Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



The Harmonian Custodian ([info]esclaramonde) wrote in [info]hp_cornfield,
@ 2007-04-30 12:30:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
It's been quiet here ... too quiet
Emma Watson recently had an interview, in which she said:

Now it is clear to everybody that it is not just friendship between them. Everybody except them, of course. It is so typical, girls tend to end up with those guys who most annoy them, who most get them angry, who most behave horribly. Ron acts exactly like this towards Hermione. But their relationship will develop somehow, sooner or later. They will become a couple, I’m sure. Ron amuses her, which is what Hermione needs. And she keeps him in line. A perfect couple.


Oh no she didn't!

(Yes, I realized that Portkey wank is not like shooting fish in a barrel but pouring the barrel of fish out on the ground and jumping on them, but still. One of the actors gave a ship preference homgz11!!!11!!!)

Miss Mady: Did she really say she liked R/Hr because "he treats her horribly"? Oh Lord. What is Emma going on about? I want to be really snarky right now and rebute those comments, but I won't...

manuel23 ve: I really don't like the message R/Hr is sending to the kids. Maybe i'm a hopeless romantic.

[My buddy] mathiasgranger: So Hermione is looking to be amused by a guy who annoys and angers her....
Wow...I might just have to take back that smart label I placed on Emma...that is just...deep as a puddle.


Salamon2 [who, like faithfulreader, knows more about girls than girls do]: So we're doing the E.N.A.S.U.T.H. thing now? Count me in!
E.N.A.S.U.T.H. - Emma needs a slap upside the head
(stolen from pemberly.com where it's Edmund needs a slap upside the head, in reference to Jane Austen's Mansfield Park).
Also "most girls end up with guys who treat them horribly" - yeah, in High School... but those relationships don't last beyond it... And if they do, then most of those relationships either end in divorce or the guy cheating on the girl. Dear lord!
Excuse me, there is little hope for the rest of the human race, so let me go kill myself:


Black Agnes: Maybe we need a PK dating service and advice column for the nice, sentient folks who know why love should only be if it is like H/Hr

Seamus22: Might as well add me to the E.N.A.S.U.T.H. club. I'm only a little older than her and I know Ron is just insensitive and the relationship they do have is abusive. If Ron were to gain maturity two books ago I'd say he has a chance, but fortunetly he hasn't yet. But it is her opinion no matter how truly odd it is.

faithful2thecall: Hermione/Ron is a horrible example of what a romantic relationship should look like to young kids, especially in HBP. Emma's comments make me think that she might be the one with the emotional depth of a teaspoon (sorry, couldn't help myself either tongue.gif ).

mathiasgranger: As a public figure even one that is considered an adult and has adult assistants...I guess I don't understand the reasoning for why she would put her thoughts in such a dumb way.
I just have a feeling society is quickly moving away from marriage...soon we'll just have people having sex with no emotional attachment...because apparently that is the only thing that matters to the media...and society at large.


faithful2thecall: It'll be a sad state of affairs when a majority of people have sex with no emotional attachment (no pun intended).
I don't know the percentages, but there are a number of authors out there who write things into their stories that are critiques of aspects of society. We've already seen JKR do that in the series (the issue of blood purity comes to mind off the top of my head), so we have every reason to believe she'll do it again when it comes to love and criticize modern societies lack of emotional depth in their relationships. Of course, I'm also a hopeless romantic.


Salamon2: Welcome to "Brave New World" where people just have sex for sex's sake, marriage is a concept of the past, children are raised in test tubes, and people are encouraged to be promiscuous. You're frowned upon if you stay with one partner for too long.


Et la piece de resistance, Black Agnes again. Bolds mine.

