Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



hinky ([info]hugsnkisses) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2003-03-17 19:36:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:modsquad

ELIJAH WOOD IS NO WHERE NEAR GAY!! I AM A#HIS BIGGEST FAN AND I KNOW HE ISN'T!!
Just realised (thankfully before re-creating any) that no RPG journals are allowed.


Does this mean the end of our happy sockpuppets?

I can entirely see the reasons behind this, RPG journals take up space and bandwidth and are generally silly.
I am also aware of how busy Zorro is right now.

However, can rules be bent? For instance if money were to be donated to The Cause, would said donater be able to mock their foes (MOCK I SAY!) with amusing puppets?

[Edit:] w00t! Sockpuppets are now allowed, but you only get 2 (max of 3 journals per person requested). I snapped up [info]thesquid in an attempt to get #303 but it eluded me. So whoever owns it on BJ, if you want it again just mail me. :)


Also, since the general consensus is that posting locked entries = bad form, can I ask that if you do post a wank, can you save (just a screenshot or something) of it. This wouldn't have to be displayed publically, but could be made available via email request should the contents of the wank be deleted before some poor souls who live in a completely different time zone miss the whole thing.

I'm sorry I don't have a wank to post. I'm silly like that. Oh, here's some funny posts from the EWIVVG guestbook. From [info]esorlehcar, because I'm lazy, yo.

ps. I actually have some wonderful DL gems from the whole "FWers are Out To Get Us, BEWARE!" which I dug up if anyone wants to see. Or is the horse beaded already?

[Edit2:] I have to go to bed now, but tomorrow shall shine upon a pwetty beaded pony. And a special message regarding FW and it's involvement with DL and all other non-directly-FW things (shocking revelations?!). Because it's all about the meta mixes.



(Post a new comment)


[info]sagralisse
2003-03-17 10:35 pm UTC (link)
::waves hand::

I wanna see DL stuff. I tried to go there to be all stalky and stuff but I got lost.

(Reply to this)


[info]lulinda
2003-03-17 10:48 pm UTC (link)
Oooh! Oooh! I wanna see DL stuff!!!!

(Reply to this)


[info]esorlehcar
2003-03-17 10:59 pm UTC (link)
Post it, I say. We wouldn't want the poor DLers to think this new incarnation of FW loves them any less.

(Reply to this)


[info]oxydosic
2003-03-17 11:11 pm UTC (link)
Ah, EWIVVG's guest book is a neverending source for entertainment.

The funny thing is, while i have mostly been on the fence on the whole Domlijah deal, i have lately been swinging more towards them being (or at least having had been) a couple. I mean i'm never gonna be on the DL wacko level, but i've seen pictures lately that really kind of influence my train of thought on this. I saw one on LJ of some of the cast members all seated around a sofa and Dom and Elijah were seated seperately, pressed up against each other, arms around each other in an embrace. It REALLY looked like a couple pose. It was actually rather lovely.

*goes to hit herself over the head before she starts compiling pics or something*

(Reply to this)(Thread)


wizzard
2003-03-17 11:15 pm UTC (link)
I don't think most fandom_wankers have any problem believing they could be a couple. I think it's probably true too. It's the whole refusal to even consider the alternatives, belief in some vast pr conspiracy to closet them instead of belief that it's their own choice, and life hinging upon the fact that they are a couple that is wankish.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]esorlehcar
2003-03-17 11:27 pm UTC (link)
I think it's unlikely - can't get over Ian McKellen's extended DVD comment - but it's definitely not believing they could be a couple that's insane. It's absolutely possible. It's just the psychotic level of absolute belief based on purely circumstantial evidence, and the use of ever-more-convoluted conspiracy theories to explain away everything that doesn't fit their world view.

