(Post a new comment)

	lidane 2009-09-28 07:18 am UTC (link)
	I couldn't even begin to guess where all that wankery goes. Personally, I'm having too much fun laughing at it all to try and figure it out. I'm still waiting for Eli Roth to drag Quentin Tarantino into ONTD. That would be hilarious. XD (Reply to this)(Thread)

	lidane 2009-09-28 07:56 am UTC (link)
	Oh, and don't forget the offshoot wankery starting over another Basterds actor, Omar Doom: http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/39573496.html (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	jar 2009-09-28 08:33 am UTC (link)
	Ah, that hadn't been posted when I looked last! I am so going to check that out, thanks for the linkage. Am torn about posting now mostly because it's so many fucking links to round up. So lazy. Also, your icon is adorable <3 QT. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	bubosquared 2009-09-28 12:00 pm UTC (link)
	Dear god, I just imagined ONTD: The Movie, directed by Quentin Tarantino. Words cannot express how badly I kind of really want this, to be honest. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	jar 2009-09-28 12:15 pm UTC (link)
	I find your ideas intriguing and wish to subscribe to your newsletter. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	bubosquared 2009-09-28 07:00 pm UTC (link)
	You may send payments in the form of porn, chocolate, or booze, to my e-mail address. :D (Reply to this)(Parent)

feenix
2009-09-28 07:32 am UTC (link)

My test is the wankiness of said source.

Considering this is ONTD we're talking about, I'd probably wait until it got to be at least Ms. Scribe-sized.

In a way, it is fandom, loosely, because what is fandom but for a collection of fans? Strictly - with the media-producing subgroup, and namely the writing/academic subgroup, it's not fandom, but has that stopped anyone before?

I'd lean towards wanking ONTD on f_w, but only if it's epic and it threatens to take down the LJ servers. (ONTD has that power, and has wielded it on occasion.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

	feenix 2009-09-28 07:35 am UTC (link)
	...Jesus Christ. Holy shit at the number of comments. I think it may be worth wanking, depending on the proportion of squee:wank, but holy shit. I am not going over there because I have a feeling I'll be assaulted with 16,000 comments worth of sparkly macros. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	jar 2009-09-28 08:28 am UTC (link)
	It's mostly squee until the most recent post where the backlash began. ... Not going to lie, you probably would be assulted with a shitload of capslocks, sparkles and pictures of blueberries (that makes sense in context. Sort of). I'M STILL TORN. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	jar 2009-09-28 08:26 am UTC (link)
	It's a good, say, 10, 000 or more comments strong, if you add together a couple of the posts? But I think you're right, until it crashes LJ, it's probably just ONTD being ONTD. Screencaps of fangirl cyber sex with Eli Roth or not. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	coffee_mug 2009-09-28 07:49 am UTC (link)
	I'd say f_w, since ONTD has its own unique flavor of fannishness I'd regard as fannishness all the same. And it's definitely wank because Eli Roth wanked. Um, I feel a bit nauseous just typing that. (Reply to this)(Thread)

	jar 2009-09-28 08:31 am UTC (link)
	It is kind of a fandom of its own. I'm still torn though. I like Eli Roth and wouldn't be opposed to, like, doing the guy, but the tissue did leave me somewhat confused as to if I should be feeling happy or a little sick. (Reply to this)(Parent)