|
|
Someone wrote in ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/community.gif){kind=small} hp_cornfield, |
It's probably the stag references in Ch. 2.
Those are in every version, AFAIK.
But you're right, some of the modern translations totally read like badfic.
The Message version of Song of Solomon 2:1-17 Is there any wonder why a KJV-only movement exists?
--The Clichemoth(used to be a member of said movement and as such is a font of useless Bible information)
Those are in every version, AFAIK.
But you're right, some of the modern translations totally read like badfic.
The Message version of Song of Solomon 2:1-17 Is there any wonder why a KJV-only movement exists?
--The Clichemoth(used to be a member of said movement and as such is a font of useless Bible information)
Post a comment in response:
