|
|
Nevada Fighter (![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} nevadafighter) wrote in ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/community.gif){kind=small} fandom_wank,@ 2003-03-20 22:08:00 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Okay, so maybe this isn't the best wank ever . . .
Can't compare to MsA or Sarah T. but I thought it was amusing anyway:
Waaah! How could they?? This album sucks! The cover art is horrible and tacky and you can't hear the audience! No Micky playing the kettledrum, etc. etc.!
The wank is in the review "Monkees Live Rip-off". The fact that the cover art is bad (in the opinion of one reviewer) and that songs were left off seems to be more important than what IS there--you don't really hear much about the actual music, just crap like "The liner notes give fans no new information and only three tiny individual photos of the Monkees (no group photo) and one blurry photo of the back-up band."
Gee, and I thought you were supposed to buy CDs to listen to them. Silly me.
Can't compare to MsA or Sarah T. but I thought it was amusing anyway:
Waaah! How could they?? This album sucks! The cover art is horrible and tacky and you can't hear the audience! No Micky playing the kettledrum, etc. etc.!
The wank is in the review "Monkees Live Rip-off". The fact that the cover art is bad (in the opinion of one reviewer) and that songs were left off seems to be more important than what IS there--you don't really hear much about the actual music, just crap like "The liner notes give fans no new information and only three tiny individual photos of the Monkees (no group photo) and one blurry photo of the back-up band."
Gee, and I thought you were supposed to buy CDs to listen to them. Silly me.
Post a comment in response:
