Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Azusa Kuraino ([info]azusa) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2003-07-02 02:49:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Silmarillion Fan Wank, for your perusal.
Okay, disclaimer: I have always frankly avoided the Tolkien fan community like a plague, even though I really do like the books and, yes, even the movies (for the most part). But I poke around in it every once in a while looking for good fanfiction, which I rarely find, although I do find an awful lot of wank.

The wank which follows is actually not a wank by LOTR fanfic writers, but by -Silmarillion- fan fiction writers, who, from all I can tell, are something of a breed apart, distinguished by less Mary Sue and fangirl wanking and much more pseudointellectual wanking, and an overwhelming inability to take their fandom in any spirit which is not one of dead seriousness. The initiator of the wank, Rose, starts out by commenting on a piece of fan fiction by P@L, the board maintainer, and immediately turns it into a discussion about God and human suffering and how fan fiction is apparently immensely relevant to this issue. P@L responds by lecturing Rose on how LOTR apparently does a better job of justifying the ways of God to man than the Bible does: "and the dual facts that Arda *is* Arda Marred and that the actual design and construction of it was carried out by semi-competent demiurges while under attack by yet other semi-competent anti-demiurges "explains" a tremendous amount about the problems in it." (Unfortunately, no one in this thread does a very good job of "explaining" themselves in any way.)

It then becomes a discussion about the Book of Job. Remember, we're -Silmarillion- fanfic writers, not like all those LOTR-fic-writing plebes, so trust us, this stuff IS immensely relevant here! P@L then proceeds to ninja-wank-attack Rose's response to the Job post, informing her that obviously she hasn't -lived- through tests of her faith because she hasn't suffered enough; ergo, shut the hell up and bow before my overwhelmingly superior wisdom. Unfortunately, however, Rose is not prepared to turn the conversation into a Super-Saiyan-Wank catfight about faith and philosophy, so P@L does it for her, accusing Rose of employing "passive-aggressive apologetics" and that she embodies the "human tendency to make facile dismissals of whoever opposes them, employing caricature and straw-man rebuttals." (The possibility that a facile dismissal might be in order when all the participants in an argument are wanking themselves into self-justifying ridiculousness is not addressed.)

Rose then begins to show the only common sense thus far demonstrated in the thread: "There comes a point at which further discussion on a topic is useless." (For FanPatricians? Perish the thought!) Naturally, P@L disagrees, and comes back with What in fact has been done is a passive-aggressive, hit-and-run bit of self-indulgence: by doing so, one can feel proud of having done one's part of "standing up for" what one believes in, without actually having had to deal with any of the necessary consequences, and without actually having done anything constructive - yet still begin able to pat one's self on the back for being brave and even persecuted." (Funny, and here I thought they were all just were just engaging in standard fan pseudointellectualism. I had no idea anyone was martyring themselves for a cause here.)

Also, according to a thread further down, "The Last Unicorn" is apparently the best Silmarillion fanfiction ever. Apparently I'm just too plebe to figure out the reasoning behind this one, being not part of the fandom myself.

Doubtless there's more wank on the board, further down, but my head hurts from pounding it against my monitor at this point.


(Post a new comment)


[info]rann
2003-07-02 09:05 am UTC (link)
*glances through all that, blinks a lot, then just starts humming the song The Last Unicorn*

(Reply to this)


[info]dawnswalker
2003-07-02 09:07 am UTC (link)
I eventually had to stop reading all of those threads because the pseudointellectualtheology was getting so convoluted it was becoming impossible to get any sort of point out of the discussion. >.<

That, and I couldn't fend hands with the billions of pop-ups.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]azusa
2003-07-02 09:22 am UTC (link)
I read through all the way to the end, and there isn't one, except to masturbate the egos of those involved. So don't worry. >.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]aruru
2003-07-02 09:38 am UTC (link)
All those big words just sort of meld together into one big muddle, don't they?

*hangs up her shiny new "PLEBE" sign on her door*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ruaki
2003-07-02 09:51 am UTC (link)
Well, Rora-sama, I just figured those big words are just straw-men designed to flower-fy and pad empty statements of grandeur. Meaning, they're designed to hide the fact that no point exists in the statement, but ooo! Look at how shiny those statements are!

