Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



NM ([info]narcissam) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2006-05-31 12:30:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
John Byrne's Bestsellers Supressed by Comic Book Stores (Psst. he's Canadian)
I've never read anything by him but John Byrne has had a fond place in my heart ever since he tried to delete most of his Wikipedia entry, including the fact he was Canadian. I leaped up to see his name on [info]wank_report even though this wank mostly features his #1 fan, Madman Mike O'Brien. Peter David took offence at a thread of Byrne's that he felt bashed his comics.

Byrne: Once upon a time, when a writer wanted to "do something different" s/he left the character/title being worked on, handing it over to someone who wanted to continue with the established motifs. Some time around 25 years ago this started to change. Writers like Claremont and David, as well as others, began changing the books/characters to suit their interests of the moment....It's the same old song -- the characters being made to serve the needs of the talent, instead of the talent serving the needs of the characters

Peter David: You just have to love that from the guy who, before my run on the title, was handed a character who was unmarried and transformed into a monster when he got angry, and over the course of the run he split the character in two, separating them into two individual beings, thus eliminating a dynamic that had been in place for a quarter of a century, married off the hero, and basically wrote a series of stories that were indistinguishable from "Godzilla"--dedicated scientist and his group of equally dedicated followers pursues a furious green monster he's accidentally unleashed upon the world. Stories that, in short, had nothing to do with the Hulk.


John Byrne bashing ensues in the comments, until Mike O'Brien, an old hand Byrne fan shows up to fight back. With news of a conspiracy by comic shop owners against Byrne.

Mike O'Brien: It's interestig that a writer known for "writing to the bit" would criticize a superior writer like John Byrne.

Wonder Woman, Lab Rats, Doom Patrol and Blood of the Demon. These are just a few of the man's latest masterpieces. Talked about by fans and pros alike as fresh and innovative takes on the hoary old superhero concept.

Let's not even bring up Next Men, Babe, Danger Unlimited, Namor and of course Alpha Flight. All of them celebrated by fans as all-time classics of comic literature!

Byrne has even written novels for chrissakes! What am I getting at here, sweetpea?

Just this, why does a tired old hack like Peter David continue to bash John Byrne? Could it be jealousy by a man who had to beg to get back on the Hulk and Spider-Man. Could it be because we have a very active messageboard honoring a true gentleman of the field, not a blog, what a creepy concept, by a man who just won't let go of his connection to a man greater than him.

Who knows? When John Byrne writes a character he brings out the best and the heroic side of the character and never forgets it's the all-age quality of the character that matters most. When David writes a character he tries to tear down the goodness and replace it with dick jokes and oh-so funny putdowns.

Now I'll go back to my mean old board and think about what Bono said: Vertigo, my friend Vertigo.

Bill Mulligan: Now THAT, my friends, is comedy.

Mike O'Brien: Byrne does nothing but create masterpieces, Lab Rats, Doom Patrol and the Demon have proven his artistry of the superhero concept. Fans and pro alike agree it's fresh and innovative.

Mike O'Brien posting a few minutes later: Byrne's working on the All-New Atom with full-figured writer supreme, Gail Simone.

What's Peter's next gig?

Mike O'Brien a few more minutes later: John Byrne's work has also appeared on the cover of Time.

I'm sure Peter's work on The Dark Tower book will garner mucho publicity as well.

That and $4.50 will get you a double late mochachino or 5 U2 songs on iTunes.

I recommend Native Son as one choice. It's an early version of Vertigo but moodier.

Joe Nazarro: A double 'late' mochachino? C'mon, somebody else step in; I can't do all the heavy lifting here!

Mike O'Brien: Joe, you can't do any of the heavy lifting. Oh my, you caught me, I misspelled "latte" a thousand pardons good sir!

Here try this one. If Peter David cares so much about the integrity of the characters he works on; why did he change the brilliant Wonder Girl character that Byrne created to be a normal teenager, into a blonde stand-in for Jenna Jameson?

You know who Jenna is, right Joe. I'm sure you do.

Madman Mike one minute later: Masterpiece. The output of one John Byrne. Open your eye and stol trying to curry the favor of your master for once.

Madman Mike immediately: LOL! That should say: Open your eyes and stop trying to curry the favor of your master for once.

Anyway, be honest with yourselves. Peace.

Robert Fuller: Normally I don't like to get involved in these sorts of things, but I gotta say that this Mike O'Brian/O'Brien (which is it? Does he really not know how to spell his own name?) is just the most pitiful person I've ever encountered. And he's certainly not doing any favors for John Byrne. He can't be for real, can he? He makes me miss that X-Ray guy.

Now can we get back to an actual rational, adult discussion?

Patrick Calloway: Well, considering he's also living in a bizarro-universe where people praised Byrne's Doom Patrol, perhaps spelling is equally mutable in his world.

And, sorry, I can't let this one slide by. Byrne has written novels? Um, yeah, techically, since the exactly two that he has written does qualify for the plural. Now if only PAD could manage to write that many...

Mike O'Brien: Never read Whipping Boy or Fear Book? Those were best-sellers. Guess you guys missed out on real literature. Undoubtedly too busy reading "the Hulk" by PAD. Or the character using the name "Hulk," anyway.

Patrick Calloway: As a matter of fact, son, I did read Whipping Boy. Had to track it down at used shops, since it's such a best-seller it was totally out of print. Never did find Fear Book.

If you had passed Reading Comprehension 101 you might have noted that I did say Byrne had written two novels, therefore, perhaps, just perhaps, implying that I was aware of their existence...

Madman Mike: Despite JBs best-selling novels, there are a lot of people in charge of ordering books at bookshops, who, not unlike yourself, have an agenda against the man and his work. They refuse to place orders, and suddenly, not so surprisingly, there is the illusion of a lack of demand. This is a hallmark of the comic shop owners who wish to see him fail.

Madman Mike about 45 minutes later: And please my friend, don't be so rude with your Reading Comprehension 101 remark. You know full well that Gods and Goddesses, the wonderful John Byrne Wonder Woman novel, was a best-seller as well as Fear Book and Whipping Boy. So please stuff your smugness in a sock, mister

People protest Byrne doesn't sell and Mike is a conspiracy theorist.

Madman Mike:
Craig J. Ries and "djinnmastr", your true colors are showing. Comic shop owners say "Byrne doesn't sell," so of course they under-order his books. So when kids come in to find the all-ages books he produces---guess what?!? They don't carry them! Self-fulfilling prophecy!

But you knew this already.

Craig J. Ries: Your right... my true colors are that I'd ban your worthless ass if I had the power. We get enough spam around here that we don't need a troll like you, too.

Go sniff Byrne's ass since you seem to enjoy being behind it so much.

Mike O'Brien: Let's also not be so quick to pat Peter on the back for writing almost 50 novels. Most of those were done for existing characters. Byrne came up with Fear Book and Whipping Boy on his own. He created the characters.

If only the bookstores weren't run by the same fanboys that have taken over and slaughtered the direct sales market, he could have been the next Stephen King.

John Seavey: Mr. O'Brien, some polite advice:

Your attempts to defend John Byrne are pretty much achieving the opposite effect intended. I respect and admire Byrne's contributions to the comics industry, but you're championing his weakest work as being "lauded by fans and pros alike", you're actively insisting that "the bookstores" are run by people who have an anti-Byrne agenda (this would be every bookstore in America, then? Nationwide chains like Barnes and Noble are run by some geek saying, "Pffh. John Byrne's not anywhere near as good as Peter David. I won't order any of his books for my hundreds of stores.")...in short, you're really making a bad impression.

My advice would be to keep quiet and let John Byrne's writing and art speak for themselves. (Which would probably be my advice to Byrne, too, should he ask for it; his central point, that sometimes writers make too drastic a change on a book simply to "shake things up", is valid, but he does it a disservice with the examples he cited.)

This isn't a popularity contest, it isn't a "Byrne vs. David" debate; both of them have done some almighty great work over the course of their long careers. John Byrne just put his foot in his mouth, that's all. Trying to fit it all the way down your throat, while insisting that you love the taste of shoe leather, isn't the best way to prove your point.

Jason M. Bryant: Actually, at this point I'm leaning more towards believing that Mike O'Brien (sounds like Miguel O'Hara) isn't being serious.

djinnmastr: I'm leaning towards Mike O'Brian being John Byrne...

Rafael: Well, believe it or not, Darick Robertson used this 'Mike O'Brian' as a basis for the editor character in Transmetropolitan. So, he's not John Byrne.

He is, however, a deeply disturbed individual. He is like the Silas character in The DaVinci Code, except he uses Byrne comics as a method of self flagelation.

Just watch and laugh.

Peter David: As for Mike's (Mikes') comments, it's hilarious that he would accuse people here of kowtowing to me when he parrots, word for word, John's inaccurate criticisms of my work. Tragically, there's no party line here to be toed, no cute slam phrases to be echoed, so everyone is forced to think for themselves rather than mouth John's words. Tragic, that. Set your watches: I'm sure he'll be along to accuse me of having someone fall to their death underwater any time now.

And yes, John's done more "original" titles than I. Then again, "Soulsearchers and Company" has run far longer than any of John's original titles, and then there's "Sachs & Violens" and "Fallen Angel," not to mention novel series such as "Sir Apropos of Nothing," the King Arthur trilogy, and the upcoming "Hidden Earth" series, so...

and in response to 'What's Peter's next gig?"'

You mean BESIDES X-Factor, Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man, Fallen Angel, Marvel Adventures Spider-Man, Wonder Man, the Dark Tower, Spike vs. Dracula, Soulsearchers and Company, an FF novel, the novelization of Spider-Man 3, the next New Frontier novel and a NF novella, a Next Gen novel, and "The Hidden Earth?" Besides all that?

Okay, actually, I do have another comic series I've turned in the first script for, but Marvel wants to be further along before it's announced, so I'm going to respect that.

Peter David a few seconds later: My work has appeared on the Op-Ed page of "The New York Times." So...your point?

Stephen McGrath on the comic book store owners: RIGHT! So, they should keep their yaps shut when someone walks to the counter with a JB book, and not bash Byrne cuz THEY don't like him. I sell for AT&T. I'd be FIRED if I said to a customer: "You shouldn't get our DSL, I think it stinks and you should go with cable!"

Bill Myers: I have yet to meet a comic-book retailer who has discouraged anyone from buying Byrne's books. Perhaps you've met some, but I doubt it's an industry-wide epidemic. Byrne may think so, but he has a rather self-centered and child-like view of the universe.

For example, here is a quote from John Byrne himself, posted on his very board: "Having a "Bad Byrne" story to relate is a way of getting creds in some "pro" circles."

Right. It's got nothing to do with the way he disparages people like Peter David, accusing them of capriciously altering characters to suit their whims, while conveniently omitting his alterations of Superman, Spider-Man and the Vision, among others.

Stéphane Garrelie: Well, each time i see a thread about Byrne here or a trade about Pad at the JBF, i know one thing for sure and its that my dream of a comicbook writen by Peter David with art by John Byrne is not for tomorow.

Mike O'Brien a long while later: I read through every post and nothing was said to make me believe PAD over John Byrne. Nice try though..

Just like Sir Bob Geldoff said many times, "taint nuthin but a laffbook fiasco and I don't like Mondays".

Goodnight.



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]glossing2
2006-05-31 09:27 pm UTC (link)
*boggles at the wacky*

I...got nothing. Except that Peter David was (partially) responsible for Young Justice, one of the rockingest comics *ever*.

Oh, and that with friends like Mike, John Byrne needs a protection order better enemies.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]glossing2, 2006-05-31 09:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]adora_spintriae, 2006-06-01 09:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]glossing2, 2006-06-01 02:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]adora_spintriae, 2006-06-02 12:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]magma9, 2006-06-02 07:49 pm UTC

[info]mindset
2006-05-31 09:31 pm UTC (link)
Byrne: Once upon a time, when a writer wanted to "do something different" s/he left the character/title being worked on, handing it over to someone who wanted to continue with the established motifs.

Oh no, he din't. The creator of the legendary "Byrne Ward" said that? Excuse me while I go laugh hysterically for a few hours.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sashenka, 2006-05-31 10:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]palabradot, 2006-05-31 10:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]freezer, 2006-06-01 12:27 am UTC

[info]pantyless_angel
2006-05-31 09:31 pm UTC (link)
this wank mostly features his #1 fan, Madman Mike O'Brien.

I had to back and read that a few times because I kept reading Madman as Madame

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]figgy, 2006-05-31 09:42 pm UTC
OT - [info]reeve, 2006-06-01 12:33 am UTC
Re: OT - [info]pantyless_angel, 2006-06-01 12:39 am UTC
Re: OT - [info]yaoiko, 2006-06-01 01:34 am UTC
Re: OT - [info]reeve, 2006-06-01 02:29 am UTC
Re: OT - [info]lillyv, 2006-06-01 03:49 am UTC
Re: OT - [info]omnicrom, 2006-06-01 05:22 pm UTC

[info]hua
2006-05-31 09:42 pm UTC (link)
Is that really an 'I don't like Mondays' reference at the end? Because, as crazy as he comes off, he can't have meant that to be taken seriously...? It almost makes me wish I wasn't too lazy to try to figure out what's up with all the U2.

