Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



TaoTao ([info]tao_tao) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2006-03-27 04:06:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood: amused
Entry tags:person: chancery stone

DANNY fandom wank!
What do you mean you are not into DANNY fandom?

[info]chancery_stone, author of DANNY, appeared on my flist announcing her latest lj entry in [info]wuthering and [info]sistersbronte, because it discusses Jane Eyre and Wuthering Heights, and DANNY.
I do most certainly not begrudge her that, since I was interested in what she had to say about these novels.
I was, however, even more interested in what she had to say in her userinfo:

There is also a discussion board run here on Live Journal by some 'fans' called Chancerys_Danny. I am not permitted to view it, and have nothing to do with its content (that's how you know this is an authentic cult novel - nothing but drama all the way), but this is the place to go if you want to diss the dirt on me - there is plenty there.

Unfortunately you will need high credentials to enter. They won't admit new users, anyone who doesn't have a regularly maintained journal, or who is not a committted net user and only wants to discuss the book. They are morbidly afraid of spies so you will have to go through the mill of suspicion that you are really me in disguise.

Should you be dedicated enough to endure this just to read about my nasty, unlovable side, a fast and simple way to shortcut this tedious process is to tell them all the things you dislike about me and/or my work. After that your journal can be a big fat zero, you will be embraced as a sister (remember never to let your facade slip though, or you'll be right out on your arse again).



The fan comm mod, excuse me, the 'fan' comm mod has this to say in an open post:

Because of the articles and blog posts by Chancery Stone, which can be read on her website and blog I have decided to moderate membership. If you are a Danny fan and wish to discuss the book, we would love to have you! Please join in the usual way and I will approve you. However, if you are not a regular Live Journal user, and appear to be a fake journal trying to read what we have to say, you will not be approved. I will be checking all journals before admitting anyone.

I would never have imagined that I would have to close membership on a book community, however criticism of the novel Danny has riled the author considerably and many attacks have been made by her using things expressed here in open discussion. Since the author has decided to resort to personal attacks away from the source of the discussion, I have decided that I am no longer going to allow her access to our comments so that discussion of the book can be enjoyed freely and without reservation. Many thanks for your understanding.



Apparently several new lj users have expressed the wish to discuss DANNY, since the community, which so far has five members, is locked.
Meet [info]valentinotango, [info]bronte_babe, [info]jeff_peters, [info]poisondripper, [info]jodie0992 and [info]jillandjodie.


Stone heavily denies that she has anything to do with the sockpuppets dramatic increase of DANNY fans, in her rant against the locking ( Why the fuck would I go to the effort of pretending to be someone else, actually making up a journal, to find out what they say?), although she obviously learned about the unpleasant screening process behind closed doors, as she described in her Farewell To The Famous Five.

I can give you the beginning of the drama.
For all the snide remarks in between, you will have to read her blogspirit.

No Anne Rice bashing, please.

ETA: Have some links to guide you through the splooge.

ETA2: The members of Wuthering read Fanfom Wank or her journal and thus comment anonymously. Hilarity ensues. In which she denies to have ever called Cathy's husband Edward.

ETA3: A brandnew, unfortunately now already deleted, sock joins [info]jillandjodie's discussion group and a stinkin' anonymous troll links her back here: link

ETA4: The Famous Five bring presents. Wheeee!

ETA5: Put those Potter stickers down for a moment and read Chancery Stone's response to Fandom Wank.
Also, I AM Chancery Stone! Maybe.




Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]narcissam
2006-03-27 05:03 am UTC (link)
. They're all would-be writers - except for the half who seems to have given up her writing ambitions, preferring to hold court on Live Journal rather like Elizabeth the first, but with gay porn instead of courtiers

*sporfles* I can see why this didn't go anywhere good.

