(Post a new comment)

	amxjm 2005-06-25 11:24 pm UTC (link)
	Huh, I never realized Zig Zag had actual, you know, character to her. I just figured she was yet another random sex object (albeit a famous one) that seems to prevail in the furrydom. Guess you learn something new every day, no matter how trivial. (Reply to this)

	marumae 2005-06-25 11:30 pm UTC (link)
	...posting a discussion on the muscle tightness of a FICTIONAL character? Well no different then discussing the tightness (or lack there off) on Laurell K Hamilton's Anita Blake or Merry Gentry... (Reply to this)(Thread)

	ruby_tuesday 2005-06-25 11:32 pm UTC (link)
	Well no different then discussing the tightness (or lack there off) on Laurell K Hamilton's Anita Blake or Merry Gentry... Exactly. Both indicate you have waaay too much time on your hands. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	amxjm 2005-06-25 11:47 pm UTC (link)
	Pardon the icon love but, dammit, I really wanna play Para Para Paradise now. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	ruby_tuesday 2005-06-26 12:29 pm UTC (link)
	Hehe! (Reply to this)(Parent)

	dracothelizard 2005-06-26 03:18 am UTC (link)
	I was like, 'oh porn!' and then it was furry porn. I was disappointed, but then there was wank. And apparently martial arts makes your vagina tighter. And I love that they compare furry porn character to the Terminator and Rambo. And why does that unicorn have a lame lion's mane thing? (Reply to this)(Thread)

	greenling 2005-06-26 04:53 am UTC (link)
	I think that's supposed to be a perm or something. (Reply to this)(Parent)

greenling
2005-06-26 04:52 am UTC (link)

Sooooo, deeply discuss a random minor character's personality, pick out all possible permutations of their backstory, create entire psychological profiles of them, and write long papers about it, and you can get an English Lit degree.

Slap a fuzzy tail on the character and you're a sad internet fuck with no life.

Okay!

Or is it "shut up, I like my fap material to be objects and you're ruining the mood"? I can't tell.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

	amxjm 2005-06-26 08:00 am UTC (link)
	A little bit of column A, a little bit of column B. (Reply to this)(Parent)

knightrider
2005-06-26 12:58 pm UTC (link)

Yay, Zig Zag :-)

I was a little worried about this:

She is a fictional porn character. The angsty background story is just a pathetic attempt to explain why a supposedly "smart" woman decided to start doing porn.

Um, fuck this turkey. You find smart women everywhere, including the porn industry. I read a wonderful account once of a woman who danced nude to put herself through law school. Geez, with that kind of experience she'd be pretty formidable in the courtroom.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

	restlesshands 2005-06-26 11:54 pm UTC (link)
	Uh, yeah, I noticed that too and went "BUH?" Cos...ya know...no women LIKE having sex or enjoy their jobs as porn stars. I mean, honestly, I have no clue when it comes to things like that, but it seems to me that stupidity is definitely not a pre-rec for being a porn star. (Reply to this)(Parent)

(Anonymous)
2005-06-27 07:41 pm UTC (link)

Fuck, yes. One of the most intelligent and interesting people I know is Joi Wolfwomyn, who has done quite a bit of erotica both in front and behind the camera, as well as performing live sex-positive demonstrations. Oh, but that dykey-femminawtzzi doesn't count, doesn't she know that all pr0n is supposed to be wank material for dirty old men and teenaged str8bois who live in their parent's basement? Or course.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

	aerobot 2005-06-26 01:53 pm UTC (link)
	So, let's see if I got this right. If a character is sexy and has been in porn, she can never be a complex character and be more than that? My, how cute. eyeroll (Reply to this)

	lots42 2005-06-30 11:37 pm UTC (link)
	Because there's no way a complexe and believable character could ever also be cheesecake. (Reply to this)