singe
2004-05-23 03:51 am UTC (link)

Pretty accurate. She was also totally humorless and obsessed with race, accusing anyone that argued with or insulted her of essentially being a klansman. Hmmm, but I couldn't say what she was originally wanked ON because her trolling distracted me. She wasted a whole hell of a lot of bandwidth by posting blocks of Also Spake Zarasthustra (sp?) which royally cheesed off the site admins.

There's no rule against wanking Stormfreak or naming her, by the way, it's just inviting more 'All hail me! I am your goddess because you're talking about me AGAIN, white trash!' drollery which gets old after a while.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

	guinevere33 2004-05-23 04:01 am UTC (link)
	I thought that if we said her name three times it would summon her :P :: hides from the onslaught :: (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	khym_chanur 2004-05-23 04:11 am UTC (link)
	No, no that's Hastur. If you say Hastur's name three time he comes an destroys you, though I don't know why Hastur woul- Oh, shi- gsdiI*ASD89s0geASId NO CARRIER (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-24 02:50 am UTC

	singe 2004-05-23 04:54 am UTC (link)
	It's like saying Bloody Mary into a darkened mirror UNTIL SHE APPEARS! AIIIGH! (Reply to this)(Parent)

	melusine 2004-05-23 10:19 am UTC (link)
	Stormfreak: she's like Beetlejuice in a way. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	bishounenhuntrs 2004-05-29 05:14 pm UTC (link)
	I tried that once, it didn't work. pout (Reply to this)(Parent)

khym_chanur
2004-05-23 04:09 am UTC (link)

She was also totally humorless and obsessed with race, accusing anyone that argued with or insulted her of essentially being a klansman.

Ah, so she's one of those people who think "It's simply not possible that anything I write could be considered to be stupid or mock-worthy, note even as an honest difference of opinion, so they must be laughing at me for some other reason", and then her race leapt immediatly to mind. I guess among White straight F_W reportees this usally leads to the invocation of Snacky's law, or armchair psychoanalysis of F_W members.

Or does she think that Blacks are somehow immune to TEH STUPID?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	singe 2004-05-23 04:53 am UTC (link)
	I dunno, I'm just reporting what happened. Singe heads off for the fallout shelter.* (Reply to this)(Parent)

	geekmagirl 2004-05-23 06:00 am UTC (link)
	We ARE? puts on my Minority Immunity Helmet (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) -

mcity, 2006-01-17 04:09 am UTC

(no subject) -

platedlizard, 2006-01-18 02:35 am UTC

::dons Old Skool Wanka hat::

snacky
2004-05-23 05:05 am UTC (link)

There's no rule against wanking Stormfreak or naming her

I think there kinda is, actually, but an unwritten rule (remembering, of course, that Hnk just wrote down the rules for the first time on Friday *g*). Stormfreak has been banned, not just from f_w, but from JF entirely, IIRC, and I believe that still stands.

She can be named if you want to, but, honestly, talking about her tends to get her to show up. One of her friends is a f_w member, and maybe that's how it gets back to her? I don't know.

The story in a nutshell: The original SF wank, back on LJ, had to do with her battle with the X-Men comicfic gang. Just your regular wanky stuff, except that Stormfreak kinda lost her shit over it. When it came up again on Blurty, some of those XM people had joined f_w, and it got ugly, with people posting other people's pictures, and people going offline and into RL situations to strike at each other (which, I believe, is the reason we were TOSed off Blurty). She showed up here on JF right away, and started with the trolling and the block text pasting. She was banned, and f_w disallowed anon comments for several months after that, to keep her out.

After a while, she came back (noticeably after being mentioned) and tried to join in the wanky fun. The site admins gave her a chance, but when the whole thing devolved into the same old same old (with accusations of racism, stupidity, ugliness, and every kind insult you can imagine), she was banned across the board - I'm pretty sure she's been banned by IP address, so she can't post to JF at all (which, yes, makes the whole point of not naming her moot, but to me, it doesn't seem fair to talk about her in a forum she can't participate. That doesn't mean I disagree with the banning, but just, seriously, it's something we should let got. But, of course, just my opinion. *g* ).

