Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



NM ([info]narcissam) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2006-01-31 20:03:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:fandom: harry potter, harmonians, pairing wars

No More One Big Happy Weasley Family
Gacked from a mouse on Wank Report. What happens when R/Hr shippers and H/G shippers fight?"

A short but amazingly passive-agressive wank. People are "offended" that H/G is left off Author-By-Night's list of canon pairings. My favourite line comes from [info]rhrsoulmates: Thank you author_by_night for at least admitting you weren't doing it against H/G shippers because we see too much of that around the fandom.

And here I thought it was the Harmonians being persecuted.

ETA: Some mice didn't think this was wanky enough for their tastes so they brought their own wank. Here and Here, most of it, and it's being discussed on [info]wankitywank here. Have fun.



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


(Anonymous)
2006-02-03 02:40 am UTC (link)
What a lot of illiterates don't get is H/G shippers have been attacked for more than five years now for being the delusional ones. Along comes book six and who's delusional? We've been attacked FOREVER because we saw the truth from the start and what we saw was called dreaming, wishful thinking and denial of first H/Hr and then H/L. If we hadn't been called morons for so long we wouldn't have been flinging that back at the anti-H/G idiots after HBP showed who was right and who was wrong.

H/G IS CANON.

And when it comes to certain fandom environments, like SQ, you have a right to expect the people there to be supportive of OBHWF. This is why it was annoying for a SugarQuiller to post this survey that said that H/G wasn't canon!

If H/G shippers have a persecution complex it's because we HAVE been attacked, constantly, for a very long time, both before and after book six. Book six SHOULD have meant the people who were wrong (at least the ones who have any integrity) admitting they were wrong, but NO. Instead they continued to call H/G shippers idiots, insisted that Harry and Ginny broke up so that means he's going to be getting together with Hermione, Luna, Tonks, Ron, Draco, Ron AND Hermione, Ron AND Draco, etc. Even though anyone with a brain could see that Harry did not WANT to break up with Ginny and that storyline is far from over.

Jo created her to be HARRY'S IDEAL GIRL. What part of that do the idiots not get?

All of it, evidently.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2006-02-03 05:12 am UTC (link)
Hi there, Prongssr. Nice of you to remind us--just in case we forgot--that Harry Potter Shipping = Serious Business.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2006-02-03 07:26 am UTC (link)
LOL. That merits an icon, methinks.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2006-02-03 05:33 am UTC (link)
Now, this is some wank I can get into right here. So hating a character or a situation within a work of fiction equals WE ARE OPPRESSED BECAUSE PEOPLE DON'T LOVE IT AND SAY SO OVER and OVER! YOU SHOULD LOVE IT BECAUSE WE SAY SO!

Some people need to get off of the computer and go get a life.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2006-02-03 06:35 am UTC (link)
Cry me a river, build a bridge, and GET OVER IT.


Move on with your life. It's laughable that you call the others idiots, when you're the one who keeps dwelling on it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2006-02-03 06:41 am UTC (link)
Aww. Poor baby. I'm so sorry that not everyone sees Ginny as Harry's ideal girl but a poor plot device.

I'm sorry your so oppressed. Next thing you know you'll be comparing yourself to slaves.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]thecheese
2006-02-03 07:01 am UTC (link)
Nope, I think that one's under copyright for exclusive Harmonian use.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-02-03 07:17 am UTC

[info]sistermagpie
2006-02-03 06:50 am UTC (link)
That's weird. I've thought H/G was going to happen for years and nobody ever called me delusional.

Though I should say I've occasionally heard the odd H/G-er say something that was delusional in support of the ship. It being canon doesn't mean that every H/G shipper is good at literary interpretation.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2006-02-03 07:51 am UTC (link)
HARRY'S IDEAL GIRL

Take note of the word 'Ideal'

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2006-02-03 08:02 am UTC (link)
ideal

1. A conception of something in its absolute perfection.
2. One that is regarded as a standard or model of perfection or excellence.

