|
|
Lucifer (call me Lucy) (![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} lillyv) wrote in ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/community.gif){kind=small} fandom_wank,@ 2003-06-19 14:37:00 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Yet another first time wanker...
So, the wrestling fandom has seen it coming for two or three years: The unmasking of Glen "Kane" Jacobs. He's worn a mask since beginning the Kane gimmick and has been updating it continuously, showing more and more face. With this being the latest incarnation.
Now, this week an announcement was made on Monday's WWE Raw Zone that next week's main event comes with a stipulation: if Kane loses, he loses his mask. Like I said, most of the fandom has seen it coming.
But some don't like it
Protesting the development of a character and getting 330 people to agree? Is this wank? Or is it just stupid?
So, the wrestling fandom has seen it coming for two or three years: The unmasking of Glen "Kane" Jacobs. He's worn a mask since beginning the Kane gimmick and has been updating it continuously, showing more and more face. With this being the latest incarnation.
Now, this week an announcement was made on Monday's WWE Raw Zone that next week's main event comes with a stipulation: if Kane loses, he loses his mask. Like I said, most of the fandom has seen it coming.
But some don't like it
Protesting the development of a character and getting 330 people to agree? Is this wank? Or is it just stupid?
Post a comment in response:
