Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



angel_kathryn ([info]angel_kathryn) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2006-01-04 00:08:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:*Snarl*
Entry tags:fandom: harry potter, pairing wars

And they're off! ... again ...
More HP wank.

Vanceone (everyone's favourite internet lawyer) is at it again, this time at Sugarquill , a R/Hr shipper site which does not allow ship debates - something which does not stop Vance.

The modly hammer is brought into play fairly quickly, but not before both sides wank a little, and the point flies over most posters' heads.

Edit: I fixed the tags.



(Post a new comment)


[info]eponine
2006-01-03 03:26 pm UTC (link)
"which does not allow ship debates"

Even though I'm a R/Hr shipper myself, I stay away from Sugarquill for the above reason. Any place that doesn't allow people to express opinions if they differ from the places owner isn't worth the time of day IMHO.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]sarahkjrsten
2006-01-03 03:36 pm UTC (link)
I agree. Attitudes like that make me flee sites as fast as my little virtual feet can carry me.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]doroc_sabah, 2006-01-03 07:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sarahkjrsten, 2006-01-03 08:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]doroc_sabah, 2006-01-03 08:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sarahkjrsten, 2006-01-03 08:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sarahkjrsten, 2006-01-03 08:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]so_long42, 2006-01-04 12:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sarahkjrsten, 2006-01-04 02:09 am UTC

[info]esclaramonde
2006-01-03 03:57 pm UTC (link)
See, that's one of the reasons I like the SQ. If I want to debate, I'll go to FAP or somewhere else it's allowed, as there's a lot of places for it there. However, as I have been doing lots of debating, it's really nice to come back to the SQ and browse through topics where I don't have to feel frustrated, angry, &c.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]aerobot
2006-01-03 04:53 pm UTC (link)
No, I can see why. I used to mod at a forum where the mods were forced to ban all pairing debate, because not only had it been utterly driven into the ground harder than a sky-diver without a parachute, but it was causing hostilities and brain death from delusional fangirls.

Really, there come times in old forums where some topics must be banned because they are done to DEATH.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]cornedbee
2006-01-03 05:35 pm UTC (link)
Your loss, really. What's wrong with wanting a little peace?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]tinybubbles
2006-01-04 12:13 am UTC (link)
I can't really blame them either. Who wants to mod a ship debate? It sounds almost as fun as shoveling shit with a spoon in an elephant tent.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]wrongly_amused
2006-01-04 07:13 am UTC (link)
In any other fandom, I agree. But in HP, people apparently can't keep it in their pants, and the splooge flies regardless of the modding.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]coffee_mug
2006-01-04 01:49 pm UTC (link)
I thought SQ's policy is pretty much "If you're a H/Hr, welcome and feel free to say you are H/Hr but don't try to say H/Hr is the only and true way - that'll just lead to debates and we don't want that."

There's difference between expressing a different opinion and debating it. Kind of like there's a difference between saying "I'm Christian" and saying "I'm God's chosen one, REPEL NOW OR fall into the flames of hell! It's okay! You can still turn back!".

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]esclaramonde
2006-01-03 03:52 pm UTC (link)
I regretted suggesting that he get an account there to a) see if they'd ban him just from his username (because I knew they wouldn't and he said they would) and b) try posting in a nonship thread and see if people freaked out at him.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]esclaramonde
2006-01-03 03:55 pm UTC (link)
Oh, and poor Ashtur.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

(no subject) - [info]karmyn75, 2006-01-03 05:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-01-03 05:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-01-03 07:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cornedbee, 2006-01-03 05:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-01-03 05:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]story645, 2006-01-04 03:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-01-04 03:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]story645, 2006-01-04 03:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]flyingphoenix, 2006-01-06 07:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]story645, 2006-01-06 07:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]flyingphoenix, 2006-01-06 08:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]story645, 2006-01-06 08:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]flyingphoenix, 2006-01-06 09:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]story645, 2006-01-06 10:04 pm UTC

[info]childofares
2006-01-03 04:26 pm UTC (link)
Ah Vanceone! What would the world do without internet lawyers wanking fighting for the poor, oppressed Harmonians? I shudder to think.

(Reply to this)

(Deleted post)
(no subject) - [info]athenaps, 2006-01-03 05:47 pm UTC

(Deleted post)
(no subject) - [info]athenaps, 2006-01-03 06:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]miss_padfoot, 2006-01-04 12:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]athenaps, 2006-01-04 12:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]miss_padfoot, 2006-01-04 01:03 pm UTC
We are all overbearing morons! - [info]childofares, 2006-01-03 08:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]agent_hyatt, 2006-01-03 08:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]azazello, 2006-01-03 10:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nebbieq, 2006-01-04 01:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-01-04 03:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dez_chan, 2006-01-05 01:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2006-01-05 03:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dez_chan, 2006-01-05 07:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2006-01-05 07:41 am UTC

[info]dynamitebabe
2006-01-03 04:49 pm UTC (link)
Ahhh New Year, same old sounds of Harmoanians fap fap fapping. How old is Vanceone anyway? As old as C****?