You mean, there is no such thing as "ideal" in reality? Oh noes, you are oppressing them with definitions beyond comprehension.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]illuminati, 2006-02-03 09:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-02-03 10:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-02-03 11:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-02-04 01:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-02-04 04:46 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-02-04 06:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-02-04 06:41 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-02-04 06:49 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-02-04 06:51 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-02-05 09:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tao_tao, 2006-02-05 04:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-02-05 05:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-02-06 12:54 am UTC
British defination of ideal - (Anonymous), 2006-02-05 12:46 am UTC
Re: British defination of ideal - [info]firebird5, 2006-02-05 04:24 pm UTC
Re: British defination of ideal - (Anonymous), 2006-02-05 05:10 pm UTC
Re: British defination of ideal - [info]firebird5, 2006-02-05 08:45 pm UTC
Re: British defination of ideal - [info]illuminati, 2006-02-06 04:38 am UTC
Re: British defination of ideal - [info]watermelon, 2006-02-06 01:43 am UTC

[info]onearmeddrummer
2006-02-03 12:59 pm UTC (link)
Gett off the fucking cross, will you? Last time I checked it was already in use.
Shipping is not the Most Serious Business Ever. You sound exactly like the Harmonians. Am I the only one who can't stand H/H and H/G equally? Bleh.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


chief
2006-02-04 01:08 am UTC (link)
Pretty sure you're not. Personally I'm more indifferent to H/Hr than H/G, but I'm pretty sure I'd hate it, if it had become canon.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]sir_hellsing
2006-02-03 01:03 pm UTC (link)
So the tasty wank is in the comments. *grabs pop corn and hopes Harry will die virgin or go Albert (Gankutsuou) with Voldemort*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]firebird5
2006-02-03 01:15 pm UTC (link)
Wahey! Bringing the wank to FW. I love you H/G shippers. The fun never stops with you lot.

Though... I do tremble in fear at your capslocks of doom.

If we hadn't been called morons for so long we wouldn't have been flinging that back at the anti-H/G idiots after HBP showed who was right and who was wrong.

No, you're not called morons because people think you "guessed wrong OMG". You're a moron because you don't seem to realise that this is just a ship and that these are just a couple of children's books, and that your damn ship warring is wanky as hell. Because you cry into your pillow from being so offended that someone didn't include your ship on a freaking poll in their own LJ. Because H/G IS CANON H/G IS CANON H/G IS CANON LALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU is the height of intellectual debate and shows how you are so well-behaved and non-wanky. Please, STFU already.

If H/G shippers have a persecution complex it's because we HAVE been attacked,

OF COURSE! YOU'RE SPESHUL! How could I not see that? You poor, poor martyr.

Get off your computer and go run around in the fresh air for a bit. If you can manage to wrench yourself off that cross you seem so attached to.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


chief
2006-02-04 01:12 am UTC (link)
Considering how many H/G-shippers think that they are personally attacked every time anyone mentions they don't like their ship or their favourite character, it's no wonder they are more persecuted than others. ;-)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2006-02-03 03:28 pm UTC (link)
Erm..what ship hasn't been attacked. Don't think your special are anything.

And JKR also said Harry and Ginny would come together and then part but y'all love to ignore that little detail.


Get off the fuckin soap box and get a life. You sound just as crazy as those Harmonians and that's saying something.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]tinybubbles
2006-02-04 12:02 am UTC (link)
Interesting. I've been shipping H/G for years and I never had any idea I was being oppressed. Thanks for letting me know! I now feel appropriately offended and persecuted.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]loopywafflehead
2006-02-04 12:46 am UTC (link)
I never had any idea we could oppress you guys, but now I know better! *offends and persecutes liek whoa* Hey, this is fun! ;)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]loopywafflehead
2006-02-04 12:59 am UTC (link)
And once again, this is why I love being a non-canon shipper. We acknowledge canon and then just continue doing our thing. We even are capable of enjoying more than one pairing. Imagine that! If the worst thing you've been called is a moron, you're doing all right. I've lost track of how many times slashers have been called 'paedophiles' and homophobic insults. If you're letting people get to this much because they don't like your OTP, it's probably time to step away from the computer.

Oh, and my OTP is HP/SS and I agree that in canon, Ginny is his ideal girl, but not for any happy fluffy reasons. (You know, I'd like H/G a lot more if it weren't so Sweet Valley High and if it played up the darker aspects of their relationship.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


chief
2006-02-04 01:18 am UTC (link)
I love your icon!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-02-04 02:30 am UTC
(no subject) - chief, 2006-02-04 02:49 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-02-04 01:29 am UTC (link)
Rowling said her books would get darker with each one and I expected as such, but that fluff threw me for a loop. It would've been great if we saw Ginny struggling with her dark side, relating with Harry's experience in the previous book. "Sunlit days" my ass. War around you, hello?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-02-04 02:38 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-02-04 04:15 am UTC (link)
If I give you a damn tissue will you go wank elsewhere? I will say this slowly and clearly fiction teenage relationship and getting this upset over it just one stop on the way to batshit. I mean, yeah, you guessed right and others guessed wrong and book seven will surely see you through...but now you're acting like an ass and I beginning to wish that I hated OBHWF too.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]esclaramonde
2006-02-04 05:11 am UTC (link)
I do agree that H/G shippers have been kicked around by most of the fandom that cares about ships at all, but please. You are not doing anybody any favors by yelling that we are persecuted and attacked. I'm going to pick apart your post ... but only because I care.