I said this in my LJ a few days ago, and I'm repeating it here because I can't be bothered to be original :-):

And honestly? If they are gay and a couple, and hiding it despite desperately wanting to come out because of evil PR people and fear for their careers, I'd think a lot less of both of them. Wanting to keep your private life private I can absolutely understand, and respect. If they're madly in love and out to all their friends and family, but have no desire to become the tabloid story of the month, more power to them. But if they desperately want their fans to know, to the point that they're trolling message boards and sending secret coded messages, but are too chickenshit to come out because of their big bad PR people, they deserve what they're getting. They're adults. They're professionals. If they let handlers control every detail of their lives, if they kiss people they can't stand on their handlers' say so, if they pretend they're not lovers, these are choices they're making. They're not children, and they're not slaves, and they're not being kept in cages and only let out when PR wants them to dance. They can - and do - make their own choices, and if they choose to let PR 'victimize' them, I say again, they deserve what they get.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - wizzard, 2003-03-17 11:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]oxydosic, 2003-03-18 12:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pinkrinse, 2003-03-18 12:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cimorene111, 2003-03-18 01:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]oxydosic, 2003-03-18 12:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pinkrinse, 2003-03-18 12:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]oxydosic, 2003-03-18 12:28 am UTC
Meh! - [info]sagralisse, 2003-03-18 01:16 am UTC
Re: Meh! - [info]oxydosic, 2003-03-18 01:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]anatsuno, 2003-03-18 01:55 am UTC
Re: Meh! - [info]darkrose, 2003-03-18 02:43 am UTC
Re: Meh! - [info]sagralisse, 2003-03-18 04:18 am UTC
frell! - [info]dafnap, 2003-03-18 07:27 am UTC
*hides* - [info]darkrose, 2003-03-18 09:42 am UTC
Re: *hides* - [info]dafnap, 2003-03-18 10:06 am UTC
Re: *hides* - [info]hugsnkisses, 2003-03-18 07:08 pm UTC
Re: Meh! - [info]mirabellawotr, 2003-03-18 02:52 pm UTC
Re: Meh! - [info]diamonde, 2003-03-18 03:45 pm UTC
Re: Meh! - [info]sagralisse, 2003-03-18 06:08 pm UTC
Re: Meh! - [info]diamonde, 2003-03-22 11:37 am UTC
Re: Meh! - [info]darkrose, 2003-03-19 04:30 am UTC
Re: Meh! - [info]diamonde, 2003-03-22 11:48 am UTC
Re: Meh! - [info]ymfaery, 2003-03-19 11:46 pm UTC
Re: Meh! - [info]hugsnkisses, 2003-03-20 12:44 am UTC
Re: Meh! - [info]diamonde, 2003-03-22 11:16 am UTC

[info]oxydosic
2003-03-17 11:55 pm UTC (link)
Oh no, i wasn't implying that the FW people thought all Domlijah people were nuts or anything like that. I fully get it's the extremists they make fun of, hell i make fun of them too.

Actually i made an icon out of the picture mentioned in my above post...i just can't think of something snappy to write on it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]anatsuno, 2003-03-18 12:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]backfromspace, 2003-03-18 12:15 am UTC
(no subject) - wizzard, 2003-03-18 12:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]backfromspace, 2003-03-18 01:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kyuuketsukirui, 2003-03-18 01:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]backfromspace, 2003-03-18 01:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]anatsuno, 2003-03-18 01:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]oxydosic, 2003-03-18 12:46 am UTC
Mwahaha!
[info]sajasma
2003-03-18 05:17 am UTC (link)
Ohhhhh yeeeeah.

Hey, I'm all for Domlijah as it provides infinite amounts of eye-candy.

Er, um. That's all I have to say. That, and as to what everyone else had to say on this...I AGREE!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Mwahaha!
[info]samantha
2003-03-18 11:17 am UTC (link)
Best. Icon. Ever.

I can't stop staring at it.

