Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Yeah, whatever. ([info]photosinensis) wrote in [info]i_wank,
@ 2009-03-25 15:30:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
XHTML Butthurt!
Sometimes, people wank over the stupidest things.

Enter [info]acpizza at LJ's [info]permmembers community. S/h/it demands to know why LJ insists on closing its line break tags when creating posts using the rich text editor, saying that this particular behavior has ruined the web client FOREVER! Admittedly, rich text editing has been the bane of support folk for a while, and it doesn't generate the best code in the world, but this is probably one of the silliest things to complain about.

Now, most people point out that this is standard for XHTML (including myself). [info]darkcryst leaves what I think is the best comment. Thinking that simple facts would suffice to explain this particular behavior, I abandoned this post, thinking that the wank was done. The community mod in charge of allowing this post even admits that he/she did it for the lulz.

However, the person is still not satisfied. Since s/h/it gives some pretty choice replies, I'll just give you excerpts from the replies.


It may have been someone's standard for "years", but the HTML standard has been around even longer than anything XML, so.. fuck XML and the horse it rode in on. Besides, the great thing about standards is there are so many to choose from.


It is properly configured, the problem is fucking LiveJournal now has the RT editor as the default, so if you use the system anywhere other than home, it changes to shit mode.

Just use TABLE tags if you want to do a quote, the way God intended. (As an aside here, there is the blockquote tag, which is defined in the current XHTML standard, I believe. I know most of y'all know that already, but for the two of you who don't, well, now you do.)

What you're talking about is a piss-poor replacement for real HTML.

Backwards compatibility, freedom, and convenience mean that this so-called "requirement" will never be enforced.

And lastly, as a response to a request to stop trolling: But.. engineering homework gets too damned tedious without a refreshing break.


(Post a new comment)


[info]reeve
2009-03-25 09:20 pm UTC (link)
Just use TABLE tags if you want to do a quote, the way God intended.

WTF?! :O

(and yeah, much love for blockquote)

(Reply to this)


[info]the__ivorytower
2009-03-25 09:23 pm UTC (link)
See, I couldn't get blockquote to work before, but I may have been doin' it wrong. Wank, what wank?

(Reply to this)


[info]kadath
2009-03-25 10:14 pm UTC (link)
HTML 3.2 WAS GOOD ENOUGH FOR ANYONE OKAY

I LIKE TABLES

CSS IS FOR WANKERS

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]meagenimage
2009-03-25 10:44 pm UTC (link)
BEGONE FOUL DEMON! DAVE SHEA COMPELS YOU!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]eilan
2009-03-26 10:08 am UTC (link)
Besides, get a clue,
predates any such requirement, and therefore, is immune to such a rule by virtue of having been around way beforehand.


...

Okay!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]eilan
2009-03-26 10:09 am UTC (link)
And this of course what happens when you copy a HTML-tag into your comment. I need to wake up.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]erototoxin
2009-03-27 01:26 am UTC (link)
But with just a little fixing, "Besides, 'get a clue' predates any such requirement" makes the most sense of anything so far!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]littlebitca
2009-03-26 06:45 pm UTC (link)
And we don't need those new-fangled coding languages like VB and Java. Assembler should be good enough for everyone!

(Reply to this)


[info]tofuknight
2009-03-27 12:51 pm UTC (link)
The fail is strong with this one.

Admitting you're trolling? Fail, fail, fail.

(Reply to this)


[info]isntitironic
2009-03-27 03:33 pm UTC (link)
That person should not be allowed anything nearly so awesome as a star-nosed mole icon.

Won't somebody think of the star-nosed moles?

(Reply to this)


[info]suziecroft
2009-03-28 02:35 pm UTC (link)
Just use TABLE tags if you want to do a quote, the way God intended

el oh el.

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map