Having gone through the F_W vs. Stormfreak battles on LJ, Blurty and JF (twice), I'd just as soon not do it again, which is why (among other reasons) I think it's a good idea not to poke at her. Honestly, I think she tried to play nice at first that last time, but there's just too much bad history and it didn't work out.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: ::dons Old Skool Wanka hat:: sorchar 2004-05-23 05:33 am UTC (link)
	That's pretty much it. The reason she can't be wanked is the same reason we don't wank minors, once we know they're minors - being that they're not allowed on JF, they can't defend themselves in FW. And yeah, she was trying to play nice, but I think it was just too late in many peoples' minds. (Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: ::dons Old Skool Wanka hat:: -

khym_chanur, 2004-05-23 05:35 am UTC

Re: ::dons Old Skool Wanka hat:: -

snacky, 2004-05-23 05:48 am UTC

Re: ::dons Old Skool Wanka hat:: -

singe, 2004-05-23 06:21 am UTC

Re: ::dons Old Skool Wanka hat:: -

hugsnkisses, 2004-05-23 07:05 pm UTC

Zorro needs a 'Shaft' icon... -

singe, 2004-05-23 08:06 pm UTC

Re: Zorro needs a 'Shaft' icon... -

j_crew_guy, 2004-05-23 10:39 pm UTC

Icon! -

singe, 2004-05-24 12:58 am UTC

Re: ::dons Old Skool Wanka hat:: -

khym_chanur, 2004-05-24 12:40 am UTC

Re: ::dons Old Skool Wanka hat:: -

ymfaery, 2004-05-24 12:04 pm UTC

Re: ::dons Old Skool Wanka hat:: -

pyratejenni, 2004-05-24 05:21 pm UTC

Re: ::dons Old Skool Wanka hat:: -

misswindy, 2004-05-24 03:27 pm UTC

Re: ::dons Old Skool Wanka hat:: -

sagralisse, 2004-05-24 06:55 pm UTC

Re: ::dons Old Skool Wanka hat:: -

singe, 2004-05-24 11:44 pm UTC

(no subject) -

backfromspace, 2004-05-25 03:53 am UTC

Re: -

singe, 2004-05-25 11:32 am UTC

Re: ::dons Old Skool Wanka hat:: - (Anonymous), 2004-06-23 07:54 pm UTC

Re: ::dons Old Skool Wanka hat:: -

singe, 2004-06-23 10:45 pm UTC

*Dave Chappelle voice* - (Anonymous), 2004-06-25 08:36 pm UTC

Re: ::dons Old Skool Wanka hat:: -

hugsnkisses, 2004-05-23 07:06 pm UTC

Re: ::dons Old Skool Wanka hat:: -

deoridhe, 2004-05-24 04:59 pm UTC

(no subject) -

backfromspace, 2004-05-25 04:02 am UTC

Re: ::dons Old Skool Wanka hat:: -

misswindy, 2004-05-24 06:06 am UTC

Re: ::dons Old Skool Wanka hat:: -

snacky, 2004-05-24 01:02 pm UTC

Re: ::dons Old Skool Wanka hat:: -

misswindy, 2004-05-24 02:24 pm UTC

Say what now? - (Anonymous), 2004-06-22 06:42 am UTC

Re: Say what now? -

snacky, 2004-06-22 12:41 pm UTC

Clearing up the Blurty toss. - (Anonymous), 2004-06-23 08:04 pm UTC

	ymfaery 2004-05-23 07:44 am UTC (link)
	It wasn't just the block text thing. She apparently teamed up with some other folks who "commented" anonymously with huge images of guys doing stupid things. Not sure whose pictures they were, but it got annoying fast. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) -

sorchar, 2004-05-23 10:59 am UTC

(no subject) -

misswindy, 2004-05-24 06:00 am UTC

(no subject) -

misswindy, 2004-05-24 06:08 am UTC

(no subject) -

sorchar, 2004-05-24 09:35 pm UTC

(no subject) -

ymfaery, 2004-05-24 11:57 am UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-24 12:37 pm UTC

(no subject) -

misswindy, 2004-05-24 02:09 pm UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-24 03:15 pm UTC

(no subject) -

misswindy, 2004-05-24 03:33 pm UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-24 05:00 pm UTC

(no subject) -

misswindy, 2004-05-24 05:27 pm UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-24 05:49 pm UTC

(no subject) -

misswindy, 2004-05-24 06:55 pm UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-24 06:59 pm UTC

(no subject) -

backfromspace, 2004-05-25 04:08 am UTC

(no subject) -

mindset, 2004-05-24 04:57 pm UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-24 05:02 pm UTC

(no subject) -

misswindy, 2004-05-24 05:29 pm UTC

(no subject) -

mindset, 2004-05-24 05:53 pm UTC

(no subject) -

misswindy, 2004-05-24 06:22 pm UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-24 07:05 pm UTC

(no subject) -

sorchar, 2004-05-24 09:41 pm UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-25 04:25 am UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-24 06:45 pm UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-06-23 08:10 pm UTC

*loud snickering* - (Anonymous), 2004-06-23 09:58 pm UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-06-22 06:44 am UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-06-22 12:42 pm UTC

Oh, Lisse. - (Anonymous), 2004-06-23 07:41 pm UTC

Re: -

sorchar, 2004-05-24 09:27 pm UTC

Re: -

singe, 2004-05-23 04:40 pm UTC

(no subject) -

moonjaguar, 2004-05-24 05:35 am UTC

(no subject) -

misswindy, 2004-05-24 02:11 pm UTC

(no subject) -

moonjaguar, 2004-05-24 08:11 pm UTC

(no subject) -

misswindy, 2004-05-25 03:19 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-06-23 07:48 pm UTC

Tell the story right! - (Anonymous), 2004-06-22 06:45 am UTC

(no subject) -

sorchar, 2004-05-24 09:29 pm UTC

(no subject) -

mpoetess, 2004-05-25 04:49 pm UTC

	(Anonymous) 2004-06-22 06:49 am UTC (link)
	There's no rule against wanking Stormfreak or naming her, by the way, it's just inviting more 'All hail me! I am your goddess because you're talking about me AGAIN, white trash!' drollery which gets old after a while. At least you acknowledge your own kind. When A happens, B tends to follow...even if it is 4 weeks later. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: -

singe, 2004-06-22 11:30 am UTC

	cimorene111 2004-06-22 10:33 pm UTC (link)
	you're wrong--there was, at least at one time, such a rule. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: -

singe, 2004-06-22 10:41 pm UTC

Re: -

cimorene111, 2004-06-23 05:38 am UTC

(no subject) -

singe, 2004-06-23 11:10 pm UTC

sagralisse
2004-05-24 03:14 am UTC (link)

From what I remember, a bunch of people got an invitation to a community that she created, which was for all people who hate her. The first f_w post was about the lameness of being an attention whore.

Then apparently some people pissed her off by... dunno. It had something to do with a fanfic contest. She posted pictures of her enemies at her comic forum and got her friends to make nasty remarks about them. She collected them and put them into an LJ post. Fandom_wank post regarding the lameness of insulting people on their looks.

The post that she made with the pictures and insults was locked, so a lot of her enemies started posting on the wank. She started flaming them back, and all hell broke loose.

She complained that someone tried to get her fired from her campus newspaper, I think. I don't remember whether she got fired or not, but I remember her saying that she got mad and threw a two-liter bottle at someone. She seemed to think fandom_wank was involved, as if nobody else on the internet hated her guts for, say, publically humiliating them.

The rest was just lots more flaming back and forth. She tried to do the same thing with my picture, except heh, she didn't have my picture. She just picked out some comic fan named Lisse and got her friends to make fun of her. Whoever Lisse is, the Freak's friends think she's fat.

Lessee, she's the originator of the Doritos thing, and the shampoo bottle thing. She seems to think that her opinion is worth more because she's attractive, and yeah, she thinks she's attractive. That's about all I remember.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

	sagralisse 2004-05-24 03:40 am UTC (link)
	The post that she made with the pictures and insults was locked... Not friends locked, really. The victims could see but not reply. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	guinevere33 2004-05-24 05:17 am UTC (link)
	Shampoo? Doritos? I've been in on F_W since the beginning on JournalFen and I've still somehow missed two key running jokes. DAMMIT. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) -

kyuuketsukirui, 2004-05-24 07:17 am UTC

(no subject) -

ymfaery, 2004-05-24 11:46 am UTC

(no subject) -

kyuuketsukirui, 2004-05-24 12:20 pm UTC

(no subject) -

ymfaery, 2004-05-24 12:28 pm UTC

(no subject) -

backfromspace, 2004-05-25 04:15 am UTC

(no subject) -

cimorene111, 2004-06-22 10:36 pm UTC

(no subject) -

backfromspace, 2004-06-22 10:50 pm UTC

Re: -

cimorene111, 2004-06-23 05:36 am UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-24 12:32 pm UTC

(no subject) -

moonjaguar, 2004-05-24 03:14 pm UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-24 03:22 pm UTC

misswindy
2004-05-24 02:16 pm UTC (link)

yeah, she thinks she's attractive.

It goes without saying that whether or not she's good looking is something that's going to be totally subjective, but SF is a steadily employed print and runway fashion model - I'm accompanying her to assist with a photo shoot next month. No, that doesn't make her opinion more valid. She just politically-incorrectly but accurately points out that a lot of people in fandom aren't conventionally attractive, and that the fact that she is has garnered her no small amount of haters.

