy do you have to be when other crazy's think you are too crazy for their crazy club?!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]gobsmacked
2005-06-08 11:21 pm UTC (link)
I answered khym_chanur's comment about him by pointing to other sections of his crazy-ass website previously unknown to me - such as the possibility of alien life, the Truth About Circumscision, More Truths about Circumcision and of course his dissertation on the nature of sexuality.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]shadownlite
2005-06-09 05:04 am UTC (link)
I find it really funny that he was too crazy for the militia people.

*snickers in amusement*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]girllyzilla
2005-06-09 05:15 am UTC (link)
Yeah that is pretty bad. You've got to be really out there for them to kick you out.
The guy who was the head of that militia got turned into swiss cheese by the Feds not too long ago. Pardo was on some boards trying to subtly hint he had something to do with it! Something along the lines of "see what happens to people who cross me"
I doubt he can put his pants on in the morning let alone organize some kind of vengeance hit on some one.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]gobsmacked
2005-06-09 10:08 pm UTC (link)
I doubt he can put his pants on in the morning
Michael Pardo without pants. Now I'm really squicked.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

  
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map