|
|
honorh (![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} honorh) wrote in ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/community.gif){kind=small} jurisimprudence,@ 2006-11-10 09:16:00 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Kiri's Corollary:
Inspired by, among other things, this wank, this is a corollary to the Law of Scientific Relevance, as suggested by myself and beautifully phrased byseraphael:
"Should a wanker claim that his/her inability to carry on basic discourse in a reasonable manner is actually a byproduct of a grandiose-sounding social 'experiment,' said wanker's arguments shall be considered null, void, and false. And said wanker shall, furthermore, be soundly beaten about the head and shoulders with the APA Style Manual, exact edition to be chosen by the affected board-members."
Ladies and gentlemen, do we agree?
Inspired by, among other things, this wank, this is a corollary to the Law of Scientific Relevance, as suggested by myself and beautifully phrased by
seraphael:"Should a wanker claim that his/her inability to carry on basic discourse in a reasonable manner is actually a byproduct of a grandiose-sounding social 'experiment,' said wanker's arguments shall be considered null, void, and false. And said wanker shall, furthermore, be soundly beaten about the head and shoulders with the APA Style Manual, exact edition to be chosen by the affected board-members."
Ladies and gentlemen, do we agree?