And people complain about JK Rowling and the 'd' word?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]narcissam, 2006-03-27 05:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]narcissam, 2006-03-27 05:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tao_tao, 2006-03-27 12:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]abydonian, 2006-03-27 11:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rachel_pi, 2006-03-28 01:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2006-03-29 06:16 am UTC

[info]chaoscheebs
2006-03-27 05:06 am UTC (link)
*blinks* I read that as "Danny Phantom wank". Now I'm kinda disappointed there's no whining about half-ghost boys and who he should be schtoinking.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]jira, 2006-03-27 05:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nekoneko, 2006-03-27 06:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nekoneko, 2006-03-27 06:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lillyv, 2006-03-27 06:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mcity, 2006-03-27 07:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dark_puck, 2006-03-27 07:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seraphtrevs, 2006-03-27 08:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2006-03-27 08:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seraphtrevs, 2006-03-27 08:23 am UTC
... - [info]smo, 2006-03-27 08:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evanwaters, 2006-03-27 08:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]daylightsparks, 2006-03-27 10:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tao_tao, 2006-03-27 12:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2006-03-28 04:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2006-03-28 06:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]khym_chanur, 2006-03-28 12:09 pm UTC

[info]kalindi
2006-03-27 05:28 am UTC (link)
Wow, I can just smell the arrogance and idiocy reeking off the author.

I bet her book's not even that good.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]emiweebee, 2006-03-28 02:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2006-03-28 06:11 am UTC

sharonapple
2006-03-27 05:33 am UTC (link)
So, it's a book about gay guys having sex, manipulating each other, and committing crimes... or something? Sounds like Kaori Yuki's Boys Next Door.

Well, at the very least, Ms. Stone knows what paragraph breaks are.

And what do gay men with psychotic tendencies have to do with The Brontes? *fangirls Emily*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tao_tao, 2006-03-27 04:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - sharonapple, 2006-03-27 04:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tao_tao, 2006-03-27 09:11 pm UTC
... - sharonapple, 2006-03-28 01:15 am UTC

[info]littlebitca
2006-03-27 05:44 am UTC (link)
"No Anne Rice bashing..." just takes the fun out of life.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - thefirebottle, 2006-03-27 07:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ilpalazzo, 2006-03-27 08:36 am UTC

[info]brown_betty
2006-03-27 05:58 am UTC (link)
She seems rather pathetically anxious to have any kind of fanclub, even one dedicated to hating her. She certainly follows their doings with interest.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tao_tao, 2006-03-27 12:36 pm UTC

[info]sorchar
2006-03-27 06:00 am UTC (link)
What the hell is DANNY?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]arien, 2006-03-27 06:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2006-03-27 06:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jadelennox, 2006-03-27 06:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]katienichol, 2006-03-27 07:35 am UTC
... - [info]julian_black, 2006-03-28 08:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]v_digitalwytch, 2006-03-27 09:50 am UTC
... - [info]randomsome1, 2006-03-28 03:04 am UTC
... - [info]v_digitalwytch, 2006-03-28 03:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]brown_betty, 2006-03-27 06:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyrrah, 2006-03-27 06:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2006-03-27 06:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]brown_betty, 2006-03-27 06:25 am UTC
... - [info]puipui, 2006-03-27 06:33 am UTC
... - [info]kijikun, 2006-03-28 06:16 am UTC
... - [info]brown_betty, 2006-03-28 06:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kalindi, 2006-03-27 06:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]brown_betty, 2006-03-27 06:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smut_queen, 2006-03-27 08:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evanwaters, 2006-03-27 09:17 am UTC
... - [info]smut_queen, 2006-03-27 09:23 am UTC
... - [info]evanwaters, 2006-03-27 10:03 am UTC
... - [info]annabelle_lee, 2006-03-27 11:39 am UTC
... - [info]crickets, 2006-03-27 11:17 pm UTC
... - [info]tofuknight, 2006-03-27 11:38 pm UTC
... - [info]crickets, 2006-03-28 06:42 am UTC
... - [info]khym_chanur, 2006-03-28 12:15 pm UTC
... - [info]crickets, 2006-03-28 09:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackhat, 2006-03-27 04:15 pm UTC
... - [info]smut_queen, 2006-03-27 08:31 pm UTC
... - [info]crickets, 2006-03-27 11:10 pm UTC
... - [info]princessdot, 2006-03-28 05:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kannaophelia, 2006-03-27 11:27 pm UTC
... - [info]influencethis, 2006-03-28 05:33 am UTC
... - [info]kijikun, 2006-03-28 06:20 am UTC
... - [info]influencethis, 2006-03-28 06:35 am UTC
... - [info]tao_tao, 2006-03-28 04:58 pm UTC
... - [info]influencethis, 2006-03-28 05:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]scorpio20, 2006-03-27 08:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ilpalazzo, 2006-03-27 10:48 am UTC
... - [info]tao_tao, 2006-03-27 12:53 pm UTC
... - [info]princessdot, 2006-03-28 05:54 am UTC
(no subject) - shempskaya, 2006-03-27 05:20 pm UTC
... - [info]seraphtrevs, 2006-03-29 04:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]distractogirl, 2006-03-27 05:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brown_betty, 2006-03-27 06:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jrs1980, 2006-03-28 03:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2006-03-29 06:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonkit, 2006-03-27 06:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mouseybrown, 2006-03-28 11:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tophets_tool, 2006-03-28 06:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mouseybrown, 2006-03-29 12:10 pm UTC

