|
|
Birdy (![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} skewed_tartan) wrote in ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/community.gif){kind=small} fandom_wank,@ 2005-10-24 22:48:00 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| Current mood: | Flippant |
| Entry tags: | anime/manga, illegality, internet lawyers, sub vs. dub |
Fansubbing vs. Official Subbing, Where Does it End?!
Open a debate of Fan subs vs. Offcial Subs on any public forum and you're guarnteed wank. However things really don't start to heat up until page two.
Someone just has to bring up ambigious legal staus of fansubbing, and starts the wank.
You're an ungrateful bastard for not paying for anime!, posted by the OP, who at first was tolerant of fansubbing. Wank changes people fast.
It appears fansubbing's legality is open to interpetation.
"End of argument" if only.
Its Illegal!, no its not, and in fact they are often of good quality.
On page four we are subjected to a rousing legal debate where our wankers clearly use all of their education to argue whether or not its legal to translate a Japanese cartoon for hobby reasons. I love the internet.
Oh no! I'm being threatened!
Anime is NOT a fad!, wank spawns more wank.
Jack Thompson comparsion is called up. That guy needs his own law, he's getting as popular as Hitler in arguments nowadays.
Put a spork in me, I'm done!
