Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



The Big Daifuku ([info]jumboclone) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2003-07-15 06:06:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Wanks last longer if you take a picture.
Matt isn't happy with the way Ellen runs The Photochallenge Community.

Apparently, Ellen's running a tight ship over there. The question of to Photoshop or not to Photoshop is one of many among the Herb Rittses and Ansel Adamses over there at the comm that frustrates her to the point of constant self-deprecation and indecisiveness on whether to write the rules of her own community or let the members vote in a poll. Poor Ellen was so confused about her own rules that she couldn't even figure out on her own if purty286's neato kiddie slide piccie was altered "more than the rules".

She wrote one woe post about the stress of running such a large comm all by herself and deleted it after she started getting flamed (I have that post saved, along with the comments -- is there any place I can upload it? I'll edit this entry if/when I do), but wrote another and included a poll asking if any member wanted to take over the community. alceria points out that Ellen has a history of writing "I am hated, therefore I go. Woe." entries, feeding off the support she gets, then "deciding" to stay.

Lo and behold, she's staying, but don't you dare post to the comm that you're leaving! And if you have her on your friends list don't you dare "sl*g [her] off", because she's a new mod and she's not taking shit from anyone anymore!

Until the next time someone complains.


(Post a new comment)


[info]sissybunny_97
2003-07-15 05:41 pm UTC (link)
Thank you.

I can't believe the way this community is run. I was a member for a while, but got so fed up with all the crap, I left. Especially the "deleted post" saga. How rude is that to delete posts solely because she didn't like what was said in it. If you don't want comments, then don't allow comments.

Some people.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Nice icon, X-Phreak.
[info]jumboclone
2003-07-16 10:25 am UTC (link)

...

...Canadian?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

*DIES @ YOUR icon*
[info]aruru
2003-07-16 12:32 pm UTC (link)
Jesus, and here I thought that the Harry "Oh, yeah..." one was evil enough already... XD

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

*muaa*
[info]jumboclone
2003-07-16 02:58 pm UTC (link)

Beh, I have a better Dobby/Harry oral ecstacy icon somewhere...someone was recently using it on LJ. *cackle*

I need to make some more...I haven't made any in ages.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: *muaa*
[info]aruru
2003-07-16 04:06 pm UTC (link)
Wow.

Maybe you should make a Snape/Sorting Hat icon, then.

And if you can somehow come up with a way to make icons deriving from this thread's subject material (either the original fic or all the suggestion on how it could be even WORSE), you will be my new god. :D

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

...
[info]jumboclone
2003-07-19 03:09 am UTC (link)
...

...

...

...BUHLARGH!!!

...

I'll mull it over. *cackle*

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Nice icon, X-Phreak.
[info]sissybunny_97
2003-07-16 07:01 pm UTC (link)
You love it. ;)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]feenix
2003-07-15 08:47 pm UTC (link)
Geez.

The wank is painful to bear from both sides--and it's a hard debate on whether the artfaggery of [info]krets & co. or the whininess of [info]webkin is worse. (What can I say? I hate art fags.)

I mean, seriously. It's a LJ community open to the public. Of course, some things that are technically crap are going to win.

But you know what? A lot of things that have no technique whatsoever and aren't all that aesthetically pleasing are lauded. I mean, look at Picasso--in his day, I'm sure everyone thought he was a joke. Simmons Hall (the new MIT dorm), which is an EYESORE in the opinion of many students there, was lauded in architecture circles at its opening last year.

Then again, it sounds like fanfiction.net syndrome is in the air...

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]feenix
2003-07-15 08:49 pm UTC (link)
Also: I'll host the drama.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]jumboclone
2003-07-16 01:12 am UTC (link)

All righty then.

Sending the thing in a .zip file via email (all I did was save the page, so....).

(Reply to this)(Parent)

*snerk*
[info]guildenstern
2003-07-16 12:14 am UTC (link)
(sic)...figure out on her own if purty286's neato kiddie slide piccie was altered "more than the rules".

How can you alter a photograph 'more than the rules' in a Photoshop community? :O Isn't Photoshop all about being able digitally skew pictures in any way, shape, or form your fancy takes you? Adobe: Gestapo 6.0.

....it tempts me to go doctor a few digipics in Photoshop just to see if they'll pass muster. Ha.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: *snerk*
[info]unnamed
2003-07-16 07:28 pm UTC (link)
Well, you could argue that it isn't a Photoshop community per se, just a digital photo community with rules about alteration. But it's still very stupid. Photographs have been altered since the invention of photography, and pretending that Photoshop is the origin of all the mess is ridiculous.

And the whole idea that somehow, a perfect photograph is completely truthful... no photograph is completely truthful. Even the simplest picture, not altered the slightest bit in the lab or Photoshop is cropped, isn't it? You take a picture of a sunset at the beach, but you exclude, say, a dog peeing a little off to the right. The only real truth is to be there, and even then, there's arguments against that.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]rikoshi
2003-07-16 02:53 am UTC (link)
Canyoncat said, Yes, ignore the bad comments, they are negligible compared with the good ones. The vast majority of photochallenge members are pleased with what you do and happy to know that you will continue doing it. Some people will find something to gripe about no matter what.