I certainly hope you're right about this. This "cultural slide" away from the romantic ideal of love perfected by Jane Austen has been going on for such a long time. The 1960s and Cosmopolitan magazine and the sexual revolution and media bubblegum for the eyes have all shaped the values of a couple of generations. The pace of life itself has quickened radically from a "long way" being walking three miles from the Bennet house to Netherfield. Instant, visual media must "grab" attention with flashy, superficiality or get lost in the flood of images. My dad was in television for 40 years (from its inception until he retired in the '80s), and he always bemoaned the slippage of storytelling itself. Rather than carefully telling (i.e., revealing artfully) a story, television and film began to rely more and more heavily on flash to cover up the lack of substance. And our media-influenced society is shaped dramatically by this hit-and-run (or "slam, bam, thank you, ma'am" if you prefer) approach. Even books geared for children and young adults began to slide away from well-told stories of wonder that transcended the ordinary (think Chronicles of Narnia, The Secret Garden, even Huckleberry Finn) to garbage (my opinion) about super-ordinary people being super-ordinary in a post-modern, minimalist world. Not to ding ordinary people as subjects of books, but literature and all storytelling should take you somewhere you haven't been on your own. That could be Narnia...or that could be a different state of being. Just don't gave me Judy Blume! Her books could just be creative non-fiction textbooks on being ordinary.

When HP came out, it represented a welcome departure back to storytelling. Clearly, JKR relishes the art of the well-told story, the slow reveal, the clue-dropping and foreshadowing, the smokecreens...oh, all the things we love in an edge-of-the-seat movie or book or play. Look at us...we're sitting on the edge of the seat right now, and isn't that amazing? She has given us indictments of bigotry, greed, selfishness, etc., the things that plague society (and always have.) I have faith that the slow pace of character development and plot in HP bodes well for further indictments of the "slam, bam, thank you, ma'am" approach. She has said she wants to show people falling in love...and falling in love the good old fashioned way that we love means seeing beyond the surface. Beauty comes from within, not from some ideal thrown up for 15 seconds on a music video. I think Ron's quote in HBP about Luna is really revealing--he is really beginning to like her. In a rare moment of reflection, he is seeing beyond the wacky and into the delightful side of this girl. Of course he really does love Hermione, but he seems to be well on the path of falling in love with Luna. Her beauty is in slow reflection and in peeling away the surface. And JKR said it is important for us to see characters fall in love...and I think she means really fall in love over time, in the slow reveal of the classically told tale. Love is not a chest monster that comes roaring down the line; love is Emma going, "oh, OH, OHHHH! Maybe I blew it...it was Knightley all the time, and I took him for granted." The denouement will be swift, but the build up has taken forever. This is good storytelling. And I trust JKR to deliver.



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]frau_eva
2007-04-30 04:14 pm UTC (link)
Even books geared for children and young adults began to slide away from well-told stories of wonder that transcended the ordinary (think Chronicles of Narnia, The Secret Garden, even Huckleberry Finn) to garbage (my opinion) about super-ordinary people being super-ordinary in a post-modern, minimalist world.

I JUST completed my English Capstone class on Postmodernism. WHY MUST YOU TORTURE ME SO?!?!

I will mostly keep my mouth shut because otherwise I will be tempted to beat her to death with The Crying of Lot 49, but I will only say this: Anyone who describes postmodernism as super-ordinary, simple or "wham-bam-thank-you-ma'am" is a fucking idiot.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tehrin, 2007-04-30 04:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]frau_eva, 2007-04-30 06:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jat_sapphire, 2007-05-01 05:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]frau_eva, 2007-05-04 02:22 pm UTC

[info]cathowl
2007-04-30 04:16 pm UTC (link)
Frankly I don't like the Ron/Hermione ship. I'm sick of "they bicker and fight so they must be in love couples. But it's very obviously canon since HBP, and is clearly going to be part of the movies, too. And I'm just going to have to deal with that.

*Sigh* At least there's fanfiction, where I can write whatever ships I like as long as I ignore the rabid shippers frothing at me.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]isntitironic, 2007-04-30 10:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistal, 2007-04-30 10:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cathowl, 2007-05-01 08:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fernwithy, 2007-04-30 11:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cathowl, 2007-04-30 11:24 pm UTC

[info]elainie
2007-04-30 04:17 pm UTC (link)
Black Agnes: Maybe we need a PK dating service and advice column for the nice, sentient folks who know why love should only be if it is like H/Hr.

What, no sex? Screw that!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]saralina25, 2007-04-30 05:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2007-04-30 09:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]drakyndra, 2007-05-01 08:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fionnabhair, 2007-05-02 04:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hinoema, 2007-05-01 06:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]yattara, 2007-05-01 01:47 pm UTC

[info]ikuko
2007-04-30 04:27 pm UTC (link)
This "cultural slide" away from the romantic ideal of love perfected by Jane Austen has been going on for such a long time.

*Chokes* WHAT romantic ideal?! Land a rich husband ASAP, as long as he is a decent enough person? Make sure that you are married to him within a year from your first laying eyes on him? Teasing and bickering (no, not only P&P, NA and Emma characters did not ignore this form of interaction either)? They are freaking delusional. Harmony is only the ideal of cheap paper back romance novels, where there is always a saintly long-suffering heroine who gets a dashing hero over a more attractive females... Real literature describes it as it is, you know...

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]nlb_muffin, 2007-04-30 04:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nekoneko, 2007-04-30 08:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]drakyndra, 2007-05-01 08:42 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-30 09:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jira, 2007-04-30 09:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fernwithy, 2007-04-30 11:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-01 12:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-01 03:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jira, 2007-05-01 03:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]influencethis, 2007-05-01 04:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jira, 2007-05-01 04:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]influencethis, 2007-05-01 04:50 am UTC
... - [info]farmercuerden, 2007-05-06 11:30 am UTC
... - [info]farmercuerden, 2007-05-06 11:31 am UTC
... - [info]influencethis, 2007-05-07 05:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chibikaijuu, 2007-05-01 03:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fionnabhair, 2007-05-02 04:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chez_moi, 2007-05-10 04:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-30 10:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]warrioreowyn, 2007-04-30 10:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]alya1989262, 2007-05-01 07:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]farmercuerden, 2007-05-06 11:32 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-10 10:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]alpheratz, 2007-04-30 11:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]farmercuerden, 2007-05-06 11:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maegwin_of_hern, 2007-05-01 07:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]farmercuerden, 2007-05-06 11:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_mouse, 2007-05-01 09:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fionnabhair, 2007-05-02 04:52 pm UTC
Oh crap- not Austen again
[info]tehrin
2007-04-30 04:43 pm UTC (link)
This "cultural slide" away from the romantic ideal of love perfected by Jane Austen

Of course things are going to slide away from Austen- it's been 200 years! Class issues and marriage are extremely different now! Why, we women actually date now (a concept which was unheard of in Austen's time), sans chaperonage (OH MY!), and can wear pants (THE HORROR)! And we have property rights, careers outside the domestic sphere open to us, and suffrage in most developed nations! If Austen was alive now, I'm sure her "romantic ideal" would be extremely different and she'd be poking fun at different social issues - which have only gotten more complex. Who knows- maybe she'd actually write sex scenes in her books (SCANDALOUS!). Ok, I really cannot picture her doing that, but it's a very giggly idea to think on.

Austen didn't perfect "the romantic ideal of love"- she wrote of an "ideal" that was suitable for her time and place. Ideals change. For the love of whatever you chose to believe in, just put down the Austen and read some damn modern lit. There are writers today that are en par with Austen and others who are probably better.

And I am stopping before I get even more meta on this. *hoses off*

...and I think she means really fall in love over time, in the slow reveal of the classically told tale.

Which is why R/Hr aren't hooking up until Book 7. But I am a little biased.

By jove, that is probably going to be the stupidest rant I've read all day.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Oh crap- not Austen again - [info]willywanka, 2007-04-30 04:56 pm UTC
Re: Oh crap- not Austen again - [info]tehrin, 2007-04-30 05:28 pm UTC
Re: Oh crap- not Austen again - (Anonymous), 2007-04-30 09:54 pm UTC
Re: Oh crap- not Austen again - [info]priestesspadfoo, 2007-05-05 11:55 am UTC
Re: Oh crap- not Austen again - (Anonymous), 2007-05-05 05:59 pm UTC
... - [info]priestesspadfoo, 2007-05-06 07:40 pm UTC
Re: Oh crap- not Austen again - [info]fionnabhair, 2007-05-02 04:55 pm UTC
Re: Oh crap- not Austen again - [info]sandyclaws68, 2007-05-01 11:38 am UTC
Re: Oh crap- not Austen again - [info]tehrin, 2007-05-01 03:44 pm UTC

[info]willywanka
2007-04-30 04:52 pm UTC (link)
manuel23 ve: I really don't like the message R/Hr is sending to the kids.

