Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Magically Ridiculous ([info]staroverthebay) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2006-04-23 00:59:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:OMGWTF
Entry tags:fandom failures, fandom: star wars, fanfic, self-publishing

Whoa. I didn't know anyone had balls like this!
EDIT: I didn't realize there was another wank about this topic until after I'd hit the submit button and this went into the fandom_wank queue. By then I couldn't delete it because it was in the approval queue. Sorry everyone!


http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1933456027/qid=1123612981/sr=2-/103-6073320-0586259

Someone decided she didn't like how George Lucas wrote the first Star Wars movie, so she decided to rewrite "Star Wars: A New Hope" (and according to the reviews, did so very poorly) and decided to sell it on Amazon!

The reviews are quite the panoply... ranging from "OMG PLAGIARIZM!!1!" to "HAY WTF?! COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT!" to "Not only is this illegal, it's SHITTY!" I'm even more amused by the lack of grammar and spelling of the reviewers than I am at the thought of this bitch Lori Jareo getting her ass handed to her by Lucas's attorneys (hey, maybe she's got herself one of them intarweb lawyers!)

I want to know why Amazon is allowing this in the first place! I mean, one bloody glance at the entry page on Amazon was all I needed to know exactly what this is -- without even reading a single actual paragraph of the "book"!

This isn't just plagiarism -- it's bloody copyright infringement on arguably the largest fiction franchise out there! (Star Wars ranks right up there with Lord of the Rings, but I don't know if it's bigger than LOTR, just cuz LOTR has some twenty or thirty years on Star Wars).

Well, methinks George Lucas is gonna hafta SMACK A BITCH soon. Holy shit.... exploding splooge!

*sits back to watch the wank unfold*



(Post a new comment)


(Anonymous)
2006-04-23 11:28 am UTC (link)
Psst. You can also watch it unfold... three entries down.

(Reply to this)


[info]jadefox
2006-04-23 11:34 am UTC (link)
i can't wait for this plagiarist to get smacked down by the interwebs.

...unless of course the tinhats applaud her for being so enterprising~!

[sorry, couldn't resist, someone pointed out the presence of a 'Star Fleet' in this fake novel. wow. what would Starfleet think of an Imperial Navy that gets its ass kicked by, essentially, hot rods and a flying saucer?]

(Reply to this)


[info]morbide_mind
2006-04-23 11:39 am UTC (link)
As always there is one review where the stupidity is just oozing out of


The best SW novel ever!, April 21, 2006
Reviewer: Millhouse van Houten "Thrillho!" (Springfield, USA) - See all my reviews
Luke and Obi Wan die off-page! (p. 114) That makes this the best STAR WARS novel ever! I can only hope Han and Chewey get dusted in the sequel!

George Lucas should take a lesson from this woman!
YOUR CAST + SUPERLASERS = CRAZY DELICIOUS

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]pipssister
2006-04-23 01:04 pm UTC (link)
Oh, come on. That review is obviously a joke.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]seiberwing
2006-04-23 03:55 pm UTC (link)
I think that's saracasm.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]entrenous88, 2006-04-23 05:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jujubee, 2006-04-24 02:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]entrenous88, 2006-04-24 02:14 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-04-24 12:01 am UTC (link)
I'm of the opinion that it is a joke review. Mostly because it's a review by Millhouse van Houten, a nerdy Simpsons character.

You know what would be sweet! If Martin Prince wrote a review filled with all his nerdery! Or the Superfriends!

~ chipper mouse

(Reply to this)(Parent)

"The 2006 Stupidest FanFic Writer Award Gets Retired Early"
[info]morbide_mind
2006-04-23 11:44 am UTC (link)
Just had to share this

Via Nick Mamatas, I learn of Lori Jareo, who has written up a Star Wars fanfic novel, published it without the expressed, written consent of George Lucas, and has it listed for sale on Amazon. Oh, but she's not worried about the massive copyright violation; Indeed, let's see what she has to say about it in her "author interview."

For more see linkg

http://www.scalzi.com/whatever/

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2006-04-23 12:16 pm UTC (link)
Whereas you just rewrote another wank entry?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]entrenous88
2006-04-23 05:57 pm UTC (link)
Heeee!

