Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



VV (sharonapple) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2006-04-17 05:10:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Snoopy-Dancing
Entry tags:person: chancery stone

Chancery Wankery
It seems that Chancie's fallen hard for us! She's talking about us in her blog, again.

Apparently her online novella just wasn't doing it for her, so after churning out several installments of "Flora & Fauna", she decided (yesterday) to write up a nice long entry about how we're all very confused females who can't find our own vaginas. She's also still delusional:

I'm not entirely sure what the fuss was about this time. Although it does seem to be that it never really is about anything. They seem to exist solely as wannabe celebrity bashers.

Lady, if you're a celebrity, I have a rack like Mae West and closet full of Manolo Blahniks.



She goes on a bit, as usual. She denies that she has that thing... the screaming about being a gay man in a woman's body thing (is there a Jurisimprudence law about that?) and takes a potshot at Elton John. Then, she muses on how this phenomena is related to how women are alienated from their sexuality:

All this tells you about her/them is how alienated women are from their sexuality, how few points of reference they have for self-definition. [edited by administration to reduce direct quotes].

I don't know about you, but I like my het porn just as much as I like boy/boy smut. Plus, I've seen plenty of ladies who enjoy writing PWP het/gay fluff/kink/non-con/etcetera. Also, since when is there het porn not designed with the ladies in mind? Hello, bodice rippers/Harlequins/those books with Fabio lookalikes who have lost their shirts.

Then we get to fanfic on the net, where the gay bois are not GAY. They are Disney Princesses!

They are so gay, in fact, that many of the poor sods are written into scenarios where they literally cuddle up on sofas together, feeding each other popcorn and doing snuggly things that wouldn't put Disney Princesses to shame.

And then she demands we find her porn about straight guys having wild, wet sex with each other.

1. It has to be 'properly' published, not POD (and before the half-wits run screaming - no, DANNY isn't POD). Understand, I'd be the last person to knock POD books, but we're trying to show how accepted and mainstream our female sexuality is nowadays, so we can't wander into a grey zone.

[edited by administration to reduce direct quotes]

Now go and find four books out of just half (that's still 100,000 - 'our' half, right?) of those books printed in the UK, that fit those four simple rules, and I will not only be amazed, but I will buy all four novels, and read them all, and then tell you you're a liar.

Or I'll eat humble pie, and say I was wrong.



Of course, I'm just jealous, a victim of fan mentality (which is a horrible, chronic illness that I will never recover from, much like Chancie's verbal diarrhea), alienated from my feminine identity, and have no idea where my vagina is.

Also, I'M Spartacus Chancery Stone!

EDIT: Also, this was on wank_report, but I didn't think to check there before I posted. Originally, orangeymouse left us a tip about Chancery's temper tantrum. Carry on!

EDIT II: Also, thanks to [info]blackhat, more batshit crazy; this time on fag hags, how lesbians and gay men loathe the opposite sex, and about how the internet women all defend gay guys being fluffy bunnies. Or something like that.

Also, after reading this over, I realized I made a couple of mistakes typing this up and made some corrections. This is what I get for typing this on no sleep and a desperate need to avoid my philosophy take-home. Sorry about that!




Page 1 of 4
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]spurious
2006-04-17 03:03 pm UTC (link)
Perhaps when she said "wannabe celebrity bashers" she meant for wannabe to modify celebrity rather than bashers? That would make a bit more sense.

Considering the rest of what she said, though, sensemaking appears to be the last thing on her mind.

(Reply to this)


[info]aegflota
2006-04-17 03:03 pm UTC (link)
This woman actually boosts my self-esteem. everytime I think my writing's crap, I look to Chancery Stone for comfort.

It has to be 'properly' published, not POD (and before the half-wits run screaming - no, DANNY isn't POD

Yeah. There was no demand.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]jadelennox, 2006-04-17 04:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nightwalker, 2006-04-17 11:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - ealusaid, 2006-04-17 07:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kalika_maxwell, 2006-04-17 08:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lykomancer, 2006-04-18 04:04 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-04-17 03:05 pm UTC (link)
They seem to exist solely as wannabe celebrity bashers.

No, no, no - you got the emphasis wrong:-) She's admitting she's only a wannabe celebrity! She's stumbling ever closer to the truth...err, maybe?

And srsly, what is up with her insistence that everyone over here is female? It's just downright bizarre.