What a lot of illiterates don't get is H/G shippers have been attacked for more than five years now for being the delusional ones.

You have a good point, but PLEASE. You've been called illiterate yourself for years, don't go affixing that label to other people. It's stupid.

And when it comes to certain fandom environments, like SQ, you have a right to expect the people there to be supportive of OBHWF. This is why it was annoying for a SugarQuiller to post this survey that said that H/G wasn't canon!

She was using a different definition of canon. It takes a bit of twistiness, but it is understandable. I'm fairly sure that she thinks it will end up with H/G. I shall ask her right now:

Me: For the purposes of mouse education on FW, do you think it will end up H/G?
ABN: What will?
ABN: The books?
Me: Yes.
ABN: Definitely, if Harry lives.
Me: Okay!
ABN: They still love one another.

Okay? it's not a big deal. She isn't anti-H/G. She wasn't bashing the ship.

If H/G shippers have a persecution complex it's because we HAVE been attacked, constantly, for a very long time, both before and after book six.

No, no. If you want people to feel for you, refer to such attacks with dry humor and downplay them. The people who agree will be more likely to stand with you. This way, they might be embarrassed. If you get very ship ranty on FW, you are not likely to get many friends.

Book six SHOULD have meant the people who were wrong (at least the ones who have any integrity) admitting they were wrong, but NO. Instead they continued to call H/G shippers idiots, insisted that Harry and Ginny broke up so that means he's going to be getting together with Hermione, Luna, Tonks, Ron, Draco, Ron AND Hermione, Ron AND Draco, etc.

I started out agreeing with you, but you're acting like people are seriously thinking it'll be a slashy or threesome ending. They don't. People can like what they want in fanon -- nobody likes it when people go on about how bad obviously fanon ships are. Also, Harry/Ron is so much better than many other ships, including H/Hr. I have a very good fic ... here we go. Two Households, Both Alike In Dignity. It roxxorz. It ROX my SOX. Anyway, my point is: don't flip over fanon pairings. Save the energy for H/Hr. *winks*

Even though anyone with a brain could see that Harry did not WANT to break up with Ginny and that storyline is far from over.

Calm down, everyone here agrees with you. Everyone HERE. Discount the other mice; nobody really cares about mice too much when they don't sign. (Which leads me to this: you will get a lot more respect if you sign your name to posts.)

Jo created her to be HARRY'S IDEAL GIRL. What part of that do the idiots not get?

DOn't even. I know it, you know it -- other people will say this means something different, like platonic ... saying it again will not change their opinions.

And after getting so worked up, making a reference to the fact that you know you're getting too angry, such as "fetch me a tissue", would not go amiss.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ella_w
2006-02-04 10:14 pm UTC (link)
exactly. Whatever reaction the ship gets now, there was a time when HG were called stupid on a fairly regular basis. Most people here either don't know that, or don't give a fuck though, so you sort of picked the wrong place to go ranting.

Maybe next time something like this would work?

"Seems to me that Harry/Ginny is canon what with the kissing and the 'omg I still love you but Peter Parker donated some lines and it would be rude not to use them.' Still, damn it feels good to be a gangsta right. Who's the illiterate fuckwad now, bitches? *kicks back heels and watches the wank*

~H/G mousie"

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]narcissam, 2006-02-04 10:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]firebird5, 2006-02-04 11:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-02-04 11:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ella_w, 2006-02-05 04:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-02-05 04:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]waltraute, 2006-02-05 04:23 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-02-05 05:39 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-02-07 01:25 am UTC
er... okay? - [info]ella_w, 2006-02-07 01:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]firebird5, 2006-02-04 11:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-02-04 11:45 pm UTC

[info]wankismyfandom
2006-02-06 12:37 am UTC (link)
You sound very Harmonian. I'm just sayin', is all.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - chief, 2006-02-06 04:42 am UTC

(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map