Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Roffling all over the wanking world ([info]adora_spintriae) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2006-05-06 16:42:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:fanart, fandom: supernatural, photoshop

My photoshop filter use is painting!
[info]dodger_winslow takes Supernatural screencaps and runs them through photoshop filters, before popping them onto her LJ and claiming they're her "paintings". In one such example, people comment, and she responds, claiming the images are digitally painted, among other things.

Some people also decide to call her on her bullshit, and there's a lot of tl;dr.

In fact, a whole seperate post of tl;dr! Huzzah!
Page 1 of 4
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] >>

(Post a new comment)


pink_lightning
2006-05-06 09:05 am UTC (link)
Dear dodger_winslow,

Arabic is the language
Arab is the ethnicity
Arabian is the horse
This is a frying pan.
That is your head.

*SPANG!*

*departs*

And what does racial profiling have to do with Photoshop? Good gweif.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]notjo, 2006-05-06 11:27 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-05-06 04:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jaseroque, 2006-05-06 04:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]miss_padfoot, 2006-05-06 07:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - pink_lightning, 2006-05-07 02:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]miss_padfoot, 2006-05-06 07:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-05-07 07:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - pink_lightning, 2006-05-07 07:54 pm UTC

pink_lightning
2006-05-06 09:10 am UTC (link)
*runs back in to blow a raspberry into the baby seal's fuzzy belly*

Eeebeebebeebeeeeesocuuuute! Yesseeeiiisss! Wabawabawabwabwabwab! *FBBBBBPPPTTT*

*goes to bed*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]adinaj69, 2006-05-06 01:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-05-06 05:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]judyhazeleyes, 2006-05-06 05:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2006-05-07 05:28 am UTC
(no subject) - pink_lightning, 2006-05-07 05:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2006-05-07 05:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kalicephirot, 2006-05-08 09:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2006-05-08 01:37 pm UTC

[info]belafarinrod
2006-05-06 09:12 am UTC (link)
...haven't we seen this wank once before?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]smut_queen, 2006-05-06 09:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ceadsearc, 2006-05-06 09:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]delcj, 2006-05-06 09:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]belafarinrod, 2006-05-06 09:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-05-06 09:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]delcj, 2006-05-06 10:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-05-06 10:12 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-05-06 09:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]panthea, 2006-05-06 05:13 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-05-06 09:12 am UTC (link)
Ahhh, Crystal!

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2006-05-06 09:13 am UTC (link)
My first thought was "Crystalwank," shortly followed by "Dear Jeebuz, not again!"

-LF

(Reply to this)


[info]seldomnaughty
2006-05-06 09:17 am UTC (link)
her paints are fakede on yay?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]deathmouse, 2006-05-06 06:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]miss_padfoot, 2006-05-06 07:52 pm UTC

[info]fevered_ego
2006-05-06 09:25 am UTC (link)
although it is sad to note, saying someone is Arabic also makes some people believe those people are terrorists.

...Photoshop: it's like Al Qaeda, in a way.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mookie, 2006-05-06 12:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyrrah, 2006-05-06 02:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jrs1980, 2006-05-07 05:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - pink_lightning, 2006-05-06 03:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-05-06 05:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-05-06 08:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mookie, 2006-05-07 12:06 am UTC

[info]misachan
2006-05-06 09:26 am UTC (link)
Is it wrong to hope that this becomes CrystalWank 2: Electric Boogaloo? Cause if it's wrong, I don't want to be right.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]gun, 2006-05-06 09:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ironymaiden, 2006-05-06 09:55 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-05-07 01:58 am UTC

[info]mochibuni
2006-05-06 09:32 am UTC (link)
*sporfle*

The filter said "paint", so when I apply it, I'm painting! Photoshop doesn't lie, so it must be so.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-05-07 06:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sidhebastardess, 2006-05-07 07:06 pm UTC

[info]tehrin
2006-05-06 09:38 am UTC (link)
I find this definition of "painting" to be restrictive and limiting in the way it excludes develping technologies and their application to traditional forms. If it's the definition you chose to hold as your own, that is more than cool with me; but why must I take it as mine, too? Especially when that definition, applied across other "media" of expression in which most of these writers consider themselves adept, makes their work as invalid as they imply mine is unless it was created with a quill and ink on parchment.



And taking a photograph you didn't take yourself that is still highly recognizable and running a cheap crosshatch filter over it is called plagurism. I'm really not surprised its only two hours of work, because its serious "crap-o-la!"

I can't feel offended at all. Its too silly. This drawing and painting major is just going to sit back and laugh at the crazy now. You, sir/miss, are a twit! Hehe.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-05-06 12:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]provetheworst, 2006-05-06 03:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smut_queen, 2006-05-06 04:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-05-06 06:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]amasaglajax, 2006-05-06 07:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]adora_spintriae, 2006-05-07 02:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seraphtrevs, 2006-05-07 03:22 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-05-06 09:41 am UTC (link)
Oh, fandom. I don't know whether to be impressed or slightly nauseated at your piles 'o bullshit covered in a delectable polite sauce, with a side of pretentious. Like putting more makeup on a hooker, this does not make you look classier. Don't you know that the only people who pay $40 for a $10 meal with an obscurely exotic name are yuppies, sell-outs and authority figures?

