Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



hinky ([info]hugsnkisses) wrote in [info]i_wank,
@ 2005-06-01 12:31:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
in which Hnk reports a rather juicy wank:
The OP herself comments "This is very long and very wanky so make of it what you will.". No, actually, it isn't wanky. It is mockable, but that is in no way the same thing as wank. Another common mistake that people (especially LOTRippers) make is thinking that playing a prank on someone, or a disagreement is wank. [fap]

in which Hnk combines the power of gentle mocking and explaining to engage the wanker:
You speak of FW condemning it's subjects as "unacceptable expressions of fandom", yet you consider Rachel's comments (and FW itself!) to be just that. Saying FW contains no internal hypocrisy is of course untrue, but on FW people attempt to realise their hypocrisies and laugh at themselves for their behaviour. You OP at least makes some attempt to do this, but your later comments involve no such awareness and it for that reason that people have a problem with you and for that reason that you are on FW. Whether you will accept that or not. [fap]

in which Hnk (or ******?) gives herself over to the dark side, becomes those she mocks and completes the circle of wank:
And see what you're doing here? You're mocking something which you view as strange (and you use "creeped out" again like you did with Esorlehcar, I'm hoping ironically) - that's no different from those nasty FW overlords. You talk of being horribly upset by being "being shredded by strangers on FW" so you chose to encourage your flist to do the same on your LJ. I like that you've been dragged down to our level, makes me feel all tingly in my pink parts. [fap]


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]ladybirdsleeps
2005-06-02 08:53 am UTC (link)
IIRC, there were a lot of comments on the Fandom Wank post - maybe ninety or so?

But since she didn't delete the post, she can re-enable comments after the wank has passed. All of the comments are still saved - they're just not visible at the moment. Unless JF is different in this regard than LJ.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]anatsuno
2005-06-02 10:48 am UTC (link)
there were? DAMMIT *wants them* (on the second FW post really? I thought that was on the first one!)

(you're right that re-enabling would show them again, i think)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ladybirdsleeps
2005-06-02 11:28 am UTC (link)
I didn't realize that there were two posts about it on FW! So, umm ... carry on. (I wish I could blame it on lack of caffeine, but I'm all caffeined-up.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map