Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



hinky ([info]hugsnkisses) wrote in [info]fw_debate,
@ 2004-10-19 23:48:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Fandom Wank has now been placed on post moderation due to excessive trolling. A one-liner idiot post where everyone can have some snarky fun in the comments is perhaps mildly tolerated once, repeated offensive attacks is another thing. All posts have now been deleted.

One of the reasons for moderation is that due to the trolling [info]zorrorojo has removed account creation. There should be no reason that the behavior of a few should spoil it for everyone. (Although there are those who might say the same thing about FW in comparison to fandom.)

Having posts on moderation would stop any sort of trolling like that occuring again and enable accounts to stay open. It might also cause people to be a little more cautious and thoughtful before posting a wank: perhaps taking the time to fully explore it's potential, writing it up clearly or not rushing so much to be the first to get a post up that the original content is removed before any wank actually occurs.

We're taking these steps to stop this type of trolling from occuring again, it doesn't have to be a dramatic change to community. We'll try to unscreen wanks as quickly as we can and keep things running smoothly. In the case of two screened posts reporting the same wank, the mods will pick the one that is more complete.

Thoughts?


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]backfromspace
2004-10-20 01:07 am UTC (link)
This would be a much better question if it weren't specifically answered in the original entry.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]bunny
2004-10-20 01:22 am UTC (link)
Not wanting to wank the wank, but my question was aimed at the hypothetical situation that the reports are of equal quality.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]backfromspace
2004-10-20 01:26 am UTC (link)
Then we will rip out the hearts of both posters, and whichever heart weighs less than a feather will be granted entrance to Heaven.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]lindentree
2004-10-20 02:03 am UTC (link)
Now that sounds like the f_w way of dealing with things.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]hellespont
2004-10-20 02:24 am UTC (link)
And the one that doesn't will be fed to a crocodile demon. Who will enjoy the heavier heart, glutted as it is with saturated fats and evil.

*nods*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map