Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



LuLuLuLu ([info]lulinda) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2003-07-02 22:54:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:annoyed

Call to arms!
The ANTIPLEBES are at it again. They have combined their obviously superior brain power in a sly evasive maneuver and managed to get a twelve-year-old girl TOSsed from LJ.

http://www.livejournal.com/users/taricorim/72629.html

Long story short, from one of the antiplebes herself:

The abbreviated version of events: pleb angers antiplebe; pleb is underage, therefore we were able to get her thrown from LiveJournal; pleb returns two months later under a different alias and angers us again; we figure out that they are the same person; pleb returns yet again under yet another alias and tries to penetrate our headquarters (i.e. the LJ communty); is last straw, hence the letter.

Enjoy the sheer wanktasticness of these comments! They boggle the mind!

Be impressed with the high IQ of one who had to *shudder* deal with this nasty, nasty plebe.

I do not speak for Lissa, but I am amused that such a creature as you could possibly believe that as person whose I.Q. is at least 100 points higher than yours would ever stoop low enough to befriend you. She was your beta-reader. How she found the courage to wade through the shite that you call stories, I'll never know; but she did; she pointed out your errors and suggested alternatives.

Excuse me while I laugh my ass off over all of this.

Getting a kid tossed from LJ. How sad!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Ever get the feeling these gals have repressed hall monitor issues they need to work out?

P.S. Antiplebers, do feel free to call me on having some sort of vendetta, I would enjoy that seeing as how I've had barely any interaction with any of you. But it would no doubt serve as a way to deflect attention away from the wank.

P.P.S. Yes, anonymous commenting has been turned off for this community as a whole, but we are not so wanky here at Fandom_Wank that we would deny any of you the chance to come over here and thwap up with your plebe sticks. I've got a few codes to spare. My email is in my userinfo.



(Post a new comment)

(Reply from suspended user)

[info]lulinda
2003-07-03 06:19 am UTC (link)
Heh, is ok.

But, JOIN TEH WANK!!!11111ONE!!!

I understand the rules and all, I worked in internet advertsing around the time COPPA was developed, and the girl probably should known better than to reveal her real age but still, reporting her is just... a tad too much for me, yanno?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]lulinda, 2003-07-03 06:40 am UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]lulinda, 2003-07-03 06:57 am UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-03 08:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2003-07-03 08:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aruru, 2003-07-03 09:27 am UTC

[info]sagralisse
2003-07-03 06:29 am UTC (link)
They didn't have the internet when I was 12. :(

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lulinda, 2003-07-03 06:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-03 08:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 03:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]yadda, 2003-07-03 08:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 09:17 pm UTC
Re: - [info]yadda, 2003-07-04 04:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-04 12:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]loki, 2003-07-03 08:43 pm UTC
Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-03 08:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2003-07-04 01:04 am UTC
Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-04 02:13 am UTC

[info]esorlehcar
2003-07-03 06:09 am UTC (link)
I've no doubt the child in question was horribly annoying, but really, there's just something truly pathetic about getting off on picking on a 12-year-old.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]lulinda
2003-07-03 06:20 am UTC (link)
Yup, that's my feeling about it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]moonjaguar
2003-07-03 07:58 am UTC (link)
I've no doubt the child in question was horribly annoying, but really, there's just something truly pathetic about getting off on picking on a 12-year-old.

I can understand them kicking her out of their community but overkill much?

I'm wondering what a twelve year old is doing playing unsupervised on LJ (to me it is no place for someone that young). But a whole herd of bull(ie)s running her over reminds me of the sixth grade boys who used to gang up and jump a passing lone first or second grader to make themselves feel all big and macho and powerful.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]pradaloz, 2003-07-03 05:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ingrid, 2003-07-03 07:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]moonjaguar, 2003-07-03 08:33 pm UTC

[info]chimara
2003-07-04 09:21 am UTC (link)
Word.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]kerikeri
2003-07-03 06:39 am UTC (link)
If that thread got any more pretentious, LJ would implode.

And I don't know if the bit with the French is some kind of in-joke or what, but I think it's kind of sad pathetic funny that she has to use a translating dictionary to show off her Totally Intellectual Foreign Language Skillz.

