Hey, y'all.

Just a few modly announcements.

Some of you may have noticed this by now, but we've been going around notifying people that we're gonna start cracking down on non-work-safe icons. Work safe here is being defined as no exposed genitalia or nipples, or giant curse words. Or overtly sexual situations.

None of that pg, pg-13, nc-17 crap because that is so debatable. Please follow our guidelines. You're allowed to use your nws icons everywhere else on journalfen. Excepting, of course, communities that specifically ban them like us and we'd really appreciate it if you just remember what keyword triggers what when you comment. We don't want to, but we will crack down on you, kay? Thank you.

Second announcement: YOU CAN NOW CONTACT THE MODS (not that you couldn't before, but now you have an email address) so go check out the fandom wank userinfo to get our email as well as finding out Apoplexia's sexual history.

And our final announcement, Hugsnkisses is back. The day right after I finally give up and put her in the missing in action column. Why? Because she sucks.

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

	djcati 2005-07-24 07:24 pm UTC (link)
	What if the rant's already NSFW and says so in the cut? ... has no NSFW icons anyway (Reply to this)(Thread)

wankprophet
2005-07-24 08:09 pm UTC (link)

Just to emphasize, we're talking images, not text. You can say 'fuck' 'cunt' 'dick' 'asshole' whatever as much as you want. Though not in huge fonts or scrolling letters or any other obnoxiously intrusive format.

In any event, if a wank itself is NSFW and the cut warns the reader, then it's fine. The question isn't one of morality, after all, but basic consideration. The person who clicks on a NWS warning cut is pretty much responsible for the consequences.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	telophase 2005-07-24 11:02 pm UTC (link)
	What about grey areas like this icon this icon - is the "fuck" small enough for okayness? I could probably figure it out on my own bt I've got the dregs of a migraine preventing me from doing much thinking at the moment. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	apoplexia 2005-07-24 11:16 pm UTC (link)
	They're both fine. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	clover_elf_kin 2005-07-25 01:32 am UTC (link)
	WHEW! Means I'm good too. -loves little Ed when he's enraged- (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	nights_mistress 2005-07-25 04:51 am UTC (link)
	ICON LOVE! Ahem. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	aerobot 2005-07-25 05:30 pm UTC (link)
	squees over your icon :D (Reply to this)(Parent)

	mister_terrific 2005-07-26 09:17 pm UTC (link)
	Dammit. My daughter would love that icon, but.... (Still trying to figure out wtf it is with teen girls going nutso over Envy...) Mister Terrific Conflicted Father (Reply to this)(Parent)

	Question windex_junkie 2005-07-25 08:03 am UTC (link)
	waves hand madly I vaguely recall the rule as applying to the OPs--IE, no making a post with a NWS icon. (Of course, I am drunk and quite possible retarded.) Am I correct in assuming this new enforcement means no NWS icons ever, even in comments, unless on a NWS wank? (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: Question apoplexia 2005-07-25 08:23 am UTC (link)
	Yes you are. The rule did always apply to comments as well, but was only sporadically enforced. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: Question windex_junkie 2005-07-25 09:29 am UTC (link)
	Duly noted; thanks. (Reply to this)(Parent)

(Read comments) -