No, but the ending to this wank is completely different.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kittenmommy, 2006-04-23 09:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]morbide_mind, 2006-04-24 08:21 am UTC

[info]kraken_sleeps
2006-04-23 12:45 pm UTC (link)
*points*

(Reply to this)


dracothelizard
2006-04-23 01:41 pm UTC (link)
http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/928529.html

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2006-04-23 01:55 pm UTC (link)
staroverthebay, don't pull a Lori Jareo

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2006-04-23 02:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]april_hurst, 2006-04-24 04:42 am UTC

[info]ashenmote
2006-04-23 02:00 pm UTC (link)
*points somewhere else to confuse things*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - dracothelizard, 2006-04-23 06:21 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-04-23 02:00 pm UTC (link)
OMG, I'm having a déjà vu!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2006-04-24 10:26 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-04-23 02:07 pm UTC (link)
A few posts down, you'll find...well, the same thing, really. Try to check next time, m'kay?

~Jay (formerly dark_elfmage)~

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]altoidsaddict, 2006-04-23 09:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 08:29 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-04-23 02:09 pm UTC (link)
Are anonymous allowed again?

Also: Don't you people read F_W before posting? I mean, really. If it's within 5 entries of the SAME WANK, that's nothing but lazy.

~Dragonrider7

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]staroverthebay, 2006-04-24 12:27 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 08:27 pm UTC

[info]provetheworst
2006-04-23 03:59 pm UTC (link)
/. needs new editors, what with all these dupes --

Wha? I'm not on /.? Damn it, f_w, I already have a source that's more than capable of filling my daily dupe quota.

(Reply to this)


[info]tekenduis
2006-04-23 04:14 pm UTC (link)
Okay, mice, we get it already. It's been posted. The very first comment was that it had been posted. STFU about it already.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-23 04:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tekenduis, 2006-04-23 04:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]provetheworst, 2006-04-23 04:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tekenduis, 2006-04-23 04:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bemysty, 2006-04-23 06:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pussycat, 2006-04-23 07:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rotten_fish, 2006-04-23 10:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jujubee, 2006-04-24 02:14 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 12:05 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 12:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]oar, 2006-04-24 10:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady7jane, 2006-04-23 05:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pussycat, 2006-04-23 07:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 11:34 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 12:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-04-24 12:35 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 08:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sheep, 2006-04-24 01:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-25 05:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]staroverthebay, 2006-04-24 08:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-25 04:17 am UTC

[info]smo
2006-04-23 04:58 pm UTC (link)
Your icon made me go o_O.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]chibikaijuu, 2006-04-25 07:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2006-04-25 02:05 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-04-23 04:59 pm UTC (link)
Funny review quotes:

"Also, some of her details are flat-out wrong. There is no "Star Fleet" in Star Wars, that's a Star Trek organization. The relevant equivalent here is the Imperial Navy."

"Not only is this thing illegal, it's awful. About half way through it, Luke gets killed of, and is replaced with a Mary-Sue. And the rest is just some of the most boring techno babble I've ever read!

(Reply to this)


[info]estrella
2006-04-23 05:26 pm UTC (link)
Speaking of violating copyrights, have you guys seen this:
http://www.agentwithstyle.com/harrypot.htm ??
Apparently [info]psychic_serpent is selling her HP fanfic trilogy there!
And wait, there is more, you can get her fanfic in audio book too:
http://psychic-serpent.livejournal.com/94925.html !!!
O_o

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]estrella, 2006-04-23 05:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]oh_envy, 2006-04-23 05:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]perletwo, 2006-04-23 06:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]oh_envy, 2006-04-23 06:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lucky13, 2006-04-23 06:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]oh_envy, 2006-04-23 06:27 pm UTC

(Deleted post)
Re: charging money for Fanfics - [info]oh_envy, 2006-04-24 07:45 am UTC
Re: charging money for Fanfics - [info]oh_envy, 2006-04-24 07:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]liebestod, 2006-04-23 06:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]oh_envy, 2006-04-23 06:39 pm UTC
Not into RPS but ... - [info]life_on_mars, 2006-04-23 07:02 pm UTC
Me neither, but mmmmm chocolate...men... - [info]oh_envy, 2006-04-23 07:13 pm UTC
Re: Me neither, but mmmmm chocolate...men... - [info]pussycat, 2006-04-23 07:40 pm UTC
Re: Me neither, but mmmmm chocolate...men... - [info]amberwaves, 2006-04-24 04:10 am UTC
Re: Me neither, but mmmmm chocolate...men... - [info]pipssister, 2006-04-24 05:12 am UTC
Re: Me neither, but mmmmm chocolate...men... - [info]amberwaves, 2006-04-24 05:13 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 03:19 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 08:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-04-23 05:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]estrella, 2006-04-23 06:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-04-23 06:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-04-23 07:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]estrella, 2006-04-24 12:51 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 02:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jo_russ, 2006-04-24 02:30 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 06:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]estrella, 2006-04-24 02:42 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 03:38 am UTC

