Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



hinky ([info]hugsnkisses) wrote in [info]fw_debate,
@ 2004-10-19 23:48:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Fandom Wank has now been placed on post moderation due to excessive trolling. A one-liner idiot post where everyone can have some snarky fun in the comments is perhaps mildly tolerated once, repeated offensive attacks is another thing. All posts have now been deleted.

One of the reasons for moderation is that due to the trolling [info]zorrorojo has removed account creation. There should be no reason that the behavior of a few should spoil it for everyone. (Although there are those who might say the same thing about FW in comparison to fandom.)

Having posts on moderation would stop any sort of trolling like that occuring again and enable accounts to stay open. It might also cause people to be a little more cautious and thoughtful before posting a wank: perhaps taking the time to fully explore it's potential, writing it up clearly or not rushing so much to be the first to get a post up that the original content is removed before any wank actually occurs.

We're taking these steps to stop this type of trolling from occuring again, it doesn't have to be a dramatic change to community. We'll try to unscreen wanks as quickly as we can and keep things running smoothly. In the case of two screened posts reporting the same wank, the mods will pick the one that is more complete.

Thoughts?


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]panthea
2004-10-20 04:15 am UTC (link)
Just want to echo [info]singe's concern that potential wanks will be judged on Quality & Worthiness. As long as posts are only non-approved for trolliness, duplicates, or technical problems, then I have no objections.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]phosfate
2004-10-20 03:02 pm UTC (link)
Wordo.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]oulangi
2004-10-20 07:44 pm UTC (link)
I think that the intention is only to screen out the troll posts, with, as always, Quality & Worthiness being judged by the members in our fine tradition of "rabid Hyenas at play". If not then we shall have to wank the mods mercilessly.

I personally hope this will be a temporary measure as I'm rather fond of FW's messiness.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]pyratejenni
2004-10-20 11:19 pm UTC (link)
You forgot grudge-matches. Most of the time they're not really wanky, and they're so boring.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]panthea
2004-10-20 11:39 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, but then we get the fun of FWers jumping all over the OP! Frankly, I wouldn't want the mods deciding what's a grudge-wank and what isn't.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]pyratejenni
2004-10-21 04:13 am UTC (link)
In the last couple I remember, it was fairly obvious because the supposed wanker was just...not wanky. The poster got called on it, and fled.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map