C'est bĂȘte.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]feenix
2003-07-03 06:50 am UTC (link)
Wow.

They were made silly by a 12-year-old.

That's just sad.

Also, Tari (if you're reading this): " iintelligent ?" I'd never expect a grammar whore such as yourself to sink this low. Hmm...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-03 09:02 am UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - wizzard, 2003-07-03 06:58 am UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 07:06 am UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]lulinda, 2003-07-03 07:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chash, 2003-07-03 07:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lulinda, 2003-07-03 07:27 am UTC
Re: - [info]chash, 2003-07-03 05:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lulinda, 2003-07-04 03:36 am UTC
Re: - [info]chash, 2003-07-04 05:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lulinda, 2003-07-04 05:50 am UTC
Re: - [info]chash, 2003-07-04 05:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]moonjaguar, 2003-07-03 07:59 am UTC
Re: - [info]chash, 2003-07-03 05:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2003-07-03 06:04 pm UTC
Er... - [info]sajasma, 2003-07-04 03:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cimorene111, 2003-07-05 08:37 pm UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]lulinda, 2003-07-04 03:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]stubbleglitter, 2003-07-03 07:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ereshkigal, 2003-07-03 07:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]covermyeyes, 2003-07-03 06:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sajasma, 2003-07-04 04:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]covermyeyes, 2003-07-04 07:38 am UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
Re: - [info]stubbleglitter, 2003-07-03 10:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kimera, 2003-07-04 06:00 am UTC

[info]jfpbookworm
2003-07-03 08:25 am UTC (link)
And I don't know if the bit with the French is some kind of in-joke or what, but I think it's kind of sad pathetic funny that she has to use a translating dictionary to show off her Totally Intellectual Foreign Language Skillz.

True. But if she truly had skillz she'd be using Latin.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lynstraine, 2003-07-03 09:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]harukami, 2003-07-03 10:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]parlance, 2003-07-04 09:54 am UTC

[info]nevadafighter
2003-07-03 06:47 am UTC (link)
Anyone know how to pronounce "sux0rz"? Like "sucks-oars"?

And yeah, there are too many pairs of panties getting into wads over one twelve year-old. Yeah, she's exactly the kind of annoying plebe who gets under the skin and pisses everyone off, but this reeks of, I don't know . . . overreaction?

Have they ever heard of not feeding the trolls?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]nekoneko
2003-07-03 06:54 am UTC (link)
Yes, at least, that's how I pronounce it. That's the only l337 I can say, though. Well, that and 'hax0rz'.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 07:02 am UTC
Re: - [info]nevadafighter, 2003-07-03 07:04 am UTC
A short guide to 1337. - [info]feenix, 2003-07-03 07:06 am UTC
Re: A short guide to 1337. - [info]nevadafighter, 2003-07-03 07:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lulinda, 2003-07-03 07:12 am UTC
Re: - [info]nevadafighter, 2003-07-03 07:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 07:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lulinda, 2003-07-03 07:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aruru, 2003-07-03 09:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lillyv, 2003-07-03 05:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2003-07-03 06:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 07:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chash, 2003-07-03 07:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kimera, 2003-07-04 06:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chimara, 2003-07-04 09:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2003-07-03 08:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nevadafighter, 2003-07-03 09:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 04:38 pm UTC
Re: - [info]nevadafighter, 2003-07-04 06:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hakainokami, 2003-07-03 11:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2003-07-03 11:51 pm UTC

[info]yadda
2003-07-03 06:57 am UTC (link)
After seeing Rachael/Vesta/Zelda/dirty-ass-lying-bitch/a-great-person's journal I find I can see the antipleber's point. Layouts that ugly should be grounds for TOSing.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lulinda, 2003-07-03 07:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]yadda, 2003-07-03 07:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hakainokami, 2003-07-03 11:16 pm UTC

