Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Embitca ([info]embitca) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2003-03-20 16:43:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:rps

RPS IS EVIL!!
Fuck it. It's wankable. I know all the F_W haters think we just wank on opinions that are different than ours so what the hell. Let's prove 'em right :)

RPS is akin to rape! or something like that. Paraphrasing, per usual ;)



(Post a new comment)


[info]phosfate
2003-03-20 11:55 pm UTC (link)
There is so little of the anti being put forward, that I was starting to think I was the last hold-out.

I'm very grateful to know I'm not.


So alone...so alone...!

(Reply to this)


dawnjosephine
2003-03-21 12:00 am UTC (link)
If there is so little anti-RPS sentiment out there, why does f_w never run out of anti-RPS wank?
*ponders*

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]embitca
2003-03-21 12:02 am UTC (link)
No kidding. I'm glad though. I'd hate to have to resort to just mocking the HP Plagiarists :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]deeablo
2003-03-21 12:12 am UTC (link)
Paraphrasing, per usual ;)

As long as you're not breaching netiquitte by posting private e-mails.

::slaps embitca on wrist::

::runs away screaming, terrified by embitca's wrath::ยก

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]lm
2003-03-21 11:30 pm UTC (link)
*dies*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]hugsnkisses
2003-03-21 12:20 am UTC (link)
I couldn't be this eloquent, because I couldn't separate the "ick" of my feelings about RPS from any objective thoughts about it.

And therein the whole of the anti RPS viewpoint is summed up.

ps. Frodo fucked the gardener

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]sagralisse
2003-03-21 12:33 am UTC (link)
::Clutches Frodo protectively:: NOOOOOOO!!! Go slash Elijah instead!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]parakeet_tree, 2003-03-21 02:47 am UTC
I'm a pushy poll pimp
[info]sagralisse
2003-03-21 12:36 am UTC (link)
RPS versus the Hypothetical Ewan Sex Tape.

(Reply to this)


[info]cesare
2003-03-21 12:45 am UTC (link)
Hey, I've got a goofy idea! How about everybody reads and writes what they'd like to read and write, and leaves everybody else the fuck alone? No puffery about how "X segment of fic is wrong and evil," no "akin to rape!" hyperbole, no growling about "this kink is unholy and offensive, whilst my kink, on the other hand, is good clean harmless fun".

It's so crazy, it just might work!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]embitca
2003-03-21 12:48 am UTC (link)
It's so crazy, it just might work!

What? No. No way, man. That could never work.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


allen
2003-03-21 01:02 am UTC (link)
That's just downright logical. You're scaring me.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]bardsong, 2003-03-21 06:26 am UTC

[info]sajasma
2003-03-21 02:50 am UTC (link)
But...but...then it would be the end of fandom_wank as we know it! Don't say it! It could happen and we'd all be doomed!

*thinks for a second*

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

(I want to lick my own icon, constantly. I want to have dawnjosephine's abortions.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - dawnjosephine, 2003-03-21 02:21 pm UTC

[info]pradaloz
2003-03-21 03:00 am UTC (link)
It's so crazy, it just might work!

Man, you ARE crazy. How the hell are we supposed to let the rest of the world know that our fics--nay, our very beings!--are morally superior to everyone else's if we don't tell them so? My god, woman! If our fanfic isn't morally correct, then what will happen to society? To the little children? Oh, won't somebody please think of the children???

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kyuuketsukirui, 2003-03-21 04:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mer1973, 2003-03-21 07:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mer1973, 2003-03-21 07:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kyuuketsukirui, 2003-03-21 08:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]telesilla, 2003-03-21 09:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-03-21 03:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pradaloz, 2003-03-21 05:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-03-21 05:40 pm UTC

[info]sagralisse
2003-03-21 12:52 am UTC (link)
Would you be so comfortable if you stumbled across an archive where a bunch of men you knew nothing about were posting stories about how they'd like to see you fucked, cut up, raped, whatever? Would you be so comfortable if it was written about your daughter on a toilet door at school? What if they were posted on telegraph poles? Would your husband/wife/children be comfortable with it?