~Samantha543

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Mwahaha! - [info]sajasma, 2003-03-18 07:20 pm UTC
Re: Mwahaha!
[info]hugsnkisses
2003-03-18 06:41 pm UTC (link)
Oh yes, give us (real) pictures of them making out and we'll happily DIE of happiness OMGITSTRUEDOMLIJAHARETEHGODSOFALL!!!11 accept it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]pinkrinse
2003-03-17 11:26 pm UTC (link)
Same here. My barometer, if pushed, swings more towards the 'they're probably together - qustion is, do they actually WANT these people prying into their lives and analysing their underwear?' school of thought. I know that *I* wouldn't want it, regardless of who I was with, man, woman or elk. (wobbling dangerously close to the 'I know their souls' brigade here - rushes off to stick head in bucket of ice-water...)

(Reply to this)


[info]pinkrinse
2003-03-17 11:31 pm UTC (link)
...like, "Okay, okay, you've sussed us. You can all run along home now and leave us in peace" kind of thing.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]oxydosic
2003-03-17 11:57 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, that's pretty much how i feel.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


dawnjosephine
2003-03-18 12:29 am UTC (link)
*raises hand*
One more vote for the DL beaded horse to be displayed.

(Reply to this)


[info]soy_latte
2003-03-18 12:50 am UTC (link)
Beaded horses are pwetty.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]hugsnkisses
2003-03-18 06:39 pm UTC (link)
*beams* Aren't they?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]pinkrinse
2003-03-18 12:54 am UTC (link)
Could someone please explain to me what a sockpuppet is?

(feels non-existent credibility drain away)

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]backfromspace
2003-03-18 01:05 am UTC (link)
babyjesus is a sock puppet. So is theterrorists, a_dead_horse_, and _hitler_.

That help?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]cimorene111
2003-03-18 01:08 am UTC (link)
a sock puppet! someone else make some more. because i'm really just too lazy.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]the_man, 2003-03-18 03:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pinkrinse, 2003-03-18 01:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_squid, 2003-03-18 02:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]backfromspace, 2003-03-18 02:35 am UTC
OMG! - [info]ymfaery, 2003-03-18 03:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]parakeet_tree, 2003-03-18 05:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hogwarts, 2003-03-18 06:50 pm UTC

[info]the_squid
2003-03-18 02:14 am UTC (link)
But I'm already here! And I have the same Person I did on BJ.

But where oh where is my lovely castle?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]kyuuketsukirui
2003-03-18 03:41 am UTC (link)
*cuddles Squid*

And you just wouldn't be the same Squid we all know and love without her.

Grace

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]hogwarts
2003-03-18 06:49 pm UTC (link)
I'm here, baby.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]the_squid, 2003-03-18 11:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hogwarts, 2003-03-19 12:11 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2003-03-18 07:09 am UTC (link)
Also, since the general consensus is that posting locked entries = bad form, can I ask that if you do post a wank, can you save (just a screenshot or something) of it. This wouldn't have to be displayed publically, but could be made available via email request should the contents of the wank be deleted before some poor souls who live in a completely different time zone miss the whole thing.

so... how is posting a photocopy of the locked entry NOT bad form? do you not understand WHY this is bad form?

angeles

(Reply to this)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2003-03-18 01:42 pm UTC (link)
One, she said email in the portion you quoted. Reading, it's a fun skill, try it.

Two, it was public at one point. It's not saving and publicizing a post that was originally friends locked, it's saving a post that no longer exists. The Wayback Machine (http://web.archive.org/) does the same thing.

- renjenri, who is currently locked out of her account.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]hugsnkisses
2003-03-18 06:39 pm UTC (link)
*tsks* Someone should really read back over the last two weeks of FW, oh and all the Y! group posts before making such ignorant and scandalous accusations.

What I said did not apply only to locked posts, but pages which get taken down, or bandwidth overloading, or a hundred other things.

Read the FAQ and you might be able to refrain from asking such silly questions.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-03-19 09:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hugsnkisses, 2003-03-19 10:14 am UTC

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map