[info]lady7jane
2006-03-27 06:09 am UTC (link)
This bodes well. She has five fans and she can't even get along with them? I always thought the early stages of a fandom were supposed to be the sweetest.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]narcissam, 2006-03-27 06:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-03-27 06:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady7jane, 2006-03-27 06:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mala_prohibita, 2006-03-28 01:51 am UTC

[info]pyrrah
2006-03-27 06:17 am UTC (link)
Wait... This is an actually published novel?

I thought it was just a BNF whining about fans of her fanfic or something.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]embyquinn, 2006-03-27 07:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kalindi, 2006-03-27 07:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]annabelle_lee, 2006-03-27 11:52 am UTC
... - [info]panthea, 2006-03-27 11:10 pm UTC
... - [info]julian_black, 2006-03-28 09:11 am UTC
... - [info]crickets, 2006-03-27 11:36 pm UTC
... - [info]annabelle_lee, 2006-03-28 04:35 am UTC
... - [info]mercutia, 2006-04-09 09:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rachel_pi, 2006-03-27 06:10 pm UTC
... - [info]nebbieq, 2006-03-27 08:30 pm UTC
... - [info]cleolinda, 2006-03-28 12:26 am UTC
... - [info]nebbieq, 2006-03-28 01:22 am UTC
... - [info]pipssister, 2006-03-28 12:42 am UTC
... - [info]tao_tao, 2006-03-28 01:04 am UTC
... - [info]rachel_pi, 2006-03-28 01:47 am UTC
... - [info]khym_chanur, 2006-03-28 12:19 pm UTC
... - [info]madmouth, 2006-04-10 08:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]frenzy, 2006-03-28 03:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]elektra3, 2006-03-27 07:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dracolovesharry, 2006-03-27 10:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2006-03-28 12:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sirbartonslady, 2006-03-27 08:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tao_tao, 2006-03-27 11:37 am UTC
(no subject) - shempskaya, 2006-03-27 05:14 pm UTC
... - [info]julian_black, 2006-03-28 09:13 am UTC
... - sharonapple, 2006-03-29 04:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]narcissam, 2006-03-27 09:06 pm UTC
... - [info]not_myself, 2006-03-27 10:02 pm UTC
... - [info]clover_elf_kin, 2006-03-27 11:40 pm UTC
... - [info]not_myself, 2006-03-28 12:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]telophase, 2006-03-28 05:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]snacky, 2006-03-27 06:19 pm UTC

[info]mooncalf
2006-03-27 06:48 am UTC (link)
I kept going 'DANNY stands for something, right? It's a clever acronym for the book's title, right?'

