Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Mac Attack ([info]insanitys_place) wrote in [info]jurisimprudence,
@ 2008-06-10 17:49:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Ghandi's Corollary
Works like Godwin's with a unique flavor of Civil Disobedience to justify wanking.  Best exemplified here.


(Post a new comment)


[info]undomielregina
2008-06-11 02:15 am UTC (link)
Am I totally nuts, or is the comparison there about the methods of the Civil Rights movement? Because it's valid to talk about civil disobedience, and valid to mention one of the greatest modern successes of the tactic when you do.

In this case, however little I agree with the purpose of the post, I don't think the use of the Civil Rights movement is flawed. A direct comparison to say "this is just like the Civil Rights movement" is bad. Saying, this is like the Civil Rights movement, but on a much lesser scale should be okay, though. And saying, the tactics of the Civil Rights movement can be applied to a situation shouldn't result in an automatic loss ever.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]kylenne
2008-06-11 05:42 am UTC (link)
At the risk of wanking in the house, I'd be more willing to agree with you if the context of the conversation was not Harry Potter fans wanking about their Dog-given right to post dumb shit on the Internet. The Civil Rights Movement was about addressing the legacy of slavery so that an entire race of people would no longer be treated like second class citizens in our own country.

This is fandom showing its ass privilege again, and it's patently offensive to me.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]insanitys_place
2008-06-11 05:43 pm UTC (link)
You caught my meaning.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]kittikattie
2008-06-12 06:05 am UTC (link)
Tubman's?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]insanitys_place
2008-06-12 04:34 pm UTC (link)
May be more appropriate.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]kittikattie
2008-06-12 06:03 pm UTC (link)
No, I mean there''s a Tubman's Law like Godwin's already. (I tend to know about it cause I threw it out there.)

http://www.journalfen.net/community/jurisimprudence/80432.html

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]insanitys_place
2008-06-12 07:00 pm UTC (link)
Hm...I don't know. This was more using the movement itself to justify wanking, not black oppression.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]insanitys_place
2008-06-12 07:03 pm UTC (link)
Perhaps instead of Civil rights use Civil Disobedience?
Ghandi's corollary?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2008-06-12 08:45 pm UTC (link)
That works.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]kittikattie
2008-06-12 08:44 pm UTC (link)
Ah, I see.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map