-Mus Musculus

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]aegflota, 2006-04-17 03:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-17 03:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aegflota, 2006-04-17 03:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-17 03:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aegflota, 2006-04-17 03:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-17 04:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aegflota, 2006-04-17 04:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-17 04:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aegflota, 2006-04-17 04:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]suziecroft, 2006-04-17 09:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-18 12:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]minibalrogmum, 2006-04-17 03:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aegflota, 2006-04-17 03:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]minibalrogmum, 2006-04-17 04:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aegflota, 2006-04-17 04:17 pm UTC
... - [info]minibalrogmum, 2006-04-17 04:24 pm UTC
... - [info]aegflota, 2006-04-17 04:34 pm UTC
... - [info]minibalrogmum, 2006-04-17 04:38 pm UTC
... - [info]aegflota, 2006-04-17 04:41 pm UTC
... - [info]minibalrogmum, 2006-04-17 04:47 pm UTC
... - [info]aegflota, 2006-04-17 06:40 pm UTC
... - [info]visp, 2006-04-18 04:47 am UTC
... - [info]mireille, 2006-04-17 05:07 pm UTC
... - [info]aegflota, 2006-04-17 06:38 pm UTC
... - [info]drakyndra, 2006-04-17 11:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]drakyndra, 2006-04-17 11:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - dracothelizard, 2006-04-18 03:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]drakyndra, 2006-04-18 02:42 pm UTC
... - dracothelizard, 2006-04-18 03:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-17 03:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aegflota, 2006-04-17 03:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]anne_noonlight, 2006-04-17 03:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aegflota, 2006-04-17 03:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]anne_noonlight, 2006-04-17 04:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aegflota, 2006-04-17 04:21 pm UTC
... - [info]anne_noonlight, 2006-04-17 04:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]slackerbitch, 2006-04-18 05:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aegflota, 2006-04-18 10:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-04-17 05:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brown_betty, 2006-04-17 06:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-04-17 07:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaootaku, 2006-04-19 04:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brown_betty, 2006-04-19 04:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - sharonapple, 2006-04-19 06:58 pm UTC

[info]inishmore
2006-04-17 03:11 pm UTC (link)
Uhm...what?

Does this essay have a point - at all?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]smut_queen, 2006-04-17 06:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]inishmore, 2006-04-17 07:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rekall, 2006-04-17 06:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]inishmore, 2006-04-17 07:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rekall, 2006-04-17 07:29 pm UTC
magegirl8(arrrg, every time i try to sign in, im told my sn doesnt exist!!) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-17 07:44 pm UTC
Re: magegirl8(arrrg, every time i try to sign in, im told my sn doesnt exist!!) - [info]rekall, 2006-04-17 08:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]inishmore, 2006-04-17 10:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2006-04-18 06:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2006-04-18 03:12 am UTC
Yes, it does. - [info]mcity, 2006-04-18 06:44 pm UTC

[info]anne_noonlight
2006-04-17 03:14 pm UTC (link)
Ugh, Chancery Stone x Christopher Paolini = OTP. Theirloveissobetterthantself-published.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]wanktastic, 2006-04-17 05:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brown_betty, 2006-04-17 06:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]wanktastic, 2006-04-17 06:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]perletwo, 2006-04-18 02:20 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-17 09:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-18 02:41 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-04-17 03:16 pm UTC (link)
...in the same Fandom Wank kerfuffle, there is a thread on how the world has changed since I wrote DANNY and now women write "semi-openly" (I believe that was the phrase – but don't worry, 98 people will correct me if I'm wrong) on man to man sex.

This little gem gave me pause in a severe *headdesking* kind of way. Am I reading this correctly? Does she honestly think - or think that people on F_W think - that by her courageous act of writing DANNY, she singlehandedly liberated all those women writing slash to post on the internetz in terrible fear of being discovered?

I also begin to think she's only writing about F_W so that her blog stats will show she has visitors.

Mus Musculus

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2006-04-17 03:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]agent_hyatt, 2006-04-17 07:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - jenova, 2006-04-17 03:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]beccastareyes, 2006-04-17 04:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]msilverstar, 2006-04-17 06:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ceadsearc, 2006-04-17 07:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2006-04-17 04:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - sharonapple, 2006-04-17 06:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2006-04-18 03:19 am UTC
(no subject) - sharonapple, 2006-04-18 03:21 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-20 12:03 pm UTC
Grammar Nazis represent! - [info]issendai, 2006-04-20 05:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-17 06:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackhat, 2006-04-17 06:28 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-04-17 03:18 pm UTC (link)
This is starting to remind me of the bloke who went on GAFF, told them that fanfiction was evil, and was surprised when they came up with a good, solid, argument.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-17 03:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-04-17 03:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-17 03:46 pm UTC

[info]harrylovesron
2006-04-17 03:25 pm UTC (link)
"Totally missing the point" AND "making stupid generalizations" FTW!