... and I still don't know!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tofuknight, 2006-03-27 06:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dr_tristessa, 2006-03-27 10:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sabinelagrande, 2006-03-27 08:51 pm UTC

[info]la_viv
2006-03-27 06:50 am UTC (link)
Well. I just spent a few minutes reading over the excerpts posted on her website. This woman needs an editor. If she already has one, she needs to fire them and hire one that has a clue.

I won't even touch the actual content of the sentences, except to say that I've read better in fanfic.

Yikes.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-03-27 01:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]snacky, 2006-03-27 06:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brown_betty, 2006-03-27 06:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nebbieq, 2006-03-27 08:36 pm UTC

[info]mcity
2006-03-27 07:02 am UTC (link)
No Anne Rice bashing, please.
Can we verbally bludgeon her, instead?

(Reply to this)


[info]sorchar
2006-03-27 08:08 am UTC (link)
It's got brothercest, according to the reviews, which would normally make me want to read it, but the author annoys me.

Also, and this is totally my persnickety little pet peeve - I hate hate hate when characters who are siblings are named John and Ian, John and Sean/Shawn/Shaun, Ian and Sean/Shawn/Shaun, or any variants/spellings of the above. They're all the same damn name. It's like naming sisters Mary and Maria. (Excluding Catholic families who purposely include some form of Mary in each daughter's name.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rolling_my_eyes, 2006-03-27 05:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]yubsie, 2006-03-27 10:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyrrah, 2006-03-27 06:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]panthea, 2006-03-27 10:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyrrah, 2006-03-27 11:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pingin_tango, 2006-03-27 06:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tao_tao, 2006-03-27 06:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rachel_pi, 2006-03-27 08:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2006-03-28 06:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2006-03-28 06:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aegflota, 2006-04-05 09:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rachel_pi, 2006-04-05 11:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]annafora, 2006-04-09 07:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]narcissam, 2006-03-27 09:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]darth_snuggles, 2006-03-28 12:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]miss_arel, 2006-03-29 05:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankismyfandom, 2006-03-29 06:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]monsley, 2006-03-28 01:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tessfawcett, 2006-03-29 03:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]annafora, 2006-04-09 07:43 pm UTC

[info]seraphtrevs
2006-03-27 08:20 am UTC (link)
A novel nobody's read ≠ "cult" novel.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sirbartonslady, 2006-03-27 09:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2006-03-28 06:25 am UTC

[info]solle
2006-03-27 09:56 am UTC (link)
*pouts* I wanted DANNY Elfman wank. Or at least DANNY Schweiger.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]miss_arel, 2006-03-29 05:04 am UTC

[info]loopywafflehead
2006-03-27 01:19 pm UTC (link)
What's this procrastinated rape theory of hers? I don't know much about the works of the Bronte sisters; is any of what she says valid?

In DANNY the protracted rape happens all the time, every day, several times a day, over and over again, till you don't know what's rape and what's not, and till you begin to realise that actually maybe the procrastinated rape is somewhere else, about something else.

Procrastinated love, perhaps...


Buh? Hey, Ms Author, if I want a "he only rapes you because he loves you" story, they're for free all over the internet. I'm not paying for rapefic.

Who should direct the film version of her book, I hear you all asking? Never fear, the author has given it serious consideration!

No-one in Hollywood, or out of it, is going to let a maverick like me loose on a film set.

Society's Hollywood's loss, I suppose.

