|
|
Friday, January 21st, 2005
|
8:36p
![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif) sluggirl's Law†:
If side A presents its argument in a reasonably polite, grammatically correct fashion, and side B responds by sarcastically rephrasing side A's argument in AOLspeak, without including an actual rebuttal, side B is declared to be without a valid argument.
Example:
A: I find your statement to be incredibly offensive.
B: OMGWTF J00R SO MEEN I'M A L0SER WHO CANT TAKE A JOKE!!11!!!11five!!!!
A: *wins*
Corollary:
The first person to resort to posting GIFs from SomethingAwful loses the argument.
Example:
A: I find your statement to be incredibly offensive.
B: [picture of Tubgirl]
A: *wins*
†Does not necessarily apply when outside observers are mocking either side of the argument, i.e. in a ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/community.gif) fandom_wank post.
[Has this already been written? I couldn't find it, anyway. Also, suggestions for a name will be greatly appreciated.]
current mood: Holier-than-thou
current music: "Tiny Dancer" - Ben Folds (8 comments |comment on this)
|
|
|
|