I'm sure kids are really books for the relationship models, and not for the awesome magic and creatures and adventures and Harry vs. Voldemort showcase showdown (one of them is going to over bid).

...soon we'll just have people having sex with no emotional attachment...

What a truly horrifying idea. I think it may just be the beginning of the end.

And no one should ever be allowed to reference Jane Austen ever again when discussing Harry Potter.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]photosinensis, 2007-04-30 05:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]willywanka, 2007-04-30 11:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]plazmah, 2007-05-01 03:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]maegwin_of_hern, 2007-05-01 07:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]yattara, 2007-05-01 01:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jat_sapphire, 2007-05-01 05:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-02 12:09 pm UTC
... - [info]esclaramonde, 2007-05-02 12:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-08-30 07:42 pm UTC

[info]nlb_muffin
2007-04-30 04:56 pm UTC (link)
Salamon2: Welcome to "Brave New World" where people just have sex for sex's sake, marriage is a concept of the past, children are raised in test tubes, and people are encouraged to be promiscuous. You're frowned upon if you stay with one partner for too long.

Are you saying my bottle isn't a good mommy?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]willywanka, 2007-04-30 04:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sheep, 2007-04-30 05:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]willywanka, 2007-04-30 06:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sheep, 2007-04-30 07:08 pm UTC
... - [info]willywanka, 2007-04-30 07:26 pm UTC
... - [info]sheep, 2007-04-30 07:53 pm UTC
... - (Anonymous), 2007-04-30 10:00 pm UTC
... - (Anonymous), 2007-04-30 10:01 pm UTC
... - (Anonymous), 2007-04-30 10:01 pm UTC
... - (Anonymous), 2007-04-30 10:02 pm UTC
... - [info]willywanka, 2007-04-30 10:42 pm UTC
... - [info]priestesspadfoo, 2007-05-05 12:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nlb_muffin, 2007-04-30 05:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]willywanka, 2007-04-30 07:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2007-04-30 07:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]peachespig, 2007-04-30 10:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-06-15 11:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]heddychaa, 2007-07-07 12:46 am UTC

[info]photosinensis
2007-04-30 05:16 pm UTC (link)
Oh, Portkey. Whatever happened to you? Once, you were a forum for Potter pr0n and crack.

Face it: the only Harry/Hermione action we're going to get is from fanfic. This is okay. Besides, it's not the end of the world yet. There are no locusts.

Of course, the moment I press "post comment", the locusts will appear, and it suddenly will be the end of the world, but the world ending will not be associated with anything that Emma Watson said.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tehrin, 2007-04-30 05:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]photosinensis, 2007-04-30 05:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - sockpuppet_rat, 2007-04-30 06:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]saralina25, 2007-04-30 07:23 pm UTC
HUZZAH /PLANET EARTH/ - [info]shark, 2007-04-30 06:44 pm UTC
Re: HUZZAH /PLANET EARTH/ - [info]spawn_of_kong, 2007-04-30 06:53 pm UTC
Re: HUZZAH /PLANET EARTH/ - [info]hallidae, 2007-04-30 06:56 pm UTC
Re: HUZZAH /PLANET EARTH/ - [info]spawn_of_kong, 2007-04-30 07:02 pm UTC
Re: HUZZAH /PLANET EARTH/ - [info]hallidae, 2007-04-30 07:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jira, 2007-04-30 09:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hoopa, 2007-05-03 01:22 am UTC

[info]rekall
2007-04-30 05:24 pm UTC (link)
Also "most girls end up with guys who treat them horribly" - yeah, in High School... but those relationships don't last beyond it... And if they do, then most of those relationships either end in divorce or the guy cheating on the girl.

I guess my family didn't get that memo. All of our bickering couples have lasted where the "perfect" couples end in divorce and/or cheating.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2007-04-30 05:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sheep, 2007-04-30 06:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rekall, 2007-04-30 11:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladyofviolets, 2007-04-30 06:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-30 06:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mister_terrific, 2007-04-30 08:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rekall, 2007-04-30 11:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chibikaijuu, 2007-05-01 03:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fionnabhair, 2007-05-02 05:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sandyclaws68, 2007-05-01 11:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]meesha1971, 2007-05-02 04:45 pm UTC

[info]doomsday
2007-04-30 05:37 pm UTC (link)
So Ron is a horrible, awful person who would be abusive, stupid, and mean if he's paired with Hermione...but if he's paired with Luna, he's thoughtful and deep and it's a classic love story?

