|
|
hrist (![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} hristaesir) wrote in ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/community.gif){kind=small} fandom_wank,@ 2006-03-09 16:39:00 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| Entry tags: | fandom: ball jointed dolls, taking it too seriously |
Over at the ball-jointed doll forum Den of Angels, user haha has a question:
Do dolls really have to marry dolls (if they want to get married)?"
haha wants to know:
i am just curious. if i get an engagement ring for my boy and myself, is it weird/crazy/mad to you? i treat my dolls not as my "kids", but as my "boyfriends". does anyone else do the same thing?
can dolls be married to their owners instead of another (or other) dolls?
Responses, naturally, vary; they range from "I'd say, marry who you like- that's for you AND your dolls...." to "if you are substituting dolls to fill normal family roles then it's time to get help." It is generally unclear whether the OP is serious or kidding.
Of course we could not have this discussion without accusations of closed-mindedness: juumou announces that "It sounds like there are some less-opened minded people here."
As if that weren't enough, we also have omichao and possibly Guide declaring their asexuality, and the requisite ad-hominem attack by Chachamaru: ""unique situation" Since when being a teenage girl pretending to be a man considered a "unique situation", just another reason to call a shrink in my opinion."
Really, the entire thread is lots of fun. It has everything, including mods stepping in and telling people to behave, and someone bitching about spelling! And if we assume everyone is going to ignore the modly pleas for civility (which is a safe bet on most message boards, really), this baby's just getting started.
