Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



rudemistress ([info]rudemistress) wrote in [info]jurisimprudence,
@ 2007-09-21 14:14:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Lissy's Law!
Anyone who agrees with, takes seriously or otherwise supports anything that Lissy aka Lysette aka The Batshit Queen of FAP says will never have any credibility in any argument ever again.

(Post a new comment)


[info]feenix
2007-09-21 01:30 pm UTC (link)
Hm. Is this grudge, or is there a story behind this?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2007-10-16 12:21 am UTC (link)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]chaimonkey
2007-09-21 01:36 pm UTC (link)
Who is Lissy, and why should we care?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]isntitironic
2007-09-21 01:41 pm UTC (link)
I think she committed pseudocide once... other than that, I'm lost.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]chaimonkey
2007-09-21 02:59 pm UTC (link)
How exciting.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]spawn_of_kong
2007-09-21 02:31 pm UTC (link)
She's a Harmoanian on the crazier end of the spectrum; here's her Wiki entry.

That said, I'm lost as to why this post has been made now. It's not like she's been doing anything crazy lately that I'm aware of. :/

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]chaimonkey
2007-09-21 02:59 pm UTC (link)
Huh. Yeah, according to the Wiki she's been quiet since April. This seems to be a bit late... unless our legislative processes have started mimicking those of the US.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]chaimonkey
2007-09-21 03:05 pm UTC (link)
Hmm, potential explanation: She's made another anti-H/G comment at FAP, which is pretty unremarkable.

I smell grudge.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]narcissam
2007-09-21 06:09 pm UTC (link)
I believe the wiki's out of date. She had an explosion about Hitler a few weeks ago that I noticed, and I'm sure she's active elsewhere.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]narcissam
2007-09-21 06:11 pm UTC (link)
And when I say, I believe the wiki is out of date, what I really mean is "I wrote that and didn't update it."

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]chaimonkey
2007-09-21 06:56 pm UTC (link)
According to the Wiki, the April one was about Hitler.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sheep
2007-09-21 07:18 pm UTC (link)
OMG! Where has the time gone. I thought it was longer than a few weeks ago, but April!?

I feel like I've been abducted by aliens and lost time somewhere.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]narcissam
2007-09-21 10:56 pm UTC (link)
Are you perchance mixing up Lissy's Hitler comparisons? There was an April one true. But there was also an August one. And I seem to remember one when Deathly Hallows came out.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sheep
2007-09-21 10:58 pm UTC (link)
Please tell me I am DDDD:

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]narcissam
2007-09-21 11:01 pm UTC (link)
I found her August appearance a couple days ago. Someone had the gall to call her on her Hitler comparisons, and she went all "You don't know the history of the Third Reich, I do!" on them.

Unfortunately, the FAP mods warned her off the thread at that point.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sheep
2007-09-21 11:11 pm UTC (link)
Oh, good. That must be what I was thinking of.

Personally, I'm just sorry that she managed to delete her post comparing JKR and/or HP and/or HP characters (that aren't the death eaters) to Al-Qaeda(sp) and terrorism before anyone saved it. She replaced all her posts with 'It's so not worth it' in bold large red font after Vance told her off. Yes, you read that right, Vance was the sane one!

All that remained was Vance's post.

That would have made a fun little wank.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]narcissam
2007-09-21 11:22 pm UTC (link)
Vance, spoiling all the fun!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]pastri_archy
2007-09-21 11:36 pm UTC (link)
Yes, you read that right, Vance was the sane one!

...I heard something go "oink oink oink" near my window one night...

If we take the handbasket down the next time it comes by, can we stop at Hell's new Dairy Queen and Ice Rink?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]narcissam
2007-09-21 10:55 pm UTC (link)
It's usually about Hitler with Lissy. Or Russell Crowe's wife. They're the two subjects she comes back to time and again.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]kylenne
2007-09-21 06:02 pm UTC (link)
I love the smell of grudge in the morning.

(Reply to this)


[info]demonbean
2007-09-21 07:25 pm UTC (link)
Now, now, the woman was CLEARLY not very good at the analogies section of the SAT, but surely she has the potential to make truthful statements. Say, "most books are made from paper," or, "run! The building is on fire!"

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]sheep
2007-09-21 10:08 pm UTC (link)
most books are made from paper

Reflex reactions might mean that I still end up disagreeing D:

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]souris
2007-09-21 10:51 pm UTC (link)
Is there a law about using [info]jurisimprudence for grudge purposes?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]photosinensis
2007-09-21 11:16 pm UTC (link)
Technically, no. However, it is generally discouraged.

As such, we might wind up striking this one upon review.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]jim_smith
2007-09-22 12:01 am UTC (link)
In a broader sense, I hate when someone proposes a law that would clearly only apply to an argument they recently had wherein someone did something they didn't like.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]puipui
2007-09-22 01:19 am UTC (link)
YES. So annoying. It's one thing if you know where someone got their most recent inspiration, but the whole concept just doesn't work nearly as well if it's not something that was at least somewhat frequently done in the first place.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]rudemistress
2007-09-23 11:54 am UTC (link)
It may have only happened in the single digits before DH, but since DH came out I've been seeing it happen more and more, actually.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]walruswalrus
2007-09-22 01:36 am UTC (link)
I agree with this, and I've never been involved in wank with her. She's a Harmonian so she seems to frequent the same threads as non-Harmonian me in VENOM a lot of the time, and I just want to shake her and tell her to STFU every time she enters a thread.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2007-09-22 01:40 am UTC (link)
I'm sure there is a real law in there somewhere after sifting through all the grudge.

(Reply to this)


[info]t_boy
2007-09-22 03:01 am UTC (link)
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

(Reply to this)


[info]warrioreowyn
2007-09-22 10:47 pm UTC (link)
I think anyone who considers this law "just grudgewank" is simply unfamiliar with Lysette. There's crazy, and then there's crazy.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

At the risk of getting myself into yet more trouble...
[info]rudemistress
2007-09-23 11:58 am UTC (link)
I was about to say, there's "crazy" and then there's "Lissy," and it becomes even scarier (though also funnier) when people start claiming, especially on an all-ships site, that Lysette was "vindicated" by DH.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]mcity
2007-11-19 12:54 am UTC (link)
Why are the comments borked?

(Reply to this)


[info]frequentmouse
2008-01-10 06:04 pm UTC (link)
Wow, three months and nobody's noticed this has a rampaging marguis tag in the anon comment from 2007-10-16 12:21 am?

OK, thn, just so we're clear on that.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2008-11-18 08:39 pm UTC (link)
Whaaaaa....

(Reply to this)

  
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map