I eat dictionaries for breakfast, yo.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]aruru, 2003-07-02 11:56 am UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]rann, 2003-07-02 07:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aruru, 2003-07-02 09:32 pm UTC
Re: - [info]rann, 2003-07-02 10:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]azusa, 2003-07-02 11:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2003-07-03 12:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]azusa, 2003-07-03 05:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2003-07-03 05:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]azusa, 2003-07-03 06:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aruru, 2003-07-03 10:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jerry_ds_girl, 2003-07-03 02:25 am UTC

[info]sorchar
2003-07-02 10:14 am UTC (link)
Holy Sweet Jebus...

If Job had been forced to sit through this wank, he'd have cursed God, God's mother and father, God's great-aunt Mehitabel, and anyone else who could possibly be held responsible.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]rann
2003-07-02 10:39 am UTC (link)
Nah. Jobe was totally God's bitch. He could have taken the most eye-gouging, whimper-inducing, soul-scarring wank, and like a frat boy with a swollen, paddled ass, would have bent and muttered, "Please sir, may I have some more?"

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]jar
2003-07-02 11:10 am UTC (link)
Okay, disclaimer: I have always frankly avoided the Tolkien fan community like a plague, even though I really do like the books and, yes, even the movies (for the most part). But I poke around in it every once in a while looking for good fanfiction, which I rarely find, although I do find an awful lot of wank.

You have just read my mind, and written my exact opinion about said fandom out. ::Stares blankly::

I have a saying, once people start mentioning the bible... Run. RUN FOR YOUR WANKING LIVES!!

(Reply to this)


[info]eyebrowofdoom
2003-07-02 01:27 pm UTC (link)
Meh. These are massive issues about what faith is and how you maintain it. It's a weird forum to have the discussion in, and everybody gets a bit overbearing. But there are a lot less trivial topics to get overbearing about.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

*nods*
[info]nolifeking
2003-07-02 03:18 pm UTC (link)
It's not that weird a forum to me, though. Tolkien was a religious man who put increasingly more of his personal beliefs into his worldcreation, and the Silmarillion is pretty much in the centre of that. I've never got far in the book fandom without finding Christians reading and discussing Tolkien from a religious point of view, which is not inherently more wanky than any fandiscussion coming from someone's personal values*

Posted for those perfectly nice theological debaters I've met. And for the old skool usenet fandom, whose old skool grand wankery makes these people look like fuzzy little lambs anyway ;}

* Though as we've seen lately that certainly doesn't say much, now does it...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: *nods*
[info]eyebrowofdoom
2003-07-02 05:20 pm UTC (link)
Old skool lotr fandom seems to have been an absolute Abode of Dragons. While researching a Balrog fic recently, I stumbled upon the abyss of does-a-Balrog-have-wings wank, whose bottom is beyond light and knowledge (to quote Gandalf). Whoah.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]nolifeking, 2003-07-02 06:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eyebrowofdoom, 2003-07-03 03:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nolifeking, 2003-07-03 12:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eyebrowofdoom, 2003-07-03 03:23 pm UTC
Hey! - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-02 07:13 pm UTC
Re: Hey! - [info]littleshebear, 2003-07-02 07:23 pm UTC
Re: Hey! - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-02 08:05 pm UTC
Re: Hey! - [info]gelasius, 2003-07-04 09:47 pm UTC
Re: Hey! - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-05 06:34 am UTC
Re: Hey! - [info]gelasius, 2003-07-05 06:43 am UTC
Re: Hey! - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-05 06:46 am UTC
Re: Hey! - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-02 08:41 pm UTC
Re: Hey! - [info]littleshebear, 2003-07-02 08:47 pm UTC
Re: Hey! - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-02 10:00 pm UTC
Re: Hey! - [info]littleshebear, 2003-07-02 10:06 pm UTC
Re: Hey! - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-02 10:29 pm UTC
Re: Hey! - [info]nolifeking, 2003-07-02 10:41 pm UTC
Re: Hey! - [info]aruru, 2003-07-03 10:09 am UTC
Re: Hey! - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-02 10:23 pm UTC
Re: Hey! - [info]littleshebear, 2003-07-02 10:42 pm UTC
Re: Hey! - [info]iczer6, 2003-07-03 12:44 am UTC
Re: Hey! - [info]eyebrowofdoom, 2003-07-03 03:54 am UTC
Re: Hey! - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 04:43 am UTC
Re: Hey! - [info]gelasius, 2003-07-04 09:51 pm UTC
Re: Hey! - [info]eyebrowofdoom, 2003-07-03 04:33 am UTC
Re: Hey! - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 04:46 am UTC
Re: Hey! - [info]eyebrowofdoom, 2003-07-03 04:55 am UTC
Re: Hey! - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 04:56 am UTC
Re: Hey! - [info]eyebrowofdoom, 2003-07-03 05:00 am UTC
Re: Hey! - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 05:15 am UTC
Re: Hey! - [info]eyebrowofdoom, 2003-07-03 05:19 am UTC
Re: Hey! - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 05:21 am UTC
Re: *nods*
[info]azusa
2003-07-02 11:26 pm UTC (link)
I have actually seen some of said old-skool wank, viz. old Usenet faqs and the like-- it seriously makes me wonder how anyone could enjoy the fandom enough to want to write fic about it, let alone read the books afterwards in light of the knowledge of their own pathetic lack of 1337ness. c_c