I'm by no means suggesting you're one of them, though, sincerely.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-24 02:42 pm UTC

(no subject) -

misswindy, 2004-05-24 02:58 pm UTC

(no subject) -

moonjaguar, 2004-05-24 03:06 pm UTC

(no subject) -

misswindy, 2004-05-24 03:23 pm UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-24 03:39 pm UTC

(no subject) -

misswindy, 2004-05-24 03:44 pm UTC

(no subject) -

misswindy, 2004-05-24 03:52 pm UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-24 05:20 pm UTC

(no subject) -

pyratejenni, 2004-05-24 04:11 pm UTC

(no subject) -

misswindy, 2004-05-24 04:18 pm UTC

(no subject) -

pyratejenni, 2004-05-24 05:31 pm UTC

(no subject) -

misswindy, 2004-05-25 07:10 am UTC

(no subject) -

mindset, 2004-05-24 06:44 pm UTC

(no subject) -

misswindy, 2004-05-24 07:04 pm UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-25 03:00 am UTC

(no subject) -

misswindy, 2004-05-25 03:06 am UTC

(no subject) -

backfromspace, 2004-05-25 03:45 am UTC

(no subject) -

misswindy, 2004-05-25 04:03 am UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-25 04:43 am UTC

(no subject) -

misswindy, 2004-05-25 04:55 am UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-25 05:02 am UTC

(no subject) -

moonjaguar, 2004-05-25 05:44 am UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-25 12:33 pm UTC

(no subject) -

backfromspace, 2004-05-25 05:01 am UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-25 05:13 am UTC

(no subject) -

backfromspace, 2004-05-25 06:15 am UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-25 12:39 pm UTC

(no subject) -

misswindy, 2004-05-25 04:35 pm UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-25 08:39 pm UTC

(no subject) -

misswindy, 2004-05-25 05:14 am UTC

(no subject) -

backfromspace, 2004-05-25 06:15 am UTC

Part 1 -

misswindy, 2004-05-25 06:59 am UTC

Part 2 -

misswindy, 2004-05-25 07:04 am UTC

(Reply from suspended user)

(no subject) - backfromspace, 2004-05-26 05:08 am UTC

(no subject) - misswindy, 2004-05-26 05:13 am UTC

(no subject) - backfromspace, 2004-05-26 05:15 am UTC

(no subject) - misswindy, 2004-05-26 05:17 am UTC

(no subject) - backfromspace, 2004-05-26 05:20 am UTC

(no subject) - misswindy, 2004-05-26 05:22 am UTC

(no subject) - backfromspace, 2004-05-26 05:33 am UTC

(no subject) - sagralisse, 2004-05-25 04:17 am UTC

A-ha! The lie is in PRINT!!!!!! - (Anonymous), 2004-06-22 06:58 am UTC

Do you ever do anything but shriek? - sagralisse, 2004-06-22 12:35 pm UTC

Re: Do you ever do anything but shriek? - (Anonymous), 2004-06-23 07:14 pm UTC

Re: A-ha! The lie is in PRINT!!!!!! - thebitingfaery, 2005-08-04 06:35 am UTC

*deep sigh* - (Anonymous), 2004-06-23 09:55 pm UTC

PS:... - (Anonymous), 2004-06-23 10:03 pm UTC

(no subject) - darkrose, 2004-05-25 06:20 am UTC

(no subject) - misswindy, 2004-05-25 07:07 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-06-22 06:59 am UTC

In conclusion: - moonjaguar, 2004-05-24 08:21 pm UTC

Re: In conclusion: - misswindy, 2004-05-24 09:45 pm UTC

Re: In conclusion: - sorchar, 2004-05-24 09:51 pm UTC

Re: In conclusion: - misswindy, 2004-05-25 03:01 am UTC

Wrong, wrong, WRONG.
(Anonymous)
2004-06-22 06:47 am UTC (link)
She complained that someone tried to get her fired from her campus newspaper, I think. I don't remember whether she got fired or not, but I remember her saying that she got mad and threw a two-liter bottle at someone. She seemed to think fandom_wank was involved, as if nobody else on the internet hated her guts for, say, publically humiliating them.

I threw a 2-liter bottle at my managing editor over a picture that wasn't allowed to run in the paper. Had NOTHING to do w/F_W.

- SF
(Reply to this)(Parent)

Whoa. Talk about being WAY off.
(Anonymous)
2004-06-23 07:45 pm UTC (link)
From what I remember, a bunch of people got an invitation to a community that she created, which was for all people who hate her. The first f_w post was about the lameness of being an attention whore.