In all honesty, it's great that she's doing her best to succeed. And anyone who's written anything original and says they've never thought about what it would be like as a movie or tv show is lying through their teeth. She just seems to be taking things far too seriously and creating even more obstacles for herself. Or perhaps the flamewars and name-calling and inability to take critcism are all part of her grand publicity plan.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tao_tao, 2006-03-27 01:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-03-27 02:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]evanwaters, 2006-03-27 07:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-03-27 08:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pipssister, 2006-03-28 12:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-03-28 03:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seraphtrevs, 2006-03-28 05:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-03-28 03:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2006-03-28 06:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-03-28 04:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]randomsome1, 2006-03-29 02:41 am UTC
... - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-03-29 03:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2006-03-28 07:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-03-28 04:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2006-03-28 08:05 pm UTC
... - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-03-29 03:42 pm UTC
... - [info]evilsqueakers, 2006-03-29 10:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mouseybrown, 2006-03-28 12:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-03-28 04:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]evanwaters, 2006-03-28 10:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - chief, 2006-03-29 04:52 am UTC

[info]adora_spintriae
2006-03-27 01:34 pm UTC (link)
I go to her website and try to read her "book extracts", but all I get is a huge mass of Chinese characters with random bits like, 'Ian didn't dare disagree, not yet. He said instead, "Reckon she wants to pull his penis?"' in English.

WTF?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-03-27 01:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]adora_spintriae, 2006-03-27 02:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-03-27 02:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tao_tao, 2006-03-27 02:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brown_betty, 2006-03-27 06:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nekoneko, 2006-03-27 07:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]plazmah, 2006-03-27 11:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]khym_chanur, 2006-03-28 12:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-03-28 04:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smut_queen, 2006-03-27 08:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jrandomlurker, 2006-03-27 10:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]randomsome1, 2006-03-29 02:49 am UTC
(no subject) - chief, 2006-03-29 04:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]khym_chanur, 2006-03-28 12:53 pm UTC
Gems in the wankmine
[info]dr_tristessa
2006-03-27 03:02 pm UTC (link)
I didn't feel like fiddling with the encoding to change her book excerpts from random Chinese characters into English, so I went to the "Articles" section. Comedy gold jackpot!

Watch as she reinvents the "Why do women write slash?" wheel with an extra order of armchair psychiatry:

In theory it's great these women are really into this, great they are writing their own porn. If only they were.

It's as if they daren't put a face to their own desires, they have to superimpose them on existing creations with sub rosa homosexual subtexts. Name any male fictional character who displays a little too much male bonding or an ambiguous sexuality, and there's slash/fanfic about them.

Does this make these women feel less abnormal? - 'I didn't think up the pervy homosexual thing, it was in there already'.

Less vulnerable? - 'These men wouldn't freak if I got them to kiss each other'.

More acceptable? - 'Look, all these other women think Angel and 'whoever' really secretly fancy each other.' (No, never seen that either ... shit.)


Shut up, gay boys! My oppression trumps your piddling complaints of homophobia:

Yes, there's lots of gay sex in [DANNY], but it was written as revenge, pornography and to show how being gay could be manufactured just like any other part of a person's psyche.
...
It may not be fashionable to be fat, but it's nobody's business but your own. It may be fashionable to be gay, but it doesn't make you special, nor have you been singled out by God. You're just fucked up like the rest of us. There's very little difference if your family dysfunction makes you crave dick or doughnuts, you'll still end up socially marginalised.

But you shouldn't be, it's not fair.

Oh tragic, get over it. You will be.

Be thankful you're queer not podgy - at least you're allowed to appear on TV and in Vogue.