My householdmate Ruka posted to the forums at theonering.net for awhile (under the alias "balrogslippers"), and left because there were too many old-sk00l wankers hanging around. There were some perfectly nice people, plenty of them, but the wankers were very loud, and they dominated book discussion (which is what he had really been there to talk about). The "do balrogs have wings" debate STILL cropped up on that forum with fair regularity, and amazingly, its initiators were NOT inevitably ignored and/or pointed in the direction of the massive archives of pre-existing wank on this same topic.

As for theology, like you said, seeing how Tolkien's Catholic faith was such a strong part of his life, and, I think, got into his work without his consciously intending to do so (viz. the parallels between lembas and Communion), I certainly don't think Middle-Earth theology or LOTR/Silm as it relates to theology is an unworthy topic of discussion. It's just that whenever the subject of religion in general comes up, wank inevitably seems to follow. >_> What really fried me about that whole wank was P@L, who obviously has some prior grudge with Rose from elsewhere which she's not fessing up about, essentially hijacking the thread and demanding at length that she give philosophical justification for believing as she did; and when Rose says to drop the issue (as I would have), tells her essentially, "Just admit I am TEH SUPERI0R and there won't be any problems around here." And, well, that -is- quite a seperate issue from LOTR or the Silmarillion. c_c

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]littleshebear
2003-07-02 01:58 pm UTC (link)
You remind me of *me* at age 10 - I too was Elihu/young Job once

Cos liek, I'm so much more sophistimacated and mature than you, there's no point in arguing with me. I've read Kierkegaard and Aristotle (or at least, I glanced through Ethics for Dummies and I think I got the gist of it). I know lots of big words and psychobabblish terms so just bow to my unltimate superiority and admit that you're wrong, wrong, wrong.

Shut up P@L, no one cares.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]ereshkigal
2003-07-02 06:59 pm UTC (link)
Shut up P@L, no one cares.

Mmm, yep, that pretty much sums it up in the proverbial nutshell.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]hugsnkisses
2003-07-02 08:37 pm UTC (link)
*chokes* Your icon. O.O

My ass wears a hat for you. <3

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re:
[info]littleshebear
2003-07-02 08:39 pm UTC (link)
Aw, and a cute li'l ass it is too. :)

I traumatised a Gil lovin' friend of mine with that icon. I had to make an 'Arwen dead from coke' icon to make her feel better.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-02 08:44 pm UTC
Re: - [info]littleshebear, 2003-07-02 08:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]azusa, 2003-07-02 11:29 pm UTC
Re: - [info]littleshebear, 2003-07-02 11:31 pm UTC

