(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

pyratejenni
2009-04-06 03:23 am UTC (link)

It doesn't have to be:

5. There are very few limits on what topics may be posted here. Some examples: There doesn't have to be any actual wank before a link is posted here. unfunnybusiness posts do not have to be fandom related, but fandom and internet issues can be here too. Tl;dr and thoughts on yaoi are welcome, no really, and we mean it when we say "unfunny". Having an opinion on serious issues is encouraged (yes, even if you're the OP). And anything is serious business enough to post here, as long as there are people who want to discuss the unfunny aspects. Yes, even if there's already a post somewhere else that's mocking the same topic.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	seiberwing 2009-04-06 03:24 am UTC (link)
	I said "is", not "could be". (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	waltraute 2009-04-06 04:59 am UTC (link)
	You realize she's one of its mods, right? (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	seiberwing 2009-04-06 10:41 am UTC (link)
	Yeah. The comm, at least the last time I checked, was half actual unfunny wank and half tragic stories sans wank. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	pyratejenni 2009-04-06 02:10 pm UTC (link)
	None of which invalidates rule #5. If folks want to talk about the unfunny bits of the SPN wank snacky posted, for example, they can. That they don't... well, can't force them to. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	seiberwing 2009-04-06 04:50 pm UTC (link)
	I...never said they were breaking the rules? I just said that's what it was, by way of that's why I generally don't go there. (Reply to this)(Parent)

(Read comments) -