Not all of us are obsessed with m/m sex. I'm not. Really. My ideal OBHWF would be Harry/Ron and Hermione/Ginny. I have a few het OTPs outside of HP fandom.

Not all of us are female, come to that... unless the Genuine F_W Males have been hiding something from us? *taps foot*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]footsie, 2006-04-17 05:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-04-17 08:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]footsie, 2006-04-17 09:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-04-18 04:20 am UTC
(no subject) - sharonapple, 2006-04-18 04:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-04-18 04:40 am UTC
... - sharonapple, 2006-04-18 04:52 am UTC
... - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-04-18 10:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]drworm, 2006-04-18 09:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]miss_sophia, 2006-04-17 11:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-04-18 04:22 am UTC
(no subject) - sharonapple, 2006-04-18 04:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-04-18 04:40 am UTC
... - sharonapple, 2006-04-18 04:48 am UTC
... - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-04-18 10:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]miss_sophia, 2006-04-18 06:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-04-18 10:15 pm UTC

[info]lush_rimbaud
2006-04-17 03:30 pm UTC (link)
WTF is she trying to prove with the whole "find me porn about straight men having sex with each other!" thing?

I mean, maybe I'm just slow, but if the straight guys are having sex with each other, aren't they kind of, you know, not straight?

Meh.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]anne_noonlight, 2006-04-17 03:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]entelodont, 2006-04-17 04:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]freezer, 2006-04-17 04:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]footsie, 2006-04-17 06:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ceadsearc, 2006-04-17 07:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2006-04-18 12:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mcity, 2006-04-18 07:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]monkeyarcher, 2006-04-19 03:09 am UTC
... - [info]mcity, 2006-04-19 04:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]inishmore, 2006-04-17 05:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]msilverstar, 2006-04-17 06:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]april_hurst, 2006-04-17 06:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-17 10:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]visp, 2006-04-18 04:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2006-04-18 07:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vigilanterodent, 2006-04-18 07:33 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-04-17 03:34 pm UTC (link)
No pseudonyms?

I guess that means that Chancery Stone is her real name. That probably explains a lot of her bitterness and wanktacularity. Being named after a minor municipal court would do that to anyone, especially if that's where she was conceived.

And I'm pretty sure that no book meets her criteria. Of course, if someone wrote such a book and did it well (in other words, NOT LIKE DANNY), they'd probably hit the top of the sales charts and get on Oprah. I'm disqualified because I have a penis, does anyone else want to take the Chancery Stone Challenge?

--The Clichemoth

(Reply to this)(Thread)

I'll take the challenge. - [info]issendai, 2006-04-17 04:38 pm UTC
Re: I'll take the challenge. - [info]mmanurere, 2006-04-17 05:26 pm UTC
Re: I'll take the challenge. - [info]dez_chan, 2006-04-17 05:52 pm UTC
Re: I'll take the challenge. - [info]pipssister, 2006-04-17 09:14 pm UTC
Re: I'll take the challenge. - [info]issendai, 2006-04-18 02:53 am UTC
Re: I'll take the challenge. - [info]notjo, 2006-04-17 07:24 pm UTC
Re: I'll take the challenge. - [info]ravenscanary, 2006-04-17 11:29 pm UTC
Re: I'll take the challenge. - [info]notjo, 2006-04-17 11:56 pm UTC
Re: I'll take the challenge. - [info]issendai, 2006-04-18 03:30 am UTC
Re: I'll take the challenge. - [info]white_serpent, 2006-04-17 09:12 pm UTC
Re: I'll take the challenge. - (Anonymous), 2006-04-18 05:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2006-04-18 05:11 pm UTC

[info]issendai
2006-04-17 03:37 pm UTC (link)
It must feature leading characters, who are (demonstrably) straight, having homosexual 'relations' with other men.

