Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



A pipe? No! ([info]also_not_a_pipe) wrote in [info]fw_debate,
@ 2007-07-12 23:36:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Hope it's okay to use this as a sounding board for the other wank communities. Feel free to delete it or Internet shout at me or whatever if I've put it in the wrong place (and it'll be taken care of in the morning, because I is going to bed right now).

Anyway, I'm having a bit of trouble deciding about whether or not I ought to post something to otf_wank.

There's a rumor going around the Internets that people on Réunion Island are using dogs as live shark bait. It turns out to be mostly not true (basically it happened once recently, the dude was charged with animal cruelty, and it turns out that there have been cases of fishermen using already deceased animals as bait but there isn't this huge epidemic of it that the rumor mongers want people to believe). The (I'd warn against following this link if you're upset by pictures of hurt animals, because they have a rather graphic photo right there at the top of the page) Snopes page and the news story about it on National Geographic's site use a picture of a dog with a big hook through its snout, but apparently there's a strong theory that it's either a hoax or a miscredited picture of some poor dog that found bad luck all on its own. But somebody on the Dogs!Dogs!Dogs! group on Flickr gets hold of the story and posts a link to it, starting a huge fight about who the True Dog Lovers are and whether it's acceptable for people outside of the US of A to not hold American values (loud minority's opinion: no, it isn't) once someone else posts a link to the Snopes page on the story.

I find Flickr wank hilarious on its own merit, because come on, they're fighting about what people should think of pictures of someone else's pets on the Internet. And I think that the people who come right out and say "I know that this is probably isn't true, but I'm outraged anyway!" are funny. But when I find myself feeling the urge to warn people to be careful of the picture in one of the links, well...I'm not quite sure that "LOL Flickrers! But OMG, don't look at that picture" doesn't sway the balance more in favor of Your Thoughts on Dogs and Sharks and Reunions and Stuff than actual lulz.

If not that, how about the two-month long fight on the graves and cemeteries community about whether it's touching or tacky to leave things on graves?


(Post a new comment)


[info]vigilanterodent
2007-07-13 03:15 am UTC (link)
A consultation with my Magic 8-Ball gives "Outlook not so good" re: the dogs. Remember, always, that [info]otf_wank is not [Bad username: animalabuse_debate].

But I bet the cemetery one could be pretty awesome. Etiquette snark is often very funny.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]vigilanterodent
2007-07-13 03:16 am UTC (link)
[info]animal_abuse, is what I meant to say there. Curses!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]herongale
2007-07-13 03:46 am UTC (link)
...

Maybe if the dog with the hook in his nose is also wearing a pirate hat and sitting next to Johnny Depp. Maybe.

(Reply to this)


[info]deliciouschaos
2007-07-13 03:49 am UTC (link)
If not that, how about the two-month long fight on the graves and cemeteries community about whether it's touching or tacky to leave things on graves?

I'm intrigued.

(Reply to this)


[info]iczer6
2007-07-13 04:25 am UTC (link)
For the dog thing I say 'no'.

There really doesn't sound there's even a remote chance for humor in the article mentioned, and IMO far too many people have been using OTF_W as their 'animal-abuse' comm and many of the members are sick of it.

(Reply to this)


[info]apoplexia
2007-07-13 06:24 am UTC (link)
Show me teh funneh and I'll think about it.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]also_not_a_pipe
2007-07-13 05:23 pm UTC (link)
I'd thought about putting the links to the threads in the post initially, but I thought that "hey, is it okay if I post this thing that I just posted?" seemed somewhere between passive-aggressive and stupid. The dog kerfluffle is over here, but that it isn't after eleven on a day where I left at 8:30 in the morning and got home after ten at night, I'm sort of "meh" on the whole thing. There are some amusing posts in there, but they seem a bit few and far between amid a bunch of people getting hysterical over dubious animal cruelty stories.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ashenmote
2007-07-13 06:27 am UTC (link)
ZOMG ANIMAL ABUSE IS NEVER FUNNY!

I don't think this kind of wank is forbidden on otf, but it bears the very realistic risk that people will say unkind things to you in the comments. In the worst case they'll say boring unkind things or some variation of 'his wife? A shark bait' or 'Silly people, how could you fall for that one, everyone knows that sharks and/or dogs don't exist in modern America!'

So, not worth the trouble. That is, unless the hilarious side of the wank is overwhelming or your post and linking technology makes it so.

(Reply to this)


[info]wankismyfandom
2007-07-13 06:51 am UTC (link)
I vote no on the dogs and yes on the cemeteries.

(Reply to this)


[info]caffeine_fairy
2007-07-13 10:43 am UTC (link)
I'd leave the dog one alone if I were you.

(Reply to this)


[info]xturtle
2007-07-13 01:36 pm UTC (link)
Cemetery wank sounds hilarious. Post that one, and don't even go near the third rail of otf_wank :-)

(Reply to this)


[info]phosfate
2007-07-13 02:59 pm UTC (link)
How about leaving dogs as live bait on graves?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]puipui
2007-07-13 05:06 pm UTC (link)
I find that babies usually work better for grave sharks, personally.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]phosfate
2007-07-13 05:31 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, but half the time, you get a baby out of the vending machine and it's already dead. At least dogs are nearly always fresh.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]also_not_a_pipe
2007-07-13 05:12 pm UTC (link)
Maybe, but really. The wank that dog thread would bring is nothing compared to what we'd get if I stirred up the anti-zombie-baiting crowd.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]deliciouschaos
2007-07-13 07:49 pm UTC (link)
OMG HOW COULD YOU TORMENT THOSE POOR INNOCENT ZOMBIES LIKE THAT YOU H0R?!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]sesana
2007-07-14 02:47 am UTC (link)
I'll also add my vote for the cemetery wank. That sounds very interesting, and the dogs and sharks do not.

(Reply to this)


[info]ladysphinx
2007-08-24 08:55 pm UTC (link)
There's a graves and cemeteries community?*


I find myself constantly asking these sorts of questions. I need to branch out from my tiny corner** of the Internets and go exploring.


**Largely my f-list, my RPG, and YouPorn.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]also_not_a_pipe
2007-08-25 06:19 pm UTC (link)
Indeedy do. Graves, Tombs, and Cemeteries seems to be the biggest and most active, but I've seen a ton of other smaller communities that people have plugged on the group or cross-posted their pictures to.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]heddychaa
2007-08-25 08:44 pm UTC (link)
What if I leave a shark on a grave?

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map