Why am I even surprised?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]magnolia_mama, 2007-04-30 07:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]doomsday, 2007-04-30 11:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]thecheese, 2007-05-01 04:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ikuko, 2007-04-30 07:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hypno_jango, 2007-04-30 09:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hufflepuffy, 2007-05-02 12:57 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-14 12:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]meesha1971, 2007-05-02 04:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]priestesspadfoo, 2007-05-05 12:17 pm UTC

[info]okalintu
2007-04-30 05:46 pm UTC (link)
...all storytelling should take you somewhere you haven't been on your own. That could be Narnia...

Because I'm currently writing first of two essays dealing with children's literature and especially Narnia, I feel that I have the right to make this remark: does she mean the Narnia the children visited, or the one which is also known as Aslan's country and Narnia-within-Narnia? Because if it's the latter, she means that the literature should kill us. [/smartassery]

And what does she mean by those classically told (love) tales? As other have said, she can't mean Jane Austen unless she has missed something very important (which is... likely). She can't mean fairytales either because those were much nastier than the commonly known and Disney versions are.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]esclaramonde, 2007-04-30 05:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2007-04-30 06:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]saralina25, 2007-04-30 06:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]esclaramonde, 2007-04-30 06:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]luckdragonfujur, 2007-05-01 03:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2007-04-30 06:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]saralina25, 2007-04-30 06:38 pm UTC
... - [info]tehrin, 2007-05-01 04:10 am UTC
... - [info]saralina25, 2007-05-01 04:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]silrana, 2007-04-30 10:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladyofviolets, 2007-04-30 10:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]influencethis, 2007-05-01 04:53 am UTC
... - [info]silrana, 2007-05-01 07:59 am UTC
... - [info]rachel_pi, 2007-05-02 05:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]anonyrat, 2007-04-30 11:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]priestesspadfoo, 2007-05-05 12:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mister_terrific, 2007-04-30 08:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mmanurere, 2007-05-01 01:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mister_terrific, 2007-05-01 05:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chibikaijuu, 2007-05-01 03:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]priestesspadfoo, 2007-05-05 12:54 pm UTC

[info]mmanurere
2007-04-30 06:00 pm UTC (link)
I will not start casting HP characters in Much Ado About Nothing.
I will not start casting HP characters in Much Ado About Nothing.
I will not start casting HP characters in Much Ado About Nothing.
I will not...crap.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - sockpuppet_rat, 2007-04-30 06:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mmanurere, 2007-04-30 06:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nam_jai, 2007-04-30 06:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-04-30 10:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nam_jai, 2007-04-30 10:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-04-30 10:38 pm UTC
... - [info]nam_jai, 2007-04-30 10:50 pm UTC
... - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-04-30 10:52 pm UTC
... - [info]nam_jai, 2007-04-30 11:59 pm UTC
... - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-01 03:41 am UTC
... - [info]nam_jai, 2007-05-02 02:58 pm UTC
... - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-02 04:25 pm UTC
... - [info]nam_jai, 2007-05-02 04:35 pm UTC
... - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-02 04:37 pm UTC
... - [info]nam_jai, 2007-05-02 05:23 pm UTC
... - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-02 10:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ryuutchi, 2007-05-01 08:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]catslash, 2007-05-13 11:49 pm UTC

[info]elwing_alcyone
2007-04-30 06:23 pm UTC (link)
I know Ron is just insensitive and the relationship they do have is abusive.

...Am I the only one to have noticed that Ron is the only one who has never shown any desire to hurt the other two in the Trio? Come back when Hermione has cowered in terror of Ron's rage and we'll talk.

But when Harry does it, it's tension and love and HEARTS.

(Disclaimer: I don't think any of the Trio have the potential to be abusive. That argument is stupid.)