(Reply to this)


[info]aerobot
2006-01-03 04:50 pm UTC (link)
I'll respectfully disagree that R/Hr is "hard canon;" not everyone thinks so (in fact, many people think otherwise), and I think they have some rather compelling arguments.

And that, Harmonians, is what makes you delusional.

You can write fanfics with different pairings, or hate it with every fibre of your little pea-picking heart, but when something is canon, it is canon no matter what the damn hell you think. No amount of essays, whining, analyses, theories, or plain ignorance will change this fact, so would you please just fucking deal already.

*phew*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]seto_fangirl, 2006-01-03 05:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2006-01-03 05:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seto_fangirl, 2006-01-03 05:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]athenaps, 2006-01-03 05:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]emiweebee, 2006-01-03 05:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2006-01-03 06:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]athenaps, 2006-01-03 06:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]doomsday, 2006-01-03 08:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2006-01-03 06:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]athenaps, 2006-01-03 06:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-01-03 07:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2006-01-03 11:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nebbieq, 2006-01-04 01:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2006-01-04 02:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nebbieq, 2006-01-04 03:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sadisticferret, 2006-01-04 04:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2006-01-04 05:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]riah_chan, 2006-01-04 06:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]story645, 2006-01-04 04:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dawnswalker, 2006-01-04 06:19 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-08-27 12:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]julian_black, 2006-01-04 07:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]white_serpent, 2006-01-04 09:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]castellated, 2006-01-04 01:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2006-01-04 04:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2006-01-05 03:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nebbieq, 2006-01-03 05:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2006-01-03 06:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nebbieq, 2006-01-03 06:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]antimatterspork, 2006-01-03 07:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-01-03 07:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2006-01-03 08:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-01-04 02:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaootaku, 2006-01-03 10:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-01-04 02:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-01-04 12:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-01-04 02:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-01-04 03:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]saralina25, 2006-01-04 07:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-01-04 08:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wrongly_amused, 2006-01-04 07:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shallow_kid, 2006-01-03 09:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mouseykins, 2006-01-03 09:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - soula, 2006-01-03 10:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mcity, 2006-01-03 11:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-01-04 01:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-01-04 02:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladyofviolets, 2006-01-04 06:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cleolinda, 2006-01-03 07:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkrose, 2006-01-03 09:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]doomsday, 2006-01-03 08:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-01-04 12:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tunxeh, 2006-01-03 08:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]doomsday, 2006-01-03 09:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mouseykins, 2006-01-03 09:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]doomsday, 2006-01-03 09:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2006-01-04 01:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]luthe, 2006-01-04 07:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]miss_padfoot, 2006-01-04 12:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]emiweebee, 2006-01-03 05:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-01-03 07:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]oxydosic, 2006-01-04 03:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2006-01-04 04:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]poconell, 2006-01-04 09:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]slackerbitch, 2006-01-04 03:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2006-01-04 04:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]poconell, 2006-01-04 10:35 pm UTC

[info]karmyn75
2006-01-03 04:56 pm UTC (link)
He just won't give up will he? I don't care who ends up with who in the end because that's not why I read Harry Potter. Some people just can't get that it's not about the romance.
If I didn't know any better, I'd swear this was my landlord, but he wanks about other things, not HP.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-01-03 07:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2006-01-03 07:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-01-04 01:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2006-01-04 04:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]yaoiko, 2006-01-04 11:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]childofares, 2006-01-03 08:26 pm UTC

[info]emiweebee
2006-01-03 06:01 pm UTC (link)
You know, Vance's arguments, fingerpointing at the evil members of the R/Hr and H/G secret police (apparently, HMS STFU), and claims that Harmonians are peaceful, nonconfrontational readers sort of fall flat when it turns out he's just a great big TROLL.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]nebbieq, 2006-01-03 06:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-01-03 07:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nebbieq, 2006-01-03 10:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]morwyn, 2006-01-03 11:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nebbieq, 2006-01-03 11:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ikuko, 2006-01-04 01:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nebbieq, 2006-01-04 01:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ikuko, 2006-01-04 01:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nebbieq, 2006-01-04 02:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistal, 2006-01-04 03:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ikuko, 2006-01-04 04:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]yaoiko, 2006-01-04 03:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]drakyndra, 2006-01-03 06:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]emiweebee, 2006-01-03 06:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]drakyndra, 2006-01-03 06:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]agent_hyatt, 2006-01-03 08:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rotten_fish, 2006-01-03 10:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-01-04 03:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2006-01-03 11:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chikane, 2006-01-04 02:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2006-01-04 02:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]yaoiko, 2006-01-04 03:56 am UTC

[info]lady_january
2006-01-03 07:29 pm UTC (link)
Ron/Hermione is Hard Canon.