WRONG. I was wanked here at F_W because I made a post in my LJ about the patheticness of this community, and how sad it is that people can't just do their thing w/o being scrutinized by other nerds - who happen to think they're nerds of a higher pedigree. In other words, I pissed on F_W before F_W knew who I was. You people got mad and copped a "how dare she!" attitude. Wacky hijinks ensued.

The rest was just lots more flaming back and forth. She tried to do the same thing with my picture, except heh, she didn't have my picture.

LOUD and WRONG, as usual. See, I don't know you and I don't care. Lyssie (dig the name spelling, d'uh) was an X-writer that I couldn't stand, and a former Haven troll. So believe it or not, posting Lyssie's picture had NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU. I still don't know who you are. All of you F_Wers tend to take one generic form in my mind.
(Reply to this)(Parent)

photosinensis
2004-05-26 05:11 am UTC (link)
Is this also the wank that got f_w tossed from livejournal? If not, what wank was it that caused that TOSsing?
(Reply to this)(Thread)

misswindy
2004-05-26 05:14 am UTC (link)
No, that was Te. THIS was the wank that got us wanked off *Blurty*!
(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - photosinensis, 2004-05-26 05:22 am UTC

(no subject) - typecast, 2004-05-27 11:17 pm UTC

(no subject) - damien, 2006-12-10 07:32 pm UTC

(no subject) - esorlehcar, 2004-05-27 03:26 pm UTC

(no subject) - misswindy, 2004-05-27 03:41 pm UTC

ymfaery
2004-05-26 06:52 am UTC (link)
Unless someone has connections with the LJ Abuse staff, I don't think anyone really knows why fw got TOSsed from LJ. There's speculation, but nothing official and concrete mainly because they've (LJ Abuse staff) zipped their lips.
(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - misswindy, 2004-05-27 03:42 pm UTC

Stormfreak here
(Anonymous)
2004-06-22 07:11 am UTC (link)
Okay, folks. I'm going to make this as short as possible.

1) Why anyone gives a damn about me all this time later is baffling. Last year, it was funny. This year, it's old. Your very first rule is that I'm not to be mentioned. So basically, you guys are hypocrites. (Which was my beef with you all last year. But I'm digressing.) Have you seen hide-nor-hair of me before this? Hell no. Point being...if you bring me up, I'm going to show up, even if I'm late to the party. You notice my flamethrower is in the car. Let's leave it there. You guys start with your "Stormfreak is bi-POLAR! OOOOOH!" bullshit and I WILL slip back to my old ways faster than lights can be cut out in the ghetto.

The ONLY thing I want to clear up is this. On my granny's grave, I never once posted long blocks of whatever-the-fuck that stuff was. In fact, when I found out who it was, I BANNED them from my own board - along with a few other people who wouldn't let the shit go. I don't even know what that shit was, and I'm tired of being blamed for it. Why can't you guys admit that you banned me because I beat you all at your own game? Wank? You guys don't know wank. You guys throw jabs - I aim at the jugular, and I always will. We KNOW this, so don't CRY like little punk BITCHES when I do. Oh, and for the record. My friends didn't show up here because you all were dogging me. My friends showed up because YOU GUYS WERE DOGGING THEM. How QUICKLY we forget. Don't worry - I have a laundry list o'memories.

The rest of that stuff is just old shit that I don't remember about and I don't care. I can't change anyone's mind about me, and I'm not about to try. Stormfreak is dead - been dead for months now. Why can't you all bury her? What was once so funny to me ("Look, guys! Crackers with Computers are at it again!") is now just...well, sad. I came here prepared to fo a-flaming and all I can do is shake my head at this. I can't even get mad at it because it's so...old and silly.

Anyway. Anyone who wants to speak to me - to ask questions, to give me a piece of their mind, to demand an apology that I must may owe you - whatever - can hit me at stormfreakisnuts@hotmail.com. Otherwise...I'm done with it. Thtis thread - and this urban legend of Stormfreak - ends the way you all choose it to end. But don't think something as simple as IP banning is going to stop me from speaking my mind if I really, really want to. Never did in the past, did it?

- J

PS to ZorroRojo: Macking fun of your dead uncle was some low shit. I can't apologize for it because I wasn't sorry about it when I did it, but I can acknowledge that it was wrong.
(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Stormfreak here
thebitingfaery
2005-08-04 06:36 am UTC (link)
Dear, no one cares about you. Someone asked what it was all about, and people told her.
(Reply to this)(Parent)