(Reply to this)


[info]seraphtrevs
2006-05-31 09:48 pm UTC (link)
Oh fanboys. Never change. ♥

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(Deleted post)
(no subject) - [info]seraphtrevs, 2006-06-01 10:04 am UTC

[info]esclaramonde
2006-05-31 10:06 pm UTC (link)
When they say Whipping Boy, do they mean the short novel where the prince and the whipping boy get kidnapped and the people think the whipping boy is the prince? because that one was really good.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mmanurere, 2006-05-31 11:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]silvernutmeg, 2006-06-01 12:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]yaoiko, 2006-06-01 01:41 am UTC

[info]jetwolf
2006-05-31 10:37 pm UTC (link)
Is it wrong for me to just wish that Byrne would go back to writing She-Hulk and stay off the Internet forever and ever? Because really. Byrne She-Hulk was fucking hilarious. But it was meant to be and no one got hurt.

It was long ago and it was far away and it was so much better than it is today.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]jim_smith, 2006-06-01 01:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jetwolf, 2006-06-01 01:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]freezer, 2006-06-01 01:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jim_smith, 2006-06-01 03:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]freezer, 2006-06-01 03:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pipssister, 2006-06-01 05:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]m_butterfly, 2006-06-01 08:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pipssister, 2006-06-01 06:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]freezer, 2006-06-02 04:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pipssister, 2006-06-02 01:57 pm UTC

[info]mister_terrific
2006-05-31 10:51 pm UTC (link)
I read this yesterday and I swear to high heaven I thought O'Brien was being incredibly witty with his parody.

The further I went into the comments, though, the more I realized he was dead serious.

Scary.

Mister Terrific
Defender of Fair Play

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]jaina, 2006-06-01 04:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]miss_padfoot, 2006-06-02 09:57 pm UTC

[info]ghyste
2006-05-31 10:53 pm UTC (link)
But I liked the Hulkbusters.

*pouts*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]freezer, 2006-06-01 12:30 am UTC
*icon love* - [info]delcj, 2006-06-01 03:44 am UTC
Re: *icon love* - [info]freezer, 2006-06-01 03:46 am UTC

[info]brown_betty
2006-05-31 10:55 pm UTC (link)
Okay, I have no opinion due to my lack of reading Marvel, but people, please. Peter David gave us Supergirl's lesbian/transexual horse. Nothing can beat that.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]m_butterfly, 2006-06-01 08:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]brown_betty, 2006-06-01 08:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]beandelphiki, 2006-06-01 12:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brown_betty, 2006-06-01 05:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]m_butterfly, 2006-06-01 08:36 am UTC

[info]brown_betty
2006-05-31 10:57 pm UTC (link)
Byrne's working on the All-New Atom with full-figured writer supreme, Gail Simone.



Does "Full figured writer," mean something other than zaftig? Because… wtf?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]onaga, 2006-06-01 04:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]adora_spintriae, 2006-06-01 09:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evanwaters, 2006-06-01 08:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]brown_betty, 2006-06-01 08:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tiki, 2006-06-01 06:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mindset, 2006-06-01 06:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eli_eli_oh, 2006-06-01 06:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brown_betty, 2006-06-01 06:52 pm UTC

[info]bangoskank
2006-05-31 11:18 pm UTC (link)
Hey, you got me all excited about the Dark Tower comic again, curse you!

*squees*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - flightstothesea, 2006-05-31 11:27 pm UTC

flightstothesea
2006-05-31 11:25 pm UTC (link)
Peter David is doing the Dark Tower comics? That is all I need to know WHY WERE THEY DELAYED UNTIL NEXT YEAR, WHYYYYYYY?

(Reply to this)


[info]rosehiptea
2006-05-31 11:39 pm UTC (link)
So comic book stores aren't buying the stuff that people want to read, because the owners don't like the creator. Yeah, right, that would be a great way to run a store.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]yattara, 2006-06-01 01:02 am UTC

[info]kami
2006-06-01 12:05 am UTC (link)
Wow...hypocrisy much? I have nothing against Byrne but he sure has had moments of feeling like "doing something different", and if I remember correctly, he certainly didn't change comic books to do it.

The Hulk is just one of many characters/comics that saw drastic changes when he was writing (Not necessarily bad changes though).

Lets see who/what else:

Superman
Wonder Woman
Alpha Flight

And that is just a few...I know there has to be many many more.

(Reply to this)

It Byrnes! It Byrnes!
[info]kamiki_seto
2006-06-01 12:16 am UTC (link)
I'm going to have to dig up that thread from The Straight Dope message board where Byrne was widely and completely acclaimed as 'The Comic book writer whose work has been most widely ignored and retconned by other writers - even when he was still writing it'.