Umm... if my daughter made a living as an actress, used her sex appeal to further her career, appeared nude in love scenes on screen, sold posters of herself wearing a bikini, etc., I probably would expect it. If she was very popular and some of her fans got scary, then she could use part of the proceeds from her career to hire security.

Given that she is just a regular girl, I would expect people to stay out of her private life.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2003-03-21 10:49 am UTC (link)
Yes, but what exactly is a public persona? Where's the line? Someone who posts a lot of details about their life on LJ, maybe photos? A BNF? An actress in a community theater group? Someone who runs for local office?

Are they now fair game for anyone to use in fiction?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-03-21 03:19 pm UTC
Why are you mocking her?
tritorella
2003-03-21 12:54 am UTC (link)
Wha's wanky about acknowedging that not everyone thinks like she does, but that these are her own personal, and well expressed views? It's not like she called anyone a backstabbing cunt, is it?

I happen to agree with her, but I really don't think she was being that wanky. It's a contentious subject. It's her personal space. It's no more mockable than me putting anti war banners on my site, or other people putting Columbia memorials on theirs.

Now if she came over here and tried to bloody someone's nose, that *would* be a wank, ne?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Why are you mocking her?
[info]phosfate
2003-03-21 12:57 am UTC (link)
Actually, that would be battery.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Why are you mocking her? - tritorella, 2003-03-21 01:13 am UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - scheherazade, 2003-03-21 06:52 am UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - [info]phosfate, 2003-03-21 04:48 pm UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - [info]lm, 2003-03-21 11:37 pm UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her?
[info]sagralisse
2003-03-21 12:57 am UTC (link)
Mooooooomy! I told Embitca not to, but she wouldn't listen!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Why are you mocking her? - [info]embitca, 2003-03-21 01:04 am UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her?
[info]embitca
2003-03-21 01:03 am UTC (link)
It's her personal space.

It's a public entry in an online journal. Did you happen to read the heading of my post because I think I made it clear that I might be a little biased in posting this. Not that it stops me, but what the fuck ever. I think anyone who conflates actual sexual violation or physical violence with writing fiction is a fucking wanker.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Why are you mocking her? - tritorella, 2003-03-21 01:12 am UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - [info]embitca, 2003-03-21 01:17 am UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - tritorella, 2003-03-21 01:25 am UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - [info]embitca, 2003-03-21 02:06 am UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - [info]sajasma, 2003-03-21 03:03 am UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - (Anonymous), 2003-03-21 05:46 am UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - [info]embitca, 2003-03-21 05:55 am UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - lain7, 2003-03-21 02:35 am UTC
Alas! And I am already weary. - [info]sagralisse, 2003-03-21 05:25 am UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - tritorella, 2003-03-21 07:47 am UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - [info]embitca, 2003-03-21 08:10 am UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - tritorella, 2003-03-21 09:18 am UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - [info]embitca, 2003-03-21 09:25 am UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - tritorella, 2003-03-21 09:42 am UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - [info]lm, 2003-03-21 11:43 pm UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - [info]sagralisse, 2003-03-21 05:26 pm UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - tritorella, 2003-03-21 05:38 pm UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - [info]sagralisse, 2003-03-21 07:39 pm UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - tritorella, 2003-03-21 08:43 pm UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - [info]sagralisse, 2003-03-21 09:13 pm UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - [info]msmanna, 2003-03-22 07:24 pm UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - [info]darkrose, 2003-03-21 11:06 pm UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - tritorella, 2003-03-21 11:15 pm UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - [info]darkrose, 2003-03-21 11:55 pm UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - lain7, 2003-03-21 07:53 pm UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - [info]lm, 2003-03-21 11:42 pm UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her?
[info]backfromspace
2003-03-21 03:08 am UTC (link)
It's no more mockable than me putting anti war banners on my site, or other people putting Columbia memorials on theirs.

