|
|
Tuesday, May 2nd, 2006
|
7:01p - Forgive me if there's already a law like this, but I haven't seen one.
The Misinterpreting Snacky's Law Law:
Anyone who accuses anyone else of breaking Snacky's Law because of the other party's opinions on fictional characters or anything else, when the other party has not, in fact, actually called the accuser or any other opponents "mean girls" automatically loses the argument, the Internet and life in general.
Addendum: This applies to Godwin's Law as well. Just replace "mean girls" with "Nazis."
Feel free to suggest other addendums and less awkward wordings.
(12 comments |comment on this)
|
7:39p - The "Sympathy in Fiction" Edict.
Or its full name: "Sympathy for a belief system in fiction that parallels immoral behavior in real life does not in fact equal sympathy for said immoral behavior in real life." Or the acronym: "S.B.S.F.P.I.B.R.L.D.N.I.F.E.S.S.I.B.R.L.", or just "The Slytherin Apologists' Edict", from the group this behavior is most highly expressed in. After people who claim they agree with Mein Kampf in it's theory, but would never follow someone like Hitler because he had a stupid looking mustache on his face anyway.
Also see: ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif) ataneill93, several times.
current mood: Catty (2 comments |comment on this)
|
|
|
|