[info]sagralisse
2003-07-03 07:12 am UTC (link)
Okay... like this is confusing. If being 12 makes one a horrid icky plebe, and using French phrases affirms ones status as a patrician, then would a 12 year-old French girl be a plebe or a patrician?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]chash, 2003-07-03 07:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nevadafighter, 2003-07-03 07:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2003-07-03 07:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nevadafighter, 2003-07-03 07:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aruru, 2003-07-03 09:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nevadafighter, 2003-07-03 10:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2003-07-03 06:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hakainokami, 2003-07-03 11:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2003-07-03 11:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-03 09:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 10:01 pm UTC
Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-04 02:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-04 05:30 am UTC
This wank truly warms the cockles of my black black heart.
[info]cmikhailovic
2003-07-03 07:22 am UTC (link)
Wow, this stuff is priceless. Only in HP, man. It's a wonder Adolfa and Co. don't break something from all that patting themselves on the back. Because they're so imbeci- idio- intelleckshually sup'rior to those of us who think kids should be let alone and that genocide is a bad thing even if it's your favorite character doing it.


(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: This wank truly warms the cockles of my black black heart. - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 07:29 am UTC
Re: This wank truly warms the cockles of my black black heart. - [info]cmikhailovic, 2003-07-03 07:36 am UTC
Re: This wank truly warms the cockles of my black black heart. - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 03:06 pm UTC
Re: This wank truly warms the cockles of my black black heart. - [info]phosfate, 2003-07-03 06:08 pm UTC
Re: This wank truly warms the cockles of my black black heart. - [info]alyse, 2003-07-03 08:39 pm UTC

[info]sorchar
2003-07-03 08:29 am UTC (link)
I do not speak for Lissa, but I am amused that such a creature as you could possibly believe that as person whose I.Q. is at least 100 points higher than yours would ever stoop low enough to befriend you.

Considering that the average IQ is considered to be around 100, and we can probably assume that the person being ridiculed is probably at least that, since she's able to use a computer, is this post claiming that the IQ of the non-stooping person is at least 200? That, my friends, is one hell of a lot of bullshit.

These folks are the reason God invented bitch-slapping.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 04:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]yadda, 2003-07-03 07:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 08:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]yadda, 2003-07-03 08:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 09:21 pm UTC
Those pesky IQ tests. - [info]moonjaguar, 2003-07-03 08:45 pm UTC
Re: Those pesky IQ tests. - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-03 09:02 pm UTC
Re: Those pesky IQ tests. - [info]cmikhailovic, 2003-07-04 01:32 am UTC
Re: Those pesky IQ tests. - [info]yadda, 2003-07-04 04:20 am UTC
Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-03 08:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]moonjaguar, 2003-07-03 09:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kimera, 2003-07-04 06:15 am UTC

[info]harukami
2003-07-03 08:36 am UTC (link)
My GOD. I couldn't even make it through that link. O_o I got pretentiousness in my eye, which stung and blinded me for several minutes, and then I got down to the angry twelve year old's anonymous response - and she was well-spoken, had good spelling and grammar (especially for someone not in *high school* yet), and seemed at a *justifiable* level of anger, not freakout-level.

Jesus, just... yeah. Wouldn't it be nice if *antiplebes* got TOSed some day... >_>

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]harukami, 2003-07-03 08:35 pm UTC

[info]backfromspace
2003-07-03 09:12 am UTC (link)
I think it's funny that she's the one person in that group who fits the audience at whom the book was targeted.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mpoetess, 2003-07-03 09:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 04:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mpoetess, 2003-07-03 05:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 07:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pradaloz, 2003-07-03 08:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 09:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kannaophelia, 2003-07-04 03:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]amandatwop, 2003-07-04 04:12 am UTC

[info]pradaloz
2003-07-03 03:16 pm UTC (link)
Wow. I'd be pointing and laughing if it wasn't so damn pathetic.

(Reply to this)


[info]dana
2003-07-03 03:38 pm UTC (link)
I had a Commodore 64 when I was 10 and everyone in my class thought I was the trendiest. Floppy disks were floppy, it took 20 minutes to load a game up, and Zork was considered the best in fantasy gaming.