The Dopers had a frightening number of examples of instances where Byrne's storylines and changes were almost immediately 'corrected', ignored, and changed by his fellow writers. Aside from the Image lot, he's one of the most widely disliked writers in the business. (Neil Gaiman, on the other hand, is regarded as one of the nicest people in the business. No surprise to anyone who's met him or read his blog.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: It Byrnes! It Byrnes! - [info]m_butterfly, 2006-06-01 08:41 am UTC
The Dope on Byrne
[info]kamiki_seto
2006-06-01 12:19 am UTC (link)
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=308010&highlight=John+Byrne

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: The Dope on Byrne - [info]freezer, 2006-06-01 01:50 am UTC
Re: The Dope on Byrne - [info]jat_sapphire, 2006-06-01 03:30 pm UTC

[info]tiki
2006-06-01 12:50 am UTC (link)
I'm always happy to see a wank that reinforces my belief that most of the people in the comics industry are thin-skinned whiny bitches.
If either Byrne or David had any sense they'd ignore such silly fan-wankiness, rather than participating in and instigating it.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mister_terrific, 2006-06-01 05:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tiki, 2006-06-01 06:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mindset, 2006-06-01 06:40 pm UTC

[info]eljuno
2006-06-01 12:56 am UTC (link)
Byrne: Once upon a time, when a writer wanted to "do something different" s/he left the character/title being worked on, handing it over to someone who wanted to continue with the established motifs.

This reads like Brian Azzarello complaining about people using cheap gross-out shock tactics in an attempt to be edgy.

Hey, Mat, did you just use an entirely unrelated comics wank to persue your irrational hatred of Azzarello?

Yes. Yes, I did.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - jenova, 2006-06-01 07:33 am UTC

[info]jim_smith
2006-06-01 01:04 am UTC (link)
I've never read anything by him but John Byrne has had a fond place in my heart

You haven't missed much, trust me. His body work isn't all that wanky, just kind of lame.

Mike O'Brien: It's interestig that a writer known for "writing to the bit" would criticize a superior writer like John Byrne.

Wonder Woman, Lab Rats, Doom Patrol and Blood of the Demon. These are just a few of the man's latest masterpieces. Talked about by fans and pros alike


Um, I call no way. Can't remember the last time I saw anyone talking about Blood of the Demon.

(Reply to this)


[info]ari_o
2006-06-01 02:16 am UTC (link)
Wow, that is some intersting batshit insane. I know zilch about comic books or who any of these people are, but I bet they could hold their own in a cage match against the Harmonians.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rhiannonmr, 2006-06-01 03:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-06-01 03:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2006-06-01 04:54 am UTC

[info]lizzypaul
2006-06-01 04:24 am UTC (link)
I adore Peter David, so without knowing anything about this wank, the comics, or the other dude, I shall blindly side with him. thhhppt.

(Reply to this)


verthandi
2006-06-01 04:30 am UTC (link)
Et tu, Peter David?

I love his Star Trek books and I'm currently reading Sir Apropos of Nothing when I'm not reading my lit crap. Everything I love turns to wank!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]seraphtrevs, 2006-06-01 07:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]catslash, 2006-06-01 08:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fatesarchitect, 2006-06-02 07:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]m_butterfly, 2006-06-01 08:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mister_terrific, 2006-06-01 05:34 pm UTC

[info]cyn
2006-06-01 06:41 am UTC (link)
Writers like Claremont and David, as well as others, began changing the books/characters to suit their interests of the moment....

Ungrateful to say the least.

Grr. Claremont made you, shrew. And David has confined his wanks to CBG from the beginning, where they belong. Bah.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]evanwaters, 2006-06-01 08:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cyn, 2006-06-01 08:39 am UTC

[info]life_on_mars
2006-06-01 08:46 am UTC (link)
1. They did what to the Hulk? Bless my years-ago decision to abandon Marvel and stick to DC! [Shudders.]

2. Getting 'all comic book retailers' to agree on anything is like getting cats to walk in a parade. I suspect that whatever rubbish you fronted up to the counter with they'd just take the money and smile. What do they care if you buy something they don't approve of personally? It's all good business.

3. I'm with the person who sensibly suggested that such rabid support does the author's cause no good at all. And as for the other guy who chimed in with his entire CV including the Op-Ed page of the New York Times, he should have a little more dignity. Let the children fight it out among themselves, mate - it won't affect you or your career one way or the other.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sashenka, 2006-06-01 10:02 am UTC



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map