(Deleted post)
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 08:29 pm UTC

(Deleted post)
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-25 10:12 am UTC

(Deleted post)
(no subject) - [info]major_dallas, 2006-04-24 09:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dreamworld, 2006-04-24 02:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sheep, 2006-04-24 03:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]estrella, 2006-04-24 12:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-04-24 05:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 06:10 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 06:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]estrella, 2006-04-24 12:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 02:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]musouka, 2006-04-24 07:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 07:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]musouka, 2006-04-24 08:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2006-04-24 10:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]musouka, 2006-04-24 10:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2006-04-24 10:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]musouka, 2006-04-24 10:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2006-04-24 10:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]musouka, 2006-04-24 10:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2006-04-24 10:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-04-24 04:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]flyingphoenix, 2006-04-24 12:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sheep, 2006-04-24 12:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]flyingphoenix, 2006-04-24 01:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sheep, 2006-04-24 01:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]flyingphoenix, 2006-04-24 02:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sheep, 2006-04-24 04:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]flyingphoenix, 2006-04-24 05:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sheep, 2006-04-24 06:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]waltraute, 2006-04-24 07:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]flyingphoenix, 2006-04-24 07:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]waltraute, 2006-04-24 09:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]major_dallas, 2006-04-24 03:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]flyingphoenix, 2006-04-24 04:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]major_dallas, 2006-04-24 06:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]flyingphoenix, 2006-04-24 06:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 11:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-25 03:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]estrella, 2006-04-24 12:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 12:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2006-04-24 04:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sheep, 2006-04-24 04:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 06:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]estrella, 2006-04-24 07:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 07:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]waltraute, 2006-04-24 07:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]estrella, 2006-04-24 10:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 10:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]estrella, 2006-04-25 02:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]estrella, 2006-04-25 02:34 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-25 02:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]estrella, 2006-04-25 02:47 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-25 02:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]estrella, 2006-04-25 02:48 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-25 02:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]estrella, 2006-04-25 02:58 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-25 03:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]estrella, 2006-04-25 03:29 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-25 03:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]estrella, 2006-04-25 05:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]snacky, 2006-04-25 08:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dreamworld, 2006-04-25 02:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-25 04:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]estrella, 2006-04-25 07:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dreamworld, 2006-04-25 07:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]estrella, 2006-04-25 07:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dreamworld, 2006-04-25 08:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dreamworld, 2006-04-25 08:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-25 02:55 am UTC
*breaks resolution* - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-04-24 07:33 pm UTC
Re: *breaks resolution* - [info]sheep, 2006-04-24 08:59 pm UTC
Re: *breaks resolution* - [info]firebird5, 2006-04-24 10:03 pm UTC
Re: *breaks resolution* - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-04-24 10:12 pm UTC
Re: *breaks resolution* - [info]firebird5, 2006-04-25 12:31 am UTC
Re: *breaks resolution* - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-04-25 01:26 am UTC
Re: *breaks resolution* - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-04-25 01:53 am UTC
Re: *breaks resolution* - [info]estrella, 2006-04-24 10:19 pm UTC
Re: *breaks resolution* - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 10:48 pm UTC
Re: *breaks resolution* - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-04-25 01:51 am UTC
Re: *breaks resolution* - (Anonymous), 2006-04-25 04:25 am UTC
Re: *breaks resolution* - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-04-25 04:28 am UTC
Re: *breaks resolution* - (Anonymous), 2006-04-25 05:20 am UTC
Re: *breaks resolution* - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-04-25 05:22 am UTC
Re: *breaks resolution* - (Anonymous), 2006-04-26 12:24 am UTC
Re: *breaks resolution* - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 11:46 pm UTC
Re: *breaks resolution* - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-04-25 12:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]estrella, 2006-04-23 06:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]shutthef_up, 2006-04-23 06:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-04-23 07:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nightwalker, 2006-04-24 06:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shutthef_up, 2006-04-24 06:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]estrella, 2006-04-25 11:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shutthef_up, 2006-04-25 01:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-23 10:38 pm UTC