Oh those were the days.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2003-07-03 04:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 04:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mpoetess, 2003-07-03 05:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2003-07-03 06:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mpoetess, 2003-07-03 06:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jfpbookworm, 2003-07-03 07:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mpoetess, 2003-07-03 07:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 07:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]amandatwop, 2003-07-04 04:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gelasius, 2003-07-04 09:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]alden, 2003-07-04 04:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pradaloz, 2003-07-03 08:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 07:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mpoetess, 2003-07-03 08:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 08:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-03 08:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hakainokami, 2003-07-03 11:28 pm UTC
Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-04 12:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2003-07-04 12:37 am UTC
Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-04 12:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2003-07-04 12:49 am UTC
Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-04 12:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2003-07-04 12:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-04 01:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2003-07-04 05:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]loki, 2003-07-04 03:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]parlance, 2003-07-04 09:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-03 08:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ymfaery, 2003-07-03 09:09 pm UTC

[info]ingrid
2003-07-03 05:33 pm UTC (link)
An annoying, petulant child in a child's body is one thing, when it comes in the guise of a big, full-grown adult, it's a whole 'nuther matter entirely. A very scary matter.

Maturity. It's the accepted attitude for people over the age of 18, who usually have enough of it to successfully let the antics of babies roll off their backs with a smile.

Usually.

(Reply to this)

Ick.
[info]snacky
2003-07-03 06:53 pm UTC (link)
As annoying as the kid was (and it seems she was incredibly annoying), what kind of people pick on kids on the internet? I mean, ever heard of the concept of a fair fight?

And aren't these the people who are supposed to be above the hoi polloi? What are they doing engaging them?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Ick. - [info]ingrid, 2003-07-03 07:30 pm UTC
Re: Ick. - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 08:23 pm UTC
Re: Ick. - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-03 09:01 pm UTC
Re: Ick. - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-03 09:55 pm UTC
Re: Ick. - [info]iczer6, 2003-07-04 01:03 am UTC
Re: Ick. - [info]ingrid, 2003-07-04 06:12 am UTC
Re: Ick. - [info]iczer6, 2003-07-04 06:55 am UTC
Re: Ick. - [info]snacky, 2003-07-04 06:16 am UTC
Re: Ick. - [info]iczer6, 2003-07-04 06:46 am UTC
late reply, sorry! - [info]snacky, 2003-07-07 07:27 pm UTC
Re: Ick. - [info]ratkrycek, 2003-07-04 09:40 am UTC
Re: Ick. - [info]harukami, 2003-07-04 08:49 pm UTC
Re: Ick. - [info]lulinda, 2003-07-05 02:34 am UTC

[info]schoenschoen
2003-07-05 12:12 pm UTC (link)
Okay, I think I'm the first person to point this part out, but...

...doesn't it seem like the beta-reader who started this whole wanktastic orgy by reporting the girl to AntiPlebes in the first place... doesn't it seem like she's kinda two-faced and bitchy for doing that? I mean, so the kid's twelve. She at least has fair-to-average grammar and spelling - is beta-ing for her really that bad? I beta for a fifteen year-old and I love her to death. Why would you beta for someone you despised? To make fun of them? Who's the mature one now?

And while it *did* seem like the twelve year old was going to extremes, it also seemed like the antiplebes were gloating over nothing more than their own immature, bitchy, holier-than-thou behavior. X_x Geez.

(Reply to this)


[info]themadfish
2003-07-07 09:31 am UTC (link)
**blinks** I noticed a lot of people have mentioned that the 12 year old girl seemed to have decent spelling and grammer...

Too bad it can't be said for the same with her fics. I actually read it before this thing got wanked or even posted on the antiplebe or whatever thing.

And...hell, it made me want to beta her fic.

Some people replying to her stuff actually posted some good criticisms(though some of them were quite rude)...but she brushed them all off because they weren't the few "this roxxs!"(or however that netspeak stuff works) comments. Her response almost seemed to be the the typical "You're not in favor of my fic! You must be flaming me!" response.

So...I can understand where those antiplebe people are coming from...though I agree they overreacted.

**looks at the fic** wait, ok, the grammer and spelling may be ok, plotwise it makes me want to hang myself.

http://www.schnoogle.com/authorLinks/Sparkling_Cider/

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lulinda, 2003-07-07 09:52 am UTC


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map