And we all know how Dean feels about authority figures.

Dear SPN fandom,

Please to be wanking like you mean it. This half-hearted PC crap is making my meal mocking so much less appetizing.

Sincerely,
last_imperatrix@LJ

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - catatonia, 2006-05-06 03:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-05-07 06:42 am UTC
(no subject) - catatonia, 2006-05-07 08:46 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-05-08 06:36 am UTC

sharonapple
2006-05-06 09:44 am UTC (link)
Too long-winded; didn't read.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mochibuni, 2006-05-06 09:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tehrin, 2006-05-06 09:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mochibuni, 2006-05-06 10:04 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-05-07 07:41 pm UTC

[info]innsmouth_eyes
2006-05-06 09:45 am UTC (link)
Semantics! It's funny watching her do loop-the-loops to avoid admitting she didn't draw the damn thing from scratch or even slightly scracth.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]innsmouth_eyes, 2006-05-06 09:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]breecita, 2006-05-06 12:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]innsmouth_eyes, 2006-05-07 07:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jerel, 2006-05-08 04:36 am UTC
not really wanky, when you look at it
(Anonymous)
2006-05-06 09:48 am UTC (link)
You know, except for the batshittery wherein she more or less said "I can call a manipped photo a painting if I want to; English is fluid" and the unverifiable claims of "I'm a professional and make pots of money at art in my RL", this is surprisingly non-wanky. Everyone involved is being very polite and respectful in their attempts to explain their perspective, comparisons to El Presidente notwithstanding.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: not really wanky, when you look at it - [info]adora_spintriae, 2006-05-06 09:52 am UTC
Re: not really wanky, when you look at it - [info]stopthatgirl7, 2006-05-06 12:40 pm UTC
Re: not really wanky, when you look at it - [info]mookie, 2006-05-06 12:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]waterfront, 2006-05-06 12:56 pm UTC
Re: not really wanky, when you look at it - [info]stopthatgirl7, 2006-05-06 01:00 pm UTC
Re: not really wanky, when you look at it - [info]magic_lilybean, 2006-05-07 06:04 pm UTC
Re: not really wanky, when you look at it - [info]nevadafighter, 2006-05-07 06:14 am UTC
Re: not really wanky, when you look at it - (Anonymous), 2006-05-07 03:18 pm UTC

[info]nlb_muffin
2006-05-06 09:52 am UTC (link)
dodger_winslow: So while I don't agree with most of what you say, you do raise some interesting points, and I appreciate your willingness to speak to them candidly and articulately.

When I have time, I may even post something to address a few of them in a little more detail. Certainly, they touch on issues that go to the core of all fannish pursuits


Porn?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-05-06 09:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mochibuni, 2006-05-06 09:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-05-06 10:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mookie, 2006-05-06 12:57 pm UTC
eh, grammar... - [info]aristaea, 2006-05-06 04:58 pm UTC
Re: eh, grammar... - [info]puipui, 2006-05-06 07:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - verthandi, 2006-05-07 02:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]randomsome1, 2006-05-08 04:26 am UTC

[info]squeakytoy
2006-05-06 09:55 am UTC (link)
What is the deal with Supernatural these days? Everything's quiet for ages, then all of a sudden, it bursts into spooge.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]manasseh, 2006-05-06 10:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wrenlet, 2006-05-06 03:23 pm UTC
*obviously is still in that "3 hour post-finale comedown" period* - [info]adora_spintriae, 2006-05-06 03:31 pm UTC
Re: *obviously is still in that "3 hour post-finale comedown" period* - [info]wrenlet, 2006-05-06 03:46 pm UTC
Re: *obviously is still in that "3 hour post-finale comedown" period* - (Anonymous), 2006-05-06 09:26 pm UTC
Re: *obviously is still in that "3 hour post-finale comedown" period* - [info]manasseh, 2006-05-07 05:50 am UTC
NEWS FLASH!
(Anonymous)
2006-05-06 09:56 am UTC (link)
SCIENTIFIC BREAKTHROUGH!


E=MC^2

Apparently discovered by some bed-head dude called Dr. Snackbert Einwankstein.

Beam me up, Snackbert!