(Deleted post)
(no subject) - [info]estrella, 2006-04-24 12:20 pm UTC

(Deleted post)
(no subject) - [info]dreamworld, 2006-04-24 02:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]major_dallas, 2006-04-24 03:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sheep, 2006-04-24 03:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-04-25 01:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dwarfjen, 2006-04-23 06:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]janegraddell, 2006-04-23 09:38 pm UTC
*grabs preemptive tissues* - [info]dwarfjen, 2006-04-23 10:43 pm UTC
Re: *grabs preemptive tissues* - [info]jo_russ, 2006-04-24 10:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]coffee_mug, 2006-04-23 08:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aegflota, 2006-04-23 10:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-23 10:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 02:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]narcissam, 2006-04-24 04:18 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 05:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]musouka, 2006-04-24 05:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]estrella, 2006-04-24 12:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 12:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 07:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]esclaramonde, 2006-04-25 01:59 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 04:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]major_dallas, 2006-04-24 03:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-25 05:49 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-04-23 06:31 pm UTC (link)
You know, I wanted to do something like this once, way back when. I actually went to the Square website to try to find contact information and see if I could get a fan-novel published using their characters. Ah, I was a wishful little thing.

But people like this, who publish fan-novels without checking with the original creators? That's just cheating.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-04-23 08:36 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-04-23 09:08 pm UTC (link)
Making Light has picked this up where some folks are trying to rationalize breaking the law as a whole for fanfic. In Scalzi's comments they got a fake lawyer post from MD but Mythago a real lawyer is getting testy. And Greg is about to do the "move along nothing to see here" song because heaven forbid the issue be kept alive and front and centre so no one ever does the "I didn't know" excuse.

WitcheryBitchery

(Reply to this)

Mmmm...
(Anonymous)
2006-04-24 05:07 am UTC (link)
It's interesting how this post has gone from redundant wank to clairvoyantwank.

*busts out popcorn*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Mmmm... - [info]sheep, 2006-04-24 04:14 pm UTC
Re: Mmmm... - (Anonymous), 2006-04-24 08:54 pm UTC
Re: Mmmm... - [info]sheep, 2006-04-24 08:57 pm UTC
Re: Mmmm... - (Anonymous), 2006-04-25 04:27 am UTC
Re: Mmmm... - (Anonymous), 2006-04-25 04:27 am UTC
Re: Mmmm... - [info]sheep, 2006-04-25 10:10 am UTC
History of zines
[info]lasha
2006-04-25 01:25 pm UTC (link)
As a person who used to publish zines (Highlander), I guess I will jump into the mess at least to clarify a few things for the newbies.

Zines have been around for 30+ years, since Star Trek days. Gene Rodenberry knew about them and didn't have a problem with them. Since we didn't have the Internet back then, people mostly published stories in a bound format to pass around amongst their circle of friends so everyone could read about Kirk doing Spock. Something you didn't see on the show. Me, I love the pretty pictures. *drool*

Zines were never made for profit, in fact most publishers never broke even, they lost money! Zines were put together as a labor of love for the fandom. However, in recent years with the creation of the Internet, zines are becoming more and more obsolete. I think that in 5 years unless you are doing an art-centric zine, they will have gone the way of the dinosaur.

Zines = making profit has been another issue that has been debated for the last 15 years I've been in fandom and it's so nice to see it debated again. It warms my cynical, battered heart to the core. *eg*

However, to clarify, Agent With Style is a zine distributor --yes, she publishes her own zines -- but mostly she agents for other zine publishers. She takes a commission for her work. (And no, I am neither for or against this practice, just stating a fact.)

Now, $60 to me is extreme for a zine, especially one that is at 300 pages unless it has tons of colored artwork. My last Highlander zine came in at nearly 400 pages with at least 6 pages of colored art and was sold for about $30, which was the cost of printing. That is half of what the HP zine is being sold for. Unless the HP zine has every other page full of art, I am very skeptical why such a high price is being charged.

In my experience, the author usually sets the price, but in this case Agent With Style could of -- I don't know. As for the assertions that the author is not getting paid, unless she has something set up that all the profits go to charity (which is what my Highlander zine did per it's authors wishes), then the author is getting paid by Agent With Style after she takes out commission.

I now get to use my K/S icon. *whee*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: History of zines - [info]estrella, 2006-04-26 02:23 am UTC
Re: History of zines - (Anonymous), 2006-04-26 02:44 am UTC


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map