Right. So because watching straight men have gay sex is her personal kink, it defines the entire genre (or else the sex terrorists have won!). I'd love some sort of explanation of why women can't enjoy, y'know, GAY men fucking.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-17 03:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2006-04-17 05:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-18 03:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-17 03:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-17 04:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]april_hurst, 2006-04-17 06:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-17 04:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]freezer, 2006-04-17 04:53 pm UTC

[info]brick_me
2006-04-17 03:44 pm UTC (link)
Someone send her a shipment of every BL manga ever professionally published.

Although I don't think any post office would accept that parcel for shipment. It'd be too huge. As in, the same size as the entire post office huge.

Well, to be fair, some of them do feature "gay" men. Gay men who have absolutely nothing to do with the gay subculture of the culture they live in, but still.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2006-04-17 04:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2006-04-17 08:37 pm UTC

[info]reinhardt
2006-04-17 04:07 pm UTC (link)
You know, it's gotten to the point where I don't even TRY to make sense of the crap Miss Stone writes. It saves me a whole lot of migraines.

(Reply to this)


[info]staroverthebay
2006-04-17 04:09 pm UTC (link)
Man, I love me some Chancery Stone wankage! \:D/

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]community_care, 2006-04-17 08:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2006-04-17 11:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]drworm, 2006-04-18 05:12 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-04-17 04:12 pm UTC (link)
Word for the bodice rippers. Thats girl's porn while the live action porn is for the boys (and what a sad state of affairs it is when women have so few choices for pr0n.)

Whaaat? Oh baby, she's a jem. How can a straight guy be having sex with other men? The be demonstrably straight you'd have to... have sex with a woman, before having sex with his man? Easy! It's called the 'bi' section in the average porn store! And porn is published mainstream.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - ladygoddess, 2006-04-17 04:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - ladygoddess, 2006-04-17 04:34 pm UTC

[info]felinephoenix
2006-04-17 04:18 pm UTC (link)
We're not interested in heterosexual porn

Guess I imagined all that masturbating I did.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cork118, 2006-04-17 04:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]utahraptor, 2006-04-17 05:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]radiotrash, 2006-04-17 06:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cat_mcdougall, 2006-04-17 09:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistal, 2006-04-18 06:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]radiotrash, 2006-04-18 07:38 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-18 06:17 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-04-17 04:19 pm UTC (link)
Wait, we're supposed to believe that Chancery Stone is someone's real name?

Also, who wants to read about straight guys having gay sex written by a woman and published by a major company? That narrows the audience down to about Chancery Stone and people who buys books because the pages taste good on sammiches.

-jennybunny

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]staroverthebay, 2006-04-17 04:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]breecita, 2006-04-17 04:31 pm UTC

[info]fandom_biatch
2006-04-17 04:22 pm UTC (link)
Dear Ms. Stone,

Keeping your head shoved tightly up your ass will give you delusions of grandeur. Please, for not only humanity's sake, but your own, slowly, very slowly, try to wedge your head gently out of your anus to stop the splooge.

As a matter of fact, keep your head tightly wedged up your ass because, with as much shit you're spouting, we don't want you flooding the world, now do we?

(Reply to this)


[info]toph
2006-04-17 04:27 pm UTC (link)
You know, for a writer, she sure has a lot of term misusage.

More frustratingly though, someone started a strand on how I think I'm a gay man in a woman's body. - Thread?

Sign 'em up for that old gender re-alignment (now there's a euphemism to die for) and sort the fuckers out. - Reassignment?

Unless this is a UK thing I'm just missing with my Stupid American Brain.

(Incidentally, I'm a female that has no interest in m/m. Period. I love boobies. Does this mean I can't look for hetporn for Miss Stone because I don't fit her theory?)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-17 04:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tiki, 2006-04-17 07:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]spikewriter, 2006-04-17 07:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]suziecroft, 2006-04-17 10:06 pm UTC

[info]cork118
2006-04-17 04:30 pm UTC (link)
Maybe this is where all the we-hate-J-Lo mags recruit their young reporters.

Dude, they actually write entire magazines devoted to hating J-Lo? WHERE?!?! And she makes it sound like a bad thing to hate J-Lo. Shouldn't the J-Lo hate unite us all?