(Reply to this)


[info]ladybirdsleeps
2006-05-06 10:09 am UTC (link)
She should try paint-by-numbers, if she wants to be called a painter that much.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-05-06 10:16 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-05-06 10:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2006-05-06 10:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ailidh, 2006-05-06 05:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-05-07 07:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladydisdain, 2006-05-08 06:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-05-06 07:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2006-05-06 07:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]heddychaa, 2006-05-08 12:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2006-05-07 08:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2006-05-07 08:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2006-05-07 08:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2006-05-07 08:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2006-05-08 02:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squib, 2006-05-06 11:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]waterfront, 2006-05-06 11:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mookie, 2006-05-06 11:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]waterfront, 2006-05-06 11:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]luckdragonfujur, 2006-05-06 07:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2006-05-06 10:24 pm UTC

[info]hallidae
2006-05-06 10:16 am UTC (link)
Considering I just went through a hellish Foundations in Painting (which I still don't understand why I'm required to take for a Drawing major), and I'm going to have to retake the damn class in the fall, I want to beat this pretentious bitch over the head with one of the industrial steel easels the professor made us use.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]drworm, 2006-05-07 03:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2006-05-07 03:23 am UTC

(Deleted post)
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-05-06 10:30 am UTC
ASSHAT TRYING TO GET MICE BANNED AGAIN - [info]xturtle, 2006-05-06 11:43 pm UTC
Re: ASSHAT TRYING TO GET MICE BANNED AGAIN - [info]adora_spintriae, 2006-05-07 03:01 am UTC
Re: ASSHAT TRYING TO GET MICE BANNED AGAIN - [info]xturtle, 2006-05-07 06:51 am UTC
[Reposted because PhotoBucket is an arse]
[info]oh_envy
2006-05-06 10:33 am UTC (link)
ZOMG u guys! I totally just painted this! It took me days, so be nice!



[Painter's note 01: The program so said 'add brush or paint strokes' so it's like completely a painting!]
[Painter's note 02: Picture-credit goes to WB-promo and Jensen Ackles, no animales were harmed during the making of this painting!]

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: [Reposted because PhotoBucket is an arse] - [info]slackerbitch, 2006-05-06 10:38 am UTC
Re: [Reposted because PhotoBucket is an arse] - [info]oh_envy, 2006-05-06 10:42 am UTC
Re: [Reposted because PhotoBucket is an arse] - [info]gun, 2006-05-06 11:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]waterfront, 2006-05-06 11:35 am UTC
Re: [Reposted because PhotoBucket is an arse] - pink_lightning, 2006-05-06 03:48 pm UTC
Re: [Reposted because PhotoBucket is an arse] - [info]dracolovesharry, 2006-05-06 05:36 pm UTC
Re: [Reposted because PhotoBucket is an arse] - (Anonymous), 2006-05-06 07:13 pm UTC
Re: [Reposted because PhotoBucket is an arse] - [info]amasaglajax, 2006-05-06 07:29 pm UTC
Re: [Reposted because PhotoBucket is an arse] - [info]rhiannon, 2006-05-06 08:00 pm UTC
Re: [Reposted because PhotoBucket is an arse] - (Anonymous), 2006-05-07 06:51 am UTC
Re: [Reposted because PhotoBucket is an arse] - [info]randomsome1, 2006-05-08 04:28 am UTC
Re: [Reposted because PhotoBucket is an arse] - [info]momcat, 2006-05-11 06:27 am UTC

[info]slackerbitch
2006-05-06 10:40 am UTC (link)
I just see something I like of Jen or the boys and screw around with it until I've got what I want.

So, uh, you take a photo, run a filter over it, and post it? Yeah, that's what I thought.

And yet, when [info]fatale asks flat out: did you do this freehand digitally, or are you copying over a photo, she responds with tl;dr and "I'm not bumping anybody's copyright." Yeaaaah.

Dear pretentious wanker:

Digital painting != "I ran this pic through three Photoshop filters."

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]chaos_theory, 2006-05-06 03:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2006-05-06 04:53 pm UTC

[info]photosinensis
2006-05-06 10:41 am UTC (link)
Whee! CrystalWank 2!

And I make the first page, this time!

Watch this turn out to be a non-event.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lessis, 2006-05-06 10:48 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-05-06 11:06 am UTC
Asshat trying to get mice banned again - [info]xturtle, 2006-05-06 11:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]notjo, 2006-05-06 11:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]waterfront, 2006-05-06 11:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mookie, 2006-05-06 11:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]waterfront, 2006-05-06 11:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]adora_spintriae, 2006-05-06 12:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]waterfront, 2006-05-06 12:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]adora_spintriae, 2006-05-06 12:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]waterfront, 2006-05-06 12:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]scootermcgaffin, 2006-05-06 12:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]waterfront, 2006-05-06 12:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]scootermcgaffin, 2006-05-06 01:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]waterfront, 2006-05-06 01:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]scootermcgaffin, 2006-05-06 01:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]waterfront, 2006-05-06 02:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]adora_spintriae, 2006-05-06 03:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]waterfront, 2006-05-06 04:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-05-06 12:25 pm UTC

[info]cheshireempress
2006-05-06 10:48 am UTC (link)
Some days, I truly wonder if there is any original wank left in the world.

Fandom: same batshit, different batchannel day

(Reply to this)(Thread)

*smite* - (Anonymous), 2006-05-06 10:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]panthea, 2006-05-06 05:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-05-07 06:37 am UTC

[info]waterfront
2006-05-06 11:36 am UTC (link)
zomg you guys, you just don't understand how much effort she put into clicking those buttons. :(((

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mcity, 2006-05-06 06:21 pm UTC
Page 1 of 4
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map