Other highlights:
Warning: This attitude will only get you places if your name is George Lucas.
Godwin's ahoy, and her antipathy to fanfic writers is explained!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Gems in the wankmine - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-03-27 03:29 pm UTC
Re: Gems in the wankmine - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-03-27 03:29 pm UTC
Re: Gems in the wankmine - [info]dr_tristessa, 2006-03-27 05:05 pm UTC
Re: Gems in the wankmine - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-03-27 07:48 pm UTC
... - [info]dr_tristessa, 2006-03-28 03:47 am UTC
... - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-03-28 04:09 pm UTC
Re: Gems in the wankmine - [info]blackhat, 2006-03-27 04:37 pm UTC
Re: Gems in the wankmine - [info]influencethis, 2006-03-28 05:49 am UTC
Re: Gems in the wankmine - [info]hickorydickory, 2006-03-27 05:43 pm UTC
Re: Gems in the wankmine - [info]kalindi, 2006-03-27 07:14 pm UTC
Re: Gems in the wankmine - [info]issendai, 2006-03-28 05:22 am UTC
Re: Gems in the wankmine - [info]nebbieq, 2006-03-27 09:10 pm UTC
Re: Gems in the wankmine - shempskaya, 2006-03-27 11:23 pm UTC
Re: Gems in the wankmine - [info]dr_tristessa, 2006-03-28 03:54 am UTC
Re: Gems in the wankmine - [info]blackhat, 2006-03-28 04:37 pm UTC
Re: Gems in the wankmine - [info]v_digitalwytch, 2006-03-28 12:39 am UTC
Re: Gems in the wankmine - [info]seraphtrevs, 2006-03-28 05:52 am UTC
Re: Gems in the wankmine - [info]sorchar, 2006-03-28 06:33 am UTC
Re: Gems in the wankmine - [info]seraphtrevs, 2006-03-28 06:51 am UTC
... - [info]sorchar, 2006-03-28 06:57 am UTC
... - [info]seraphtrevs, 2006-03-28 07:17 am UTC
... - [info]sorchar, 2006-03-28 07:22 am UTC
... - [info]seraphtrevs, 2006-03-28 07:27 am UTC

[info]loopywafflehead
2006-03-27 04:31 pm UTC (link)
You've stumbled on a goldmine here, tao_tao. There are these two posts where she's angry that people didn't promote her book enough because they're too obsessed with Brokeback Mountain. Or something. The people she bitched about took down the favourable reviews of her book, which is apparently what she wanted (see last comment on second post).

And Agape FTW: Five fans who read your "cult novel" get together to discuss it in an online version of a book group. Instead of finding it gratifying that people are taking your work seriously enough to give it the same treatment that the best works of literature receive, you skulk about trying to dig up dirt on these five people through the public entries of their journals and then passively aggressively rant about them in rather personal, lengthy tomes on a blog.

Lady, all the PR in the world couldn't make me read your novel after this ridiculous display. Get over yourself.


(I'm so sorry for spamming your post, this topic is just so much fun, I discover something new every time! Who knew I wrote slash to feel less abnormal? Not me!)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tao_tao, 2006-03-27 06:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-03-27 07:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rachel_pi, 2006-03-27 06:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-03-27 07:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kalindi, 2006-03-27 07:38 pm UTC
... - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-03-27 07:55 pm UTC
... - [info]rachel_pi, 2006-03-27 08:07 pm UTC
... - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-03-27 08:13 pm UTC
... - [info]rachel_pi, 2006-03-27 08:23 pm UTC
... - [info]sorchar, 2006-03-28 06:36 am UTC
... - [info]jadelennox, 2006-03-27 08:49 pm UTC
... - [info]rachel_pi, 2006-03-27 11:24 pm UTC
... - [info]jadelennox, 2006-03-28 03:28 pm UTC
... - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-03-28 04:13 pm UTC
... - [info]rachel_pi, 2006-03-28 04:36 pm UTC
... - [info]sorchar, 2006-03-28 06:38 am UTC
... - [info]dwarfjen, 2006-03-28 12:09 pm UTC
... - [info]sorchar, 2006-03-28 10:54 pm UTC
... - [info]jadelennox, 2006-03-28 03:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2006-03-28 06:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]julian_black, 2006-03-28 09:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]carlanime, 2006-03-28 03:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-03-28 04:26 pm UTC

[info]blackhat
2006-03-27 04:50 pm UTC (link)
Her book is nearly a *thousand pages long*? And she's writing *three sequels*?