Not yet read DANNY? Find out what all the fuss is about at www.poisonpixie.com

Everytime I read "DANNY," I have to say it outloud. And then I get flashbacks of Jack Nicholson with an axe, and then I remember this and get happy. So thank you, Chancery Stone. Because every time you write an entry, I remember "Shining," the feel-good movie of the year, and I'm a happy panda.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]v_digitalwytch, 2006-04-17 06:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nlb_muffin, 2006-04-17 07:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - dracothelizard, 2006-04-18 03:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]v_digitalwytch, 2006-04-18 07:37 am UTC

[info]xero_sky
2006-04-17 04:37 pm UTC (link)
Generally speaking... why is it that men can be big fans of lesbian porn without being accused of hating their cocks, while women into gay porn are accused of despising their own vaginas?

Embrace your porn, Ms. Stone, and back the hell up off mine, you big bag of fluff.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2006-04-17 05:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]footsie, 2006-04-17 06:13 pm UTC
Personally, I love the cock - [info]lindentreeisle, 2006-04-17 08:04 pm UTC
Re: Personally, I love the cock - (Anonymous), 2006-04-18 01:17 am UTC

[info]aerobot
2006-04-17 04:40 pm UTC (link)
However, the prevailing themes this time appear to be menstruation, which they don't like, confusion about the location of their vaginas – some poor sod was actually having her "vagina" waxed; a nasty image, if ever there was one - and offence at the possibility that gay men might be misogynists. They got downright cross about that one.

Funny - I thought the common themes were porn, boobies, making icons, and general squeeing. Am I missing something?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]missdaisy, 2006-04-17 04:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]elektra3, 2006-04-17 04:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brown_betty, 2006-04-17 07:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-18 01:39 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-18 07:43 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-21 04:42 am UTC

[info]jadelennox
2006-04-17 04:40 pm UTC (link)
It has to be written by a bona fide woman. This means ... no transgendering

Come on, where is the transgender wank? Get with the program, people!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-17 04:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-04-17 05:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]april_hurst, 2006-04-17 07:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]drworm, 2006-04-18 05:01 am UTC
(no subject) - redwarrior, 2006-04-19 10:59 pm UTC

[info]parzi
2006-04-17 04:45 pm UTC (link)
Wouldn't sex between two straight men be kind of...awkward? Because, you know, they don't want to be having sex with each other. Because if they did, they'd be gay. Unless that 'awkward' is her kink, I really don't get it.
...I'm so confused.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-17 04:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-04-17 05:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]prettyveela, 2006-04-17 05:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-17 06:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-17 06:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lindentreeisle, 2006-04-17 08:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-19 04:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]footsie, 2006-04-17 06:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]naienko, 2006-04-17 09:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-04-17 11:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]miss_sophia, 2006-04-17 11:49 pm UTC
My writing skills are in their bunk. - [info]issendai, 2006-04-18 03:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]isa, 2006-04-18 05:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]felinephoenix, 2006-04-19 09:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]notjo, 2006-04-17 07:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kahrohseh, 2006-04-17 08:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]notjo, 2006-04-17 09:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kahrohseh, 2006-04-18 12:23 am UTC
(no subject) - dracothelizard, 2006-04-18 03:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]isa, 2006-04-18 05:38 am UTC
(no subject) - sharonapple, 2006-04-18 05:45 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-18 07:35 am UTC
(no subject) - sharonapple, 2006-04-18 08:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]isa, 2006-04-18 08:44 am UTC
(no subject) - sharonapple, 2006-04-18 10:01 am UTC
... - [info]isa, 2006-04-18 02:39 pm UTC
... - sharonapple, 2006-04-19 01:13 am UTC
(no subject) - sharonapple, 2006-04-18 05:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]xero_sky, 2006-04-17 10:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]notjo, 2006-04-17 11:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2006-04-18 07:13 am UTC
(no subject) - redwarrior, 2006-04-19 11:00 pm UTC

[info]jetwolf
2006-04-17 04:45 pm UTC (link)
However, the prevailing themes this time appear to be menstruation, which they don't like

Who the hell does? Still, I think it's okay to hate my uterus right now, since it so very clearly hates me.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]toph, 2006-04-17 04:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]v_digitalwytch, 2006-04-17 06:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-04-17 11:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]azawakh, 2006-04-17 06:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]azawakh, 2006-04-17 06:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]entelodont, 2006-04-17 06:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]naienko, 2006-04-17 09:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brown_betty, 2006-04-17 07:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-18 01:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]khym_chanur, 2006-04-18 02:29 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-18 02:56 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-18 06:29 pm UTC


Page 1 of 4
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map