[info]sorchar
2003-07-02 10:44 pm UTC (link)
That icon is be-yoo-tee-full.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]azusa
2003-07-02 11:52 pm UTC (link)
P@L is something of a wanker in general, if you check the link back to her homepage. The unfortunate thing is, as someone noted further down, she makes a lot of points I -agree- with, such as that one should keep certain things in mind while writing Ardaverse romance in order to keep it from turning into Middle-Earth Does Melrose Place; but she does it with so much snobbery, self-aggrandizing (Oh you remind me of *me* at age 10, how cute!), assumption that all of her readers are morons who would -never- have thought of any of this if she hadn't been beneficient enough to point it out to them, endless references to show off how well-read she is... You know, I have a couple of friends like this, who -are- extremely well-read and well-versed in a lot of historical and literary subjects, and it -is- possible to share one's knowledge without coming off as, well, showing off, and trying to cow everyone else into intimidation by bludgeoning them with the sheer breadth of your learning. Yes, it can be -intimidating- to approach someone like that, but when someone seems to be going -out of their way- to set themselves up as T3H SUPERI0R INTELLECTUAL, in my experience that's a blinking red sign with the message "Wow! This person has some issues. Stay back."

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re:
[info]littleshebear
2003-07-02 11:56 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, it's not so much what is said, it's the way in which it is said. You shouldn't need to brow-beat people like that.

Also, there comes a time in a discussion where you really should let it go. If someone politely asks you to drop it, I really think you should. Jumping up and down going, "Nyah, nyah, so and so can't argue!" really isn't the way adults ought to behave.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]aruru
2003-07-03 10:37 am UTC (link)
You know, the more I think about it, perhaps this P@L person should hook up with that Ian Andreas Miller guy (who btw, is a fairly recent topic on Portal of Evil for another section of his site) from Azusa's previous wank.

If they had kids, my theory would be that either the wankiness from each side would cancel each other out and give us a relatively sane indivdual, or we would have the mother of all wanky hellspawn! :D

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]nostalgia
2003-07-02 08:48 pm UTC (link)
Well, obviously the anti-median longtitudinal carapace of the wank is far more angrifangelised than people like us have the intellect for. We are, quite simply, too thick, and too limited by pop-cultural representations of the Mother-Goddess dichotomy to truly pass muster with these people. Oh, that we could scale such shuddering cliffs of intellectuo-socio-political methodolgical... umm... stuff.

(Reply to this)


[info]sagralisse
2003-07-02 10:17 pm UTC (link)
I wish people would be all off-track or all on-track. Unfortunately for me I really really like this part of P@L's first reply:

There is a reason why, if you read Silm as harmonized with LOTR (which I do), it becomes inevitable that ultimately *Nienna* is the most effective of the Powers in Middle-earth. Not Orome, not Aule, not even Yavanna and Varda, not even Manwe - despite the work of the Ents, the valor of the Dwarf, and the Riders of Rohan, and the Phial of Galadriel, despite the crucial tho' subtle roles of Healing and History, despite the Eagles - it's *Compassion* which makes it all possible in the end, without which none of the rest would have mattered. Because Pity is the only Power which can bring Water into the dry places where there is none...

If you've got that, then why do you need the rest of the bells and whistles?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]sorchar
2003-07-02 10:45 pm UTC (link)
To show off how soo-peeeer-ee-orrrr you are?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sagralisse
2003-07-03 12:41 am UTC (link)
Sorry, I meant the bells and whistles of believing in an omnipotent-yet-lovingly paternal God.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-03 06:51 am UTC

[info]azusa
2003-07-02 11:36 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, the unfortunate thing about religious!wank debates in general is that sooner or later, someone is bound to make a few points I agree with, even if the rest of their post is smoking crack. I agree with most of what she's saying here too, basically that it's compassion and pity which is the strongest force in Middle-Earth, not brute power, and it's one of the reasons I like the whole M-E mythos.

I just wish she'd show some of the same damn compassion for the people on her MB (and I don't qualify permutations of "shut up and accept the superiority of my intellect and judgement and everything will be spiffy" as such...). >_

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 12:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gelasius, 2003-07-04 09:56 pm UTC


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map