Not even She-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named overwrites to that extent.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]julian_black, 2006-03-28 09:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]magdelene, 2006-03-28 02:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]julian_black, 2006-03-28 02:56 pm UTC
... - [info]magdelene, 2006-03-28 03:02 pm UTC

[info]smut_queen
2006-03-27 06:52 pm UTC (link)
Can't someone sue her for this?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-03-27 08:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rachel_pi, 2006-03-27 08:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smut_queen, 2006-03-27 08:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rachel_pi, 2006-03-27 08:48 pm UTC
... - [info]smut_queen, 2006-03-27 08:59 pm UTC
... - [info]rachel_pi, 2006-03-27 11:25 pm UTC
... - [info]randomsome1, 2006-03-28 03:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2006-03-28 12:24 am UTC

[info]kalindi
2006-03-27 07:24 pm UTC (link)
She wastes an entry self-promoting on the Wuthering community. A mouse calls her out on it.

She runs back to her lj to whinge about it.

http://chancery-stone.livejournal.com/3699.html

(Reply to this)(Thread)

plus! - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-03-27 07:41 pm UTC
Re: plus! - [info]hobbitsexual, 2006-03-28 04:37 am UTC
Re: plus! - [info]loopywafflehead, 2006-03-28 04:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackhat, 2006-03-27 07:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sabinelagrande, 2006-03-27 08:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-01 07:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mouseybrown, 2006-03-27 08:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]moriath, 2006-03-27 08:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tao_tao, 2006-03-27 09:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sporked, 2006-03-27 10:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2006-03-28 12:27 am UTC
... - [info]lady7jane, 2006-03-28 02:07 am UTC
... - [info]dr_tristessa, 2006-03-28 04:14 am UTC
... - [info]jrs1980, 2006-03-28 04:17 am UTC
... - [info]smut_queen, 2006-03-28 05:49 am UTC
... - [info]issendai, 2006-03-28 07:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seraphtrevs, 2006-03-29 04:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tao_tao, 2006-03-29 10:57 pm UTC
... - [info]seraphtrevs, 2006-03-30 04:18 am UTC
... - [info]tao_tao, 2006-03-30 05:38 am UTC
... - [info]seraphtrevs, 2006-03-30 05:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2006-03-30 03:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]carlanime, 2006-03-28 04:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jediowl, 2006-03-28 08:45 pm UTC

[info]frequentmouse
2006-03-27 09:07 pm UTC (link)
Wow.

And I thought I was incurably wordy.

Chancery Stone, Queen of the Prolix Tautology.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mathias, 2006-03-27 11:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaos_theory, 2006-03-28 12:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2006-03-28 01:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaos_theory, 2006-03-28 05:06 am UTC

[info]simkin_mouse
2006-03-27 09:52 pm UTC (link)
...excuse me, eye bleach and I need to cuddle and bond after those excerpts.

*cough* meanwhile, who's in favour of a petition with the undersigned offering to beta read the piece? Come on, surely among a few dozens of us, we'd manage all the typos, abused tenses, clauses and commas! Think of it as community service! only with assured traumatic consequences

(Reply to this)


[info]blackhat
2006-03-27 10:47 pm UTC (link)
And here, Ms. Stone talks about how the members of her fan club PERSONALLY hate her for being for being "arrogant, condescending and a massive egoist with an abject lust for 'fawning' praise."

Oh, and she claims her book was originally LONGER before it was edited. Yes, she claims it was edited:

The book was edited over thirteen years to achieve its current length. . . Between 128 and 200 pages were removed from it, not in chapters or even scenes, but in paragraphs, sentences and single words, inch by painstaking inch. Most of the text was rewritten, some of it drastically, many, many times. Believe me girls (sadly, yes, my anti-fans are 'sisters') it was edited to death.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]blackhat, 2006-03-27 10:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seraphtrevs, 2006-03-28 05:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]inishmore, 2006-03-27 10:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kalindi, 2006-03-27 10:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lykomancer, 2006-03-27 11:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tofuknight, 2006-03-27 11:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]moriath, 2006-03-28 01:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]moriath, 2006-03-28 01:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2006-03-28 06:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]solar_type_star, 2006-03-29 08:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seraphtrevs, 2006-03-28 06:00 pm UTC


Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map