And when are they going to notice that Vernon/Petunia is just the sort of respectful, conflict-free and harmonious love they're looking for?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]spawn_of_kong, 2007-04-30 06:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-30 08:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mrs_bombastic, 2007-04-30 08:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tehrin, 2007-05-01 04:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mrs_bombastic, 2007-05-01 11:41 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-30 10:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - soula, 2007-05-01 04:33 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-01 11:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tunxeh, 2007-04-30 08:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]elwing_alcyone, 2007-04-30 09:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]zyna_kat, 2007-05-01 05:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tunxeh, 2007-05-01 05:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jim_smith, 2007-04-30 09:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2007-04-30 10:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pastri_archy, 2007-04-30 10:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2007-05-01 01:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fernwithy, 2007-04-30 11:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]meesha1971, 2007-05-02 05:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rudemistress, 2007-05-11 01:27 pm UTC

[info]spawn_of_kong
2007-04-30 06:51 pm UTC (link)
From where I'm standing, Black Agnes seems to be taking the joys of escapism to an unhealthy level.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tehrin, 2007-05-01 04:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2007-05-01 07:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]priestesspadfoo, 2007-05-05 01:14 pm UTC

[info]daylightsparks
2007-04-30 07:07 pm UTC (link)
I'm so tired of the fuckwits who think there's only ONE type of storytelling and go on and on about what stories SHOULD do - as if all great literature was exactly the same.

It's not surprising that these same fuckwits are the ones going on about how there's only ONE type of TRUE LOVE and any other kind is abusive and horrible.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]spawn_of_kong, 2007-04-30 07:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mmanurere, 2007-04-30 08:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]khym_chanur, 2007-04-30 08:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]isntitironic, 2007-04-30 10:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]silrana, 2007-05-01 07:23 am UTC

[info]shallow_kid
2007-04-30 07:27 pm UTC (link)
I hate to bring up the "never been kissed, never dated, kicked around in high school, bitter, pathetic, dorky virgin" Harmonian stereotype but ... well, there it is!

I mean, the romantic ideal we should all aspire to is 200 years old and basically confines women to a boring life of childbearing and needlepoint? But noooo, the entire world is gone mad and we're all out here, shipping R/Hr and having meaningless sex with one another because abusive!Ron tells us to while the Harmonians sit in their towers, chastity belts locked tighter than Fort Knox.

Do they honestly consider themselves liberals with strong feminist ideals? Are they seriously so delusional that Austen's style of romance seems wonderfully progressive to them? Do I even need to be asking this question?

Poor Harmonian!Hermione. She is so very put-upon.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]elwing_alcyone, 2007-04-30 07:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sheep, 2007-04-30 07:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]khym_chanur, 2007-04-30 08:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]magnolia_mama, 2007-04-30 09:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-30 10:20 pm UTC
... - sockpuppet_rat, 2007-05-01 03:40 am UTC
... - [info]thecheese, 2007-05-01 04:36 am UTC
... - (Anonymous), 2007-05-01 02:11 pm UTC
... - [info]priestesspadfoo, 2007-05-05 01:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]maegwin_of_hern, 2007-05-01 07:57 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-01 09:13 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-01 11:00 pm UTC

[info]greypearl
2007-04-30 07:55 pm UTC (link)
It'll be a sad state of affairs when a majority of people have sex with no emotional attachment (no pun intended).

Okay, perhaps it is obvious, and I'm just missing something, but... where's the pun?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]dreamworld, 2007-04-30 07:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]zaliesiren, 2007-04-30 11:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]thecheese, 2007-05-01 04:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hoopa, 2007-05-03 01:27 am UTC

[info]tesgirl123
2007-04-30 07:59 pm UTC (link)
So romance only happens if it follows an "ideal" set during the Austen regency era? Therefore, by that logic, my parents don't love each other because they didn't exist in a time or followed customs where men wore waistcoats and women required a chaperone lest they be "ruined" for good society?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]daylightsparks, 2007-04-30 08:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tesgirl123, 2007-04-30 09:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-01 09:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hoopa, 2007-05-03 01:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tesgirl123, 2007-05-03 02:00 am UTC

[info]singe
2007-04-30 08:26 pm UTC (link)
Love is not a chest monster that comes roaring down the line

Gee, I...I can't help but agree. *tries to fight mental image of a giant tit on a train...*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]major_dallas, 2007-04-30 09:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jira, 2007-04-30 09:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2007-05-01 03:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nyoda, 2007-05-20 09:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sashenka, 2007-05-01 04:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2007-05-01 03:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]priestesspadfoo, 2007-05-05 01:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2007-05-05 02:52 pm UTC

[info]gun
2007-04-30 09:37 pm UTC (link)
I love it when I don't need to put any effort into making an argument about how the difference between H/Hr shippers and harmonians is the 'monian's disgustingly bigoted and unrealistic life-view. To have them do it for me really takes the grunt-work out of my day.

What the hell is wrong with you, you misogynistic cuntsmears?!Thanks, Harmonians!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sheep, 2007-04-30 10:10 pm UTC

[info]sandyclaws68
2007-04-30 09:48 pm UTC (link)
[spooge]HARRY. POTTER. IS. NOT. A. ROMANCE. NOVEL.[/spooge]

*deep breath*

OK, I feel better now.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2007-04-30 10:08 pm UTC (link)
As a portkey.org poster, I had to stop myself from sarcastically replying to almost everyone since that interview came out. How can people who seem normal suddenly turn so pretentious and unfunny at once ? It's such an unfortunate combination.

God, and the males, the males were making me see red. Here's a tip, gents, the reason why women don't come within teen feet of you (or your special place) is not because you are "nice guys". It's because they can sense the condescension and misogyny from a mile off. My tip, since it seems as an H/Hr supporter I'm duty bound to offer my sage wisdom, is the following : if a guy describes himself as a "nice guy", then points to that as the reason why he's got no significant other, RUN! Run for the hills like Colbert would if it were Bush waiting for him with open arms at the top of that hill! Run like a horse on speed! Because usually those are not actual nice guys.

Man, I feel like such a hypocrite. But I refuse to become thread mommy when I should be having fun. So instead I'll point and laugh.

*points*

*laugh*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sandyclaws68, 2007-04-30 10:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-30 10:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]elainie, 2007-04-30 10:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-30 10:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]elwing_alcyone, 2007-05-01 01:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]influencethis, 2007-05-01 05:04 am UTC
Hem, hem... - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2007-05-01 08:43 am UTC
Re: Hem, hem... - [info]influencethis, 2007-05-01 09:12 am UTC
Re: Hem, hem... - [info]farmercuerden, 2007-05-03 09:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sleepyjean, 2007-05-03 09:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]gun, 2007-05-01 03:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tehrin, 2007-05-01 05:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2007-05-01 05:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2007-05-01 08:57 am UTC
re: "nice guys" - [info]semirecluse, 2007-05-01 11:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]meesha1971, 2007-05-02 06:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - sockpuppet_rat, 2007-05-03 07:55 pm UTC

[info]camilla
2007-04-30 10:32 pm UTC (link)
Lol throwbacks.

(Reply to this)


verthandi
2007-04-30 11:10 pm UTC (link)
Why do they always bring up Austen? I'm no fan of her writing, but you'd think they could find another "romantic" author. Just once!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]esclaramonde, 2007-04-30 11:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ikuko, 2007-04-30 11:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mmanurere, 2007-05-01 12:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tehrin, 2007-05-01 05:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fionnabhair, 2007-05-02 05:08 pm UTC

[info]fernwithy
2007-04-30 11:23 pm UTC (link)
Salamon2: Welcome to "Brave New World" where people just have sex for sex's sake, marriage is a concept of the past, children are raised in test tubes, and people are encouraged to be promiscuous. You're frowned upon if you stay with one partner for too long.

What does this have to do with Ron and Hermione? I mean, like, at all? They've each been on a date. Ron had a girlfriend for a little while. Hermione kissed her date. They've been doing the whole crush dance for six years, and there's been no sex yet... so where does R/Hr=promiscuous sex? And how would H/Hr be less promiscuous, since Harry has even more experience, having had two steady girlfriends?

I'm all for old-fashioned--what can I say, I'm an old-fashioned romantic--but R/Hr is pretty danged old-fashioned. And as to H/Hr... it also would be, if JKR had gone in that direction, but I can't see how it's more so. It's not like she's been bedhopping with either of them. Where do they even get that? Is that in the sooper-sekrit editions where Ron beats Hermione?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-01 05:51 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-01 09:18 am UTC


Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map