Because the tragedy of RPS is on par with people dying.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Why are you mocking her? - tritorella, 2003-03-21 07:50 am UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - [info]sorchar, 2003-03-21 10:09 am UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - tritorella, 2003-03-21 02:44 pm UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - [info]sorchar, 2003-03-21 02:57 pm UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - tritorella, 2003-03-21 03:17 pm UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - [info]cimorene111, 2003-03-21 05:18 pm UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - tritorella, 2003-03-21 05:21 pm UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - [info]triestoohard, 2003-03-22 01:20 pm UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - (Anonymous), 2003-03-21 08:25 pm UTC
Re: Why are you mocking her? - [info]darkrose, 2003-03-22 12:00 am UTC

[info]misswindy
2003-03-21 01:19 am UTC (link)
If RPS is the same as rape, then if I *tell* someone to write RPS about me, is that like having sex?

Because if so-- doooood. That could totally put a new spin on my social life.

Write me, baby, write me.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Not inspired enough to change your social life...sorry - [info]slippery_fish, 2003-03-21 01:33 am UTC
Re: Not inspired enough to change your social life...sorry - [info]embitca, 2003-03-21 02:03 am UTC
Re: Not inspired enough to change your social life...sorry - [info]slippery_fish, 2003-03-21 02:19 am UTC

[info]kannaophelia
2003-03-21 02:06 am UTC (link)
You know, paraphrasing or not, I can't see a single place where she even came close to implying that RPF is equal to rape. The closest she came was saying she broke up with an ex for not caring that her step father perved on her, because she cares about sexual privacy. In fact, I thought she was remarkably clear that she was talking about sexual *fantasy* in her entry, not that she thought RPF was carried out in the real world.

I'd say this entry is fairly accurate, actually, in that it's not pointing out wank at all, just someone having a different opinion.

But hey, I don't read RPF about living people, so my opinion probably doesn't count. ~sigh~

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]embitca, 2003-03-21 02:20 am UTC
(no subject) - tritorella, 2003-03-21 07:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]embitca, 2003-03-21 08:13 am UTC
(no subject) - tritorella, 2003-03-21 09:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cesare, 2003-03-21 08:18 am UTC
(no subject) - tritorella, 2003-03-21 09:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-03-21 06:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kannaophelia, 2003-03-21 11:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-03-21 05:32 pm UTC

[info]elle
2003-03-21 06:30 am UTC (link)
I don't really want to touch this one. On the one hand, RPS squicks me like no other. On the other hand, no one's forcing me to read it, and it does spawn some pretty amusing jokes/art/icons/satire/etc. I think this calls for some kind of wanky rant in my journalfen account. *gasps* It'll be my first post there! ...or not. *combats apathy*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rhi_silverflame, 2003-03-21 07:50 am UTC
Re: - [info]elle, 2003-03-21 08:13 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-03-21 10:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-03-21 10:21 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-03-21 05:04 pm UTC
Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-03-21 05:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]elle, 2003-03-22 07:17 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-03-22 07:39 am UTC
Fen - [info]jerry_ds_girl, 2003-03-30 07:11 am UTC

[info]msmanna
2003-03-21 10:28 am UTC (link)

I thought it was a reasonable argument, although a bit emotionally-phrased in places. I always distrust 'Well, how would *you* feel if [circustance X] happened', because [circumstance X] is usually subtly different to the actual topic under discussion. But she did a pretty good job of actually trying to explain *why* she gets the 'ick' reaction.

So, low ranking on the wank-score there, I'm afraid. Where did I put that {squid}?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cimorene111, 2003-03-21 04:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - tritorella, 2003-03-21 05:18 pm UTC

[info]eyebrowofdoom
2003-03-22 01:29 pm UTC (link)
This hyperbole just exhausts me. Tape scenario: it would be an actual theft of an actual tape that actually did feature the actual Ewan and his actual wife engaged in an actual sexual act in their actual bed. RPF involves no theft, no tape, no actual sexual acts, no Ewan and no wife; only expressly fictional words.

Bleargh.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]diamonde, 2003-03-22 04:02 pm UTC

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map