Harry/Hermione is Hard Wank.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]poconell, 2006-01-05 08:19 pm UTC

[info]doomsday
2006-01-03 08:26 pm UTC (link)
I'm just curious; if there is hard canon, is there also soft canon, and wtf is it?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]the_gentleman, 2006-01-03 08:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]doomsday, 2006-01-03 09:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]magnolia_mama, 2006-01-03 09:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]doomsday, 2006-01-03 10:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]story645, 2006-01-04 04:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]doomsday, 2006-01-04 06:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]story645, 2006-01-04 06:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]magnolia_mama, 2006-01-04 02:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_gentleman, 2006-01-04 08:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]doomsday, 2006-01-04 09:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]castellated, 2006-01-04 01:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_gentleman, 2006-01-04 08:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mouseykins, 2006-01-03 09:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nlb_muffin, 2006-01-03 10:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - soula, 2006-01-03 09:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]azazello, 2006-01-03 10:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]magnolia_mama, 2006-01-03 11:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nebbieq, 2006-01-04 02:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladylance, 2006-01-04 08:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]doomsday, 2006-01-04 09:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2006-01-04 04:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladylance, 2006-01-04 05:24 pm UTC

[info]luthe
2006-01-03 09:44 pm UTC (link)
Vanceone gives me hope for gender equality. Mostly because I've never seen another male wank so hard to prove a romantic relationship.

In the future, maybe all men will wank this hard about romance! *envisions fist fights in the streets over Scarlett/Rhett vs. Scarlett/Ashley*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Even though I am not a guy... - [info]rotten_fish, 2006-01-03 10:09 pm UTC
Re: Even though I am not a guy... - [info]souris, 2006-01-04 01:29 am UTC
ooh, femmeslash! - [info]luthe, 2006-01-04 07:38 am UTC
Re: ooh, femmeslash! - [info]evilsqueakers, 2006-01-05 03:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]llama_treats, 2006-01-03 11:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2006-01-03 11:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-01-04 12:48 am UTC
One guy is a whole ship?
[info]agony
2006-01-03 09:53 pm UTC (link)
I'm going to hazard a guess that a fair number of H/Hr shippers don't think this guy represents them at all. There must be sane Harmonians out there?

But if they showed up, that might put a damper on all the "I told you so, you delusional people" comments.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: One guy is a whole ship? - [info]rotten_fish, 2006-01-03 10:08 pm UTC
Re: One guy is a whole ship? - [info]ella_w, 2006-01-03 11:49 pm UTC
Re: One guy is a whole ship? - [info]story645, 2006-01-04 03:23 am UTC
Re: One guy is a whole ship? - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-01-04 03:37 am UTC
Re: One guy is a whole ship? - [info]story645, 2006-01-04 03:48 am UTC
Re: One guy is a whole ship? - [info]oliphauntine, 2006-01-05 02:31 pm UTC
Re: One guy is a whole ship? - [info]story645, 2006-01-05 08:11 pm UTC
Re: One guy is a whole ship? - [info]influencethis, 2006-01-07 10:25 am UTC
Re: One guy is a whole ship? - [info]massromantic, 2006-01-03 11:22 pm UTC
Re: One guy is a whole ship? - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-01-04 01:44 am UTC
Re: One guy is a whole ship? - [info]angel_kathryn, 2006-01-04 04:59 am UTC

[info]prettyveela
2006-01-03 10:17 pm UTC (link)
As much as the pumpkin pie lawyer gets on my nerves, this is a mini wank that died out before it could begin.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rotten_fish, 2006-01-03 10:19 pm UTC

[info]rotten_fish
2006-01-03 10:18 pm UTC (link)
My mind went straight to hardcore porn instead of hard canon, and frankly, that's where it's staying, because this is just not funny anymore.

::sigh:: At least my icon still amuses me. Smile, Hermione, for your pussy is the Light of millions of idiotic and socially defunct HP fen! But that was redundant.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]yaoiko, 2006-01-04 11:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hermiones_hymen, 2006-01-05 06:26 am UTC

[info]wrongly_amused
2006-01-04 07:41 am UTC (link)
I feel like HBP's relationship conflicts have turned into a gigantic wank bang, with the Harmoanians at one end screaming, "Yeah, that's right, take it all, bitch! Everlasting romance, hippogriffs, symbolism, OH YEAH!" while the Herons and H/G fans go at with the other end with passionate, keening wails of, "OH GOD, CANON, YOU KNOW YOU LIKE IT, BABY."

The entire things just makes me want to shut my eyes in horror and rinse my hands under scalding hot water for several long minutes.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hoopa, 2006-01-04 08:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wrongly_amused, 2006-01-04 08:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]slackerbitch, 2006-01-04 03:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]agent_hyatt, 2006-01-04 05:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rotten_fish, 2006-01-05 01:22 am UTC

[info]slackerbitch
2006-01-04 03:30 pm UTC (link)
OK, y'know, could he please get that stick and its gigantic sense of entitlement out of his ass? He's so, "Ah, yes, I'm a HARMONIAN and I'm sure you all hate me, but I suppose I'll deign to hang around and see if you can be mature about it, sniff, let me come in and piss on your carpet and then act horrified when you call me on it. Clearly YOU'RE the barbarians, and I am the educated elitist snifty one."

(Reply to this)


mirandafox
2006-01-04 05:14 pm UTC (link)
Haven't the Harmonians given up and gone to bed yet?

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map