In other words, folks, don't pay attention to constructive criticism! The purpose of showing your other word to people in a forum isn't for advice on how to get better, it's so that you can reap praise and praise and praise. Because remember! The only reason to do something is to show how good you are at it. Things like having fun and improving yourself and what have you are all just insignificant wastes of your time.

(Reply to this)

Ooh!!! More wank.
[info]feenix
2003-07-16 04:21 am UTC (link)
[info]jumboclone was nice enough to send me the deleted post, and now it's online to be mocked. As it rightfully should.

http://www.mit.edu/~dcpete06/photochallengewank.htm

(Reply to this)(Thread)

That entry reeked so bad of potential wankery.
[info]jumboclone
2003-07-16 06:24 am UTC (link)

Ugh.

I just wanted to say pass the fucking tissues already. What a woe post that was.

"I am human/sensitive" -- yeah, real sensitive to go into other peoples' LJs and "defend" her community with semi-sarcastic remarks.

*resists urge to kill that smiley at the end of each of her comments*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

"you better be careful!"
[info]kannaophelia
2003-07-16 10:37 am UTC (link)
I think that thread is my favourite part of all. "Your friends don't really like you, nyah nyah nyah!" So... adorable.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: That entry reeked so bad of potential wankery.
[info]sorchar
2003-07-16 12:14 pm UTC (link)
*sings* I am huuuuman and I need to be constantly fawned upon, coddled, and reassured loved, just like everybody else does...

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Ooh!!! More wank.
[info]dawnswalker
2003-07-16 07:16 am UTC (link)
Wait, so she's whining that no one ever offered to help her with the community, but when people offer to help in the replies, she turns them down because she wants to do things her own way anyway?

OW. My brain!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Ooh!!! More wank.
[info]kannaophelia
2003-07-16 10:38 am UTC (link)
They're trying to steal her community, you insensitive scum. Have a little compassion.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Ooh!!! More wank.
[info]sissybunny97
2003-07-18 04:14 am UTC (link)
Oh please. Whatever. I can start my own community if I want, I don't need to "steal" other's. Give me a break. Insensitive. [info]dawnswalker isn't being insensitive, just honest.

Oh the drama.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Ooh!!! More wank.
[info]kannaophelia
2003-07-18 08:24 am UTC (link)
But why would anyone want to start their own, when hers is so much better?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Ooh!!! More wank.
[info]sissybunny97
2003-07-18 03:48 pm UTC (link)
Better? You call acting like a 2 year old better? Wow.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Ooh!!! More wank.
[info]charabok
2003-07-18 08:25 pm UTC (link)
You know, I honestly can't tell if you know if Kanna is kidding and you're kidding back, or if you think she's serious. Enlighten me?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Ooh!!! More wank.
[info]jumboclone
2003-07-19 03:12 am UTC (link)

Siss is Canadian.

That ought to explain things a bit.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Ooh!!! More wank.
[info]sissybunny_97
2003-07-19 03:13 am UTC (link)
SHUT UP. You leave Canada out of this! ;)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Ooh!!! More wank.
[info]jumboclone
2003-07-19 06:09 am UTC (link)

Oh, admit it. Canada sucks the big donkey.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Ooh!!! More wank.
[info]sissybunny_97
2003-07-19 07:05 pm UTC (link)
Well, Americans suck rhinoballs. :P

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Ooh!!! More wank.
[info]sissybunny_97
2003-07-19 03:15 am UTC (link)
We're both on crack. ;)

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Ooh!!! More wank.
[info]virago
2003-07-16 04:27 pm UTC (link)
And remember, she's very very overburdened but don't try to help because that would give her less reasons to angst and moan about it.

And if I hear one more person blame their poor time management / intentional wankery on depression, the smitings will begin.

I need a "bitch, please" icon.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Ooh!!! More wank.
[info]iczer6
2003-07-18 10:41 pm UTC (link)
Wanna use mine?


Icz

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Ooh!!! More wank.
[info]virago
2003-07-19 08:20 am UTC (link)
That is a good one. I can't decide which of my present ones to whack in order to fit any new ones, so I'll probably just keep making comments like this. Thanks for the offer, though.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Ooh!!! More wank.
[info]iczer6
2003-07-19 08:24 am UTC (link)
>>Thanks for the offer, though<<

Sure. Just to clarify I didn't make this icon I snagged it from one of the Icon LJs.


Icz

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]guinevere33
2003-07-16 06:58 am UTC (link)
No one's going to usurp your little community from your death grip pretty little hands, doll. All those two were offering was a little bit of help, so chill.

:: gives a cookie to jumbodaifuku ::

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Ho shit, FOOD!
[info]jumboclone
2003-07-16 10:20 am UTC (link)

*inhales it with glee*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]jar
2003-07-16 02:32 pm UTC (link)
::Shudder:: That mod-chick is so... uptight. Someone get her some chill-pills XD;; I swear it like:

RandomPerson: I ju--
Mod: DON'T ATTACK ME!! I OWN THIS COM!!

-_-;;

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map